In:
The Oncologist, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 17, No. 9 ( 2012-09-01), p. 1146-1154
Abstract:
After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Compare the diagnostic performances of 18F-FDG PET/CT and conventional CT with respect to their ability to detect primary tumor sites in carcinoma of unknown primary patients with extracervical metastases.Describe the rate of identification of primary tumor sites using 18F-FDG PET/CT and conventional CT. CME This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Background. The aim of the present study was to evaluate prospectively the diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and conventional CT regarding the ability to detect the primary tumor site in patients with extracervical metastases from carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) site. Patients and Methods. From January 2006 to December 2010, 136 newly diagnosed CUP patients with extracervical metastases underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT. A standard of reference (SR) was established by a multidisciplinary team to ensure that the same set of criteria were used for classification of patients, that is, either as CUP patients or patients with a suggested primary tumor site. The independently obtained suggestions of primary tumor sites using PET/CT and CT were correlated with the SR to reach a consensus regarding true-positive (TP), true-negative, false-negative, and false-positive results. Results. SR identified a primary tumor site in 66 CUP patients (48.9%). PET/CT identified 38 TP primary tumor sites and CT identified 43 TP primary tumor sites. No statistically significant differences were observed between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT alone in regard to sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Conclusion. In the general CUP population with multiple extracervical metastases 18F-FDG PET/CT does not represent a clear diagnostic advantage over CT alone regarding the ability to detect the primary tumor site.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1083-7159
,
1549-490X
DOI:
10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0449
Language:
English
Publisher:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Publication Date:
2012
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2023829-0
Permalink
