GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 3347-3347
    Abstract: Purpose Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used as a part of induction treatment for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma. For successful ASCT, mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood is essential because collecting a sufficient number of stem cells using apheresis is mandatory. As a method for mobilization, chemomobilization consisting of high-dose chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone (G-mobilization) has been used. However, the mobilization failure still remains a problematic issue. Given repeated mobilization attempts increase medical costs and the risk of morbidity related with apheresis, the mobilization process should be efficient. Chemomobilization is more effective than G-mobilization, however, chemomobilization has the risk of complication such as febrile neutropenia or chemotherapy-induced second malignancy. Thus, we compared the efficacy and safety of our new chemomobilization regimen, one-day low-dose etoposide with that of two-day low-dose etoposide, one-day high-dose cyclophosphamide, and G-mobilization. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 234 patients who underwent ASCT for MM between 2008 and 2018 in four tertiary hospitals in Korea. One-day low-dose etoposide regimen (E1) was the intravenous (IV) administration of etoposide (375 mg/m2) over 4 hours whereas two-day low-dose etoposide (E2) was the same dose of etoposide on 1st and 2nd day in outpatient clinic. G-CSF administration was started around on 10th day until the end of collection. In G-mobilization regimen (G), the injection of G-CSF was started four days (day -4) before initiation of apheresis (day 0), and G-CSF once a day was maintained untill the end of collection. One-day high-dose cyclophosphamide regimen (C) was the IV administration of cyclophosphamide (3.5 g/m2) on 1st day and the daily injection of G-CSF from 2nd day until the end of stem cell collection. Peripheral blood stem cell collection was started when CD34-positive cells or hematopoietic progenitor cells were more than 5000/μL in peripheral blood, or white blood cell count was more than 5000/μL. In this study, we defined the 'adequate mobilization' as CD34-positive cells more than 4ⅹ106/kg, and 'mobilization failure' as a collected CD34-positive cells less than 2ⅹ106/kg. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was defined as more than 500/μL and 20,000/μL on consecutive two days, respectively. Results 31 patients received single dose etoposide (E1) between 2016 and 2018 whereas 28 patients received double dose etoposide (E2) between 2011 and 2018. The other two regimens were used in 105 (C, 2008-2015) and 70 patients (G, 2008-2017) according to physicians' decision. The comparison of four regimens showed the median CD34-positive cells of E1 regimen was 5.57ⅹ106/kg that was comparable to that of E2 and C (Table 1). The number of CD34-positive cells on 1st day of apheresis was 4.03ⅹ106/kg in E1 regimen, and it was higher than that of C and G (3.32 and 1.79ⅹ106/kg, respectively). As a result, E1 regimen achieved 'adequate mobilization' in 100% of patients (n=30) like E2 regimen (n=28, 100%). Mobilization failure did not occur in E1 and E2 regimens whereas 4-10% of patients experienced mobilization failure in C and G regimens (Table 1). All patients receiving E1 and E2 regimen but one patient in E1 could collect more than 4ⅹ106/kg of CD34-positive cells within three cycles of apheresis. The occurrence of febrile neutropenia was extremely lower in E1 regimen (7%) than E2 and C regimens (43% and 34%, respectively, p 〈 0.001). Both neutrophil and platelet engraftment were the fastest in E1 (the median 9 days after ASCT, p 〈 0.001). Conclusions One-day low-dose etoposide administration could be effective for chemomobilization in myeloma patients with reduced risk of complication compared to two-day low-dose etoposide, high-dose cyclophosphamide and G-mobilization. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 2227-2227
    Abstract: Purpose Eculizumab is reported to be highly effective in managing patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). However, eculizumab therapy is associated with high cost and thus is inaccessible to all patients with PNH. Additionally, there are some restrictions in the coverage of PNH therapy from the health insurance, which varies depending on each country. In South Korea, majority of the cost involved in eculizumab therapy is supported by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) with very limited indication. The patients with PNH must satisfy all of the following criteria to be eligible for financial support from NIHS: (1) PNH granulocyte count ≥ 10%; (2) lactate dehydrogenase ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal; (3) at least 4 units of red blood cells must have be transfused in the past 12 months (transfusion-dependent anemia (TDA)); and (4) exhibit at least more than one of the PNH-related complications (except TDA), which include thrombosis, renal insufficiency, pulmonary insufficiency, or recurrent smooth muscle spasm. These criteria are the narrowest indication for eculizumab therapy compared with those used by other countries. Hence, we performed a nation-wide study including all the patients with PNH in South Korea using the NHIS database to investigate the real-world efficacy of eculizumab. Methods The National Health Insurance Database of the NHIS in South Korea was used to collect the data of patients diagnosed with PNH between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2016. Propensity score (PS) method was used to evaluate the real-world effects of eculizumab on patient survival. For PS method, the patients with PNH were divided into the following two groups: (1) patients treated with eculizumab; and (2) patients not treated with eculizumab. Additionally, the patients used for the analysis were limited to those who are surviving from the time of introduction of eculizumab in South Korea (October 1, 2012). In total, 11 variables were selected for PS matching according to the indications for using eculizumab in South Korea: age, sex, TDA, venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, AA, MDS, acute renal failure (ARF), chronic renal failure (CRF), prescription of opioid analgesic drug (≥ 2 times), and pulmonary hypertension. The patients diagnosed with acute leukemia were excluded. The time point of the matching was designated as the date on which the eculizumab was first administered. All survival or complication analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The duration of PNH was used as the explanatory variable to estimate the proper treatment effect. Results Eculizumab-treated patients exhibited significantly higher survival rate than the eculizumab-untreated patients (4-year survival after propensity score matching, 98.31% vs. 79.67%, p = 0.0489). The mean RBC transfusion units per 12 months after eculizumab therapy was significantly lower than that before eculizumab therapy (5.75 units vs. 12.28 units, p 〈 0.0001). The median time for the first transfusion in the eculizumab-treated group was significantly longer than that in the eculizumab-untreated group (p = 0.0078). The 4-year transfusion-independence rate for the eculizumab-treated group was significantly higher than that for the eculizumab-untreated group (20.81%; 95% CI, 10.71-33.20%, vs. 10.24%; 95% CI, 4.17-19.50%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of new documented complications related to PNH between the two groups. These complications include venous thrombosis (p = 0.886), arterial thrombosis (p = 0.112), acute renal failure (p = 0.745), chronic renal failure (p = 0.827), use of opioid analgesics (p = 0.142), and pulmonary hypertension (p = 0.396). Conclusions Eculizumab therapy for high-risk PNH patients may effectively improve the survival rate and reduce the transfusion requirement. Paradoxically, the eculizumab-treated patients with severe PNH exhibit higher survival rate than the eculizumab-untreated patients with less severe PNH. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: The Korean Journal of Medicine, Korean Association of Internal Medicine, Vol. 94, No. 2 ( 2019-04-01), p. 182-190
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1738-9364 , 2289-0769
    Language: English
    Publisher: Korean Association of Internal Medicine
    Publication Date: 2019
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Annals of Hematology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 99, No. 7 ( 2020-07), p. 1493-1503
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0939-5555 , 1432-0584
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1458429-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 22 ( 2022-08), p. S41-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 3099-3099
    Abstract: Introduction: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are used for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Two HMAs, decitabine and azacitidine, are currently available for such treatment. Numerous studies have analyzed the clinical efficacy of HMAs in patients with MDS; however, reports directly comparing decitabine and azacitidine in patients with lower-risk (low and intermediate-1) MDS are limited. The clinical efficacy of standard-dose HMA treatment in lower-risk MDS remains controversial. Patients and methods: The Korea University MDS registry is a longitudinal cohort that contains data on 452 patients consecutively diagnosed with MDS from October 2006 to December 2017 in Korea University Medical Center (Korea University Anam, Guro, and Ansan Hospital). In the Korea University MDS registry, 357 patients were classified as having lower-risk MDS. Among them, 115 patients were treated with HMA (decitabine or azacitidine); 111 patients were eligible for the study. We compared treatment responses, survival outcomes, and adverse events between standard-dose decitabine (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 4 weeks) and azacitidine (75 mg/m2 daily for 7 days every 4 weeks) in lower-risk MDS patients. Treatment responses were assessed according to the modified 2006 International Working Group response criteria. Patients who were evaluated received at least one cycle of HMA therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) included complete remission (CR), partial remission, marrow CR, and hematologic improvement. Progression-free survival (PFS) was measured from the time of treatment initiation until disease progression or death from MDS. Results: The CR rates were 16.4% (10/61) in the decitabine group and 6.0% (3/50) in the azacitidine group with borderline significance (P = .090). The ORRs were 67.2% (41/61) and 44.0% (22/50) for decitabine and azacitidine, respectively (P = .014). The erythroid responses for decitabine and azacitidine were 68.3% (41/60) and 44.2% (19/43), respectively (P = .014). In the multivariable analysis, treatment with decitabine (hazard ratio [HR] 2.553; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.116-5.840; P = .026), hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 〈 8 g/dL (HR 3.073; 95% CI 1.340-7.048; P = .008), and ≥5% BM blasts (HR 3.739; 95% CI 1.102-12.683; P = .034) were significantly associated with higher ORRs. The median progression-free survival was significantly better in patients treated with decitabine than in those treated with azacitidine (33 vs. 19 months; P = .019). There were no significant differences in the event-free survival and in the overall survival between the two HMAs. In the multivariable analysis, treatment with decitabine (HR 0.496; 95% CI 0.257-0.957; P = .037) and achievement of CR (HR 0.122; 95% CI 0.015-0.993; P = .049) were significant prognostic factors for better survival, whereas ANC below 0.8 × 109/L (HR 1.905; 95% CI 1.032-3.515; P = .039) was a significant prognostic factor for poor prognosis. The poor cytogenetic risk group, as classified by International Prognostic Scoring System (HR 2.136; 95% CI 0.992-4.556; P = .052), also affected the survival unfavorably with borderline significance. There were no significant differences in grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events between the two HMAs. Conclusions: The standard-dose decitabine therapy showed significantly better ORR, erythroid response, and longer PFS than did standard-dose azacitidine in patients with lower-risk MDS. The frequencies of hematologic adverse events did not differ between the patients who received decitabine and those who received azacitidine. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ivyspring International Publisher ; 2023
    In:  International Journal of Medical Sciences Vol. 20, No. 2 ( 2023), p. 186-193
    In: International Journal of Medical Sciences, Ivyspring International Publisher, Vol. 20, No. 2 ( 2023), p. 186-193
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1449-1907
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ivyspring International Publisher
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2151424-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Korean Association of Internal Medicine ; 2020
    In:  The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine Vol. 35, No. 5 ( 2020-09-01), p. 1199-1209
    In: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, Korean Association of Internal Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 5 ( 2020-09-01), p. 1199-1209
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1226-3303 , 2005-6648
    Language: English
    Publisher: Korean Association of Internal Medicine
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2500508-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Korean Association of Internal Medicine ; 2021
    In:  The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine Vol. 36, No. 6 ( 2021-11-01), p. 1459-1470
    In: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, Korean Association of Internal Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 6 ( 2021-11-01), p. 1459-1470
    Abstract: Background/Aims: Relatively little data are available on how the response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected treatment outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy for lymphoma or multiple myeloma. We aimed to determine the effect of COVID-19 countermeasures on treatment outcomes in this patient population.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on patients treated for lymphoma or multiple myeloma in two tertiary hospitals in Seoul. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included patients who received chemotherapy between September and December 2019 (the control period), and group 2 included patients who received chemotherapy between September and December 2020 (the study period). Countermeasures to COVID-19 were applied to the patients in group 2. The countermeasures implemented included mask wearing and regular handwashing at home and in hospital; COVID-19 risk assessments on all hospital visitors; and pre-emptive COVID-19 screening for all newly hospitalized patients and their resident guardians.Results: No differences in treatment outcomes, including treatment response, incidence and duration of neutropenia or neutropenic fever, delays in chemotherapy, or number of deaths during chemotherapy, were observed between the g roups. None of the patients in group 2 tested positive for COVID-19, and there were no COVID-19-related deaths during the study period.Conclusions: Countermeasures to COVID-19 did not affect treatment outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy for lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Data on the effect of countermeasures to COVID-19 on treatment outcomes should continue to be analyzed to ensure that treatment outcomes are not adversely affected.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1226-3303 , 2005-6648
    Language: English
    Publisher: Korean Association of Internal Medicine
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2500508-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Scientific Reports, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 11, No. 1 ( 2021-09-16)
    Abstract: In clinical practice, most patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) undergo long-term follow-up without disease progression. There is insufficient real-world data about how closely and whether anything other than disease progression should be monitored. Herein, we performed a nationwide study of 470 patients with MGUS with a 10-year follow-up to determine the patterns of disease progression and other comorbidities. During the follow-up period, 158 of 470 patients with MGUS (33.62%) progressed to symptomatic monoclonal gammopathies. Most of these were multiple myeloma (134/470 patients, 28.51%), and those diagnosed within 2 years after diagnosis of MGUS was high. Approximately 30–50% of patients with MGUS had hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and osteoarthritis at the time of diagnosis, and these comorbidities were newly developed during the follow-up period in approximately 50% of the remaining patients with MGUS. Approximately 20–40% of patients with MGUS have acute or chronic kidney failure, thyroid disorders, disc disorders, peripheral neuropathy, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure during the follow-up period. Altogether, when MGUS is diagnosed, close follow-up of the possibility of progression to multiple myeloma is required, especially within 2 years after diagnosis; simultaneously, various comorbidities should be considered and monitored during the follow-up of patients with MGUS. Continuous research is needed to establish appropriate follow-up guidelines.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2045-2322
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2615211-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...