GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)  (11)
  • Lee, Joo Myung  (11)
  • 1
    In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 8, No. 8 ( 2019-04-16)
    Abstract: Quantitative flow ratio ( QFR ) has a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing functional stenoses relevance, as judged by fractional flow reserve ( FFR ). However, its diagnostic performance has not been thoroughly evaluated using instantaneous wave‐free ratio ( iFR ) or coronary flow reserve as the reference standard. This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of QFR using other reference standards beyond FFR . Methods and Results We analyzed 182 patients (253 vessels) with stable ischemic heart disease and 82 patients (105 nonculprit vessels) with acute myocardial infarction in whom coronary stenoses were assessed with FFR , iFR, and coronary flow reserve. Contrast QFR analysis of interrogated vessels was performed in blinded fashion by a core laboratory, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated with respect to the other invasive physiological indices. Mean percentage diameter stenosis, FFR , iFR , coronary flow reserve, and QFR were 53.1±19.0%, 0.80±0.13, 0.88±0.12, 3.14±1.30, and 0.81±0.14, respectively. QFR showed higher correlation ( r =0.863 with FFR versus 0.740 with iFR , P 〈 0.001), diagnostic accuracy (90.8% versus 81.3%, P 〈 0.001), and discriminant function (area under the curve=0.953 versus 0.880, P 〈 0.001) when FFR was used as a reference standard than when iFR was used as the reference standard. However, when coronary flow reserve was used as an independent reference standard, FFR , iFR , and QFR showed modest discriminant function (area under the curve=0.682, 0.765, and 0.677, respectively) and there were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy among FFR , iFR , and QFR (65.4%, 70.6%, and 64.9%; all P values in pairwise comparisons 〉 0.05, overall comparison P =0.061). Conclusions QFR has a high correlation and agreement with respect to both FFR and iFR , although it is better when FFR is used as the comparator. As a pressure‐derived index not depending on wire or adenosine, QFR might be a promising tool for improving the adoption rate of physiology‐based revascularization in clinical practice.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2047-9980
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2653953-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 10, No. 1 ( 2021-01-05)
    Abstract: This study sought to investigate the safety of 3‐month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients receiving ultrathin sirolimus‐eluting stents with biodegradable polymer (Orsiro). Methods and Results The SMART‐CHOICE (Smart Angioplasty Research Team: Comparison Between P2Y12 Antagonist Monotherapy vs Dual Anti‐ platelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Coronary Drug‐Eluting Stents) randomized trial compared 3‐month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with 12‐month DAPT in 2993 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The present analysis was a prespecified subgroup analysis for patients receiving Orsiro stents. As a post hoc analysis, comparisons between Orsiro and everolimus‐eluting stents were also done among patients receiving 3‐month DAPT. Of 972 patients receiving Orsiro stents, 481 patients were randomly assigned to 3‐month DAPT and 491 to 12‐month DAPT. At 12 months, the target vessel failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization, occurred in 8 patients (1.7%) in the 3‐month DAPT group and in 14 patients (2.9%) in the 12‐month DAPT group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.24–1.39; P =0.22). In whole population who were randomly assigned to receive 3‐month DAPT (n=1495), there was no significant difference in the target vessel failure between the Orsiro group and the everolimus‐eluting stent group (n=1014) (1.7% versus 1.8%; HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.41–2.22; P =0.92). Conclusions In patients receiving Orsiro stents, clinical outcomes at 1 year were similar between the 3‐month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and 12‐month DAPT strategies. With 3‐month DAPT, there was no significant difference in target vessel failure between Orsiro and everolimus‐eluting stents. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02079194.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2047-9980
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2653953-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 10, No. 11 ( 2017-11)
    Abstract: There are limited data on the frequency of and factors associated with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)–defined longitudinal stent deformation (LSD) in various contemporary drug-eluting stents platforms. This study sought to evaluate the predictors of LSD and its long-term clinical implication. Methods and Results— A patient-level pooled analysis was performed with 7350 lesions in 5871 patients treated with platinum-chromium–based everolimus-eluting stent (Promus Element), cobalt-chromium–based everolimus-eluting stent (Promus/Xience V), or cobalt-chromium–based zotarolimus-eluting stent (Endeavor Resolute). QCA was performed to analyze differences of stent length between immediate post-deployment and final post-procedure. Independent factors associated with LSD were identified. Clinical outcomes at 3 years were compared between those with and without QCA-based LSD. The frequency of QCA-based LSD was 1.12% (82 cases). Nine of these cases were angiographically overt. Left main or ostial lesion, bifurcation treatment with provisional side branch stenting or ballooning, additional downstream intervention of a distal lesion, intravascular ultrasound use, and adjunctive post-dilatation were independently associated with QCA-based LSD. The type of stent was not associated with QCA-based LSD. Rates of target lesion failure were nominally higher in lesions with QCA-based LSD than in those without (8.97% versus 5.88%; hazard ratio, 1.415; 95% confidence interval, 0.631–3.175; P =0.399). Conclusions— LSD is uncommon with contemporary drug-eluting stents, regardless of the type of stent platform. LSD is mainly associated with procedural factors, especially with additional downstream procedures which require the passage of devices through the stent. Careful manipulation of poststent imaging or procedural devices is required to prevent LSD. More data are needed to clarify the impact of LSD on clinical events.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1941-7640 , 1941-7632
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2450801-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 130, No. suppl_2 ( 2014-11-25)
    Abstract: Objective: The optimal treatment option for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is not established. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloon (DEB), drug-eluting stent (DES) or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) for treatment of ISR. Design: Systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis using random-effects model. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The pairwise posterior median odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI) was the effect measure. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, BioMed Central, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, conference proceedings through February 2014. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DEB, DES, or POBA for treatment of ISR. Results: This analysis included 2,059 patients from 11 RCTs. The risk of TLR was markedly lower in patients treated with DEB (OR 0.22, 95% CrI 0.10-0.42) or DES (OR 0.24, 95% CrI 0.11-0.47) than in those treated with POBA. The risk of TLR (OR 0.92, 95% CrI 0.43-1.90) was similar between DEB and DES. The risk of MI or all-cause mortality was lowest in the DEB group compared with DES or POBA, which did not meet statistical significance. The risk of MACE was significantly lower in DEB (OR 0.24, 95% CrI 0.12-0.39) or DES (OR 0.28, 95% CrI 0.14-0.53) than in POBA, but it was similar between DEB and DES group (OR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.45-1.50). The probability to be ranked as the best treatment were 59.9% (DEB), 40.1% (DES), and 0.1% (POBA) in terms of TLR, whereas, 63.0% (DEB), 35.3% (POBA), and 1.7% (DES) in terms of MI. Conclusions: DEB or DES was markedly better than POBA in preventing TLR, but not for MI or mortality in treatment of ISR. DEB resulted in less MI than DES without statistical significance.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 130, No. suppl_2 ( 2014-11-25)
    Abstract: Background: Long term outcomes are imperative to confirm safety of drug-eluting stents. There have been two randomized controlled trials comparing everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES-R). To date, long-term clinical outcomes of these stents were limited to only one report which has recently reported 4-year comparisons of these stents. Therefore, more evidences are needed regarding long-term clinical outcomes of the second generation stents. This study compared the long-term clinical outcomes of EES with ZES-R in “all-comer” cohorts up to 3-year follow-up. Methods: The EXCELLENT and RESOLUTE-Korea registries prospectively enrolled 3,056 patients treated with EES and 1,998 with ZES-R. Target lesion failure and patient-related composite events were compared in crude and propensity score matched analyses. Results: Of 5054 patients, 3830 patients (75.8%) had off label indication (2217 with EES and 1613 with ZES-R). The stent-related outcome (189 [6.2%] vs. 127 [6.4%] , p=0.812) and the patient-related outcome (420 [13.7%] vs. 250 [12.5%] , p=0.581) did not differ between EES and ZES-R respectively at 3 year, which was corroborated by similar results from the propensity score-matched cohort (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.20, p=0.523 and 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.02, p=0.081, for stent and patient related outcomes, respectively). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis up to 3 years (22 [0.7%] vs. 10 [0.5%] , p=0.370) was also similar. The rate of stent thrombosis was very low and comparable between the two stents (3 [0.1%] vs. 1 [0.1%] , p=0.657). In multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure (adjusted HR 3.615, 95% CI 2.440-5.354, p 〈 0.001) and off label indication (adjusted HR 1.782, 95% CI 1.169-2.718, p=0.007) were the strongest predictors of target lesion failure. Conclusion: In this robust real world registry with unrestricted use of EES and ZES-R, both stents showed comparable safety and efficacy at 3-year follow-up. Overall incidences of target lesion failure and definite stent thrombosis, including very late stent thrombosis, were low, even in the patients with off label indications, suggesting excellent long term safety and sustained efficacy of both types of second generation drug-eluting stents.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 144, No. 18 ( 2021-11-02), p. 1459-1472
    Abstract: Acute cellular rejection is a major determinant of mortality and retransplantation after heart transplantation. We sought to evaluate the prognostic implications of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction assessed by index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) for the risk of acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation. Methods: The present study prospectively enrolled 154 heart transplant recipients who underwent scheduled coronary angiography and invasive coronary physiological assessment 1 month after transplantation. IMR is microcirculatory resistance under maximal hyperemia. By measuring hyperemic mean transit time using 3 injections (4 mL each) of room-temperature saline under maximal hyperemia, IMR was calculated as hyperemic distal coronary pressure×hyperemic mean transit time. The primary end point was biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection of grade ≥2R during 2 years of follow-up after transplantation and was compared by using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression according to IMR. The incremental prognostic value of IMR, in addition to the model with clinical factors, was evaluated by comparison of C-index, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination index. Results: The mean age of recipients was 51.2±13.1 years (81.2% male), and the cumulative incidence of acute cellular rejection was 19.0% at 2 years. Patients with acute cellular rejection had significantly higher IMR values at 1 month than those without acute cellular rejection (23.1±8.6 versus 16.8±11.1, P =0.002). IMR was significantly associated with the risk of acute cellular rejection (per 5-U increase: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.04–1.34], P =0.011) and the optimal cutoff value of IMR to predict acute cellular rejection was 15. Patients with IMR≥15 showed significantly higher risk of acute cellular rejection than those with IMR 〈 15 (34.4% versus 3.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 15.3 [95% CI 3.6–65.7], P 〈 0.001). Addition of IMR to clinical variables showed significantly higher discriminant and reclassification ability for risk of acute cellular rejection (C-index 0.87 versus 0.74, P 〈 0.001; net reclassification index 1.05, P 〈 0.001; integrated discrimination index 0.20, P 〈 0.001). Conclusions: Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction assessed by IMR measured early after heart transplantation showed significant association with the risk of acute cellular rejection. In addition to surveillance endomyocardial biopsy, early stratification using IMR could be a clinically useful tool to identify patients at higher risk of future acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02798731.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 12, No. 6 ( 2023-03-21)
    Abstract: Recently, diastolic stress testing and invasive hemodynamic measurements have been emphasized for diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) because when determined using noninvasive parameters it can fall into a nondiagnostic intermediate range. The current study evaluated the discriminative and prognostic roles of invasive measured left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure in the population with suspected HFpEF, particularly for patients with intermediate Heart Failure Association Pre‐test Assessment, Echocardiography & Natriuretic Peptide, Functional Testing, Final Etiology (HFA‐PEFF) score. Methods and Results A total of 404 patients with symptoms or signs of HF and preserved left ventricular systolic function were enrolled. All subjects underwent left heart catheterization with left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure measurement for confirmation of HFpEF (≥16 mm Hg). The primary outcome was all‐cause death or readmission due to HF within 10 years. Among the study population, 324 patients (80.2%) were diagnosed as invasively confirmed HFpEF, and 80 patients (19.8%) were as noncardiac dyspnea. The patients with HFpEF showed a significantly higher HFA‐PEFF score than the patients with noncardiac dyspnea (3.8±1.8 versus 2.6±1.5, P 〈 0.001). The discriminative ability of the HFA‐PEFF score for diagnosing HFpEF was modest (area under the curve, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.64–0.75], P 〈 0.001). The HFA‐PEFF score was associated with a significantly higher 10‐year risk of death or HF readmission (per‐1 increase, hazard ratio [HR], 1.603 [95% CI, 1.376–1.868] , P 〈 0.001). Among the 226 patients with an intermediate HFA‐PEFF score (2–4), those with invasively confirmed HFpEF had a significantly higher risk of death or HF readmission within 10 years than the patients with noncardiac dyspnea (24.0% versus 6.9%, HR, 3.327 [95% CI, 1.109–16.280], P =0.030). Conclusions The HFA‐PEFF score is a moderately useful tool for predicting future adverse events in suspected HFpEF, and invasively measured left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure can provide additional information to discriminate patient prognosis, particularly in those with intermediate HFA‐PEFF scores. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04505449.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2047-9980
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2653953-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 144, No. Suppl_1 ( 2021-11-16)
    Abstract: Introduction: The clinical value of residual quantitative flow ratio (rQFR), a novel function of QFR technique aimed to predict residual ischemia after virtual percutaneous coronary intervention (vPCI) is unknown. Hypothesis: We hypothesized rQFR well predict functional results after PCI. Methods: This is a sub-study of the COE-PERSPECTIVE registry, which investigated the prognostic value of post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR). From pre-PCI angiograms, QFR and rQFR were analyzed and their diagnostic performance was assessed at blinded fashion using pre-PCI FFR and post-PCI FFR as reference, respectively. The prognostic value of rQFR after vPCI was assessed according to vessel-oriented composite outcome (VOCO) (a composite of cardiac death, vessel-specific myocardial infarction, and vessel-specific revascularization) at 2 years. Results: Two hundred and seventy-four patients (274 vessels) with FFR-based ischemic causing lesions were analyzed. Pre-PCI QFR and FFR were 0.63±0.10 and 0.66±0.11 (R=0.756, p 〈 0.001). rQFR after vPCI and FFR after real PCI were 0.93±0.06 and 0.86±0.07 (R=0.528, p 〈 0.001). Diagnostic performance of rQFR to predict actual post-PCI FFR was good (area under the curve (AUC): 0.856 [0.804-0.909], p 〈 0.001). rQFR predicted well the incidence of 2-year VOCO after index PCI (AUC: 0.712 [0.555-0.869], p=0.041), being similar to that of actual post-PCI FFR (AUC: 0.691 [0.512-0.870] , p=0.061). rQFR ≤0.89 was associated with increased risk of 2-year VOCO (hazard ratio: 12.9 [2.32-71.3], P=0.0035). Conclusions: Residual QFR estimated from pre-PCI angiography and virtual coronary stenting predicts procedural functional results and long-term vessel-related clinical events.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 8, No. 12 ( 2015-12)
    Abstract: We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided and routine drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with an intermediate coronary stenosis. Methods and Results— A total of 229 patients with an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis were randomly assigned to FFR-guided or Routine-DES implantation group. For FFR-guided group (n=114), treatment strategy was determined according to the target vessel FFR (FFR 〈 0.75: DES implantation [FFR-DES group]; FFR≥0.75: deferral of stenting [FFR-Defer group] ). Routine-DES group underwent DES implantation without FFR measurement (n=115). The primary end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. Of lesions assigned to FFR-guided strategy, only one quarter had functional significance (FFR 〈 0.75). At 2-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 7.9±2.5% in the FFR-guided group and 8.8±2.7% in Routine-DES group ( P =0.80). At 5-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 11.6±3.0% and 14.2±3.3% for the FFR-guided group and the Routine-DES group ( P =0.55). There was no difference in major adverse cardiac events rates between the 2 groups ≤5-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.60). Conclusions— In lesions with angiographically intermediate stenosis, FFR guidance provides a tailored approach, which is at least as good as an angiography-guided routine-DES implantation strategy and avoids unnecessary DES-stenting in a considerable part of the patients. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00592228.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1941-7640 , 1941-7632
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2450801-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 10, No. 15 ( 2021-08-03)
    Abstract: In tandem stenoses, nonhyperemic pressure ratio pullback is the preferred method to fractional flow reserve (FFR), based on the assumption of stable resting coronary flow. This study aimed to evaluate temporal changes of coronary circulatory indexes in tandem stenoses before and after angioplasty for proximal stenosis. Methods and Results Coronary tandem stenoses were created by porcine restenosis model with 2 bare metal stents in the left anterior descending artery. Four weeks later, changes in distal coronary pressure (Pd), averaged peak velocity, microvascular resistance, transstenotic pressure gradient across distal stenosis, resting Pd/aortic pressure, and FFR were measured before and 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after balloon angioplasty for proximal stenosis. After angioplasty, there were significant changes in both resting and hyperemic Pd, averaged peak velocity, microvascular resistance, and transstenotic pressure gradient across distal stenosis (all P values 〈 0.01). After initial acute changes, hyperemic averaged peak velocity and microvascular resistance did not show significant difference from the baseline values ( P =0.712 and 0.972, respectively). Conversely, resting averaged peak velocity remained increased (10.1±0.7 to 17.8±0.7; P 〈 0.001) and resting microvascular resistance decreased (6.0±0.1 to 2.2±0.7; P 〈 0.001). Transstenotic pressure gradient across distal stenosis was significantly increased in both resting (13.1±7.6 to 25.3±4.2; P =0.040) and hyperemic conditions (11.0±3.0 to 27.4±3.3 mm Hg; P 〈 0.001). Actual post–percutaneous coronary intervention Pd/aortic pressure and FFR were significantly lower than predicted values (Pd/aortic pressure, 0.68±0.22 versus 0.85±0.14; P 〈 0.001; FFR, 0.63±0.08 versus 0.81±0.08; P 〈 0.001). Conclusions After angioplasty for proximal stenosis, transstenotic pressure gradient across distal stenosis showed similar changes between resting and hyperemic conditions. Both actual post–percutaneous coronary intervention resting Pd/aortic pressure and FFR were significantly lower than predicted values.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2047-9980
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2653953-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...