GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: International Journal of Cancer, Wiley, Vol. 150, No. 2 ( 2022-01-15), p. 308-316
    Abstract: What's new? Cabozantinib, a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets multiple signaling pathways, is approved for use against advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Variations in cabozantinib clearance, however, warrant further investigation. Here, the authors evaluated cabozantinib exposure in RCC patients and in patients with salivary gland cancer (SGC). SGC patients were found to have significantly higher cabozantinib exposure compared to RCC patients following a 40 mg dose. However, the best‐tolerated cabozantinib exposure was equivalent (~600 μg/L) for both tumor types and was substantially below the previously proposed target. The findings offer insight on exposure, dose, and the balance between efficacy and toxicity for cabozantinib.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0020-7136 , 1097-0215
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 218257-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1474822-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2021
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 81, No. 13_Supplement ( 2021-07-01), p. 1363-1363
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 13_Supplement ( 2021-07-01), p. 1363-1363
    Abstract: Background Cabozantinib is approved for treatment of renal cell cancer (RCC) in a starting dose of 60 mg. However, in the registration studies dose reductions were needed in 46-62% of patients due to toxicity. Improved clinical efficacy of cabozantinib was observed in RCC patients with an average exposure of & gt; 750 ug/L. Data about cabozantinib pharmacokinetics in patients routinely treated with this drug is scarce, while treatment is challenging due to toxicity. Therefore, we explored the cabozantinib exposure in patients with two different tumour types in our clinic. Methods Clinical data and cabozantinib trough concentrations (Cmin) were collected from all patients treated with cabozantinib with at least one measured Cmin at steady state in our clinic between Jan 2018 - Aug 2020. We included salivary gland cancer (SGC) patients treated in a phase II study and RCC patients from our outpatient clinic. Geometric mean (GM) Cmin at the start dose, at 40 mg and at best tolerated dose (BTD) were compared between the two tumour types. Results In total 47 patients were included. All patients with SGC (n=22) started with 60 mg, while 13 of 25 patients with RCC started with 40 mg. GM Cmin level at the start dose was 1350 µg/L (95% CI 1182-1781) vs. 689 µg/L (95% CI 576-823) (P & lt;.001) for patients with SGC and RCC, respectively. When dose-normalized to 40 mg, SGC patients had a significantly higher cabozantinib exposure compared to RCC patients (GM Cmin 968 µg/L (95% CI 788-1188) vs. 676 µg/L (95% CI 571-799)(P=.007). A higher cabozantinib GM Cmin level was observed in female compared to male patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity were needed in 91% and 60% of patients with SGC and RCC, respectively. Median BTD was 25 mg for SGC patients and 40 mg for RCC patients. GM Cmin at BTD were comparable between the SGC group and the RCC group, i.e. 692 µg/L (95% CI 582-822) vs. 576 µg/L (95% CI 493-673) (P=.1), respectively. At BTD, 64% of SGC patients and 80% of RCC patients had an exposure below the proposed target of & gt;750 ug/L. Conclusion Unexpectedly, cabozantinib levels were significantly higher in patients with SGC compared to those with RCC at the dose of 40 mg. However, cabozantinib levels at BTD were comparable between patients with SGC and RCC. At BTD, the majority of patients did not reach the target of & gt;750 µg/L. For most patients with RCC, the cabozantinib level at BTD corresponded to a dose of 40 mg. Therefore, 40 mg instead of 60 mg as a starting dose followed by dose-adjustment based on exposure and tolerability may be preferred in patients with RCC. Although cabozantinib is not registered for SGC, an even lower starting dose of 20 mg/day may be required in these patients based on cabozantinib levels at BTD. Future studies should focus on identifying an optimal and tolerable exposure-response target value for cabozantinib and elucidate factors that contribute to the differences in exposure, in order to individualise and improve treatment. Citation Format: Stefanie D. Krens, Wim van Boxtel, Maike J. Uijen, Frank G. Jansman, Ingrid M. Desar, Sasja F. Mulder, Carla M. van Herpen, Nielka P. van Erp. Exposure-toxicity analysis of cabozantinib in patients with salivary gland cancer and renal cell cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1363.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: International Journal of Cancer, Wiley, Vol. 148, No. 11 ( 2021-06), p. 2799-2806
    Abstract: Co‐treatment with gastric acid suppressants (GAS) in patients taking anticancer drugs that exhibit pH‐dependant absorption may lead to decreased drug exposure and may hamper drug efficacy. In our study, we investigated whether a 1‐hour time interval between subsequent intake of pazopanib and GAS could mitigate this negative effect on drug exposure. We performed an observational study in which we collected the first steady‐state pazopanib trough concentration ( C min ) levels from patients treated with pazopanib 800 mg once daily (OD) taken fasted or pazopanib 600 mg OD taken with food. All patients were advised to take GAS 1 hour after pazopanib. Patients were grouped based on the use of GAS and the geometric (GM) C min levels were compared between groups for each dose regimen. Additionally, the percentage of patients with exposure below the target threshold of 20.5 mg/L and the effect of the type of PPI was explored. The GM C min levels were lower in GAS users vs non‐GAS users for both the 800 and 600 mg cohorts (23.7 mg/L [95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.1‐26.7] vs 28.2 mg/L [95% CI: 25.9‐30.5], P = .015 and 26.0 mg/L [95% CI: 22.4‐30.3] vs 33.5 mg/L [95% CI: 30.3‐37.1] , P = .006). Subtherapeutic exposure was more prevalent in GAS users vs non‐GAS users (33.3% vs 19.5% and 29.6% vs 14%). Sub‐analysis showed lower GM pazopanib C min in patients who received omeprazole, while minimal difference was observed in those receiving pantoprazole compared to non‐users. Our research showed that a 1‐hour time interval between intake of pazopanib and GAS did not mitigate the negative effect of GAS on pazopanib exposure and may hamper pazopanib efficacy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0020-7136 , 1097-0215
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 218257-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1474822-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...