Abstract: Abstract 6 Background Simultaneous ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) is the current gold standard for newly diagnosed APL resulting in ∼80% cure rates, while arsenic trioxide (ATO) is the treatment of choice for relapsed patients. ATO in variable combinations including ± ATRA ± CHT has also been tested as front-line therapy yielding encouraging results in several pilot studies as well as in two phase III studies conducted in China and the US. So far, no randomised studies have compared front-line CHT-free ATO+ATRA combination against the standard ATRA+CHT approach. Patients and Methods The phase III, randomised, prospective APL0406 trial was started in October 2007 by the Italian GIMEMA group and joined in November 2008 by the German SAL and AMLSG multicenter groups. Eligible patients were adults aged 18- 〈 71 years with newly diagnosed, genetically confirmed, non-high-risk (WBC≤10×109/L) APL. Patients were randomized to receive the ATO+ATRA combination originally reported by the MD Anderson group (Estey et al. Blood 2006, arm A), or the Italian AIDA2000 risk-adapted protocol for non high-risk disease (arm B). Patients in arm A received ATO 0.15/kg plus ATRA 45 mg/m2 daily until CR, then ATO 5 days/week, 4 weeks on 4 weeks off, for a total of 4 courses and ATRA 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off for a total of 7 courses. Patients in arm B received the standard AIDA (ATRA+Idarubicin) induction followed by 3 cycles of anthracycline-based plus ATRA consolidation and low dose CHT and ATRA for maintenance as reported (Lo-Coco et al., Blood 2011). The primary study objective was EFS at 2 years. The study was designed to show that the rate of patients alive event-free at two years in the experimental treatment arm is at least 80%. Secondary objectives included OS, DFS, CIR rates, molecular response and toxicity profile. Results From October 2007 to September 2010, the required sample size of 162 enrolled patients was completed. Median age was 45.3 years (18.7–70.2 years) and median WBC 1.50 × 109/L. As to the Sanz's risk score, 61.8% and 38.2% of patients were in the intermediate- and low-risk categories, respectively. The two treatment arms were well balanced for main baseline characteristics including age, sex, median WBC and Sanz's score. Eight patients were not evaluable for induction due to ineligibility or protocol violation. Of 154 patients evaluable for response to induction, CR was achieved in 150 (97.4%): 75/75 (100%) in arm A vs 75/79 (95%) in arm B (P=0.12). After a median follow-up of 31 months (range 0.07–50.4) the 2 year EFS (primary objective) was 97% (C.I.95%: 93.1–100) and 86.7% (C.I.95%: 80.3–93.6) in arms A and B respectively (P=0.03). There were 1 death in CR and 2 relapses in arm A, and 7 deaths (4 in induction, 3 in CR) and 4 relapses in arm B. As to secondary objectives, OS, DFS, and CIR rates were 98.7% vs. 91.1% (P=0.03), 97% vs. 91.6% (P=0.19) and 1.6% vs. 4.3% (P=0.41) in arm A and B, respectively. Fever episodes, prolonged ( 〉 15 d) grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly more frequent in patients in arm B as compared to those in arm A (P 〈 .001 for all comparisons). Other side effects including differentiation syndrome and increase of liver enzymes were recorded with similar frequency in the two study arms. Two patients in arm A had QTc prolongation requiring ATO discontinuation with final withdrawal in one case. PCR analysis of PML/RARA (sensitivity 10−4) was centrally performed in Rome (F. Lo-Coco) and Dresden (C. Thiede) and showed molecular CR in 141/142 (99%) of evaluable patients after completion of 3rd consolidation. One patient in arm B who tested PCR-positive at this time point was considered resistant and taken off protocol as per study design. Conclusions For patients with newly diagnosed non-high-risk APL, as compared to the standard AIDA regimen, the front-line CHT-free ATO+ATRA combination is at least not inferior for 2 year EFS. Disclosures: Lo-Coco: Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) is currently approved for therapy of relapsed APL in the US and Europe. In this study the role of ATO in front-line therapy of APL is explored. Fiedler:Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Breccia:Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Platzbecker:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

Abstract: Background: We recently showed that the combination of ATRA and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is at least not inferior and possibly superior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in the front-line management of low/intermediate risk APL (Italian-German APL 0406 trial; Lo-Coco et al., NEJM 2013). We report herein on the extended and final series of 276 patients (162 were in the previous report) with the last case being enrolled into the study in January 2013. Methods: The APL0406 study was a prospective, open-label, randomized intergroup trial conducted by the Italian GIMEMA and the German SAL and AMLSG study groups. Eligible patients were adults aged 18- 〈 71 years with newly diagnosed, genetically confirmed, non-high-risk (WBC≤10x109/L) APL. Patients were randomized to receive the ATO+ATRA combination originally developed by the MD Anderson Cancer Center group, or the Italian AIDA2000 protocol (Estey et al., Blood 2006 and Lo-Coco et al., Blood 2010). Patients in the ATRA-ATO arm received ATO 0.15/kg plus ATRA 45 mg/m2 daily until CR, then ATO 5 days/week, 4 weeks on 4 weeks off, for a total of 4 courses and ATRA 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off for a total of 7 courses. Patients in the ATRA-CHT arm received the standard AIDA (ATRA+Idarubicin) induction followed by 3 cycles of anthracycline-based consolidation together with ATRA and low dose CHT and ATRA for maintenance. The primary study objective was EFS at 2 years. Results: A total of 254 patients were evaluable for response to induction. CR was achieved in 122/122 (100%) in the ATRA-ATO versus 128/132 (97%) in the ATRA-CHT arm (P=0.12). Four patients died during induction in the ATRA-CHT arm. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range 1-75 months), the 2-year EFS was 98% and 84.9% in the ATRA-ATO and ATRA-CHT groups respectively (P= 0.0002), The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rate was 1.1% and 9.4%, respectively (P=0.005) and, finally, the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 99.1% vs. 94.4% (P=0.01) for ATRA-ATO vs ATRA-CHT, respectively. Conclusions: The data on this extended cohort demonstrate a significantly augmented survival benefit coupled to a higher antileukemic efficacy provided by ATRA-ATO as compared to ATRA-CHT, in low/intermediate risk APL. These results further support ATRA-ATO as the new standard of care in this clinical setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Platzbecker: Teva: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Presentation includes off-label use of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in front-line management of APL. ATO is currently approved in treatment of relapsed APL in the US and Europe. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Fiedler:TEVA: Travel reimbursement for meeting attendance Other. Lübbert:Cephalon / TEVA: Travel support Other. Link:TEVA: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radsak:Celgene: Research Funding. Döhner:TEVA: Research Funding. Schlenk:TEVA: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lo-Coco:TEVA: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria.

Abstract: The initial results of the APL0406 trial showed that the combination of all- trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is at least not inferior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in first-line therapy of low- or intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). We herein report the final analysis on the complete series of patients enrolled onto this trial. Patients and Methods The APL0406 study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III noninferiority trial. Eligible patients were adults between 18 and 71 years of age with newly diagnosed, low- or intermediate-risk APL (WBC at diagnosis ≤ 10 × 10 9 /L). Overall, 276 patients were randomly assigned to receive ATRA-ATO or ATRA-CHT between October 2007 and January 2013. Results Of 263 patients evaluable for response to induction, 127 (100%) of 127 patients and 132 (97%) of 136 patients achieved complete remission (CR) in the ATRA-ATO and ATRA-CHT arms, respectively ( P = .12). After a median follow-up of 40.6 months, the event-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival at 50 months for patients in the ATRA-ATO versus ATRA-CHT arms were 97.3% v 80%, 1.9% v 13.9%, and 99.2% v 92.6%, respectively ( P 〈 .001, P = .0013, and P = .0073, respectively). Postinduction events included two relapses and one death in CR in the ATRA-ATO arm and two instances of molecular resistance after third consolidation, 15 relapses, and five deaths in CR in the ATRA-CHT arm. Two patients in the ATRA-CHT arm developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. Conclusion These results show that the advantages of ATRA-ATO over ATRA-CHT increase over time and that there is significantly greater and more sustained antileukemic efficacy of ATO-ATRA compared with ATRA-CHT in low- and intermediate-risk APL.

Abstract: Background: Recently, the oral multitargeted small molecule FLT3 inhibitor midostaurin (M) was approved for treatment of FLT3-mutated AML in combination with standard chemotherapy. In the international RATIFY (NCT00651261) trial, addition of M led to superior overall and event-free survival compared to placebo, thus defining a new standard of care in this AML subset (Stone RM et al. NEJM 2017). Although not powered for subgroup analyses, M showed consistent effects across all FLT3 mutation strata [tyrosine kinase domain (TKD); internal tandem duplication (ITD) with low (0.05-0.7; ITDlow) or high ( 〉 0.7; ITDhigh) allelic ratio] suggesting significant off-target activity beyond FLT3 inhibition. Aim: We aimed to comprehensively profile the mutational landscape of FLT3 mutated (FLT3mut) AML in a large, well characterized cohort of patients (pts) treated within the RATIFY trial using a high-throughput targeted sequencing (HTS) approach. Methods: HTS was performed on the entire coding region of 262 genes involved in hematologic malignancies including 20 genes that encode kinases targeted by M (M kinome, MK). Pretreatment peripheral blood (PB; 14%) or bone marrow (BM; 86%) specimens were available from 475 (66%) of 717 FLT3mut AML RATIFY pts. Libraries were prepared using SureSelectXT custom solutions (Agilent). Paired-end sequencing was carried out on a HiSeq platform (Illumina). FLT3 mutation (mut) status was available for all pts [TKD: 24%; ITD: 76% (ITDlow: 45%; ITDhigh:31%)], and cytogenetic data for 454 pts (96%). Results: An average sequencing depth of 978x was obtained for all pts. In sum, 1815 mut (missense: 49%; indels: 40%; nonsense: 7%; other: 3%) were identified with a mean of 3.8 mut per pt (FLT3 strata; TKD: 4; ITDlow: 4; ITDhigh: 3.6).Overall, recurrent mut ( 〉 5% of all pts) were found in NPM1 (61%), DNMT3A (39%), WT1 (21%), TET2 (12%), RUNX1 (11%), NRAS (11%), PTPN11 (9%), ASXL1 (8%), IDH1 (8%), IDH2 (7%; R140 only), and SMC1A (6%). In contrast, TP53 (1%) and biallelic CEPBA (1%) mut were rare events. This was also true for aberrations of the MK (7% in total) with KIT (2%), MAP3K11 (1%), and NTRK3 (1%) being most frequently mutated. When stratified according to FLT3mut type, mut in NRAS (24% vs 7%, p 〈 .0001), SMC1A (10% vs 4%, p=.02), and KIT (4% vs 1%, p=.02) occurred significantly more often in TKD than ITD groups, respectively, whereas WT1 (13% vs 24%, p=.018) was more frequently co-mutated in the ITD group. In general, pts in the TKD group had significantly more mut in genes encoding for cohesin (TKD: 29% vs ITD: 16%, p=.004) and signaling (TKD: 40% vs ITD: 24%, p=.001) proteins compared to ITD pts, who had significantly more mut in transcription genes (TKD: 37% vs ITD: 48%, p=.03). Based on the mut and cytogenetic data, we next sought to assign all FLT3mut pts to the 11 recently defined molecular AML classes (Papaemmanuil E et al. NEJM 2016). The majority fell into two classes, namely the NPM1 (N; 62%) and the chromatin-spliceosome (CS; 15%) classes, underscoring the significance of FLT3mut as the driver in these particular genomic classes. Other class-defining lesions were rare or absent in this cohort [inv(16): 2%; t(8;21): 2%; t(11q23;x): 2%; t(6;9): 1%, TP53-aneuploidy: 1%; CEBPAbiallelic: 1%; IDH2R172: 0%]. In 14% of all pts categorization was not possible (no or 〉 1 class-defining lesion), emphasizing the need for further refinement of this classification. When focusing on these two groups, N and CS had comparable FLT3mut patterns (TKD: 24% vs 21%; ITDlow: 44% vs 45%; ITDhigh: 32% vs 33%), whereas N more frequently correlated with a normal karyotype (N: 91% vs CS: 63%). With respect to clinical characteristics, no differences between N and CS in terms of age, white blood cells, platelets, PB and BM blasts, as well as history of MDS were observed. Conclusion: In this comprehensive sequencing approach, we could further delineate the molecular pattern of FLT3mut AML. Here, FLT3-ITD and -TKD groups exhibited remarkable differences in cooperating pathways, highlighting distinct biologic features in the leukemogenesis of FLT3mut AML. Overall, mut of MK genes were rare events, not fully explaining the complexity of M off-target effects. Understanding the underlying disease mechanism will potentially provide useful information on prognosis and prediction of response to M. Further analyses including correlation with clinical outcome are ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180861, U10CA180882, U24CA196171 Disclosures Bullinger: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer Oncology: Research Funding. Gathmann:Novartis: Employment. Larson:Ariad/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BristolMyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Medeiros:Genentech: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Tallman:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; Cellerant: Research Funding. Tiecke:Novartis: Employment. Pallaud:Novartis: Employment. Ehninger:Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Bayer: Research Funding. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stone:Otsuka: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Cornerstone: Consultancy; Fujifilm: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sumitomo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Argenx: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; AbbVie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Steering Committee. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner:AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Abstract: Introduction: Internal tandem duplication of the FLT3 gene (FLT3-ITD), resulting in duplication of 3 to more than hundreds of nucleotides, are present in approximately 25% of adults with newly diagnosed AML. Several studies have shown that ITD mutations are associated with poor prognosis due to a high relapse rate, in particular in case of a high mutant to wild-type allele ratio and/or insertion site in the beta1-sheet of the tyrosine kinase domain-1 (beta1-sheet). Aims: To investigate the relationship between ITD insertion site and patient outcome, Roche 454 next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in 452/555 (81.4%) FLT3-ITD positive patients (pts) enrolled into the RATIFY trial (NCT00651261). Results: NGS identified 908 ITDs with up to 9 ITDs per case (1 ITD: n=210, 46.5%; 2 ITDs: n=131, 29.0%; 3 ITDs: n=58, 12.8%; 4 ITDs: n=24, 5.3%; 5 ITDs: n=18, 4.0%; 6 ITDs: n=3, 0.7%; 7 ITDs: n=7, 1.5%; 9 ITDs: n=1, 0.2%). Median ITD-size was 45 nucleotides (range, 6-246); all ITDs were in-frame with direct head-to-tail orientation. According to the 4 functional groups, 488 ITDs (53.7%) were located within the juxtamembrane domain (JMD), 155 ITDs (17.1%) within the hinge region, 211 ITDs (23.2%) within the beta1-sheet, and 54 ITDs (5.9%) 3´of beta1-sheet. ITD size strongly correlated with insertion site, in that the more C-terminal the insertion site, the longer the size of the inserted fragment (P 〈 .001). In 242 pts (53.5%) featuring multiple ITD clones, 698 concurrent integration sites were delineated, with coexistent integration sites within JMD being the most frequent interaction (37%) followed by JMD and beta1-sheet (13.5%), and within beta1-sheet (7.8%). NPM1 mutations (NPM1mut) were present in 203/358 pts (56.7%). Correlation of ITD insertion site with NPM1mut revealed a significantly lower incidence of NPM1mut in pts with insertion located within the hinge region (50/106, 47.2% vs 153/252, 60.7%; P=.02) and 3´of beta1-sheet (14/41, 34.1% vs 189/317, 59.6%; P=.002), whereas NPM1mut were significantly more frequent in pts with insertions affecting JMD (143/235, 60.9% vs 60/123, 48.8%; P=.03). Clinical characteristics differing among the 4 functional ITD groups were gender and WBC. Pts with insertions 3´of beta1-sheet were predominantly male (28/46, 60.9% vs 178/406, 43.8%; P=.03); pts with JMD insertions exhibited lower WBC (median 36.5 vs 52.7 x109/L; P=.03). Complete remission (CR) was achieved within 60 days in 248/452 pts (54.9%). To evaluate the impact of ITD insertion site on response to induction, a logistic regression model was used. ITD insertion sites were categorized in (i) only in beta1-sheet, (ii) in beta1-sheet and other sites, and (iii) outside the beta1-sheet. Other variables were ITD mutant to wild-type allelic ratio (fragment analysis, cutoff at 0.5), number of ITDs per patient, log2 of WBC counts, age, NPM1mut, and midostaurin treatment. In this model, only number of ITDs predicted lower CR rate (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90), while NPM1mut was a favorable marker for CR (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.70-4.28). Median follow-up for survival was 60.6 months (mo); median event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9 mo and 24.4 mo, respectively. The 4-year EFS and OS rates were 21.0% (95% CI, 17.2%-24.8%) and 42.6% (95% CI, 37.9%-47.4%), respectively. Survival analysis according to categorized insertion site groups showed that pts exhibiting insertion exclusively in the beta1-sheet had significantly inferior OS (P=.014) compared to the other two groups. Multivariate models for OS and EFS including hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) as a time-dependent covariate revealed WBC counts as unfavorable and NPM1mut as favorable for both endpoints; further unfavorable factors were older age and exclusive insertion in the beta1-sheet (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01-2.20) for OS and number of ITDs (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.28) for EFS; HSCT was a favorable factor only for EFS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99). Midostaurin treatment was associated with in trend improved EFS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.63-1.03) and OS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.57-1.02). Conclusions: In this large cohort of 452 FLT3-ITD mutated AML treated within the RATIFY trial the negative prognostic impact of beta1-sheet insertion site of FLT3-ITD could be confirmed. Further analyses to investigate potential predictive effects of midostaurin treatment are ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, (CCSRI) #704970. Disclosures Du: Novartis: Employment. Gathmann:Novartis: Employment. Larson:Ariad/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BristolMyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Medeiros:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Employment. Tallman:Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; Cellerant: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Tiecke:Novartis: Employment. Pallaud:Novartis: Employment. de Witte:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau. Ehninger:Bayer: Research Funding; GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bullinger:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Bayer Oncology: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Döhner:Pfizer: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding. Thiede:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AgenDix: Other: Ownership.

Abstract: Introduction: Mutations localized in the tyrosine kinase domain activation loop of FLT3 (FLT3-TKD), representing point mutations in codon D835/I836 and rarely deletions of codon I836, induce constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase similarly to FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations. However, the prognostic role of FLT3-TKD in AML, particularly in the presence of NPM1 mutations, is not well established. The phase 3 RATIFY trial [NCT00651261; Stone et al. N Engl J Med. 2017] showed that in combination with standard chemotherapy, midostaurin (PKC412) improved survival outcomes across all 3 FLT3 stratification subgroups (ITD high allelic ratio [≥ 0.7] , ITD low allelic ratio [ 〈 0.7], and TKD) vs placebo in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML. Here, we evaluated the prognostic impact of FLT3-TKD and NPM1 mutations in a post hoc analysis from the RATIFY trial. Methods: In RATIFY, newly diagnosed patients with AML 18-60 years old were randomly assigned to receive midostaurin or placebo together with standard induction and consolidation therapy followed by 12 28-day cycles of maintenance therapy with midostaurin or placebo. FLT3-TKD mutation was detected by PCR and capillary electrophoresis at 9 reference laboratories. Patients were categorized as NPM1 mutated (mut) or NPM1 wild-type (WT) using PCR. Efficacy outcomes included complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). EFS and DFS analyses were performed considering CR within a 60-day window. P values presented have not been adjusted for multiplicity. Results: Of the total randomized 162 FLT3-TKD patients, 134 with available NPM1 data had consented for exploratory analysis and thus were included in this study (see Table for subgroup distribution). Overall, 47.8% of patients were male, and the median age was 49 years (95% CI, 45.5-51.1 years). The median white blood cell (WBC) count was higher in patients with NPM1-mut than in patients with NPM1-WT (34.1 vs 15.5 × 109/L, P = .0011). CR rates (during the first 60 days) were higher in patients with FLT3-TKD/NPM1-mut vs FLT3-TKD/NPM1-WT (66% vs 53%); however, this was driven by the higher rate of CR in the midostaurin arm (76% NPM1-mut vs 44% NPM1-WT) rather than the placebo arm (53% NPM1-mut vs 60% NPM1-WT). The overall CR rate (regardless of NPM1 genotype) was 64% for midostaurin and 56% for placebo in FLT3-TKD patients. The prognostic effect of the NPM1 mutation concurrent with FLT3-TKD was seen for all endpoints consistently with hazard ratios (HRs) around 0.50 or lower (Figures 1 and 2 and Table). Overall (regardless of treatment) OS, EFS, and DFS estimates at 3 years were 73% vs 52%, 48% vs 25%, and 74% vs 47%, respectively, in patients with FLT3-TKD/NPM1-mut vs FLT3-TKD/NPM1-WT. Whereas the HRs for midostaurin vs placebo were 0.73 for both OS and EFS, the impact of treatment on outcomes varied between the individual NPM1/TKD subgroups and was not consistently observed when endpoints were censored at stem cell transplant (SCT) (Table). It should be noted that the number of patients in each subgroup was small and therefore the HRs with 95% CIs should be interpreted with caution. Multivariate analyses in these FLT3-TKD patients revealed that NPM1 genotype was an independent prognostic factor for OS, EFS and DFS (2-sided P 〈 .05), whereas study drug, age, sex, WBC at baseline and SCT (no/yes) did not reach this level of significance in the Cox model. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis of the FLT3-TKD patient subset in the RATIFY trial showed the high prognostic value of NPM1 mutational status. Whereas midostaurin showed an overall benefit in the FLT3-TKD patients for OS, EFS, CR and DFS, the impact of treatment on outcome varied between the individual NPM1 subgroups within these FLT3-TKD patients and was not consistently observed.Further analyses using additional endpoints and additional multivariate analyses are planned. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180820, U10CA180791, U10CA180888, U10CA180863, (CCSRI) #704970, U24CA196171; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00651261 Disclosures Voso: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Larson:Ariad/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BristolMyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Heuser:Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; StemLine Therapeutics: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; BergenBio: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Bayer Pharma AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding. Wei:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory committee, Research Funding. Brandwein:Lundbeck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding. de Witte:Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Medeiros:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Employment. Tallman:Cellerant: Research Funding; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board. Schlenk:Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cheng:Novartis: Employment. Gathmann:Novartis: Employment. Tiecke:Novartis: Employment. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stone:Otsuka: Consultancy; Argenx: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Orsenix: Consultancy; Ono: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Cornerstone: Consultancy; Fujifilm: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Steering Committee; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sumitomo: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Abstract: The results from the RATIFY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00651261; CALGB 10603) showed that midostaurin combined with standard chemotherapy significantly improved outcomes in patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)–mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), compared with placebo. In this post hoc subgroup analysis from the trial, we evaluated the impact of midostaurin in 163 patients with FLT3-tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations. At a median follow-up of 60.7 months (95% CI, 55.0-70.8), the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with midostaurin than in those treated with placebo (45.2% vs 30.1%; P = .044). A trend toward improved disease-free survival was also observed with midostaurin (67.3% vs 53.4%; P = .089), whereas overall survival (OS) was similar in the 2 groups. Patients with AML and NPM1mut/FLT3-TKDmut or core binding factor (CBF)–rearranged/FLT3-TKDmut genotypes had significantly prolonged OS with or without censoring at hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), compared with NPM1WT/CBF-negative AMLs. The multivariable model for OS and EFS adjusted for allogeneic HCT in first complete remission as a time-dependent covariable, revealed NPM1 mutations and CBF rearrangements as significant favorable factors. These data show that NPM1 mutations or CBF rearrangements identify favorable prognostic groups in patients with FLT3-TKD AMLs, independent of other factors, also in the context of midostaurin treatment.

Abstract: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy with an undefined heritable risk. Here we perform a meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies, with replication in a fourth study, incorporating a total of 4018 AML cases and 10488 controls. We identify a genome-wide significant risk locus for AML at 11q13.2 (rs4930561; P  = 2.15 × 10 −8 ; KMT5B ). We also identify a genome-wide significant risk locus for the cytogenetically normal AML sub-group (N = 1287) at 6p21.32 (rs3916765; P  = 1.51 × 10 −10 ; HLA ). Our results inform on AML etiology and identify putative functional genes operating in histone methylation ( KMT5B ) and immune function ( HLA ).