GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (3)
  • Kim, Do Hoon  (3)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (3)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e15578-e15578
    Abstract: e15578 Background: Although dCRT is the standard treatment for pts who have locally advanced unresectable EC or refuse surgery, the prognosis of these pts remains dismal. There are urgent needs to develop the novel treatment strategy based on prognostic stratification after dCRT. Methods: A total of 382 pts with locoregional EC without distant metastasis except for supraclavicular lymph node who received dCRT at Asan Medical Center in South Korea from 2006 to 2015 were included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors were analyzed using Cox regression. Risk scores were calculated by multiplying coefficients in Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Baseline characteristics were as follows: median age = 66 yrs (range: 40-85); male = 359 pts (94.0%); squamous cell carcinoma = 375 (98.2%); cTNM stage (AJCC 8th) I = 40 (10.5%), II = 122 (31.9%), III = 128 (33.5%), IV = 92 (24.1%). During median follow-up of 52.9 mo, median PFS was 13.5 mo (95% CI, 10.9-16.1), and median OS was 26.7 mo (95% CI, 19.8-33.7). In the univariate analyses, sex (only for PFS), weight loss (≥ 5 kg) during dCRT, cT stage, cN stage, cTNM stage, clinical response after dCRT, reason for dCRT were significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS. In the multivariate analyses, clinical response after dCRT, cTNM stage, and weight loss were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS (Table). Risk-scoring model using these factors stratified pts into four groups: for median PFS (p 〈 0.0001), group 1 = 58.2 mo (95% CI, 43.5-73.0), group 2 = 17.0 mo (95% CI, 11.9-22.1), group 3 = 9.0 mo (95% CI, 7.0-11.1), and group 4 = 3.9 mo (95% CI, 3.7-4.2); for median OS (p 〈 0.0001), group 1 = 106.2 mo (95% CI, 44.9-167.6), group 2 = 38.0 mo (95% CI, 24.4-51.5), group 3 = 13.0 mo (95% CI, 8.5-17.6), and group 4 = 8.0 mo (95% CI, 7.4-8.6). Conclusions: In dCRT-treated locoregional EC pts, survival outcome significantly varied according to baseline clinical stage, treatment response, and dynamic change in body weight. Different treatment and surveillance strategies based on the risk score might be needed in these pts.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 4020-4020
    Abstract: 4020 Background: To investigate the role of esophagectomy in pts who achieved clinical complete response (cCR) with CRT for locally advanced ESCC. Methods: Pts with resectable cT3-T4a anyN M0 or anyT N+ M0 thoracic ESCC, 20-75 yrs, and ECOG PS ≤2 received 2 cycles of induction XP (capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 bid D1-14 + cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 D1 q3w) followed by CRT (50.4 Gy/28 fx, X 800 mg/m 2 bid x 5 d/w and P 30 mg/m 2 weekly). Pts with cCR were randomized to surgery (S) or observation (O). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: From Nov 2012 to March 2016, 86 pts (17.7% of the target number) were enrolled. The slow accrual caused early closure of the study. 81 pts completed CRT, and 38 pts (44.2%) achieved cCR among whom 37 pts were randomized to S (n=19) or O (n=18). The compliance rates differed between the allocated arms (68.4% in the S arm vs 100% in the O arm; P=0.020). In both Intent-to-treat (ITT) and as-treated analysis, there were no significant differences in DFS, PFS, TTP, and OS in both arms although the S arm tended to have better DFS, PFS and TTP than the O arm (Table 1). In the as-treated analysis, the relapse rate was 23.1% (3/13) in the S arm and 45.8% (11/24) in the O arm ( P=0.288). All 10 locoregional only relapse in the O arm were considered resectable, of whom 8 pts underwent surgery (n=7) or endoscopic dissection (n=1). In the as-treated analysis, the S arm had a higher R0 resection rate (92.3% vs 42.9%; P=0.031) and lower pTNM stages ( P=0.0005) than the O arm. Conclusions: Watchful waiting might be a valuable option in pts with thoracic ESCC who have cCR to CRT. Further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm our results and to optimize treatment decision in the individual pt. Clinical trial information: NCT01740375. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 3_suppl ( 2014-01-20), p. 8-8
    Abstract: 8 Background: A customized screening program for gastric cancer would optimize the benefits of screening endoscopy. This study investigated the risk factors for gastric cancer detected during screening, and factors affecting clinical outcomes. Methods: From April 2000 to December 2010, subjects who underwent screening endoscopy at Asan Medical Center were included. To investigate risk factors, age and sex-matched control group were selected.The clinical outcomes of gastric cancer identified during screening (screening group) were compared with age, sex and date of diagnosis-matched subjects who were diagnosed with gastric cancer in the outpatient clinic (outpatient group). Results: Of 109,530 subjects, 327 were diagnosed with gastric cancer. The median age of the screening group was 63.6 years (interquartile range: 56-71 years), and the male to female ratio was 2.4:1. When comparing with the control group, H. pylori seropositivity (odds ratio [OR] 2.933, p 〈 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (OR 8.633, p=0.004), family history of gastric cancer (OR 2.254, p=0.007), and drinking (OR 3.312, p 〈 0.001) were independent positive risk factors, and the use of aspirin a negative risk factor for gastric cancer (OR 0.445, p=0.012) in multivariate analysis. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (hazard ratio [HR] 0.987, p=0.005), cancer antigen 19-9 (HR 21.713, p 〈 0.001), resectability (HR 59.833, p 〈 0.001), and family history (HR 0.308, p=0.009) were independent risk factors for death. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the screening group than in the outpatient group (p 〈 0.001). Conclusions: Early detection of gastric cancer by screening endoscopy while asymptomatic enhances patient outcomes, especially in high risk groups.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...