GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Language
Preferred search index
Number of Hits per Page
Default Sort Criterion
Default Sort Ordering
Size of Search History
Default Email Address
Default Export Format
Default Export Encoding
Facet list arrangement
Maximum number of values per filter
Auto Completion
Topics (search only within journals and journal articles that belong to one or more of the selected topics)
Feed Format
Maximum Number of Items per Feed

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Kamke, Kendall K.  (4)
Material
Publisher
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2013
    In:  North American Journal of Fisheries Management Vol. 33, No. 5 ( 2013-10), p. 909-916
    In: North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Wiley, Vol. 33, No. 5 ( 2013-10), p. 909-916
    Abstract: Rates of tag loss should be estimated and accounted for when using mark–recapture surveys and angler tag returns to estimate fish population abundance and exploitation rates. Walleyes Sander vitreus sampled during April 2010 spawning assessments conducted in the Winnebago system, Wisconsin, were marked with anchor tags and upper caudal fin clips to estimate tag loss rates during three time intervals: 0–11 d posttagging, 0–90 d posttagging, and 1 year posttagging. Tag loss was negligible ( 〈 0.5%) within the first 11 d but increased to 4.7% within the first 90 d and to 21.9% after 1 year. After we corrected for the tag loss occurring within the first 90 d, estimates of population abundance decreased 4.3% for females and 4.4% for males, while estimates of exploitation increased 4.9% for both sexes. Accounting for 21.9% annual tag loss led to more severe decreases in the estimates of population abundance (20.0% for females and 21.2% for males) and increases in the estimates of exploitation (28.0% for both sexes) than not accounting for any tag loss. Higher exploitation rates resulted in higher estimates of fishing mortality and lower estimates of natural mortality. When used in yield‐per‐recruit models, the estimated natural mortality rates derived from exploitation rates that accounted for tag loss resulted in higher yields through the implementation of larger minimum length limits to maximize yield. We recommend that managers evaluate the effectiveness of their tagging operations by estimating tag loss and assessing the potential impacts of quantified loss on management metrics. We also caution against the application of population models without an accurate estimate of tag loss and the associated impacts on estimates of population abundance and exploitation and, in turn, fishing and natural mortality rates. Received May 22, 2013; accepted June 11, 2013
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0275-5947 , 1548-8675
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2192453-3
    SSG: 21,3
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2015
    In:  Fisheries Research Vol. 167 ( 2015-07), p. 13-21
    In: Fisheries Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 167 ( 2015-07), p. 13-21
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0165-7836
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 406532-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1497860-X
    SSG: 21,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 1996
    In:  North American Journal of Fisheries Management Vol. 16, No. 2 ( 1996-05), p. 364-370
    In: North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Wiley, Vol. 16, No. 2 ( 1996-05), p. 364-370
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0275-5947 , 1548-8675
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 1996
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2192453-3
    SSG: 21,3
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2013
    In:  North American Journal of Fisheries Management Vol. 33, No. 5 ( 2013-10), p. 900-908
    In: North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Wiley, Vol. 33, No. 5 ( 2013-10), p. 900-908
    Abstract: The age data used to manage Walleye Sander vitreus fisheries are not always accurate, as otoliths typically provide more accurate age estimates for larger, older Walleyes than dorsal spines. We assessed the impacts that the aging error associated with the use of dorsal spines has on the estimated age distribution, growth and mortality rates, and yield per recruit for Walleyes in the Winnebago system, Wisconsin. Age distributions derived from otolith age estimates more accurately portrayed variable recruitment than those derived from dorsal spine age estimates. The mean estimates of instantaneous total annual mortality developed from sex‐specific catch curves were greater when dorsal spine age estimates were used (0.515 for males, 0.493 for females) than when otolith age estimates were (0.349 for males, 0.396 for females), with most of the differences being observed in natural mortality estimates. The von Bertalanffy growth models were not significantly different, but the yield‐per‐recruit models (which rely heavily on von Bertalanffy model parameters) incorporating spine age data produced average yield estimates 50–70% lower than the models developed from otolith ages. The yield‐per‐recruit models derived from spine‐determined ages also resulted in lower recommendations as to the age and size of fish for maximum yield at all exploitation levels than the models developed from otolith age data. The mean dorsal spine and otolith age estimates were similar for male Walleyes 〈 457 mm and female Walleyes 〈 508 mm, but for larger fish otoliths yielded significantly older ages than spines. Given the economic and social impacts of the Winnebago system Walleye fishery, we recommend exclusive use of otoliths to obtain the most accurate estimates of fish age, growth, mortality, and yield. In populations in which the sacrifice of large quantities of fish is not acceptable, we recommend using spines to estimate the ages of smaller fish (males 〈 457 mm, females 〈 508 mm) and otoliths to estimate the ages of fish larger than these critical lengths. Received December 26, 2012; accepted June 10, 2013
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0275-5947 , 1548-8675
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2192453-3
    SSG: 21,3
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...