GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Ma, Junming  (1)
  • Wang, Tao  (1)
Material
Publisher
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 1
    In: Global Spine Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 12, No. 8 ( 2022-10), p. 1956-1967
    Abstract: This is a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature. Objective In the case of severe foraminal stenosis, conducting uncinate process resection (UPR) during ACDF could achieve complete nerve root decompression and significant relief of neurological symptoms for CR. However, there is some controversy regarding its necessity and safety. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of ACDF with UPR and ACDF. Methods The following electronic databases were searched: Medline, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews, VIP, and CNKI. And the following data items were considered: baseline demographics, efficacy evaluation indicators, radiographic outcome, and surgical details. Results 10 studies were finally identified, including 746 patients who underwent ACDF with UPR compared to 729 patients who underwent ACDF. The group of ACDF with UPR had statistically longer intraoperative time (95% CI: 4.83, 19.77, P = .001) and more intraoperative blood loss (95% CI: 12.23, 17.76, P 〈 .001). ACDF with UPR obtained a significantly better improvement of Arm VAS at postoperative first follow-up (95% CI: −1.85, −.14 P = .02). There was no significant difference found in improvement of Neck VAS at postoperative latest follow-up (95% CI: −.88, .27, P = .30), improvement of Arm VAS at postoperative latest follow-up (95% CI: −.59, −.01, P = .05), improvement of NDI (95% CI: −2.34, .33, P = .14), JOA (95% CI: −.24, .43, P = .56), change of C2-C7 lordosis (95% CI: −.87, 1.33, P = .68), C2-C7 SVA (95% CI: −.73, 5.08, P = .14), T1 slope (95% CI: −2.25, 1.51, P = .70), and fusion rate (95% CI: .83, 1.90 P = .29). Conclusion ACDF with UPR is an effective and necessary surgical method for CR patients with severe foraminal stenosis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2192-5682 , 2192-5690
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2648287-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...