GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    RA07.06: BASELINE FDG-PET/CT PARAMETERS AS PREDICTOR FOR RESIDUAL TUMOUR AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN OESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2018
    In:  Diseases of the Esophagus Vol. 31, No. Supplement_1 ( 2018-09-01), p. 35-35
    Details
    In: Diseases of the Esophagus, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 31, No. Supplement_1 ( 2018-09-01), p. 35-35
    Abstract: An optimal model for predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal cancer has not been defined yet. FDG-PET/CT is frequently used in response assessments. The aim of this side study of the preSANO trial (NL41732.078.13) was to investigate if the FDG-PET parameters SUVmax, total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumour volume (MTV) were predictive for residual tumour in the resected specimen of oesophageal cancer patients treated with nCRT. Methods Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT at baseline according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine guidelines 1.0 (2.3MBq/kg F-18-FDG; scanning 60 ± 5min.). All parameters were corrected for lean body mass. MTV was defined as the volume within a 41% of SULmax ( = SUV/lean body mass) isocontour threshold at tumour and lymph nodes. TLG was calculated as SULmean x MTV. Logarithmic transformation was performed because of non-normal distribution of TLG and MTV. Baseline PET parameters were compared to tumour regression grade in the resection specimen (TRG3–4 =  〉  10% residual tumour vs. TRG1 = complete response). Peroperatively irresectable tumours were recoded as TRG4. Analyses were performed using an independent-samples T-test. Results From a total of 207 patients who underwent FDG-PET/CT before nCRT, 197 were included for analysis (5 were non-FDG avid, 5 had incomplete data). Histological type of tumour: adenocarcinoma (AC) n = 154, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) n = 42, and one adenosquamous carcinoma. Thirty-seven patients (19%) had TRG1 and 41 patients (21%) had TRG3–4. In complete responders (TRG1), SULmax, TLG and MTV (mean ± SD) were 9.6 ± 5.8, 85.3 ± 85.5 and 13.0 ± 9.9, respectively. In patients with TRG3–4, SULmax, TLG and MTV were 9.4 ± 5.4145.8 ± 164.6 and 21.9 ± 16.2, respectively. SULmax was not significantly different between both groups (P = 0.8), but log(TLG) and log(MTV) (P = 0.008 and P = 0.001) were. In adenocarcinomas, log(TLG) did not differ between groups (P = 0.1). Conclusion Initial FDG tumour mass, expressed as MTV, (rather than SULmax) is the most contributing factor in predicting residual disease after nCRT in both SCC and AC. The effect is stronger in SCC. Therefore, baseline FDG tumour mass should be included in a prediction model, besides other clinical and tumour parameters. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1120-8694 , 1442-2050
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy089.RA07.06
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004949-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    PS02.064: ACCURACY OF F-18-FDG-PET/CT IN MONITORING TUMOUR RESPONSE AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH OESOPHAGEAL CANCER
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2018
    In:  Diseases of the Esophagus Vol. 31, No. Supplement_1 ( 2018-09-01), p. 138-139
    Details
    In: Diseases of the Esophagus, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 31, No. Supplement_1 ( 2018-09-01), p. 138-139
    Abstract: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) induces a pathologically complete response in approximately 30% of patients with oesophageal cancer. To explore the possibility of safe postponement of surgery, accurate clinical response evaluations are needed to exclude residual disease. The present study aims to assess the value of F-18-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of residual tumour ( 〉  10% tumour cells = TRG3–4 vs. no vital cells = TRG1) or metastases after nCRT. Methods FDG-PET/CT at baseline and 12 weeks after nCRT was performed according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine guidelines 1.0 (2.3MBq/kg F-18-FDG; scanning 60 ± 5min.) and the protocol of the preSANO study. Qualitative analysis included sensitive reading of presence of residual tumour and/or metastases. A lesion was considered FDG-positive, when any uptake in the lesion itself was above the adjacent oesophageal background uptake. Quantitatively, SUV/lean body mass (SUL) measurements at tumour, lymph nodes, oesophagus, liver and bloodpool were recorded and compared with pathology (resection specimen: gold standard). Results Some 129 of 207 patients with FDG-avid tumours at baseline proceeded to FDG-PET/CT at around 12 weeks after nCRT just before surgery. Forty-one of 129 patients had TRG3–4, of whom 6 were missed on FDG-PET/CT (15% false negative) with SULmax 2.07 ± 0.25, SUL-ratio tumour/oesophagus (SULR) 1.35 ± 0.14. Sensitivity for TRG2–3-4 vs. TRG1 was 57/71 (80%). SULmax and SULR of FDG-positives were 3.76 ± 1.33 and 1.82 ± 0.69 respectively, compared to SULmax 2.21 ± 0.42 and SULR 1.31 ± 0.22 in FDG-negatives. Distant metastases were detected in 18 of 190 (10%) patients. Of all patients with postponed surgery, 12 had ≥ 1 additional FDG-PET/CT during follow-up (25–49.7 weeks after nCRT). Eventually, 4 patients underwent surgery. Three of 4 had increased FDG-signal and TRG3–4; 1 patient had decreased FDG-signal and no tumour left (TRG1). Conclusion FDG-PET/CT at around 12 weeks after nCRT misses TRG3–4 tumours in 15% and detects residual TRG2–3-4 in 80%. Furthermore, PET-CT detects distant metastases in 10% of patients after nCRT. These data indicate that serial FDG-PET may become valuable in an active surveillance approach. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1120-8694 , 1442-2050
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy089.PS02.064
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004949-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    FA03.04: ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE VS SURGERY IN CLINICALLY COMPLETE RESPONDERS AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: A PROPENSITY-MATCHED STUDY
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2018
    In:  Diseases of the Esophagus Vol. 31, No. Supplement_1 ( 2018-09-01), p. 7-7
    Details
    In: Diseases of the Esophagus, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 31, No. Supplement_1 ( 2018-09-01), p. 7-7
    Abstract: Nearly one third of esophageal cancer patients show a pathologically complete response in their resection specimens after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) according to CROSS regimen. This raises questions whether all patients benefit from surgery or if active surveillance can be applied to patients with a clinically complete response (cCR) after nCRT. This retrospective-multicenter propensity matched study compared outcomes of patients with a cCR after nCRT undergoing active surveillance or standard surgery. Methods Patients that refused surgery after nCRT between 2012–2017 from 4 hospitals were included. For the standard surgery group, patients from the preSANO trial were enrolled. A cCR was defined as endoscopies with multiple (bite-on-bite) biopsies, EUS-FNA and PET-CT showing no residual disease 6 and 12 weeks after completion of nCRT. Optimal propensity-score matching generated a matched cohort (1:2) matched for age, comorbidities, cT, cN, histology of the tumor and biopsy type. For comparison of severity of complications according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification, a separate optimal propensity-score matching cohort was generated (1:2) for all patients in the active surveillance group that underwent surgery. Primary outcome was overall survival, secondary outcomes were rate of radically resected tumors, distant dissemination rate and rate of postoperative complications according to the CD-classification. Results 75 patients were identified of whom 50 patients underwent standard surgery and 25 patients underwent active surveillance. 13 of 25 patients in the active surveillance group underwent surgery for locoregional recurrent disease. Median follow-up was 23.7 months for the standard surgery group and 18.8 months for the active surveillance group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in overall survival (HR = 0.48, 95%C.I. 0.10–2.2, P = 0.96). In both groups, all tumors were radically resected. There were no statistically significant differences in distant dissemination rate between the active surveillance and standard surgery group (16.0% versus 22.0%, P = 0.76) or in severity of complications (CD ≥ 3;46.2% versus 23.1%, P = 0.16). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival, distant dissemination rate and severity of complications between patients undergoing standard surgery or active surveillance after nCRT. However, since sample sizes were small, especially for the severity of complications, these results should be interpreted with caution. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1120-8694 , 1442-2050
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy089.FA03.04
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004949-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...