GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), ( 2023-07-11)
    Abstract: Purpose: We sought to identify features of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who achieve long-term response (LTR) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and how these might differ from features predictive of short-term response (STR). Experimental Design: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs over ten years. LTR and STR were defined as response ≥ 24 months and response & lt; 12 months, respectively. Tumor PD-L1 expression, mutational burden (TMB), next-generation sequencing, and whole exome sequencing data were analyzed to identify characteristics enriched in patients achieving LTR compared to STR and non-LTR. Results: Among 3118 patients, 8% achieved LTR and 7% achieved STR, with 5-year overall survival of 81% and 18% among LTR and STR patients respectively. High TMB (≥ 50th percentile) enriched for LTR compared to STR (P = 0.001) and non-LTR (P & lt; 0.001). Whereas PD-L1 ≥ 50% enriched for LTR compared to non-LTR (P & lt; 0.001); PD-L1 ≥ 50% did not enrich for LTR compared to STR (P = 0.181). Non-squamous histology (P = 0.040) and increasing depth of response (median best overall response [BOR] -65% vs -46%, P & lt; 0.001) also associated with LTR compared to STR; no individual genomic alterations were uniquely enriched among LTR patients. Conclusions: Among advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, distinct features including high TMB, non-squamous histology, and depth of radiographic improvement distinguish patients poised to achieve long-term response compared to initial response followed by progression, whereas high PD-L1 does not.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 9596-9596
    Abstract: 9596 Background: KRAS mutations are identified in approximately 30% of NSCLC. There are no FDA approved targeted therapies for patients with KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but novel direct inhibitors of KRAS G12C have shown some activity in early phase clinical trials. We hypothesized that patients with KRAS-G12C mutations may have distinct clinical characteristics and responses to systemic therapies compared to patients with non-G12C subtypes. Methods: We identified patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancers who underwent next-generation sequencing with MSK-IMPACT, between January 2014 and December 2018. Baseline characteristics were compared with the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-rum test for continuous data. Overall survival was calculated from time of diagnosis of metastatic/recurrent disease to date of death or last follow up, with left truncation to account for time of MSK-IMPACT. Overall survival was compared between groups using the Cox proportional-hazards model. Response evaluations where performed by independent thoracic radiologists according to RECIST 1. and compared between group with the Fisher’s exact test. Results: We identified 1194 patients with KRAS -mutant NSCLC, 772 with recurrent or metastatic disease. Of patients with advanced disease, 46% (352/772) had mutations in KRAS-G12C and 54% harbored non-G12C mutations (15% G12D, 16% G12V, 8% G12A, 4% G13D). Co-mutation patterns were similar with respect to KEAP1 (p=0.9) and STK11 (p=1.0). Patients with non-G12C mutations had a higher proportion of never smokers (10% vs 1.4% p 〈 0.001). The median OS from diagnosis was 13 months for G12C and non-G12C patients (p=0.99). 45% (347/772) received 1L or 2L line treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitor. RECIST measurements were available for 290/347 cases (84%). ORR with anti-PD-(L)1 treatment was 24% vs 28% in G12C vs non-G12C patients (p=0.5). In patients with PD-L1 50% (n=103), ORR was 39% for G12C vs 58% non-G12C patients (p=0.06). Conclusions: KRAS G12C mutations are present in 12% of patients with NSCLC and represent a relevant subtype of NSCLC given KRAS G12C inhibitors now in clinical development. Baseline characteristics including co-mutation patterns are similar between patients with G12C and non-G12C, except for smoking history. The efficacy of KRAS G12C direct inhibitors will need to be compared to other available therapies for KRAS mutant NSCLC (chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitors) to identify most effective therapeutic strategy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 9088-9088
    Abstract: 9088 Background: KRAS mutations are identified in approximately 30% of NSCLC, with G12C mutations being the most common subtype and representing 12% of all non-small cell lung cancer cases. Novel direct inhibitors are in clinical development and have shown promising activity, although the efficacy of these agents compared to other standard therapies for lung cancer is not yet known. We hypothesized that patients with KRAS-G12C mutations may have distinct responses to chemo-immunotherapy regimens both with respect to STK11 and KEAP1 co-mutation status and compared to patients with non-G12C subtypes. Methods: Patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Dana Farber Cancer Institute treated with chemo-immunotherapy regimens as first line therapy for advanced/metastatic disease were identified. Subset with KRAS G12C mutations non-G12C subtypes were compared and response to therapy was assessed by investigator. Baseline characteristics were compared with the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-rum test for continuous data. Response evaluations where performed by investigators and compared between groups with the Fisher’s exact test. Progression free survival and overall survival was calculated from start of therapy to date of progression or death/last follow up, respectively and compared between groups using the Cox proportional-hazards model. Results: We identified 137 patients with KRAS -mutant NSCLC treated with chemo-immunotherapy: 45% (62/137) had mutations in KRAS-G12C and 55% harbored non-G12C mutations (17% G12V, 15% G12D, 4% G12A, 4% G12S, 3% G13D). The median OS was 21 and 14 months for G12C and non-G12C patients, respectively (p = 0.24). ORR to chemo-immunotherapy for patients harboring a KRAS-G12C mutation was 40% (25/62) compared to 31% (23/75) in non-G12C subtypes (p = 0.3). Median PFS was similar for both G12C and non-G12C subtypes (7.3 vs 6.1 months, respectively, p = 0.12). Concurrent STK11 mutation was identified in 40% of patients with KRAS-G12C and KEAP1 alterations were observed in 32% of patients. In patients with KRAS-G12C, co-mutation in STK11 and/or KEAP1 was associated with shorter PFS (15.8 vs 5.1 months, p = 0.01). Conclusions: KRAS-G12C mutations are present in 12% of patients with NSCLC and represent a relevant subtype of NSCLC given KRAS G12C inhibitors now in clinical development. Treatment outcomes to chemo-immunotherapy are similar in patients with G12C and non-G12C subtypes. Outcomes are poor for patients with concurrent STK11 and/or KEAP1 mutations representing a significant unmet need.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 27, No. 8 ( 2021-04-15), p. 2209-2215
    Abstract: KRAS mutations are identified in approximately 30% of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Novel direct inhibitors of KRAS G12C have shown activity in early-phase clinical trials. We hypothesized that patients with KRAS G12C mutations may have distinct clinical characteristics and responses to therapies. Experimental Design: Through routine next-generation sequencing, we identified patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) from 2014 to 2018 and reviewed tumor characteristics, overall survival, and treatment outcomes. Results: We identified 1,194 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC, including 770 with recurrent or metastatic disease. KRAS G12C mutations were present in 46% and KRAS non-G12C mutations in 54%. Patients with KRAS G12C had a higher tumor mutation burden (median, 8.8 vs. 7 mut/Mb; P = 0.006) and higher median PD-L1 expression (5% vs. 1%). The comutation patterns of STK11 (28% vs. 29%) and KEAP1 (23% vs. 24%) were similar. The median overall survivals from diagnosis were similar for KRAS G12C (13.4 months) and KRAS non-G12C mutations (13.1 months; P = 0.96). In patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, there was not a significant difference in response rate with single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor for patients with KRAS G12C mutations (40% vs. 58%; P = 0.07). Conclusions: We provide outcome data for a large series of patients with KRAS G12C–mutant NSCLC with available therapies, demonstrating that responses and duration of benefit with available therapies are similar to those seen in patients with KRAS non-G12C mutations. Strategies to incorporate new targeted therapies into the current treatment paradigm will need to consider outcomes specific to patients harboring KRAS G12C mutations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 11 ( 2020-06-01), p. 2654-2663
    Abstract: Patterns of resistance to first-line osimertinib are not well-established and have primarily been evaluated using plasma assays, which cannot detect histologic transformation and have differential sensitivity for copy number changes and chromosomal rearrangements. Experimental Design: To characterize mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib, patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancers who received osimertinib at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and had next-generation sequencing performed on tumor tissue before osimertinib initiation and after progression were identified. Results: Among 62 patients who met eligibility criteria, histologic transformation, primarily squamous transformation, was identified in 15% of first-line osimertinib cases and 14% of later-line cases. Nineteen percent (5/27) of patients treated with first-line osimertinib had off-target genetic resistance (2 MET amplification, 1 KRAS mutation, 1 RET fusion, and 1 BRAF fusion) whereas 4% (1/27) had an acquired EGFR mutation (EGFR G724S). Patients with squamous transformation exhibited considerable genomic complexity; acquired PIK3CA mutation, chromosome 3q amplification, and FGF amplification were all seen. Patients with transformation had shorter time on osimertinib and shorter survival compared with patients with on-target resistance. Initial EGFR sensitizing mutation, time on osimertinib treatment, and line of therapy also influenced resistance mechanism that emerged. The compound mutation EGFR S768 + V769L and the mutation MET H1094Y were identified and validated as resistance mechanisms with potential treatment options. Conclusions: Histologic transformation and other off-target molecular alterations are frequent early emerging resistance mechanisms to osimertinib and are associated with poor clinical outcomes. See related commentary by Piotrowska and Hata, p. 2441
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: JAMA Oncology, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 6, No. 7 ( 2020-07-01), p. 1048-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2374-2437
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2020
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 16, No. 10 ( 2021-10), p. 1759-1764
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1556-0864
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2223437-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 9549-9549
    Abstract: 9549 Background: Long-term response – the plateau of the survival curve – is the transcendent benefit from PD-1 blockade. However, only a subset of responses achieve substantial durability. The frequency, characteristics, and predictors of long-term responders (LTR) to PD-1 blockade are not well known and may differ from short-term responders (STR). Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy from two institutions (MSK and DFCI) were examined. Responses were assessed by RECIST. LTR was defined as PR/CR lasting ≥ 24 months. STR was defined as PR/CR lasting 〈 12 months. Comparisons were also made to patients with progressive disease (PD). PD-L1 expression was assessed by IHC. TMB was assessed by targeted NGS; high TMB was defined as ≥ median of the cohort. A subset had detailed molecular profiling by MSK-IMPACT. Fisher’s exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare features, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival. Results: Of 2318 patients (MSK n = 1536, DFCI n = 782), 126 (5.4%, 95% CI 4.6-6.4%) achieved LTR, with similar rates in both cohorts. STR occurred in 139 (6%). Overall survival was longer in LTR compared to STR (median NR vs 19.6 months, HR 0.07, p 〈 0.001). LTR had deeper responses compared to STR (median best overall response -69% vs -46%, p 〈 0.001). Patients with LTR were younger ( 〈 65 years old) and had increased TMB (≥ median mut/Mb) compared to both STR and PD (p = 0.006, p = 0.03; p 〈 0.001, p 〈 0.001). The rate of LTR was enriched among patients with both high TMB/high PD-L1 compared to those with low TMB/low PD-L1 (9% vs 1%, OR 9.2, p 〈 0.001), while STR was similar in both groups (7% vs 6%). 2% of patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations (n = 243) achieved LTR. Loss of function variants in ARID1A (14% vs 2%), PTEN (8% vs 0%), and KEAP1 (12% vs 2%) were enriched in LTR compared to STR (p 〈 0.05 for each). Among patients with KRAS mutations, the rate of LTR was higher in those with co-mutation with TP53 compared to STK11 (11% vs 2%, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Long-term response (LTR, ongoing response ≥ 24 months) to PD-1 blockade is an uncommon but profound clinical outcome in metastatic lung cancers. Younger age and high TMB correlate with LTR; the combination of high TMB/high PD-L1 enriches for LTR but not STR. Features predicting long term response may be distinct from those predicting initial response.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Discovery, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 11, No. 1 ( 2021-01-01), p. 59-67
    Abstract: Real-world evidence (RWE), conclusions derived from analysis of patients not treated in clinical trials, is increasingly recognized as an opportunity for discovery, to reduce disparities, and to contribute to regulatory approval. Maximal value of RWE may be facilitated through machine-learning techniques to integrate and interrogate large and otherwise underutilized datasets. In cancer research, an ongoing challenge for RWE is the lack of reliable, reproducible, scalable assessment of treatment-specific outcomes. We hypothesized a deep-learning model could be trained to use radiology text reports to estimate gold-standard RECIST-defined outcomes. Using text reports from patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1 blockade in a training cohort and two test cohorts, we developed a deep-learning model to accurately estimate best overall response and progression-free survival. Our model may be a tool to determine outcomes at scale, enabling analyses of large clinical databases. Significance: We developed and validated a deep-learning model trained on radiology text reports to estimate gold-standard objective response categories used in clinical trial assessments. This tool may facilitate analysis of large real-world oncology datasets using objective outcome metrics determined more reliably and at greater scale than currently possible. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2159-8274 , 2159-8290
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2607892-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 27, No. 10 ( 2021-05-15), p. 2920-2927
    Abstract: EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) are an uncommon genotype in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for which targeted therapies are under development. We sought to describe treatment outcomes and genomic and immunophenotypic characteristics of these tumors. Experimental Design: We identified sequential patients with NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins and compared their clinical outcomes and pathologic features with other patients with NSCLC. Results: Among 6,290 patients with NSCLC, 106 (2%) had EGFR ex20ins. Patients with EGFR ex20ins were more likely to be Black (14% vs. 6%; P & lt; 0.001) or Asian (22% vs. 10%; P & lt; 0.001) compared with all other patients with NSCLC. Median tumor mutational burden (TMB; 3.5 vs. 5.9; P & lt; 0.001) and proportion of tumors with PD-L1 expression ≥1% (22% vs. 60%; P & lt; 0.001) were lower in EGFR ex20ins compared with other NSCLCs (TMB, n = 5,851 and PD-L1 expression, n = 282) and EGFR del 19/L858R (median TMB, 3.5; P = 0.001 and 39% PD-L1 ≥ 1%; P = 0.02). Compared with a 2:1 cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC without targetable alterations (n = 192), EGFR ex20ins patients had longer overall survival (median 20 vs. 12 months; HR, 0.56; P = 0.007) and longer time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for platinum chemotherapy (median, 7 vs. 4 months; HR, 0.6; P = 0.02) and no improvement in TTD for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI; HR, 1.75; P = 0.05). Conclusions: With better outcomes on platinum chemotherapy, patients with EGFR ex20ins NSCLC have improved prognosis, lower PD-L1 expression and TMB, and derive less benefit from ICIs compared with patients with NSCLC without targetable oncogenes. Improving molecularly targeted therapies could provide greater benefit for patients with EGFR ex20ins.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...