GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
  • 2010-2014  (2)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
  • 2010-2014  (2)
Jahr
Fachgebiete(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 4628-4628
    Kurzfassung: 4628 Background: Previous studies with sorafenib in Asian patients with advanced RCC were relatively small and used strict entry criteria. Here we investigated safety and efficacy in a large subset of Asian patients in the prospective, non-interventional PREDICT study of sorafenib in routine practice (NCT 00895674). Methods: Patients were eligible based on a diagnosis of advanced RCC and the decision by the investigator to prescribe sorafenib under compliance of the local product label. Tumor status, patients’ performance and physician assessment of efficacy and tolerability were collected up to 12 months. Results: Between Jan 2007 and June 2010, 1092 patients were enrolled in China (n=1033), South Korea (n=55), the Philippines (n=3) and Indonesia (n=1). In the efficacy population (n=909), baseline characteristics were: 71% male; 89% 〈 70 years old; 89% clear cell histology; 78% prior nephrectomy; 56% prior systemic therapy; 16% high MSKCC risk; 35% ECOG PS ≥2; 5% brain metastases. Overall, 19% of patients had ≥1 concomitant disease at baseline; the most frequent concomitant diseases were hypertension (14%) and diabetes (6%). Initial sorafenib dose was 800 mg daily in 97% of patients, of whom 91% were also receiving 800 mg daily as last dose. Median duration of sorafenib treatment was 9.7 months (range 0.2–24.1), and in clinically relevant subgroups was as follows: treatment-naïve, 9.7 months; high MSKCC risk, 9.3 months; brain metastases, 8.4 months; age ≥70 years, 7.6 months; ECOG PS 2, 9.7 months; ECOG PS 3, 6.1 months. At last follow up, 63% of physicians reported good/very good efficacy and 59% good/very good tolerability. Sorafenib was well tolerated; 〈 2% of the safety population (n=1022) reported serious drug-related adverse events (SDRAEs) and only 3% discontinued due to DRAEs. In all, 35% of patients reported a DRAE, with the most frequent being hand-foot skin reaction (21%), diarrhea (7%), rash (7%), alopecia (5%), hypertension (3%). Conclusions: In this large subset of Asian patients with advanced RCC treated in daily practice settings, sorafenib was well tolerated and provided benefit, including in clinically relevant patient subgroups.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2012
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 23 ( 2013-08-10), p. 2861-2869
    Kurzfassung: To evaluate which patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) obtained the greatest benefits from the detection of distant metastasis with [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) combined with plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels. Patients and Methods Consecutive patients with NPC were prospectively enrolled. PET/CT, conventional work-up (CWU), and quantification of plasma EBV DNA were performed before treatment. The accuracy of these strategies for distant metastases was assessed. The costs of the diagnostic strategies were compared. Results Eighty-six (14.8%) of the 583 eligible patients were found to have distant metastases; 71 patients (82.6%) by PET/CT and 31 patients (36.0%) by CWU. In the multivariable analysis, advanced N stage (odds ratio, 2.689; 95% CI, 1.894 to 3.818) and pretreatment EBV DNA level (odds ratio, 3.344; 95% CI, 1.825 to 6.126) were significant risk factors for distant metastases. PET/CT was not superior to CWU for detecting distant metastases in very low–risk patients (N0-1 with EBV DNA 〈 4,000 copies/mL; P = .062), but was superior for the low-risk patients (N0-1 with EBV DNA ≥ 4,000 copies/mL and N2-3 with EBV DNA 〈 4,000 copies/mL; P = .039) and intermediate-risk patients (N2-3 disease with EBV DNA ≥ 4,000 copies/mL; P 〈 .001). The corresponding patient management changes based on PET/CT were 2.9%, 6.3%, and 16.5%, respectively. The costs per true-positive case detected by PET/CT among these groups were ¥324,138 (≈$47,458), ¥96,907 (≈$14,188), and ¥34,182 (≈$5,005), respectively. Conclusion PET/CT detects more distant metastases than conventional staging in patients with NPC. The largest benefit in terms of cost and patient management was observed in the subgroup with N2-3 disease and EBV DNA ≥ 4,000 copies/mL.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2013
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...