GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)  (3)
  • Leteurtre, Stephane  (3)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)  (3)
Person/Organisation
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate (PODIUM) Contemporary Organ Dysfunction Criteria: Executive Summary
    American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ; 2022
    In:  Pediatrics Vol. 149, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-01-01), p. S1-S12
    Details
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 149, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-01-01), p. S1-S12
    Kurzfassung: Prior criteria for organ dysfunction in critically ill children were based mainly on expert opinion. We convened the Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate (PODIUM) expert panel to summarize data characterizing single and multiple organ dysfunction and to derive contemporary criteria for pediatric organ dysfunction. The panel was composed of 88 members representing 47 institutions and 7 countries. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature to derive evidence-based criteria for single organ dysfunction for neurologic, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, acute liver, renal, hematologic, coagulation, endocrine, endothelial, and immune system dysfunction. We searched PubMed and Embase from January 1992 to January 2020. Study identification was accomplished using a combination of medical subject headings terms and keywords related to concepts of pediatric organ dysfunction. Electronic searches were performed by medical librarians. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the authors reported original data collected in critically ill children; evaluated performance characteristics of scoring tools or clinical assessments for organ dysfunction; and assessed a patient-centered, clinically meaningful outcome. Data were abstracted from each included study into an electronic data extraction form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Consensus was achieved for a final set of 43 criteria for pediatric organ dysfunction through iterative voting and discussion. Although the PODIUM criteria for organ dysfunction were limited by available evidence and will require validation, they provide a contemporary foundation for researchers to identify and study single and multiple organ dysfunction in critically ill children.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0031-4005 , 1098-4275
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-052888B
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 1477004-0
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Scoring Systems for Organ Dysfunction and Multiple Organ Dysfunction: The PODIUM Consensus Conference
    American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ; 2022
    In:  Pediatrics Vol. 149, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-01-01), p. S23-S31
    Details
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 149, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-01-01), p. S23-S31
    Kurzfassung: Multiple scores exist to characterize organ dysfunction in children. OBJECTIVE To review the literature on multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) scoring systems to estimate severity of illness and to characterize the performance characteristics of currently used scoring tools and clinical assessments for organ dysfunction in critically ill children. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they evaluated critically ill children with MOD, evaluated the performance characteristics of scoring tools for MOD, and assessed outcomes related to mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted into a standard data extraction form by a task force member. RESULTS Of 1152 unique abstracts screened, 156 full text studies were assessed including a total of 54 eligible studies. The most commonly reported scores were the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (PELOD), pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (pSOFA), Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PRISM, and counts of organ dysfunction using the International Pediatric Sepsis Definition Consensus Conference. Cut-offs for specific organ dysfunction criteria, diagnostic elements included, and use of counts versus weighting varied substantially. LIMITATIONS While scores demonstrated an increase in mortality associated with the severity and number of organ dysfunctions, the performance ranged widely. CONCLUSIONS The multitude of scores on organ dysfunction to assess severity of illness indicates a need for unified and data-driven organ dysfunction criteria, derived and validated in large, heterogenous international databases of critically ill children.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0031-4005 , 1098-4275
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-052888D
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 1477004-0
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 3
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Refining the Pediatric Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome
    American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ; 2022
    In:  Pediatrics Vol. 149, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-01-01), p. S13-S22
    Details
    In: Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Vol. 149, No. Supplement_1 ( 2022-01-01), p. S13-S22
    Kurzfassung: Since its introduction into the medical literature in the 1970s, the term multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (or some variant) has been applied broadly to any patient with & gt;1 concurrent organ dysfunction. However, the epidemiology, mechanisms, time course, and outcomes among children with multiple organ dysfunction vary substantially. We posit that the term pediatric multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (or MODS) should be reserved for patients with a systemic pathologic state resulting from a common mechanism (or mechanisms) that affects numerous organ systems simultaneously. In contrast, children in whom organ injuries are attributable to distinct mechanisms should be considered to have additive organ system dysfunctions but not the syndrome of MODS. Although such differentiation may not always be possible with current scientific knowledge, we make the case for how attempts to differentiate multiple organ dysfunction from other states of additive organ dysfunctions can help to evolve clinical and research priorities in diagnosis, monitoring, and therapy from largely organ-specific to more holistic strategies.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0031-4005 , 1098-4275
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-052888C
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 1477004-0
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...