In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 17, No. 6 ( 2022-6-6), p. e0269064-
Abstract:
Recent studies indicate that vitamin D supplementation may decrease respiratory tract infections, but the association between vitamin D and COVID-19 is still unclear. Objective To explore the association between vitamin D status and infections, hospitalisation, and mortality due to COVID-19. Methods We used UK Biobank, a nationwide cohort of 500,000 individuals aged between 40 and 69 years at recruitment between 2006 and 2010. We included people with at least one serum vitamin D test, living in England with linked primary care and inpatient records. The primary exposure was serum vitamin D status measured at recruitment, defined as deficiency at 〈 25 nmol/L, insufficiency at 25–49 nmol/L and sufficiency at ≥ 50 nmol/L. Secondary exposures were self-reported or prescribed vitamin D supplements. The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed or clinically diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections. The secondary outcomes included hospitalisation and mortality due to COVID-19. We used multivariable Cox regression models stratified by summertime months and non-summertime months, adjusting for demographic factors and underlying comorbidities. Results We included 307,512 participants (54.9% female, 55.9% over 70 years old) in our analysis. During summertime months, weak evidence existed that the vitamin D deficiency group had a lower hazard of being diagnosed with COVID-19 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77–0.95). During non-summertime, the vitamin D deficiency group had a higher hazard of COVID-19 compared with the vitamin D sufficient group (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01–1.30). No evidence was found that vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency was associated with either hospitalisation or mortality due to COVID-19 in any time strata. Conclusion We found no evidence of an association between historical vitamin D status and hospitalisation or mortality due to COVID-19, along with inconsistent results for any association between vitamin D and diagnosis of COVID-19. However, studies using more recent vitamin D measurements and systematic COVID-19 testing are needed.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.t004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.t005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.s015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.r001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.r002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.r003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0269064.r004
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Permalink