Abstract: Lymph node skip metastasis is a subgroup of lymph node metastatic patterns with low incidence in node-positive colon cancer. Its clinical significance is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis in stage III colon cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational analysis. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital. PATIENTS: This study included patients with stage III colon cancer who underwent D3 lymphadenectomy between 2006 and 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The patients were divided into a lymph node skip metastasis–positive group and a negative group. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Cox regression was applied to identify related risk factors influencing survival. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were reviewed, and lymph node skip metastasis–positive patients represented 13.2% of our sample. Patients with lymph node skip metastasis tended to present with a higher proportion of right-sided cancer, lower positive lymph nodes, lower lymph node ratio, and higher mean BMI. Liver recurrence was more prevalent in the lymph node skip metastasis group ( p = 0.028) than in the negative group. The presence of lymph node skip metastasis was a negative prognostic factor for 5-year recurrence-free survival (51.4% vs 68.7%; p = 0.002) and 5-year overall survival (66.4% vs 80.4%; p = 0.024) in Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression. Subgroup analysis revealed the survival significance of recurrence-free survival ( p = 0.001) and overall survival ( p = 0.011) in lymph node skip metastasis with pN1 disease. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design, single-center nature, and sampling error. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node skip metastasis is an independent negative prognostic factor in stage III colon cancer with pN1 disease. More intensive surveillance may be necessary for patients of this subgroup. See Video Abstract at https://links.lww.com/DCR/C60. IMPACTO PRONÓSTICO NEGATIVO DE LAS METÁSTASIS DISCONTÍNUAS GANGLIONARES LINFÁTICAS EN CASOS DE CÁNCER DE COLON ESTADIO III CON ENFERMEDAD PN1: ESTUDIO DE COHORTES RETROSPECTIVO MONOCENTRICO ANTECEDENTES: Las metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas, son un subgrupo de patrones metastásicos en los ganglios linfáticos con baja incidencia en el cáncer de colon con nódulos positivos. Su significado clínico aún no está claro. OBJETIVO: Estudio que tiene por objetivo el investigar el impacto pronóstico de las metástasis discontínuas de los ganglios linfáticos en el cáncer de colon de estadio III. DISEÑO: Análisis observacional retrospectivo. AJUSTES: El estudio se realizó en el Hospital General de Veteranos de Taipei. PACIENTES: Pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio III que se sometieron a linfadenectomía D3 entre 2006 y 2015. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Los pacientes se dividieron en un grupo positivo de metástasis discontínuas en los ganglios linfáticos y un otro grupo negativo. La sobrevida libre de recidiva y la sobrevida global, fueron comparadas mediante las curvas de Kaplan-Meier y la prueba de rango logarítmico. Se aplicó la regresión de Cox para identificar los factores de riesgo relacionados que influyeron en la sobrevida. RESULTADOS: Se revisaron un total de 461 casos, donde los pacientes positivos con metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos representaron el 13,2% de nuestra muestra. Los pacientes con metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas tendían a presentar una mayor proporción de cáncer localizado en el lado derecho del colon, presentar un menor numéro de ganglios linfáticos positivos y una proporción menor de ganglios linfáticos con un IMC promedio más alto. Las recidivas hepáticas fueron más prevalentes en el grupo de metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas ( p = 0,028) que en el grupo negativo. La presencia de metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas fué un factor de pronóstico negativo en la sobrevida libre de recidiva a 5 años (51,4% frente a 68,7%, p = 0,002) y la sobrevida general a 5 años (66,4% frente a 80,4%, p = 0,024) evaluada por las curvas de Kaplan-Meier y la regresión multivariada de Cox. El análisis de subgrupos reveló la importancia de la sobrevida libre de recidiva ( p = 0,001) y la sobrevida general ( p = 0,011) en los casos con metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas con enfermedad pN1. LIMITACIONES: Diseño retrospectivo, naturaleza de centro único y error de muestreo. CONCLUSIONES: Las metástasis discontínuas ganglionares linfáticas son un factor pronóstico negativo independiente en los casos de cáncer de colon estadio III con enfermedad pN1. Tal vez sea necesaria una mayor vigilancia de los pacientes en este subgrupo.Consulte Video Resumen en https://links.lww.com/DCR/C60. (Traducción—Dr. Xavier Delgadillo )

Abstract: Both regorafenib and reduced-intensity FOLFOXIRI (riFOLFOXIRI) prolong survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the sequence in which they should be administrated first in late-line treatment for refractory mCRC remains unclear. Patients and Methods: This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study that reviewed data from patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, with mCRC refractory to fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, cetuximab (wild-type RAS ), and bevacizumab. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a regorafenib-first group and a riFOLFOXIRI-first group. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze survival, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses. Results: A total of 136 and 55 patients followed a regorafenib-first or riFOLFOXIRI-first treatment strategy, respectively. At baseline, patient characteristics were similar between the groups, except for younger age in the riFOLFOXIRI-first group. The regorafenib-first group had better overall survival (13.8 vs. 10.7 mo, P =0.038), whereas patients in the riFOLFOXIRI-first group had a better partial response rate ( P =0.005) but a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse effects ( P =0.004) and cross-over to regorafenib ( P 〈 0.001). Thus, no significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (regorafenib-first strategy: 3.17 mo; riFOLFOXIRI-first strategy: 4.97 mo; P =0.624). Regorafenib-first strategy, sex, and pathology were identified as independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis indicated that younger age, better performance status, stage IV disease, and mutant RAS gene favored the regorafenib-first strategy. Conclusion: Treatment with regorafenib-first followed by riFOLFOXIRI resulted in better overall survival when given as late-line treatment for patients with refractory mCRC.

Abstract: The role of hepatectomy in a specific group of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastases (SCRLM) and synchronous extrahepatic disease (SEHD) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of liver surgery and define the selection criteria for surgical candidates in patients with SCRLM + SEHD. Methods: Between July 2007 and October 2018, 475 patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent liver resection were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients with SCRLM + SEHD were identified and included in the study. Clinical pathological data of these patients were analyzed to evaluate the influence on survival. Important prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. The risk score system and decision tree analysis were generated according to the important prognostic factors for better patient selection. Results: The 5-year survival rate of patients with SCRLM + SEHD was 21.9%. The most important prognostic factors were SCRLM number of more than five, site of SEHD other than the lung only, inability to achieve SCRLM + SEHD R0 resection, and BRAF mutation of cancer cells. The proposed risk score system and decision tree model easily discriminated between patients with different survival rates and identified the profile of suitable surgical patients. Conclusion: Liver surgery should not be a contraindication for patients with SCRLM + SEHD. Patients with complete SCRLM + SEHD R0 resection, SCRLM number less than or equal to five, SEHD confined to the lung only, and wild-type BRAF could have favorable survival outcomes. The proposed scoring system and decision tree model may be beneficial to patient selection in clinical use.

Abstract: Perineal wound complications are a long-lasting issue for abdominoperineal resection (APR) patients. Complication rates as high as 60% have been reported, with the most common complication being delayed perineal wound healing. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for delayed perineal wound healing and its impact on prolonged hospital stay. Methods We included low rectal tumor patients who underwent APR at a referral medical center from April 2002 to December 2017; a total of 229 patients were included. The basic characteristics and surgical outcomes of the patients were analyzed to identify risk factors for delayed perineal wound healing ( 〉  30 days after APR) and prolonged hospital stay (post-APR hospital stay 〉  14 days). Results All patients received primary closure for their perineal wound. The majority of patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma ( N = 213, 93.1%). In the univariate analysis, patients with hypoalbuminemia (albumin 〈  3.5 g/dL) had an increased risk of delayed wound healing (39.5% vs. 60.5%, P = 0.001), which was an independent risk factor in the multivariable analysis (OR 2.962, 95% CI 1.437–6.102, P = 0.003). Patients with delayed wound healing also had a significantly increased risk of prolonged hospital stay (OR 6.404, 95% CI 3.508–11.694, P 〈 0.001). Conclusions Hypoalbuminemia was an independent risk factor for delayed wound healing, which consequently led to a prolonged hospital stay. Further clinical trials are needed to reduce the incidence of delayed perineal wound healing by correcting albumin levels or nutritional status before APR.

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of mutations in the tumor suppressor gene FBXW7 for clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Between January 2000 and December 2009, FBXW7 mutations in tumor tissues from 1,519 CRC patients at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were assessed using a MassArray system. We compared the clinicopathological variables and prognosis between the wild-type and mutant tumor tissue groups. Results FBXW7 mutations were present in 114/1,519 CRC patients (7.5%). In stage I/II CRC patients, mutant FBXW7 was more common than wild-type FBXW7 (62.3% vs. 50.8%). CRC patients with FBXW7 mutations did not differ significantly in their 5-year overall survival (OS). Stage I/II CRC patients with FBXW7 mutations had lower OS, but this difference was not significant (71.6% vs. 78.2%). Among FBXW7 tumors, S582L was the most frequent mutation type (19.3%), followed by R465H (16.6%), R505C (14.9%) and R479Q (14.9%). Subgroup analysis of FBXW7 mutants showed that R465H/R465C/R479Q had better 5-year OS than other mutant types (76.9% vs. 56.0%; p=0.012). Conclusions There was no strong association between patient prognosis and FBXW7 mutations in our large-scale study.

Abstract: Mutation spectra in colorectal cancer with metastasis and its response to chemotherapy. Summary of Background Data: No molecular markers are available for selecting the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen (irinotecan or oxaliplatin) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: We enrolled 161 mCRC patients who underwent surgery for their primary tumors at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from 2004 to 2010. The prevalence of gene mutations was measured and correlated with responses to different cytotoxic agents. Results: We detected 1,836 mutations in 12 genes. KRAS mutants affected 44.3% of the tumors. The rate of good response was insignificantly higher for patients with KRAS mutant tumors who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy compared with patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (65.6% versus 47.0%; P = 0.15). For patients who received irinotecan-based chemotherapy, the rate of good response was similar in patients with wild-type (55.0%; n = 11) and those with KRAS mutant tumors (54.5%; n = 12; P = 1). In patients with KRAS mutant tumors treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen, the overall survival was 38.5 months (95% CI: 26.6–50.5 months), which was insignificantly better than that for patients treated with an irinotecan-based regimen (30.4 months; 95% CI: 15.8–45.1 months; P = 0.206). Conclusions: Our data could not come to the conclusion that patient with KRAS mutation mCRC may have better response with oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. Further study is needed to confirm the relationship between gene mutation and chemotherapy response.