GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Lin, Xiaoyan  (12)
  • 1
    In: The Lancet, Elsevier BV, Vol. 402, No. 10408 ( 2023-09), p. 1133-1146
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0140-6736
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067452-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3306-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1476593-7
    SSG: 5,21
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 4_suppl ( 2018-02-01), p. 126-126
    Abstract: 126 Background: Old age is a potential negative predictor, and thus is of interest. Data from the ongoing post-marketing Phase IV trial were collected to assess the effect of age on apatinib treatment in 2000+ patients (pts) with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: This subgroup analysis was stratified by age ( 〈 65 or ≥65 yrs). Both incidence of adverse events (AEs) and clinical outcomes were compared. Results: 725 pts 〈 65 yrs and 312 pts ≥65 yrs were enrolled (data cut-off 2017/7/10). Differences in gender, ECOG PS, BMI, disease duration and metastatic sites were observed. 68.6% and 39.7% of pts aged ≥65 yrs experienced AEs of any grade and grade ≥3, which were not different with 70.2% and 40.0% of pts aged 〈 65 yrs. The common AE profile was similar, but elderly pts had a higher incidence of hypertension, diarrhea and bilirubin increase (Table). Pts ≥65 yrs showed a higher objective response rate (12.2% vs. 9.9%) and longer overall survival (7.82 vs. 6.05 mos); however, there was no statistical difference. The disease control rate (79.6% vs. 65.4%; p=0.002) and progression free survival (PFS) (5.71 vs. 3.22 mos; p 〈 0.001) of pts ≥65 yrs were significantly superior to pts 〈 65 yrs. Multivariate Cox regression model confirmed that age ≥65 yr was a positive prognostic factor for PFS independent of baseline and treatment characteristics (HR: 0.67 [95%CI, 0.50–0.88]). Conclusions: Pts ≥65 yr is not at increased risk of overall AEs, but hypertension, diarrhea and bilirubin increase should be closely monitored. The PFS benefit in elderly pts will be validated. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 4_suppl ( 2018-02-01), p. 19-19
    Abstract: 19 Background: Easily detectable and reliable prognostic factors for apatinib response in gastric cancer are of great interest. In this study, 42 characteristics were test for their prognostic value. Methods: Data were collected from the ongoing single-arm phase IV trial in patents (pts) with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after failure of ≥2 lines of chemotherapy. Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox analysis were conducted. Results: As of 2017/7/10, 1037 pts were enrolled. 820 were evaluable for survival. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 4.60 and 6.57 m. Age, metastatic lesions, region, treatment interruption, leucocyte decrease and adverse events (AEs) occurrence were independent prognostic factors for PFS, while ECOG PS, disease duration, metastatic lesions, region, developed city, initial dose, treatment interruption, BMI, AST abnormal, hand-foot-skin reaction (HFSR), leucocyte decrease and AE occurrence for OS (Table). Conclusions: Multiple demographics, baseline clinical and laboratory indexes, treatment related indicators and occurrence of AEs can predict the efficacy of apatinib in gastric cancer. Updated results will be reported to guide the clinical application of apatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 4_suppl ( 2018-02-01), p. 40-40
    Abstract: 40 Background: The single-arm, open-label, multi-center, Phase IV trial of apatinib was conducting in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction with a target sample size of 2000+. We aimed to analyze the effect of region and hospital attributes on clinical outcomes. Methods: From April 2015 to July 2017, 1037 subjects were enrolled, among which 820 were evaluable in the survival analysis. Results: The incidences of adverse events (AEs) and severe AEs (SAEs) are listed in Table. Overall, both incidences were higher in Southern center compared to Northern Center (p=0.002 and 〈 0.001). More SAEs occurred in developed cities (p=0.028) and in hospitals not specialized in oncology (p=0.028). For efficacy, the median overall survival (mOS) of subjects in Northern Center and Southern centers were 8.71 and 5.72 mos (p 〈 0.001), and the median progression free survival (mPFS) was 5.36 and 3.25 mos (p=0.002), respectively. The mOS of subjects in developed and developing cities were 6.18 and 5.72 mos (p=0.105), and the mPFS was 3.02 and 4.73 mos (p=0.013), respectively. The mOS of subjects in hospital specialized and those not in oncology were 7.59 and 5.78 mos (p=0.014), and the mPFS was 4.73 and 3.84 mos (p=0.068), respectively. Conclusions: Region and attribute hospital can affect the safety and clinical outcome of apatinib in treating gastric cancer in the real world. Patients Northern, developing city or hospitals specialized in oncology experience less SAEs but have better clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e16034-e16034
    Abstract: e16034 Background: Apatinib, a small molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor with high selectivity for VEGFR-2, has been approved for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in China by significantly improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Here, we report safety and efficacy data from an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase IV trial of apatinib as a third-line or later line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2; and adequate haematological and hepatic function; and failure of at least two lines of chemotherapy. Patients received oral apatinib until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included PFS and OS. Results: The intention-to-treat population (ITT) included 2004 patients. At baseline, the median age was 59 (range, 19-85) years, ECOG performance status of 0/1/2 (%) was 15.4/68.8/15.1, and stage III/IV was 3.5/96.4; 98.8% had metastases, and among which metastatic foci≤2/ 〉 2 was 64.5/34.2 (%), respectively. 89.6% of the patients were given apatinib 500mg as the initial does and the median treatment duration was 56 days. After a median follow-up of 126.5 days, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 95.1% of the patients and 70.3% were grade ≥3. 87.9% of the patients experienced treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), of which 51% had grade ≥3, 12.3% and 16.8% reduced dose and discontinued the treatment, respectively. 57 (2.9%) TRAEs-related deaths were reported, mainly because of gastrointestinal bleeding (16 cases), upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (7), cerebral haemorrhage (2), and gastric perforation (1). The incidence of TRAEs of special interest was 74.3%; 38.1% of patients developed grade≥3, mainly including hypertension (26.3%), bleeding (5.1%), proteinuria (4.5%), and hand-foot syndrome (3.1%). In an ITT population, median PFS was 2.7 months (95%CI 2.23-2.79) and median OS was 5.8 months (95% CI 5.42-6.11). Conclusions: This study confirms that apatinib has a well-established and manageable safety profile and survival benefit as third or later line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e16037-e16037
    Abstract: e16037 Background: Apatinib, a highly selective VEGFR2 inhibitor, has shown a clinical benefit as third-line or further-line treatment in patients with gastric cancer in a randomized phase III study with the initial dose of 850mg. However, the study was conducted in a small scale (n = 267) under standardized conditions. Here, we assessed exposure and effectiveness of apatinib at different doses using data collected from a post-marketing phase IV study that included a broader patient population with a larger sample size. Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who were aged 18-75 with ECOG performance status of 0-2 and failed at least two lines of chemotherapy were enrolled. Apatinib was recommended with an initial dose of 850 mg q.d orally, while the initial dose was determined at the discretion of the investigators. Administration of apatinib regarding the initial dose, duration of treatment, dose modification, average daily exposure dose (ADED) and its effect on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 2004 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population. The median age was 59 (range, 19-85) years, 71.8% of patients were male, 84.2% had ECOG performance status of 0-1; 96.4% had stage IV disease, and 98.8% had metastases, among which 34.2% with more than 2 metastases. Five patients did not receive therapy. Compared to 5.5% of patients with the initial dose 〉 500mg, 94.1% was given at the initial dose≤500mg; 8.6% had ADED 〉 500mg and 91.1% had ADED ≤500mg. The median duration of treatment was 56 days. Treatment interruption and discontinuation, and dose reduction occurred in 34.4%, 24.5%, and 13.7% of patients due to adverse events, respectively. Survival analyses in the initial dose ≤500mg/ 〉 500mg subgroups showed median PFS of 2.6 months (95%CI 2.20-2.79) vs 2.7 months (95% CI 1.91-3.32), median OS of 5.6 months (95% CI 5.26-5.95) vs 5.9 months (95% CI 4.40-6.87). In the ADED ≤500mg/ 〉 500mg subgroups, the median PFS was 2.6 months (95% CI 2.14-2.76) vs 3.0 months (95% CI 2.27-3.61), and median OS was 5.7 months (95% CI 5.32-6.08) vs 6.1 months (95% CI 5.36-7.72). Conclusions: In conclusion, more than 90% of the patients received a lower dose regimen, which indicate dosage of 500mg or lower is a tolerated exposure. Furthermore, dose at 500mg or lower produced similar efficacy to that more than 500mg. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 4_suppl ( 2018-02-01), p. 35-35
    Abstract: 35 Background: A fine balance between maintaining efficacy and reducing toxicity is necessary for drug therapies in many cancers. This study seeks to review the data from phase IV clinical trial of Ahead-G201 to help elucidate the optimal initial dose of apatinib in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Pts data from the Ahead-G201 study at cut-off date of Jul 10, 2017 were extracted to explore the correlation of apatinib initial dose (500 mg vs 850 mg) with safety and clinical efficacy. Results: 864 of eligible pts received apatinib at an initial dose of 500 mg, and 58 pts received at 850 mg. Dose interruption occurred in 258 pts (33.1%) at 500 mg and in 27 pts (46.5%) at 850 mg. For safety, the most common adverse events (AEs) were proteinuria, hypertension and leukocyte decrease in both groups. Moreover, the incidence of all AEs and grade 3-4 AEs in pts at 500 mg was significantly lower than pts at 850 mg (Table). For efficacy, pts at 500 mg achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 10.8% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 70.6%, at best response, which were 10.3% and 55.2% in pts at 850 mg. Pts at 500 mg got a significantly longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) than pts at 850 mg (PFS, 4.6 mos vs 2.2 mos; OS, 6.8 mos vs 4.0 mos). Multivariate analysis indicated that apatinib treatment at an initial dose of 500 mg was significantly associated with longer mOS in advanced gastric cancer pts (6.8 mos vs 4.0 mos: hazard ratio, 0.5; 95%CI, 0.3 to 0.8), compared to initial dose of 850 mg. Conclusions: Compared to receiving apatinib at initial dose of 850mg, oral administration of apatinib starting from 500 mg seemed to bring more clinical benefit for patients with advanced gastric cancer, whilst with lower toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 4_suppl ( 2018-02-01), p. 36-36
    Abstract: 36 Background: Intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer are main histological types of gastric cancer, based on Lauren’s classification, which account for 34–47% and 46–57%, respectively. Patients (pts) with intestinal gastric cancer have better prognosis. The present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of apatinib between the two intestinal gastric cancer, based on data from post-marketing Phase IV study (Ahead-G201). Methods: The single-arm, open-label, multi-center, Phase IV trial enrolled advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction after failure of ≥2 lines of chemotherapy. Data of pts with intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer were collected and compared. Results: As of 2017/7/10, 96 intestinal and 104 diffuse pts were recruited. Differences in age (64 vs. 55 yrs), gender (male: 77.1% vs. 57.7%) and disease duration ( 〉 12 months: 71.3% vs. 56.7%) were detected. Between intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer, there was no discrepancy in incidences of adverse events (AEs) (78.1% vs. 73.1%) and Grade ≥3 AEs (41.7% vs. 38.5%). The incidences of typical AEs associated anti-angiogenesis drugs were also comparable (hypertension 26.0% vs. 16.4%; proteinuria 14.6% vs. 20.2%; hand-foot-skin reaction 16.7% vs. 9.6%). No statistical difference was observed in best overall response rate (12.8% vs. 14.3%) and disease control rate (76.0% vs. 64.3%). Survival benefit in pts with intestinal gastric cancer was detected (progression free survival: 5.52 vs. 2.76 months, p = 0.036; overall survival: 8.11 vs. 4.70 months, p = 0.047). However, the multivariable Cox regression model analysis showed that histological type was not independently prognostic factors for survival, indicating that clinical benefit of pts with intestinal gastric cancer was influenced by other factors. Conclusions: Compared with diffuse gastric cancer, pts intestinal gastric cancer have more clinical benefit after treated by apatinib. However, histological type based on the Lauren’s classification was not independently prognostic factors for survival, which needs to be further analyzed, considering the small sample size. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: BMC Medicine, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 21, No. 1 ( 2023-05-05)
    Abstract: Apatinib, a highly selective VEGFR2 inhibitor, significantly improved efficacy versus placebo as a third- and later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer in phase 2 and 3 trials. This prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase IV AHEAD study was conducted to verify the safety and efficacy of apatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after at least two lines of systematic therapy in clinical practice settings. Methods Patients with advanced gastric cancer who had previously failed at least two lines of chemotherapy received oral apatinib until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events were summarized by the incidence rate. Median OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. ORR, DCR, OS at 3 and 6 months, and PFS at 3 and 6 months were calculated, and their 95% CIs were estimated according to the Clopper-Pearson method. Results Between May 2015 and November 2019, a total of 2004 patients were enrolled, and 1999 patients who received at least one dose of apatinib were assessed for safety. In the safety population, 87.9% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with the most common hypertension (45.2%), proteinuria (26.5%), and white blood cell count decreased (25.3%). Additionally, 51% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. Fatal TRAEs occurred in 57 (2.9%) patients. No new safety concerns were reported. Among the 2004 patients included in the intention-to-treat population, the ORR was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.6–5.4%), and DCR was 35.8% (95% CI, 33.7–38.0%). The median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 2.2–2.8), and the median OS was 5.8 months (95% CI 5.4–6.1). Conclusions The findings in the AHEAD study confirmed the acceptable and manageable safety profile and clinical benefit of apatinib in patients with advanced gastric cancer as a third- or later-line of treatment. Trial registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02426034. Registration date was April 24, 2015.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1741-7015
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2131669-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 4_suppl ( 2018-02-01), p. 142-142
    Abstract: 142 Background: Apatinib, a small molecule VEGFR TKI, has been approved in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in China. Due to toxicity, many pts underwent temporary interruptions during treatment. We analyzed the data from a phase IV clinical trial of Ahead-G201 to evaluate the relationship between dose interruption, drug safety and efficacy. Methods: At the cutoff date of Jul 10, 2017, Ahead-G201 study enrolled 1037 pts. The adverse events (AEs) and clinical efficacy were evaluated for pts with no, 1, 2 and ≥3 dose interruptions. Results: 336 of 1037 pts underwent dose interruptions during apatinib treatment: 1 interruption in 183 pts; 2 interruptions in 67 pts; and ≥3 interruptions in 86 pts. The toxicity and efficacy for them were listed in Table. For safety, pts with no interruption had the lowest incidence of all AEs (59.3%) and grade 3-4 AEs (30.0%). Pts with ≥3 interruptions had the highest objective response rate (ORR, 20.3%) and disease control rate (DCR, 82.6%). Moreover, these pts got median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.6 mos and median overall survival (mOS) of 9.4 mos, which were the longest among 4 groups. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that ≥3 interruptions of apatinib bring much more efficacy benefit both in mPFS (6.6 vs 3.8 mos: hazard ratio, 0.5, 95%CI, 0.3 to 0.7) and mOS (9.4 vs 6.6 mos: hazard ratio, 0.5, 95%CI, 0.3 to 0.8) for pts, than those with no interruption. Conclusions: Current results indicated that dose interruptions are required to manage toxicity and it is necessary to explore an optimal dosing pattern of apatinib in advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02426034. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...