Abstract: Background. Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection prior to high dose chemotherapy for autologous transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care, and an attractive alternative to the use of bone marrow cells, for transplantation in Multiple Myeloma (MM). The optimal methodology for mobilizing PBSC has yet to be defined, both G-CSF and GM-CSF can be used; although, the stimulatory effect may be more pronounced when given after high dose cyclophosphamide (usually administered at a dose of 1.5 to 6g/m2 IV for one to two days) and use of Plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist (Mozobil®). The latter 2 options are preferred, overall, in France. Indeed, it was shown that the most recent combined bortezomib and IMids-based induction regimens used prior to ASCT in MM upfront yielded poorly or required multiple days of collection with steady state method. Because of the intense competition for hospital resources and the staff required to evaluate and manage patients preparing for stem cell mobilization and transplantation, it is reasonable to attempt to quantify the total impact of stem cell mobilization on available staff resources and cost to the hospital, especially when newer therapies, i.e. plerixafor is available and may be more suitable for some of these patients. We aimed at better evaluate the burden of stem cell mobilization on the hospital of the 2 techniques of mobilization, either high dose endoxan (n=57) versus plerixafor (n=55); this study will not, however, evaluate the suitability or advisability of one therapy versus another. Method and Results . This is a retrospective observational cohort database analysis of 112 consecutive patients with MM treated upfront with ASCT between 2009 and 2013 and that had been mobilized with either high dose endoxan or plerixafor from 15 IFM centers. We planned to determine the cost versus benefit of either technique taking in consideration a number of key markers that influence the mobilization process. A cost-consequences analysis of the different regimens of mobilization will be performed. Cost will be quantified using "microcosting" approach. Only direct medical costs are included in this economic analysis. Hospital resources will be calculated using two different approaches: per diem hospitalization costs (excluding direct medical costs) versus French public diagnosis-related group (DRG). The point of view of the French Public Health System is adopted for this study. Monetary values for 2012 euros prices will be used for all components. Median (range) age was 59.5 (24-72), sex ratio was 1.5, ISS 3 was 26% in either group, all patients were collected to allow the number of graft requested by the hematologist of reference. The median CD34 collected was 8.9 (4-30) for HD cyclophosphamide and 5.8 (2-15) for plerixafor. All data will be updated at ASH 2016 including cost comparison. Conclusion. Because of the intense competition for hospital resources and the staff required to evaluate and manage patients preparing for stem cell mobilization and transplantation, it is reasonable to attempt to quantify the total impact of stem cell mobilization on available staff resources and cost to the hospital, especially when newer therapies, i.e. plerixafor is available and may be more suitable for some of these patients. Disclosures Macro: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol: Consultancy; Celgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hulin:celgene: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria. Attal:sanofi: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. Leleu:TEVA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Abstract: Background: Approximately 20–40% of pts with NDMM present with RI, which is associated with a negative impact on survival (Rajkumar, 2005). In the pivotal phase 3 FIRST trial (median follow-up 37 months [mos]), continuous Rd improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs. melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT) in elderly NDMM pts by 28% (25.5 vs. 20.7 mos; HR = 0.72; P 〈 0.01) (Facon, Blood 2013). Although 121 pts receiving continuous Rd are still on Tx, the interim overall survival (OS) analysis showed a 22% reduction in the risk of death in favor of continuous Rd vs. MPT (HR = 0.78; P = 0.02). The present analysis was conducted to determine the impact of RI on PFS, OS, and time to 2nd antimyeloma Tx (AMT) as clinical study outcomes. Methods: Pts were randomized to 3 Tx arms: continuous Rd until progression (n = 535); Rd for 18 cycles (72 weeks) (Rd18; n = 541); or MPT for 12 cycles (72 weeks) (n = 547). Enrolled NDMM pts were categorized according to their renal function: 24% had normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 80 mL/min), 44% presented with mild RI (≥ 50 and 〈 80 mL/min), 23% had moderate RI (≥ 30 and 〈 50 mL/min), and 9% had severe RI ( 〈 30 mL/min). Pts requiring dialysis were excluded. Lenalidomide starting dose was 25 mg QD for pts with normal renal function or mild RI, 10 mg QD for moderate RI, and 15 mg QOD for severe RI. Melphalan dose was reduced by 50% in pts with moderate or severe RI. The primary endpoint was PFS (continuous Rd vs. MPT); secondary endpoints were OS, overall response rate, time to response, duration of response, time to Tx failure, time to 2nd AMT, health-related quality of life, safety, and improvement in renal function from baseline. Improvement in RI was defined as shifts from baseline to most extreme post-baseline value of the calculated CrCl as a measure of renal function during the active Tx (N = 1484). Results: A PFS benefit favored continuous Rd vs. MPT irrespective of the degree of renal function (Table 1): there was a benefit in pts with normal renal function (HR = 0.72 (0.51–1.02); P = 0.06), and better in pts with mild RI (HR = 0.79 (0.62–1.00); P = 0.05) and moderate RI (HR = 0.62 (0.45–0.85); P 〈 0.01). A PFS benefit was also seen with continuous Rd vs. Rd18 (a secondary comparison) in pts with mild RI and moderate RI (P 〈 0.01 for both). An interim OS benefit with continuous Rd vs. MPT was observed in most renal subgroups. Similar results were observed between Rd18 and MPT in terms of PFS or interim OS in any of the renal subgroups. Continuous Rd, compared with Rd18 or MPT, extended time to 2nd AMT in most renal groups except severe RI (CrCl 〈 30mL/min) (Table 2). Improvement in RI was observed more frequently in pts treated with continuous Rd than those with Rd18 or MPT: improvement of mild RI, 48%, 43%, and 48%, respectively; of moderate RI, 67% 61%, and 62%; and of severe RI, 64%, 59%, and 56%. Overall, 〈 5% of pts in any Tx group experienced a worsening in renal function status during Tx (continuous Rd 2.2%; Rd18 2.8%; MPT 2.7%). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) for these Txs were anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, deep-vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (Table 3). Tx discontinuation due to AEs increased in pts with moderate and severe RI, regardless of the type of Tx (Table 3). Conclusions: PFS, OS (at interim analysis), and time to 2nd AMT outcomes generally improved continuous Rd vs. Rd18 or MPT in transplant-ineligible NDMM pts with normal renal function, and in those with mild or moderate RI. The small number of pts in the severe RI group precluded a meaningful conclusion. Continuous Rd was generally well tolerated and renal function improved in the majority of pts during Tx with continuous Rd vs. Rd18 or MPT. Disclosures Dimopoulos: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Roussel:Celgene: Consultancy, Lecture fees Other, Research Funding. van der Jagt:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Jaccard:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tosikyan:Celgene: Consultancy. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bensinger:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schots:Celgene: Research Funding. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Marek:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ervin-Haynes:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract: Background Induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma less than 66 years old. The quality of response to the induction treatment is an important prognostic factor and is predictive of progression free survival (PFS) following ASCT. The triplet combinations bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) and bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) have demonstrated high response rates in prospective phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials, they are 2 of the most commonly used induction regimens prior to ASCT, and are both recommended in the International guidelines. To date, no comparative data from prospective randomized trials of the safety and efficacy of VTD vs VCD are available. This provided the rationale for the phase 3 investigation of VTD vs VCD prior to ASCT in patients with de novo MM in this randomized multicenter study (NCT01564537). Methods Patients with de novo symptomatic MM less than 66 years old were prospectively randomized to receive either 4 cycles of VTD (arm A) or 4 cycles of VCD (arm B) followed by ASCT. The VTD regimen consisted of four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²/d, subcutaneously (SC) D1, 4, 8 and 11, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, PO D1 to 4, D9 to 12 and Thalidomide 100 mg/d, PO D1 to D21. The VCD regimen consisted of four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²/d, SC D1, 4, 8 and 11, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, PO D1 to 4, D9 to 12 and Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m²/d, PO D1, 8, 15. Patients were stratified according to ISS (1-2 versus 3) and cytogenetics (high-risk defined by 17p deletion and t(4;14) versus other).The primary endpoint was very good partial response (VGPR) rate following 4 cycles. Response was assessed in a central lab according to the IMWG criteria. Assuming a VGPR rate of 60% in the VTD arm versus 45% in the VCD arm (15% difference), the possibility to detect a statistically significant difference required the enrolment of 340 patients overall (170 per arm). Adverse events were graded using the NCI CTCAE catalogue, version 4.0. Results From 11/2013 to 02/2015, 358 patients were enrolled into the study. 18 were screening failures, and 170 were randomized each to arm A (VTD) and arm B (VCD). The median age was 60 years (range, 26-65), 62% of the patients were male, and overall, the patient characteristics were well-balanced across the 2 arms of the study. The median number of induction cycles administered in both arms was 4 (1-4). On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response rate ( 〉 partial response [PR]) was 92.3% in arm A, including a 10.7% complete response (CR) rate and a VGPR rate of 66.7%, while in arm B the overall response rate was 84%, with a 9.5% CR and a 56.2% VGPR rate. VGPR and PR rates were significantly higher in the VTD arm with p-values of 0.04 and 0.02, respectively. Seven patients died during induction therapy (2%), 3 in arm A from infections (2) and pulmonary embolism (1), and 4 in arm B from progression to extramedullary myeloma (2) and infections (2). Grades 3 / 4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 4% and 2.2% in Arm A and B, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 11.9% vs 22.5% in Arm A and B, respectively. Conclusion This trial is the first prospective randomized comparison of 4 cycles of VTD versus 4 cycles of VCD administered as induction therapy prior to ASCT. VTD was shown to be significantly superior to VCD in terms of VGPR and PR rates. Neuropathy rates low in both arms, while neutropenia was more frequent with VCD. Disclosures Moreau: Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. MACRO:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garderet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Stoppa:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Facon:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Attal:jansen: Honoraria; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Background: The role of maintenance lenalidomide in myeloma, following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or not, is well established. However, 29% of patients discontinue the treatment with a median duration of less than 2 years with an increased rate of secondary primary malignancies (SPM). Pomalidomide could provide alternative maintenance therapy. Methods: This was a single arm phase II study of pomalidomide/dex (PD) maintenance therapy for MM patients (pts) in first relapse after treatment in the IFM 2009 trial. At first relapse, 100 pts received pomalidomide/cyclophosphamide/dex (PCD) for 4 cycles, after which half underwent ASCT (if no first line transplant) followed by 2 cycles of PCD consolidation (Arm A), or 5 cycles of PCD (if previously transplanted) (Arm B). All pts then received maintenance therapy consisting of 28-day cycles of pomalidomide 4 mg daily on days 1-21 and dex 20 mg once a week until progression (Blood 2018). The primary objective was to establish the safety and efficacy of PD as maintenance therapy. Results: A total of 75 pts were enrolled in the maintenance phase from January 2015 to November 2017 (Table 1) and the database was locked on 07/07/2021. The median age was 60 (range 39-70); 67% (50/75) were male. 53 pts had ISS stage I, 10 stage II and 3 stage III disease (9 missing). Infectious prophylaxis was antiviral in 94%, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim in 76%, penicillin in 69% and fluoroquinolone in 38%. A granulocyte colony stimulating factor was administered in 15 (20%) pts and immunoglobulins in 13 (17%). One quarter had thromboprophylaxis. The median follow-up was 73 months (95% CI: 68-75). Among the 75 pts, 63 (84%) left the study, 34 (54%) due to progressive disease, 19 (30%) due to AE/SAE, 7 (11%) on investigator (PI) discretion and 3 (5%) after consent withdrawal. 12 (16%) remained on therapy in July 2021.The median duration of maintenance was 23.7 months (IQR: 14.5-44). Pts received a median of 26 cycles (range 1-80) and 17 (23%) had 50 or more cycles. The reasons for pomalidomide discontinuation were progression or death in 54%, AE/SAE in 30%, PI decisions in 11% and patient decisions in 5%. 56 (75%) pts required a reduction in the dose of pomalidomide due to AE/SAE in 50%, omission in 19%, resumption of treatment in 11%, PI decisions in 16% and patient decisions in 2.7%. The reasons for dex discontinuation were progression or death in 30%, AE/SAE in 43%, PI decisions in 22% and patient decisions in 3%. 57 (76%) pts required a reduction in the dose of dex due to AE/SAE in 54%, omission in 3.4%, resumption of treatment in 0.3%, PI decisions in 38.7% and patient decisions in 3.1%. 31 SAE were reported in 22 pts: 13 (42%) infections, 5 tumors, 1 case of thrombosis, 1 diabetic ketoacidosis and 12 others. Grade 3/4 hematologic AE included neutropenia (51%), lymphopenia (35%), anemia and thrombocytopenia (0%). G3/4 drug-related non-hematologic AE ( & gt;5%) comprised 13% infections (5% pneumonia). G1/2 AE included 69% infections (49% bronchitis), 49.3% gastrointestinal disorders (20% diarrhea, 20% constipation), 48% fatigue, 31% skin disorders, 25% muscle spasms, 24% insomnia and 14.7% eye disorders (6.7% cataracts, 4% dry eyes). Concerning peripheral neuropathy, one patient had G3/4 and 45% G1/2. Eight pts developed SPM: 4 basocellular carcinoma, 1 epidermoid carcinoma, 1 melanoma, 1 colon carcinoma and 1 non small cell bronchial carcinoma. We observed an improvement in the response from the initiation of treatment: PR: 32.4 to 17.4%, VGPR: 56.8 to 49.3%, CR: 9.5 to 28%, sCR: 0 to 5.3% (at initiation to best response, respectively). A total of 33.4% of pts improved their response. The median PFS was 33.2 months (95% CI: 25.6-53.3). 41 pts died and the median OS was not reached (95% CI: 70.7-NR). All deaths were related to myeloma progression except 2 due to pulmonary infection, 1 lung carcinoma and 1 colorectal cancer. Conclusions: In the first relapse PCD trial, 75% initiated maintenance therapy. Long term administration of pomalidomide/dexamethasone as maintenance therapy is feasible. Thirty percent stopped pomalidomide because of SAE/AE, mostly related to hematologic AE, but this could be managed with dose reductions. There was generally G1/2 neuropathy, rare SPM and no other unexpected toxicity. One third of the pts improved their depth of response. The combination is safe, feasible and well tolerated and experience to date supports its further exploration with monoclonal antibodies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Garderet: Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Roussel: Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy. Leleu: Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Carsgen Therapeutics Ltd: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support. Karlin: Takeda: Honoraria, Other: member of advisory board; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: travel support and advisory board ; Sanofi: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; oncopeptide: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria, Other: member of advisory board; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: member of advisory board, travel support; Celgene-BMS: Honoraria, Other: member of advisory board. Perrot: Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau: Abbvie: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Celgene BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Macro: abbvie: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene bms: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria. Jourdan: Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; bms/celgene: Consultancy. Jaccard: Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria. Mohty: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria. Hulin: Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; abbvie: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: pomalidomide as maintenance treatment

Abstract: 8004 Background: Melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib (MPV) is a standard of care upfront for newly diagnosed elderly myeloma (eNDMM). Despite significant improvements on MPV’s safety profile, toxicity issues remain. Carfilzomib (K) is a novel generation proteasome inhibitor with a different safety profile from Bortezomib. Carmysap phase I/II study (twice a week Carfilzomib+MP) demonstrated K at 36mg/m² safe and active in eNDMM. We thought to study the K weekly-MP combination in eNDMM. Methods: IFM2012-03 is a multicenter phase I/II study in eNDMM (65 and older) aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of K weekly. 4 cohorts of 6 patients each were recruited at K 36, 45, 56 and 70 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22 IV of 35-days cycles, with oral Melphalan and Prednisone from days 1 to 4 at usual doses. Patients received a 9-cycles induction followed by a K monotherapy maintenance at 36 mg/m 2 IV every 2 weeks for 1 year. 3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) defined MTD at the lower N-1 dose. Results: 24 patients were included at K 36, 45, 56 and 70 mg/m². One DLT occurred at 36 mg/m² (grade 4 lymphopenia), one at 45 mg/m² (tumor lysis syndrome with grade 4 renal insufficiency), two at 56 mg/m² (grade 3 cardiac insufficiency and grade 3 febrile neutropenia) and two at 70 mg/m² (grade 3 nausea/vomiting and grade 3 hepatic cytolysis). One patient died from cardiac dysfunction considered related to K at 56 mg/m². 3 patients stopped therapy and 3 others required dose reduction of K. Following DSMB’s request a second 6-patients cohort was recruited at 70 mg/m², with increased attention around hyperhydration and monitoring HTA. We observed no DLT and no grade 3/4 adverse event in this cohort. Median age was 75 years, 56% patients were R-ISS 2 or 3. For the whole cohort (N=30), the overall response rate was 87% including 67% very good partial responses and 44% complete responses. Conclusions: The MTD of weekly K in the KMP combination is 70 mg/m² upfront for eNDMM, but it seems reasonable to recommend 56mg/m² after 75 years-old for safety reasons. KMP offers high response rates and possibly greater CR rate. However, since the CLARION study (VMP vs KMP) will not allow KMP’s approval in eNDMM in Europe, IFM decided to stop IFM2012-03 after phase I without performing phase II. Clinical trial information: NCT02302495.

Abstract: Background. New standards with increasing efficacy that are also characterized with improving the quality of life are needed for elderly myeloma patients. Although MPT and MPV regimens are remarkable in terms of efficacy, quality of life while on treatment with these 2 regimens remain an issue. The Carmysap twice weekly carfilzomib-based phase 2 study has demonstrated that Carfilzomib at the MTD of 36mg/m² might challenge bortezomib in the VMP standard. However, it has become routine practice to use bortezomib on a weekly schedule, with maintained efficacy and an improved safety profile. We sought to demonstrate that Carfilzomib Weekly plus Melphalan and Prednisone will prove strongly efficacious with acceptable safety profile and quality of life to newly diagnosed elderly multiple myeloma (eNDMM). Methods . IFM2012-03 (also called carmysap weekly) is a phase 1/2 multicenter open label single arm study to determine MTD during the phase 1 part and VGPR+CR rate during the phase 2 part of the study. The inclusion/exclusion criteria of interest were eNDMM (65 and older), with symptomatic and measurable disease, with absolute neutrophils ≥1 G/L, untransfused platelet count ≥75 G/L, hemoglobine ≥8.5 g/dL and clairance creatinine ≥ 30ml/min. We report herein the phase 1 part of the study which last cohort was completed at ASH abstract deadline. For the phase 1 part of the study, each cohort was 6 patients based, and started at 36mg/m² of carfilzomib on days 1, 8, 15, 22 using IV, 30 minutes infusion, route followed by a 13-day rest period per 35-days cycles, melphalan given at 0.25mg/kg/j and oral prednisone 60mg/m², both on days 1 to 4. The subsequent cohorts' doses for carfilzomib were 45, then 56 and finally 70mg/m². 9 cycles were planned as induction followed by a maintenance phase of weekly carfilzomib monotherapy given at 36mg/m² weekly for one year. The MTD was determined when ˃2 DLTs were observed. DLTs were considered during cycle 1 if any hematologic toxicity of grade 4 intensity or preventing administration of 2 or more of the 4 carfilzomib doses of the first treatment cycle, grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia, grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicities, any other grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity considered related to CMP by the principal investigator, grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy persisting for more than 3 weeks after discontinuation of study drugs. Results. 26 NDMM patients recruited, 24 treated in the study, 6 per cohort at 36 mg/m² carfilzomib +MP, then 45 then 56, and finally at 70mg/m² which cohort cycle 1 is up and running. The median age was 74 with 10 patients older than 75 and sex ratio M/F 65. There was a DLT at 36 mg/m² carfilzomib (grade 4 lymphopenia), one at 45 (lysis syndrome complicated with grade 4 renal insufficiency, two at 56 (cardiac insufficiency grade 3 and febrile neutropenia grade 3). At ASH deadline, all patients from cohort 36 of carfilzomib have completed induction and maintenance up to cycle 6, 5/6 of cohort 45 have completed induction and started the maintenance phase, 5/6 of cohort 56 have completed cycle 6 of induction and pursue within the induction phase, and finally all patients from cohort 70 of carfilzomib are undergoing cycle 1. There are 22 SAE reported for a total of 171 cycles administered of carfilzomib +MP. So far, 3 patients (out of 24) have stopped treatment, including the 2 patients with DLTs, lysis syndrome and cardiac failure, and one patient that presented with pulmonary hypertension later in the disease course on cycle 5 of the 56mg/m² carfilzomib +MP cohort. And, an extra 3 patients have had Carfilzomib dose reduction, 2 patients at 36 from 45 and one at 45 from 56, for neutropenia grade 4, thrombocytopenia grade 4, and Dyspnea grade 3, respectively. Conclusion. The MTD of weekly carfilzomib in the combination to Melphalan and Prednisone could be determined at 70mg/m² in elderly NDMM, demonstrating the good safety profile of carfilzomib in this regimen and fragile population. The complete dataset of the entire study will be updated at ASH with response rate, survival and safety profile. Disclosures Leleu: Chugai: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; TEVA: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Karlin:Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria. Fitoussi:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Background. Melphalan plus prednisone and bortezomib combination is the most frequent standard of care used upfront for newly diagnosed elderly myeloma (eNDMM). Despite significant improvements with bortezomib sub-cutaneous administration and weekly schedule, safety profile issues remain with MPV, that only can be resolved with lowering the doses, albeit of the potential loss of efficacy. Carfilzomib (K), a novel generation proteasome inhibitor, has different safety profile with absence of neuropathy. Carmysap, a phase I/II trial of twice weekly Carfilzomib plus MP in eNDMM, demonstrated carfilzomib MTD at 36mg/m2. The safety profile appeared otherwise good for this frail population. We hypothesized that Carfilzomib can be used on a weekly schedule allowing to increase the dose of Carfilzomib given its positive safety profile. Methods. IFM2012-03 (carmysap weekly) is a phase 1/2 multicenter symptomatic eNDMM (65 and older) study to determine MTD during the phase 1 part and VGPR+CR rate (IMWG criteria) during the phase 2 part of KMP (Carfilzomib Weekly Plus Melphalan and Prednisone) regimen. Inclusion criteria required absolute neutrophils ≥1G/L, untransfused platelet count ≥75G/L, hemoglobine ≥8.5g/dL and clairance creatinine ≥30ml/min. Induction comprised nine 5 weeks cycles. K is given 36, 45, 56 and 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22 IV route in combination to oral Melphalan 0.25mg/kg/j and oral prednisone 60mg/m2, both on days 1 to 4. Maintenance. Carfilzomib. 36 mg/m2 weekly, every two weeks IV route for 1 year. Melphalan and Prednisone is not pursued at maintenance. Analysis is done on ITT. Recruitment was 6 patients per cohort, 3 DLTs defined MTD at the lower N-1 dose. We will report at ASH the results of the phase 1 and 2. Results. 32 NDMM recruited, 30 treated in the study, 6 per cohort at K 36 mg/m², 45, 56, and 70 twice per DSMB request. The median age was 76 with 2/3rd older than 75, sex ratio M/F 1.2, R-ISS 2 and 3 in 80%.There was one DLT at K 36 (grade 4 lymphopenia), one at 45 (lysis syndrome complicated with grade 4 renal insufficiency, two at 56 (cardiac insufficiency grade 3 and febrile neutropenia grade 3) and 2 at 70 (vomiting grade 3 and liver cholestase enzyme grade 3) across the 2 70 cohorts. As a whole for the study, the ORR is 87.5%, with 45.7% at least in CR. At data cut-off, with a median follow-up at 15 months, one patient had progressed and 2 had died of whom one of cardiac dysfunction considered K related at 56. The safery profile appeared well tolerated, however, 22 SAE were reported for a total of greater than 200 cycles administered of KMP. Of particular interest, 19 SAEs were reported across the K 56 and 70 cohorts, 6 of which were cardiovascular origin. Conclusion. IFM2012-03, KMP weekly, Carfilzomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone in elderly NDMM has reached RP2D at 70mg/m2 of K. The SAE signal at the highest dose of K 70 raise concerns on using K 70 in patients older than 75-80 years old, and the DSMB may recommend for these patients to limit the RP2D at 56mg/m2 of K. Updated data for phase 1 and 2 portions will be presented at ASH for the first time. Disclosures Leleu: TEVA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Karlin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol: Consultancy; takeda: Consultancy; janssen-cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Meuleman:Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Roussel:AMGEN: Consultancy, Other: lecture fees, Research Funding; sanofi: Other: lecture fees; celgene: Consultancy, Other: lecture fees, Research Funding; janssen: Consultancy, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Other: lecture fees. Decaux:The Binding Site: Other: supply of free light chain assays , Research Funding; SIEMENS: Honoraria, Other: supply of free light chain assays , Research Funding. Hulin:celgene: Honoraria; Bristol: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria. Attal:amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; sanofi: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Facon:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy.

Abstract: The overall response rate following 4 induction cycles of VTD prior to ASCT is higher than that of 4 cycles of VCD.

Abstract: In the era of personalized treatment in multiple myeloma, high-risk patients must be accurately identified. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends using the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) to pick out high-risk patients. The main purpose of our work was to explore the heterogeneity of outcome among R-ISS stage II patients assessing the impact of International Staging System (ISS) stage, chromosomal abnormalities and lactate dehydrogenase level in this subgroup. Data were collected from 1,343 patients up to 65 years old with newly diagnosed myeloma, enrolled in three clinical trials implemented by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. All patients were eligible for intensive treatment. Patients in R-ISS stage II but ISS stage I had 1.6 times higher risk of death than patients in R-ISS stage I (adjusted hazard ratio=1.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.2; P=0.01) and patients in R-ISS stage II but with ISS stage III had a better overall survival than patients in R-ISS stage III (adjusted hazard ratio=0.7; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.9, P=0.02). However, among patients classified in R-ISS II, ISS stage and chromosomal abnormalities (del[17p] and t[4;14] ) were still relevant prognostic factors for death. Dividing R-ISS stage II into three subgroups: ISS I with standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities, ISS II or III with standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities and patients with high-risk chromosomal abnormalities, median overall survival times were, respectively, not reached, 112 months and 71 months (P 〈 0.001). In conclusion, stratification of patients in the R-ISS stage II group can be improved by taking into account chromosomal abnormalities and ISS. However, this does not improve predictive performance of survival models.