GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • MEIGS, JAMES B.  (2)
Material
Language
Years
  • 1
    In: Diabetes, American Diabetes Association, Vol. 71, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-06-01)
    Abstract: Background: Gestational glucose intolerance (GGI, abnormal initial gestational diabetes [GDM] screen) conveys an increased risk of future diabetes (DM) , even when GDM criteria is not met. We previously defined subtypes of GGI/GDM according to the underlying mechanism leading to hyperglycemia (insulin resistance vs. deficiency) . We aimed to determine if GGI subtypes are at differential risk for future prediabetes/DM; we hypothesized increased risk with insulin deficient subtypes. Methods: We defined GGI as glucose loading test 1-hr glucose ≥ 140 mg/dL at & gt; 22 weeks’ gestation. We applied homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) to fasting glucose and insulin at 16-20 weeks’ gestation and classified pregnancies with GGI without GDM into subtypes according to the presence of insulin resistance and/or deficiency. We used Cox proportional-hazards models with time-varying exposures to assess risk of preDM/DM (HbA1c ≥ 5.7% at ≥ 3 months after delivery) in each GGI subtype compared to pregnancies with normal glucose tolerance after adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, health insurance, and first trimester BMI. Women were censored at the time of last HbA1c or GDM diagnosis. Results: Of 671 women with a median 9.9 years of follow-up, 29% (n=196) developed preDM/DM. Among pregnancies in 113 women with GGI, 54% had the insulin resistant subtype (IR) , 25% had the insulin deficient subtype (ID) , and 16% had the mixed pathophysiology subtype (MP) . Subtypes with insulin deficiency (ID + MP) and insulin resistance (IR) were both associated with increased risk of preDM/DM (ID + MP hazard ratio [HR]=1.8 [1.1-2.9] , p=0.02 and IR HR=1.7 [1.1-2.6], p=0.01) . Each insulin deficient subtype also appeared to carry increased risk: ID HR=1.7 (0.9-3.1, p=0.12) and MP HR=2.1 (1.0-4.2, p=0.048) . Conclusions: GGI confers an increased risk of future prediabetes/DM, regardless of the mechanism leading to glucose intolerance. A combination of insulin resistance and deficiency may convey the highest risk of future prediabetes/DM. Disclosure D.J. Selen: None. T. Thaweethai: None. K. James: None. J.L. Ecker: None. J.B. Meigs: Consultant; Quest Diagnostics. C.E. Powe: None. Funding National Institutes of Health (T32DK007028) , Massachusetts General Hospital (Physician Scientist Development Award and Claflin Distinguished Scholar’s Award)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0012-1797
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Diabetes Association
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1501252-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Diabetes, American Diabetes Association, Vol. 70, No. Supplement_1 ( 2021-06-01)
    Abstract: Background: Women with gestational diabetes (GDM) have an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes and future type 2 diabetes (T2D). Gestational glucose intolerance (GGI, abnormal initial GDM screen) without GDM has been linked to adverse perinatal outcomes but is not a recognized T2D risk factor. We tested whether GGI without GDM is associated with incident T2D. Methods: Using clinical data from women seen at our US medical center for prenatal and primary care (1998-2018), we assessed risk of T2D (defined using validated laboratory and outpatient diagnoses) according to GGI/GDM status during pregnancy. We defined GGI as 1-hr glucose loading test (GLT) ≥ 140 mg/dl at ≥ 24 weeks gestation. We subcategorized GGI by 3-hr oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) result. We used Cox proportional-hazard models with time-varying exposures/covariates to assess T2D risk after delivery, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, parity, insurance type, marital status, BMI, and blood pressure. Women were followed from 1st delivery until diagnosed with T2D or censored at time of last primary care visit. Results: Among 13988 women, 17109 pregnancies had normal glucose tolerance (NGT, GLT & lt; 140mg/dL). Among 3619 GGI pregnancies (GLT ≥ 140 mg/dl), 2076 had a normal OGTT, 699 had 1 abnormal OGTT value, and 844 had GDM (≥ 2 abnormal OGTT values). Over a median of 8.3 years of follow-up, 2.2% (N=304 women) developed T2D. In our primary comparison, women with GGI without GDM (16% of pregnancies) had increased T2D risk compared to women with NGT (HR 2.1 [1.5-2.9], p & lt;0.001). Among women with GGI, T2D risk increased with the number of abnormal OGTT values (normal OGTT: HR 1.8; 1 abnormal OGTT value: HR 2.8; GDM: HR 11.7; p≤0.01 for all compared to NGT). Conclusions: Pregnant women with GGI without GDM have a two-fold increased risk of future T2D compared to those with NGT. Clinical data universally available during pregnancy identifies a large, previously unrecognized group of women who may benefit from T2D screening and prevention. Disclosure D. J. Selen: None. T. Thaweethai: None. S. Hsu: None. K. James: None. A. Kaimal: None. J. B. Meigs: Consultant; Self; Quest Diagnostics. C. E. Powe: None. Funding National Institutes of Health (2T32DK007028-46, K23DK113218); Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; Massachusetts General Hospital
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0012-1797 , 1939-327X
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Diabetes Association
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1501252-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...