Abstract: Background and Scientific Rationale Solitary plasmacytoma of the bone (SPB) is a rare entity representing 5% of all plasma cell dyscrasias. SPB treated with radiation therapy (RT) has a 10% risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM) over 3 years if there is no marrow involvement, whereas there is a 60% chance of progression over 3 years in patients with minimal marrow involvement. Median time to progression in the latter group is 26 months. Presently, despite mounting evidence of a significant risk of progression to MM, there is no FDA-approved therapy and patients are usually treated with localized RT. This is an area of unmet need. A similar opportunity exists in the setting of MM patients relapsing with localized disease amenable to RT. This group of patients may not immediately require long-term systemic therapy especially if RT combined with epigenetic modulation and lenalidomide results in therapeutically relevant immune responses. A few studies combining lenalidomide and azacitidine have shown responses even in a lenalidomide refractory population with upregulation of cancer testis antigen (CTA) as well as CTA specific T cell responses (Table 1). These synergistic mechanisms focus on: 1) manipulating antigen expression and enhancing antigen presentation (both neoantigens and cancer testis antigens) with oral azacitidine (CC-486), and 2) augmentation of antigen specific immune responses via increased IL2 production leading to an increase in the proliferation of T cells with lenalidomide. This combination with RT would serve to inflame the tumor microenvironment and potentially lead to therapeutically active systemic immune responses via an abscopal effect. Study Design and Methods This is an open-label, single center, single-arm study of CC-486, lenalidomide plus RT, which will enroll a total of 20 patients in two cohorts. Clinical trial registry number NCT04174196, actively recruiting. Study population and inclusion criteria Each cohort will enroll ten patients - Cohort 1: i) Histologically confirmed newly diagnosed solitary plasmacytoma of the bone or lytic bone lesion ii) Minimal marrow involvement (Detectable clonal bone marrow (BM) plasma cells by multicolor flow cytometry and ≤ 10% clonal plasma cells in a BM biopsy by immunohistochemistry, morphology, or flow cytometry) iii) Secretory M protein & lt; 3 g/dL Cohort 2: i) Relapsed multiple myeloma with plasmacytomas appropriate for RT on imaging ii) Relapsed (reappearance of M-spike/serum FLC) or progressive myeloma defined by a 25% increase from nadir in M-spike or involved serum FLC on 2 separate measurements; or with BM involvement by clonal plasma cells detectable by IHC iii) Any prior number of therapies is permitted, including prior RT iv) Allogeneic transplant patients are permitted Statistical methods We estimate the historical rate of stringent complete response (sCR) is approximately 5% (based on the rate for newly diagnosed myeloma with lenalidomide and dexamethasone on the MAIA study of 7.3% and for relapsed myeloma with Rd based on the POLLUX study of 4.6%). The primary endpoint of the study will be reported separately for the two cohorts. With 10 patients in each cohort, the maximum half-width of the exact 95% confidence interval for the response rate is +/- 0.31. A sCR rate of ≥20% would be considered promising for either cohort. Study treatment In the study, patients will be treated with CC-486 100 mg on day 1-21 and lenalidomide 25 mg on day 1-21 for 6 cycles. RT to the plasmacytoma will be initiated after cycle 2. Total dose may vary between 30-50 Gy (45-50 Gy for cohort 1) based on clinical judgement. (Figure 1) Endpoints Primary To provide preliminary efficacy data based on the rate of sCR by 2016 IMWG Criteria on post-treatment BM biopsy and aspirate specimens with no new lesions by PET. Secondary - To assess the safety of this combination. - To estimate the progression free survival and overall survival Exploratory - To evaluate antigen expression at the tumor site pre and post RT - To further characterize the antigen specific T cell response pre and post RT at the tumor site - To assess changes in epigenetic marks - To assess changes in the tumor microenvironment Disclosures Shah: Physicians Education Resource: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Research Funding. Mailankody:Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; PleXus Communications: Honoraria; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Korde:Astra Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Research Funding. Hultcrantz:GSK: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Intellisphere LLC: Consultancy. Smith:Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Shah:Janssen Pharmaceutica: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Lahoud:MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board. Scordo:McKinsey & Company: Consultancy; Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Omeros Corporation: Consultancy; Kite - A Gilead Company: Other: Ad-hoc advisory board. Dahi:Kite: Consultancy. Chung:Genentech: Research Funding. Hassoun:Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Barker:Elekta: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Alpha Tau Medical: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Giralt:KITE: Consultancy; MILTENYI: Consultancy, Research Funding; OMEROS: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria; ACTINUUM: Consultancy, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Research Funding. Landgren:Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committees for clinical trials, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glenmark: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Other; Karyopharma: Research Funding; Binding Site: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Other; Glenmark: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committees for clinical trials, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committees for clinical trials, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Research Funding; Binding Site: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Independent Data Monitoring Committees for clinical trials, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Lesokhin:Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties. OffLabel Disclosure: CC-486 is an is an oral hypomethylating agent that has been studied in acute myeloid leukemia. This study combines CC-486 with lenalidomide and radiation therapy in plasma cell disorders.

Abstract: Background: High-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT remains the standard of care for patients aged ≤75 years with NDMM. The ability of novel agents, such as lenalidomide and bortezomib, to produce treatment response rates comparable to those seen with ASCT has raised questions about the necessity for upfront ASCT in transplant-eligible NDMM patients. This analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous Ld versus Ld+ASCT in patients with NDMM. Methods: Data were pooled from two randomized clinical trials (NCT01731886 and NCT00807599) that compared Ld alone versus Ld+ASCT in NDMM patients aged ≤75 years. Patients received four 28-day cycles of Ld (lenalidomide 25mg daily on days 1-21; dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) followed by stem-cell mobilization and collection, and either a) Arm A: continuous Ld (an additional 4 cycles +/- lenalidomide maintenance in NCT01731886, or continuous lenalidomide at the last tolerated dose until disease progression plus dexamethasone 20mg for 1 year following treatment initiation in NCT00807599); or b) Arm B: ASCT conditioned with high-dose melphalan, and followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy. In both trials, patients were withdrawn if they developed progressive disease (PD) at any time, or had stable disease (SD) after cycle 4 of Ld induction. We evaluated overall response rate (ORR; defined as a partial response or better), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE) incidence rates, focusing on those randomized patients who responded to 4 cycles of Ld induction. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled into NCT01731886, and 63 into NCT00807599. The analysis included a total of 85 patients who had been randomized and achieved a response to 4 cycles of Ld induction: 41 in Arm A, and 44 in Arm B. Mean ages in Arm A versus Arm B were 61.8 versus 61.7 years; median (range) follow-up times were 3.97 (0.27-6.19) versus 3.71 (0.16-5.66) years. Baseline cytogenetic risk profiles were similar overall, although Arm A contained a higher percentage of intermediate-risk patients (17.1% versus 11.4%). More than half of all patients included in the analysis had International Staging System stage 1 disease: 63.4% of patients in Arm A, and 47.7% of those in Arm B. Median PFS was similar with the two treatment approaches: 4.3 versus 4.4 years (Figure 1; p = 0.9107). OS also did not differ significantly between the two arms (Figure 2). As expected, both treatment regimens were well tolerated. Clinically significant grade 3 and 4 AEs occurring outside of the transplant period included the following: anemia (17.1% Arm A versus 15.9% Arm B); neutropenia (36.6% versus 38.6%); thrombocytopenia (17.1% versus 18.4%); infectious complications (14.6% versus 27.3%); thromboembolic events (7.3% versus 6.8%); and secondary malignancies (7.3% versus 4.5%). Conclusions: The findings of this pooled analysis suggest that, in transplant-eligible patients responsive to Ld induction, continuous Ld results in similar PFS and OS to Ld+ASCT. Larger phase III trials addressing this question are awaited. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Lentzsch: Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Axiom: Honoraria. Landau:Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Lesokhin:Efranat: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Aduro: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kewalramani:Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Getchell v Doon East Community Hospital, Alfred Wakeman et al.: Consultancy. Comenzo:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Takeda Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Landgren:Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Medscape: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; BMJ Publishing: Consultancy; BMJ Publishing: Honoraria; Medscape: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Hassoun:Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Abstract: Background: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) protein downregulates T cell activation and is related to immune tolerance. PDL1 up regulation, T cell infiltration, and T cell exhaustion are features, which suggest susceptibility to PD-1 blockade antibodies. Blockade of PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1 has shown promising responses in several malignancies. Although little clinical activity has been seen in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), the role of the PD-1 pathway and T cell exhaustion in newly diagnosed MM has not been explored. Objective: To determine whether T-cell infiltrate or expression of PD-1 correlates with clinical features and prognosis among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Methods: We screened a clinically annotated database of 341 patients seen at MSKCC between 1998 and 2012 that had Multiple Myeloma, received a bone marrow transplant and were consented to a biospecimen research protocol for availability of pre-treatment bone marrow specimens. A total of 64 bone marrow biopsy specimens were identified. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens using an anti human CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (Dako, Clone F7.2.38) and an anti human PD-1 mAb (Cell Marque, catalog #315M-95). CD3 and PD1 IHC staining were graded as negative ( 〈 5% for CD3, 〈 1% for PD1), or positive (≥5% for CD3, ≥1% for PD1). Correlative analyses were performed between CD3/PD1 expression and clinical outcome using the following parameters: International Staging System (ISS), cytogenetic risk, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response to treatment. Groups were compared by Fisher's exact test. OS and PFS were assessed by Cox regression and estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 23 specimens (36%) were CD3 positive and 10 specimens (16%) were PD-1 positive. All PD-1 positive specimens were CD3 positive. 41 specimens (64%) were CD3 negative ( 〈 5%) and PD1 negative ( 〈 1%). Based on these results, specimens were divided into three groups: Exhausted T-cell infiltrate (CD3+/PD1+), non exhausted T-cell infiltrate (CD3+/PD1-) and no T-Cell infiltrate (CD3-/PD1-). In the exhausted T-cell infiltrate group 30% of patients had ISS stage 3 and 40% had high risk cytogenetics. In the non-exhausted T-cell group 15% of patients had ISS stage 3 and 15% high cytogenetic risk. In the no T-cell infiltrate group 10% had ISS stage 3 disease and 22% high cytogenetic risk. These proportions were not significantly different across the 3 groups. Median OS from 1st auto infusion was 7 years while median PFS was 2.3 years. On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in PFS between the 3 groups. The presence of CD3 and PD1 T-cells were significantly associated with OS (p-value = 0.04). Median OS from 1st auto infusion was 43 months for the exhausted T-Cell infiltrate group followed by 83 months for the no T-Cell infiltrate group. The non exhausted T-cell group had the highest OS, median not reached; OS by 7-years was 75%. Cytogenetic risk at diagnosis was significantly associated with OS (p-value = 0.03). In a multivariable model, CD3/PD1 staining continued to trend toward an association with OS (p-value = 0.08) and cytogenetic risk remained significant (p-value = 0.05). Conclusions: The presence of T-cells with PD-1 expression was not associated with higher risk disease at MM diagnosis based on cytogenetics and ISS stage. The presence of PD-1 expressing CD3+ T cells trends toward an association with poorer overall survival in newly diagnosed MM, especially compared to non exhausted T-cell infiltrate, suggesting the possibility that T cell exhaustion represents a novel high risk disease characteristic. Further investigation is necessary to assess if the presence of CD3+PD-1+ T cells is an independent prognostic feature in newly diagnosed MM. Figure 1. Overall survival by CD3/PD1 Staining in 64 newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Figure 1. Overall survival by CD3/PD1 Staining in 64 newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Disclosures Giralt: JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; SANOFI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Landgren:International Myeloma Foundation: Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Medscape: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Medscape: Consultancy; BMJ Publishing: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; BMJ Publishing: Honoraria; Onyx: Research Funding. Hassoun:Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lesokhin:Genentech: Research Funding; Aduro: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Efranat: Consultancy.

Abstract: Introduction Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic precursor stage to active multiple myeloma (MM), comprised by a heterogenous group of patients with varying rates of progression. While the overall yearly progression rate is 10% the first 5 years, some patients progress at a considerably higher rate. A study from the Mayo Clinic showed that in a subset of 21 patients defined by ≥60% monoclonal bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC), 95% progressed within 2 years. It was subsequently concluded by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) that patients with biomarkers predictive of a 2-year progression rate at 80%, and a median time to progression at 12 months were at ultra-high risk of progression and should be considered to have MM requiring treatment despite being asymptomatic. In 2014, ultra-high risk biomarkers were incorporated in the definition of MM, including BMPC ≥60%, free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥100 and ≥2 focal lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). While the updated myeloma definition changed the diagnosis of some patients with ultra-high risk SMM to MM, there remain patients classified as SMM progressing at a very high rate. In the present study, we aimed at further identifying ultra-high risk biomarkers predictive of a high rate of progression to active MM. Methods Patients with SMM presenting to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between the years 2000 and 2017 were identified and included in the study. Diagnosis of SMM and progression to MM requiring therapy was defined according to the IMWG criteria at the time of diagnosis. Baseline patient and disease characteristics were collected at date of diagnosis with SMM, including pathology reports, laboratory results and imaging data. Time to progression (TTP) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test for comparisons. Optimal cut-off values for continuous variables were assessed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Patients who had not progressed by the end of study or were lost to follow up were censored at the date of last visit. Univariate Cox regression was used to estimate risk factors for TTP with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Significant univariate risk factors were selected for multivariate Cox regression. Results A total of 444 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up time was 78 months. During the study period, 215 (48%) patients progressed to active MM, with a median TTP of 72 months. Cut-off points for BMPC, M-spike, and FLC ratio were determined with ROC curves to be 20%, 2 g/dL, and 18, respectively, for predicting high risk of progression. The following factors were associated with significantly increased risk of progression to active MM: BMPC 〉 20%, M-spike 〉 2g/dL, FLC ratio 〉 18, immunoparesis with depression of 1 and 2 uninvolved immunoglobulins respectively, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, elevated beta-2-microglobulin, and low albumin (Table 1). In the multivariate model, BMPC 〉 20% (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.9), M-spike 〉 2g/dL (HR 3.2, CI 1.9-5.5), FLC ratio 〉 18 (HR 1.8, CI 1.1-3.0), albumin 〈 3.5 g/dL (HR 3.9, CI 1.5-10.0), and immunoparesis with 2 uninvolved immunoglobulins (HR 2.3, CI 1.2-4.3), predicted a decreased TTP (Table 1). A total of 12 patients had 4 or 5 of the risk factors from the multivariate model, 8 of these did not meet the 2014 IMWG criteria for MM. These patients had a significantly shorter TTP than patients with less than 4 risk factors (median TTP 11 vs 74 months, p 〈 0.0001, Figure 1). At 16 months, 82% of these patients had progressed, and within 2 years, 91% of the patients progressed. Only one patient remained progression free after 2 years, progressing at 31 months. Of patients with less than 4 risk factors, 19% progressed within the first 2 years. Conclusion In addition to baseline BMPC 〉 20%, M-spike 〉 2g/dL, FLC-ratio 〉 18, we found that albumin 〈 3.5g/dL and immunoparesis of both uninvolved immunoglobulins at the time of diagnosis with SMM were highly predictive of a decreased TTP to MM requiring therapy. These biomarkers are readily available and routinely assessed in clinic. Patients with 4 or 5 of these risk factors represent a new ultra-high risk group that progress to active disease within 2 years, further expanding on the definition of ultra-high risk SMM. In accordance with the rationale on ultra-high risk biomarkers as criteria established by the IMWG in 2014, such patients should be considered to have MM requiring therapy. Disclosures Korde: Amgen: Research Funding. Mailankody:Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Lesokhin:Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix, inc.: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Hassoun:Oncopeptides AB: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding. Shah:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Mezzi:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Khurana:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Braunlin:Amgen: Employment. Werther:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Landgren:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract: Background: For multiple myeloma (MM) patients, depth of response after induction therapy and after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) has been shown to be important for progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in some studies. Furthermore, the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) on outcomes and treatment decisions has been widely discussed. We aimed to evaluate outcomes by depth of response after induction and AHCT. Methods: MM patients who received their first AHCT within 1 year of starting induction were identified from the institutional registry. MRD was assessed by non-10 color flow cytometry. Response was defined by the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Summary statistics were used to describe the population. Kaplan-Meier methodology estimated PFS and OS by response status pre-AHCT and at post-AHCT restaging. Results: Between 2012 - 2014, 182 MM patients met our inclusion criteria, with 83% alive at last follow-up. The median age at AHCT was 60 years (range 29-76) with 57% male. By the International Staging System (ISS), 50% were stage I, 26% stage II, and 24% stage III. High risk cytogenetics were detected in 24%. Isotype was IgG in 55%, IgA 21%, Kappa Free Light Chain (KFLC) 11%, and lambda FLC (LFCL) 9%. First induction therapy included bortezomib in 90% and lenalidomide in 79%. Median time to AHCT was 5.5 months (range 2.8-11.7). The median follow-up from AHCT was 3.7 years (range 0.22 - 4.6 years), with 84% of patients receiving lenalidomide maintenance, and 9% receiving an additional autologous or allogenic transplant at relapse. Response prior to the initial AHCT was a complete remission (CR) in 13.7% (MRD negative 6.6%, positive 4.4%, unknown 2.7%), very good partial remission (VGPR) 38%, partial remission (PR) 40%, stable disease (SD) 5%, and progressive disease (PD) 4%. At post-AHCT restaging, responses had improved to 42% CR (MRD negative 23%, positive 6%, unknown 13%), 35% VGPR, 19% PR, 2% SD, and 3% PD. Median PFS from AHCT for the entire cohort was 3.2 years (95% CI 2.4 - 4 years) with 1-year and 3-year PFS 85% and 52%, respectively. Median OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI 4.4 years - NR) with 1-year and 3-year OS 97% and 88%, respectively (Figure 1). PFS from AHCT was significantly longer in patients with an MRD negative CR prior to AHCT with median PFS not reached (95% CI 1.7 - NR) compared to MRD positive/unknown CR, VGPR, and ≤ PR [3.64 years (95% CI 1.09-3.64), 3.46 years (95% CI 2.4 - NR), and 2.44 years (1.68-3.56 years), respectively, p=0.048] (Figure 2A). From post-AHCT restaging, PFS was also significantly longer in patients with an MRD negative CR prior to AHCT with median PFS not reached compared to MRD positive/unknown CR, VGPR, and ≤ PR [3.49 years (95% CI 0.86-3.49), 3.56 years (95% CI 2.5 - NR), and 2.4 years (1.6-3.33 years), respectively, p=0.026] (Figure 2B). However, there was no difference in PFS based on the post-AHCT restaging with median PFS in MRD negative CR, MRD positive/unknown CR, VGPR, and ≤ PR of 3.49 years (95% CI 2-NR), not reached (95% CI 1.4-NR), 2.96 years (95% CI 1.7-NR), and 2.86 years (95% CI 1.7 - NR) (p=0.78, Figure 2C), respectively. OS from AHCT was not significantly different by pre-AHCT response, and the median was not reached in any group (p=0.33, Figure 3A). Finally, the median OS from post-AHCT restaging by pre-AHCT response or by post-AHCT response was also not reached in any group (p=0.32 and 0.31, respectively; Figure 3B & C). Conclusion: For MM patients, AHCT deepened responses and increased the CR rate. We were unable to show a significant difference in outcomes at post AHCT restaging, which may be due to the effect of maintenance therapy, the small numbers of MRD negative patients, or the sensitivity of the MRD assay available during this time period, though potentially show that MRD positive patients do as well as MRD negative patients after AHCT. We plan to add additional patients treated in the more recent years who were assessed by more sensitive methods. Disclosures Shah: Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Korde:Amgen: Research Funding. Lesokhin:Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix, inc.: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Janssen: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding. Landgren:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract: Background Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is a strong predictor for outcome in multiple myeloma. Next generation sequencing (NGS) for immunoglobulin heavy chain and kappa light chain VDJ rearrangements has become increasingly more common for MRD assessment. One of the known challenges with NGS for VDJ rearrangements is the vast diversity of sequences that are present, resulting in a need for a multiplex approach as common primers cannot be used to amplify all rearrangements. Also, somatic hypermutation may affect the annealing of primers and decrease the capture rate. The NGS VDJ assay developed by Adaptive Biotechnologies targets all theoretical combinations of VDJ sequences and has been used in several recent large randomized trials in multiple myeloma. The reported ~80% capture rate of the first version of the Sequenta/Adaptive 1.3 assay limited the ability to track MRD status post therapy. The assay has recently been updated and validated to increase resilience to somatic hypermutation. As there is no published reference data using this assay, we were motivated to assess VDJ capture in the clinical setting. Methods In total, 147 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM, n=101) or relapse/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM, n=46) seen at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were identified and included in the study. At bone marrow collection, patient samples were sorted for mononuclear cells and a subset of samples were sorted for CD138+ plasma cells. Stored bone marrow samples from these patients underwent DNA extraction and were sequenced with the Adaptive NGS VDJ assay. The same samples were also sequenced for genomic events using our internal NGS panel myTYPE. myTYPE is a custom capture panel targeting the most frequent multiple myeloma associated-somatic mutations, copy number alterations, and IGH translocations. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of detection success in relation to clinical parameters such as age, gender, percent bone marrow plasma cells, as well as immunoglobulin heavy and light chain types, and myTYPE positivity. Results There overall capture rate for a unique VDJ sequence was 80%, 75% in NDMM samples and 89% in RRMM samples, respectively. The VDJ capture rate in samples that were myTYPE positive, e.g. samples with at least one genomic aberration detected by myTYPE, was 94%. In univariate analysis, the ORs of detecting a clonal VDJ sequence was 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.5) and 1.5 (1.2-1.9) for every 10% increase in plasma cells on bone marrow aspirate and biopsy, respectively. For every 1g/dL increase in M-spike, the OR of VDJ capture was 1.6 (1.2-2.2). Samples with at least one genomic aberration detected by myTYPE had a significantly higher detection rate of VDJ sequence, the OR of VDJ capture in myTYPE positive samples was 8.8 (3.2-31.3). Conversely, age, gender, type of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgG or IgA), or light chain type (kappa or lambda) had no significant effect on the VDJ detection rate (Table). In multivariate analysis, myTYPE positivity was found to be an independent predictor of VDJ capture, with an OR of 4.9 (1.6-18.4, p=0.009) for myTYPE positive samples. The ORs were 1.4 (1.1-2.2, p=0.052) for an increase in 10% plasma cells on bone marrow aspirate and 1.5 (0.97-2.3, p=0.083) every 1g/dL increase in M-spike. Conclusion The VDJ capture rate using the updated Adaptive NGS VDJ assay was 94% in multiple myeloma samples of high quality as indicated by myTYPE positivity. The capture success rate was higher in samples with a greater disease burden. As expected, the assay was less sensitive in samples with insufficient DNA content. Our results are supportive of the use of this NGS VDJ in multiple myeloma, but also illustrate the importance of optimal sample ascertainment and processing. Disclosures Jacob: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Equity Ownership. Korde:Amgen: Research Funding. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Lesokhin:Serametrix, inc.: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Hassoun:Oncopeptides AB: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding. Landgren:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION. Bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) is considered a standard of care combination therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Prior studies show that ~25% of patients treated with 8 cycles of VRd achieve minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Recently, 42% stringent complete response (sCR) rates were reported with the use of VRd combined with the CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody daratumumab (VRd-D). Prior studies using 8 cycles of bi-weekly carfilzomib 36 mg/m2 with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (bKRd) combination therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma show ~40% MRD negativity rates. We were motivated to develop a phase 2 study (total N=82) using weekly dosing of carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (wKRd) in combination with daratumumab (wKRd-D). Our study also included a parallel cohort of bi-weekly dosing of carfilzomib 36 mg/m2 with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (bKRd) in combination with daratumumab (bKRd-D). Primary end-point of our study was to rule out 60% and to target up to 80% MRD negativity rate. METHODS. This is a two-arm, Phase II clinical trial based on Simon's optimal two-stage design. The once-a-week carfilzomib (wKRd) (N=41) has the following treatment schedule: 8 cycles of treatment; 28-day cycles with carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15; lenalidomide 25 mg days 1-21; dexamethasone 40 mg weekly cycles 1-4, 20 mg after cycle 4; and daratumumab 16 mg/kg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 cycles 1-2, days 1 and 15 cycles 3-6, and day 1 cycles 7-8. The bi-weekly carfilzomib (bKRd) (N=41): 8 cycles of treatment; 28-day cycles with carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2 days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16; lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab are given at the same doses/schedules as the weekly cohort. For fit patients, stem cell collection is recommended after 4 to 6 cycles of therapy; DKRd therapy is resumed after collection to a total of 8 cycles DKRd. Treatment response is being assessed with parallel bone marrow-based MRD assays (10-color single tube flowcytometry and invivoscribe IGHV sequencing); per IMWG guidelines both MRD assays allow detection of 1 myeloma cell in 100,000 bone marrow cells (10^-5). Baseline bone marrow samples are evaluated with targeted DNA sequencing for FISH-Seq and somatic mutational characteristics (myTYPE). RESULTS. The first stage of the weekly cohort (wKRd-D) is fully enrolled (N=28) and the second stage of the cohort (N=13) is anticipated to complete enrollment shortly (total N=41). Currently, 29 patients meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled (14 males, 15 females) between October 2018 and August 2019. Baseline characteristics include; median age 59 years (range 36-70 years); 12 (41%) patients had high-risk FISH/SNP signature defined as one or more of the following: 1q+, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and 17p-. At the submission of this abstract, 28 patients have completed one or more cycles wKRd-D; among these, 10 patients have completed therapy. The median number of cycles delivered is currently 6 (range 1-8). Seven of the 10 patients who have completed study treatment are MRD negative. So far, additional 8 patients have become MRD negative while on therapy. Thus, among patients treated on the weekly cohort (wKRd-D) and who were evaluable for the MRD primary end-point at this analysis, we found 15/18 (83%) to be MRD negative. We further show no added major clinical toxicities with wKRd-D compared to our institution standard of care bKRd. The bi-weekly carfilzomib cohort (bKRd-D) shows similar results to the weekly cohort (wKRd-D). With a comparable efficacy and safety profile coupled with a substantial reduction of the number of infusions (total of 51 vs 27 infusions with bKRd-D vs wKRd-D, respectively), we conclude that the weekly dosing (wKRd-D) may offer an attractive treatment modality for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. CONCLUSIONS. Among patients evaluable for the MRD primary end-point, in the absence of an autologous bone marrow transplant, we show an unprecedented 15/18 (83%) MRD negativity rate among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated on the weekly cohort (wKRd-D) using carfilzomib 56 mg/m2 dosing. Our promising results have prompted the development of a large randomized multi-center study ("ADVANCE") evaluating wKRd-D in relation to established standard of care, which is anticipated to start enrollment in Q3/Q4 of 2019. Disclosures Landgren: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lesokhin:GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Hassoun:Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Smith:Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Shah:Physicians' Education Resource: Honoraria. Landau:Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scordo:Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy; McKinsey & Company: Consultancy. Arcila:Invivoscribe, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ho:Invivoscribe, Inc.: Honoraria. Roshal:Auron Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Provision of services; Physicians' Education Resource: Other: Provision of services; Celgene: Other: Provision of Services. Dogan:Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Dara-KRd is not an FDA approved combination therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.