GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-06-03), p. 66-67
    Abstract: Simplex is a new herbicide in Norway containing the active substances aminopyralid and fluroxypyr. Aminopyralid is a new active substance in Norway, but fluroxypyr is registered in several authorized products. The intended use of the plant protection product is in established grassland for forage, established ley and pasture and in grass at the first year of sowing.   During the spring of 2010, the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) performed a human health risk assessment of the active substance aminopyralid and the product on request from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. On further request from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, VKM has performed a risk assessment on the fate and the behaviour in the environment and the environmental risk with regard to the properties of the active substance aminopyralid and the product Simplex, which was finalized at a meeting of VKM’s Scientific Panel on plant protection products (Panel 2) on November 25, 2010. VKM Panel 2’s conclusion is as follows: Aminopyralid is highly mobile in soil and the substance is very likely to reach ground water at concentrations above the threshold of 0.1 µg/L. Experimental data (watersediment studies) suggest that aminopyralid is persistent. However, aminopyralid concentrations in surface water are expected to decrease rapidly due to photolytic degradation. The overall risk for adverse effects on terrestrial and aquatic organisms following the proposed application of Simplex is considered to be minimal.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-08-13), p. 9-11
    Abstract: Movento 100 SC is a new insecticide containing the active substance spirotetramat. The intended use is in stone fruit, pome fruit, vegetables and ornamentals outdoors, and lettuce, tomatoes and cucumbers in greenhouses. VKM was requested by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to consider possible health risk for operators related to the properties of Movento 100 SC; in particular the relevance of the effects of spirotetramat on thyroid hormones, brain, thymus and body weight observed in dogs, and the reproductive effects of spirotetramat observed in rats. VKM was also asked to consider the fate and behaviour of Movento 100 SC with the active ingredient spirotetramat in the environment, and the ecotoxicological effects and risks related to its use. The risk assessment was finalized in a meeting on May 24. 2013, by VKM’s Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products. VKM’s conclusions are as follows: Health: VKM concludes that spirotetramat shows toxic effects in dogs and rats that could be relevant for humans. Thyroid and thymus glands are target organs in the oral subchronic toxicity studies of spirotetramat in dogs, and effects are observed from 19 mg/kg bw/day (600 ppm). Decreases in circulating thyroid hormone levels were detected in all three studies carried out with dogs (28-, 90-days and 1-year) and should be considered toxicologically relevant. The opinion of the Panel is that it cannot be excluded that the observed brain dilatation in dogs is treatment-related, and relevant to humans. Furthermore, VKM concludes that the reproductive effect observed in rats could be relevant for humans. VKM proposes a NOAEL of 5 mg/kg bw/day (200 ppm) for spirotetramat based on a 1- year toxicity study in dogs, and a NOAEL of 100 mg/kg bw/day based on the acute neurotoxicity study in rats. VKM supports/proposes: ADI: 0.05 mg/kg bw/day. AOEL: 0.05 mg/kg bw/day. ARfD: 1 mg/kg bw/day. Risk calculations show minimal risk if personal protective equipment is used. Environment: VKM concludes that spirotetramat and its metabolites are not expected to accumulate in soil. It is not expected that spirotetramat or any of its metabolites will reach concentrations in groundwater above the threshold level of 0.1 μg/L when the formulation Movento 100 SC is applied according to the intended use. VKM concludes that use of Movento 100 SC with the active substance spirotetramat according to the proposed application scheme in Norway represents a minimal risk of adverse effects on terrestrial mammals, birds, earthworms, and soil microorganisms. However, in-field effects on sensitive species of predatory mites in the crop cannot be excluded. The risk of adverse effects on bees is minimal providing that spirotetramat is not used on crops during flowering or when bees are actively foraging. For aquatic organisms in surface water, the risk is considered minimal, provided that a 5 m buffer zone to open water is used.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-08-13), p. 64-66
    Abstract: Aviator Xpro EC 225 is a new fungicide for use in cereals, containing the new active substance bixafen and the already approved active substance prothioconazole. Prothioconazole was assessed by the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety in 2006, and is therefore not included in this report. VKM was requested by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to consider the possible health risk for operators related to the properties of bixafen used in Aviator Xpro EC 225; in particular to evaluate the relevance of the effects of bixafen on liver and coagulation parameters observed in rats and mice, thyroid tumours and reproductive effects observed in rats, and the establishment of NOAELs and reference values. VKM was also asked to evaluate the fate and behaviour of bixafen in the environment, and the ecotoxicological effects and risks related to its use. The risk assessment was finalized in a meeting on May 24. 2013 by VKM’s Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products. VKM’s conclusions are as follows: Health: VKM concluded that the liver effects reported in sub-chronic and chronic studies in rats, dogs and mice exposed to bixafen, as well as the effects on coagulating parameters, should be considered adverse and of relevance to humans. It is the opinion of VKM that the thyroid follicular cell tumours reported in female rats exposed to bixafen is not sufficient to suggest that bixafen has a tumour inducing potential. It is further the opinion of VKM that it cannot be excluded that the reduced pup weight during lactation in the two-generation study is mediated by bixafen via the milk, and that bixafen has a direct effect on the number of stillborn pups in the F1 and F2 generation. Finally, the pup developmental variants and anomalies reported in the teratogenicity study are considered treatment related, and not as secondary effects related to maternal toxicity. VKM proposes a NOAEL of 2.0 mg/kg bw/day based on a 2 year feeding study in rats. VKM support/propose: ADI: 0.02 mg/kg bw/day AOEL: 0.13 mg/kg bw/day ARfD: 0.2 mg/kg bw/day Risk calculations show minimal risk if personal protective equipment is used. Environment: Bixafen is shown to be persistent in soil. VKM considers the results from a field study on a German site and the Finnish PEC calculator to be relevant and concludes that repeated annual applications can cause accumulation in soil under Norwegian conditions. There is also a potential for groundwater contamination from leaching of the metabolite M44. VKM has concluded that the use of bixafen as an ingredient in Aviator Xpro EC 225 with the proposed application regime in Norway will represent a minimal risk for toxic effects to terrestrial organisms. The toxicity of bixafen to aquatic organisms is high, and minimal risk of effects in surface waters can be achieved only if risk mitigation measures with bufferzones of 10 m are applied.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-08-13), p. 12-14
    Abstract: Plenum is a new insecticide containing the new active substance pymetrozine. Plenum is an insecticide against different pests in ornamentals, lettuce, cucumber and tomato in greenhouse and against pollen beetles in oilseed- and turnip rapes. The risk assessment was finalized at a meeting Mai 29, 2012, by VKM’s Scientific Panel on plant protection products (VKM). The Panel is in particular asked by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to look at the following:  The human health risk for operators related to the properties of the active substance and the product. The Panel is in particular asked to look at the following: o The effects seen in studies on dog and if these effects warrant a classification for chronic toxicity. o The oncogenic effects in liver and lungs o The genotoxicity of metabolite CGA 300407. o The effects on reproduction and if the effects seen in teratology studies and developmental neurotoxicity study warrant a classification for developmental toxicity o The establishment of NOAELs and reference values (ADI, AOEL and ARfD). o The classification and labelling of the active substances and the product. VKM’s conclusion is as follows:  The effects reported in the repeated dose toxicity studies with dogs should be considered as adverse.   The increased incidence of liver and lung tumors should be considered as relevant for humans. It cannot be excluded that a genotoxic mechanism could be involved in the formation of the liver tumors, which would have implications for risk assessment. It should therefore be considered to test pymetrozine in more sensitive in vivo genotoxic endpoints in liver.  The effects reported in the teratogenicity studies in rats and rabbits and in the developmental neurotoxicity study in rats should be considered for a classification of pymetrozine for developmental toxicity.  Risk calculations with both the German model and the UK POEM show low risk if personal protection equipment is used. VKM propose: NOAEL of 0.6 mg/kg bw/day for pymetrozine based on the 1-year study in dogs.   AOEL of 0.006 mg/kg bw/day for pymetrozine based on the NOAEL value at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day from the one year study in dogs and an UF of 100.   ADI of 0.006 for pymetrozine based on the NOAEL value at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day from the one year study in dogs and an UF of 100.   ARfD of 0.02 mg/kg bw/day for pymetrozine based on the LOAEL value at 8.1 mg/kg bw/day from the developmental neurotoxicity study and an UF of 500 (10 x interspecies difference, 10 x intraspecies difference, 3 x due to the use of a LOAEL value and 2 x due to the adversity of the neurodevelopmental effects). VKM supports the classification proposal from Norwegian Food Safety Authority.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2019-02-26), p. 99-101
    Abstract: The present report is based on data from the 2010 EFSA Report on pesticide residues in food, the Norwegian monitoring programmes 2007-2012 and data from peer reviewed literature and governmental agencies. It is a challenge to perform quantitative estimates and comparative studies of residue levels due to large variation in the measured levels, and the large number of different pesticides present in the samples. Thus, the focus is on the frequency of observed contaminations in relation to regulatory limits and to present examples to illustrate the variation in residue values and number of detected substances.  Pesticide residues in conventional and organic products: Of the 12,168 samples (plant- and animal products) in the 2010 EU-coordinated programme, 1.6% exceeded the respective maximum residue level (MRL) values, and 47.7% had measurable residues above the limit of quantification (LOQ), but below or at the MRL. Of the 1168 samples analysed in Norway in 2012 (from both imported and domestic products), 1.9% exceeded MRL and 53% contained measurable pesticide residues. Direct comparison of these values is however not possible, since they contain different types of food samples, and are analysed for a different number of pesticides. When organic and conventional samples from fruit, vegetables and other plant products in the 2010 EU-coordinated programme were compared, 4.2% of the conventional and 1.0% of the organic samples exceeded the MRL values, while 43.2% of the conventional and 10.8% of the organic samples had measurable residues below or at the MRL value. Most of the pesticide residues detected in organic samples are not permitted for use in organic farming.  Of the 624 organic samples analysed in Norway 2007 - 2012, 0.2% (one sample) had residues exceeding MRL, while measurable residues were detected in 1.8% of the samples (11 samples). Conventional products were often found to contain different pesticides while most organic samples were found to contain few or only one type of pesticide.   Lack of data on pesticide residue levels of organic samples in the EU-coordinated programme, and few Norwegian samples do not allow for a quantitative comparison of pesticide residue levels in organic and conventional samples. Comparative estimation of pesticide residues faces a number of challenges and uncertainties. However, it seems unquestionable based on available data that organic plant products contain fewer and substantially lower amounts of pesticide residues than conventional products. Health risk associated with pesticide residues: The general level of pesticide residues in both conventional and organic food is low, and well below what is likely to result in adverse health effects. This conclusion is based on the comparison of estimated dietary exposure with toxicological reference values i.e. acceptable daily intake (ADI) for chronic effects, and acute reference dose (ARfD) for acute effects. The finding of pesticide residues that exceeds established regulatory limits in a minority of tested samples is not considered to represent a health risk. When dietary exposure that was estimated in six different food commodities in the 2010 EUcoordinated programme was compared with their relevant reference values, EFSA concluded that for 79 of 18243 conventionally grown fruit and vegetable samples, a short-term acute consumer health risk could not be excluded. The conclusion was based on the exceeding of ARfD. None of these 79 samples were organic. It is important to also consider that the exceeding of the acute reference value only occurred in 0.4% of the samples and that the scenario used for acute intake assessment is conservative, suggesting that the toxicological implications are limited. This is also reflected in the chronic exposure assessment, where none of the samples were found to exceed the toxicological reference value ADI.   Dietary exposure assessments on the basis of Norwegian samples of apples, tomatoes, carrots, strawberries and lettuce did not show an exceeding of any toxicological reference value.  Combined exposure and cumulative risk assessment of pesticide residues: No generally accepted methodology is at present established for cumulative risk assessment of combined exposure to pesticide residues. Available data suggest however that combined exposure is not likely to result in increased human health risk.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-08-13), p. 67-68
    Abstract: Infinito is a new fungicide containing the two active substances fluopicolide and propamocarb-HCL. Infinito is a new generation fungicide to protect potatoes against the blight pathogen phytophtora infestans. The risk assessment was finalized at a meeting Mai 29, 2012, by the Panel on plant protection products of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM).  The Norwegian Food Safety Authority would like, in this regard, an assessment of the following: The fate and behaviour in the environment and the ecotoxicological effects and risks with regard to the properties of Infinito and the active substances. The Panel is particularly asked to look at the following: o The persistence of fluopicolide and its metabolites. o The leaching potential of fluopicolide and its metabolites. VKM considers both fluopicolide and its main metabolite M-01 (2,6-dichlorobenzamid (BAM)) to be persistent in Norwegian soils and surface waters. Other conclusions from VKM are as follows: Fluopicolide and its main metabolite may have a significant potential for soil accumulation after repeated use under Norwegian conditions.   Fluopicolide shows low mobility in both studies and modelling. Metabolite M-01 (BAM) is however highly mobile.   There is minimal risk for toxic effects of fluopicolide to terrestrial and aquatic organisms with the proposed application regime.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-08-13), p. 1-3
    Abstract: Luna Privilege is a new fungicide for use in apples, pears, outdoor and indoor strawberries, outdoor and indoor lettuces, peas, beans and indoor tomatoes, and contains the new active substance fluopyram. VKM was requested by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to consider the possible health risk for operators related to the properties of Luna Privilege and fluopyram; in particular to evaluate the potential for bioaccumulation, reproductive and neurotoxic effects, and discuss possible mechanisms involved in liver and thyroid tumor formation observed in rats, and the establishment of NOAELs and reference values. VKM was also asked to evaluate the fate and behaviour of fluopyram in the environment, and the ecotoxicological effects and risks related to its use, in particular the potential for groundwater contamination, safety margins and possible effects on birds and aquatic organisms. The assessment was finalized in a meeting on December 13. 2013 by VKM’s Panel on Plant Protection Products. VKM’s conclusions are as follows: Health: It is the opinion of VKM that: The active ingredient fluopyram has low potential for bioaccumulation, and the data do not suggest a sex-specific excretion.   An in vivo Comet Assay in rat liver could help to further elucidate the genotoxic potential of fluopyram.   It can not be excluded that the reported incidence of “gall bladder absent” is treatment related.   NOAEL for the 90-day feeding study in rats should be set to 3.06 mg/kg bw/day, resulting in an AOEL of 0.03 mg/kg bw/day.   The “dumb-bell or incomplete ossification and/or bipartite/normal cartilage” should be considered as a malformation and regarded as treatment related.   The time points used for neurotoxic measurements are not optimal to detect neurotoxic effects from acute exposure, since the time window between the first and second measurements is too long.   The studies where effects of fluopyram and phenobarbital are compared can not be used to exclude human relevance of the tumor-inducing effect of fluopyram in the liver of female rats.   The results from the mechanistic studies are insufficient to support the proposed mode of action for the induction of thyroid follicular cell tumors in male mice, and thus the induction of thyroid tumors in male mice could be relevant for humans. VKM proposes:   NOAEL of 1.2 mg/kg bw/day based on a 2 year feeding study in rats.   ADI: 0.012 mg/kg bw/day   AOEL: 0.03 mg/kg bw/day   ARfD: 0.25 mg/kg bw/day   Risk calculations for field use of Luna Privilege show minimal risk if personal protective equipment is used. The AOEL of fluopyram for greenhouse use is not exceeded, even without protective equipment. Re-entry and bystander exposure is calculated to be well below the AOEL. Environment: It is the opinion of VKM that: Worst case degradation rates from laboratory studies should preferably be used to calculate PECsoil values for fluopyram. Both fluopyram and fluopyram-7-hydroxy have a high potential for groundwater contamination.   The efficacy of buffer zones needs to be considered on a case-by-case basis, and further validation of values for efficacy from the model simulation is necessary.   It is further the opinion of VKM that all the refinements used in the risk assessment for birds are relevant. Since the TER values estimated for all crops except for orchards are below the trigger following refinements, it is the view of VKM that the data indicate medium risk for strawberries and pulses, and high risk for lettuce in open field.   The use of LC50 values for fluopyram in the TER calculations with a TER trigger value of 100 is overly conservative, and a reduction of the acute trigger for both invertebrates and fish from 100 to 10 for such calculations are suggested.   The trigger for acute toxicity is not exceeded for any of the crops. For chronic toxicity, VKM concludes that there is a moderate risk for effects on fish when Luna Privilege is applied to beans/strawberries without the use of a vegetated mitigation buffer-strip.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-06-03), p. 1-3
    Abstract: Milbeknock is a new insecticide/acaricide containing the new active substance milbemectin, which is a microbial fermentation product of Streptomyces. It is applied for control of mites and leafminers. The intended use is as a foliar spray in fruits (apples/pears), strawberries (only after harvest) and in ornamental plants growing in greenhouse and outdoors. The risk assessment was finalized at a meeting November 24, 2011, by VKM’s Scientific Panel on plant protection products (Panel 2). Panel 2 is in particular asked by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority to look at the following: 1) The human health risk for operators related to the properties of the active substance and the product. 2) The degree of oral absorption. 3) Acute toxicity. 4) The reproduction and developmental toxicity. 5) Establishment of reference values (ADI, AOEL and ARfD). 6) The fate and behaviour in the environment and environmental risk with regard to the  properties of Milbeknock and milbemectin. 7) Bioavailability of milbemectin. 8) The microcosm study.  VKM Panel 2’s conclusion is as follows:   Health: Panel 2 proposes to set the absorption to 50%, which is in agreement with the EU DAR report (propose 47%). For acute toxicicity, Panel 2 concludes that milbemectin probably has a LD50 for dogs between 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight (bw)/day. Dogs seem to be the most sensitive experimental species and should be considered for hazard classification purposes. With respect to reproduction and developmental toxicity, Panel 2 concludes that the documentation of the role of the P-glycoprotein transporter is not convincing, and that the CF1 mice study cannot be used to support the argumentation of no developmental toxicity put forward by the applicant. The following reference values have been estimated: ADI of 0.03 mg/kg bw/day; AOEL of 0.015 mg/kg bw/day and ARfD of 0.067 mg/kg bw/day for milbemectin. Provided that personal protection equipment is used, the AOEL for operators is not exceeded.  Environment: With respect to environmental fate, the opinion of the Panel is that the relatively rapid degradation in soil indicates a significant bioavailability in both soil and water-sediment systems. Further it concludes that 0.058µg/L should be regarded as NOECpopulation for the microcosm study. Panel 2 concludes that there is a medium risk of toxic effects on aquatic organisms due to exposure of milbemectin sprayed in fruits with the proposed application regime, provided that a buffer zone of 30 meters to surface water is applied. There are minimal risks of toxic effects on aquatic organisms with sufficient buffer zones in other applied crops. Panel 2 further considers the risk for foliage dwelling non-target predators and parasitoids to be high, and the risk to earthworms to be medium.  The strong sorption to soil suggests that the bioavailability in soil may be limited. However, the opinion of the Panel is that the relatively rapid degradation in soil indicates a significant bioavailability. Also, for a substance with such a high log Kow the reported water solubility is relatively high, which will contribute to the availability for biological uptake. The toxicity observed in the microcosm study indicates high bioavailability also in a water/sediment system.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-08-13), p. 56-58
    Abstract: Infinito is a new fungicide containing the two active substances fluopicolide and propamocarb-HCl intended to protect potatoes against the blight pathogen Phytophtora infestans. Fluopicolide is a new active substance in Norway, while propamocarb-HCl is already approved in several products. The risk assessment of Infinito was finalized in a meeting on 29. May 2012 by the Panel on Plant Protection Products of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM). The main conclusions from the risk assessment of Infinito were: VKMs opinion is that both fluopicolide and its main metabolite M-01 (2,6- dichlorobenzamid (BAM)) are persistent in Norwegian soils and surface waters. Fluopicolide and its main metabolite M-01 may accumulate in Norwegian soils. The metabolite M-01 is highly mobile, while fluopicolide shows lower mobility in both studies and modelling. Based on the environmental properties pointed out in the risk assessment, The Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet) turned down the application for use of Infinito in Norway. The decision made by Mattilsynet has been appealed by the applicant, Bayer Crop Science. No new studies have been presented. Mattilsynet has asked VKM to consider the arguments in the appeal from Bayer Crop Science on the risk assessment of Infinito. The appeal and arguments were discussed in a meeting in VKMs Panel on Plant Protection Products on 13. December 2013. The conclusions were as follows: VKM maintains the previous conclusion on the risk assessment on persistence, accumulation and mobility of fluopicolide and one of the metabolites M-01. Our conclusion is further strengthened by additional documentation on: Persistence of M-01 as indicated by data from the National Monitoring program (JOVA) and international studies Accumulation as related to results from 4 year field studies and model calculations using the Finnish PEC calculator Mobility of M-01 as identified by FOCUS PELMO, FOCUS PEARL and MACRO simulations using Swedish and Norwegian scenarios in addition to monitoring results from groundwater in Norway Opinion from EFSA indicating that model simulations and risk of leaching to groundwater from row crops are under-estimated by a factor of six, and should be revised in the new FOCUS scenarios. Half-life calculations based on field studies of mobile substances should be avoided as some of the substances could have escaped to deeper layers and therefore showing artificially high degradation rates.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, Sciencedomain International, ( 2022-06-03), p. 1-2
    Abstract: Simplex is a new herbicide in Norway containing the active substances aminopyralid and fluroxypyr. Aminopyralid is a new active substance in Norway, but fluroxypyr is found in several authorized products. The application concerns use in established grassland for forage, established ley and pasture and in grass at the first year of sowing. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) has on a request from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority performed a risk assessment on human health of the active substance and the product. The risk assessment of the product was approved at a meeting May 11 2010 by VKMs Scientific Panel on Pesticides (Panel 2). VKM’s Panel 2 concludes as following:  Both Simplex and the active substance aminopyralid are characterized as extremely irritating to the eye based on persistent irritation to the eyes of rabbits. The product Simplex is also found irritating to the rabbit skin.   Aminopyralid has low acute toxicity and is not shown to have genotoxic potential, or to be teratogenic or toxic to the reproduction in animals. There may however be a carcinogenic effect of aminopyralid based on an increased number of uterine sarcomas in mice. The main target organs for sub-chronic and chronic toxicity were the caecum (rats), the stomach (dogs, inflammation) and the liver (dogs, hyperthropy). No adverse effects for chronic toxicity were seen in mice. Rabbit was the most sensitive species for toxicity and the no observed effect levels (NOAELs) derived from studies in this species serve as base for calculations of values for acceptable daily intake (ADI) and acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL).   The estimated risk for operator is assessed as minimal both by use of boom spraying (46% of AOEL) and knapsack sprayers (81% of AOEL).   However, as a result of the hazard classification, a faceshield and gloves are necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) to be worn during mixing and loading operations, due to the risk of serious damage to the eyes and skin irritation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2347-5641
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Sciencedomain International
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2810065-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...