GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 22_Supplement ( 2021-11-15), p. PR-003-PR-003
    Abstract: Cancer immunoediting is a hallmark of cancer that predicts T cells recognize and kill tumor cells expressing immunogenic mutations (neoantigens), to induce less immunogenic clones to outgrow in tumors. Although established through longitudinal studies of how tumors evolve in immune-proficient and -deficient mice, whether the human immune system naturally targets neoantigens to edit tumors remains unclear. Here, we investigate how 70 human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) – a poorly immunogenic cancer with few neoantigens and thus largely presumed to not be subject to immunoediting – evolved over 10 years. We use longitudinal tumor sampling to compare how primary tumors evolve to recurrence in rare long-term PDAC survivors previously shown to have more immunogenic tumors (n = 9 patients, n = 9 primary and 22 recurrent tumors, median survival 5.4 years), to short-term survivors with less immunogenic primary tumors (n = 6 patients, n = 6 primary and 33 recurrent tumors, median survival 1.8 years). Compared to short-term survivors, we observe that long-term survivors evolve fewer recurrent tumors with longer latency, and distinct tissue tropism. To evaluate if differential immune pressures could explain these differences, we perform whole exome sequencing to bioinformatically predict tumor clonal structures and neoantigens. We discover that despite longer times to evolve, long-term survivors evolve genetically less heterogeneous tumors with fewer clones, fewer nonsynonymous mutations, and fewer neoantigens. To identify the edited neoantigens, we sought to improve upon and apply our previously defined quality model that quantifies the immunogenic features of a neoantigen. With our quality model, we now infer a neoantigen is immunogenic (“high quality”) by two parameters – if the immune system can recognize a neoantigen as “non-self” by its similarity to known immunogenic antigens, and discriminate it from “self” by estimating if a neoantigen has sufficient antigenic distance from its wild-type peptide to differentially bind the MHC or activate a T cell. We integrate these features to estimate neoantigen quality in primary and recurrent tumors of long- and short-term survivors. With the quality model, we observe that neoantigens with greater antigenic distance (“less self”) are more depleted in primary and recurrent tumors of long- compared to short-term survivors. Furthermore, we find that long-term survivors evolve markedly fewer new neoantigens of strikingly lower quality, to indicate clones with high quality (more immunogenic) neoantigens are immunoedited. Thus, we submit longitudinal evidence that the human immune system naturally edits neoantigens in PDAC. Furthermore, we present a model that describes how cancer neoantigens evolve under immune pressure over time, with implications for cancer biology and therapy. More broadly, our results argue that immunoediting is a fundamental cancer suppressive mechanism that can be quantified to predict tumor evolution. Citation Format: Luis A. Rojas, Marta Łuksza, Zachary M. Sethna, Kevin Soares, Joanne Leung, Jayon Lihm, David Hoyos, Anton Dobrin, Rajya Kappagantula, Alvin Makohon-Moore, Amber Johns, Anthony Gill, Masataka Amisaki, Pablo Guasp, Abderezak Zebboudj, Rebecca Yu, Adrienne Kaya Chandra, Zagaa Odgerel, Michel Sadelain, Erin Patterson, Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue, Benjamin D. Greenbaum, Vinod P. Balachandran. High quality neoantigens are immunoedited in long-term pancreatic cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2021 Sep 29-30. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 20 21;81(22 Suppl):Abstract nr PR-003.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Nature, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 606, No. 7913 ( 2022-06-09), p. 389-395
    Abstract: Cancer immunoediting 1 is a hallmark of cancer 2 that predicts that lymphocytes kill more immunogenic cancer cells to cause less immunogenic clones to dominate a population. Although proven in mice 1,3 , whether immunoediting occurs naturally in human cancers remains unclear. Here, to address this, we investigate how 70 human pancreatic cancers evolved over 10 years. We find that, despite having more time to accumulate mutations, rare long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer who have stronger T cell activity in primary tumours develop genetically less heterogeneous recurrent tumours with fewer immunogenic mutations (neoantigens). To quantify whether immunoediting underlies these observations, we infer that a neoantigen is immunogenic (high-quality) by two features—‘non-selfness’  based on neoantigen similarity to known antigens 4,5 , and ‘selfness’  based on the antigenic distance required for a neoantigen to differentially bind to the MHC or activate a T cell compared with its wild-type peptide. Using these features, we estimate cancer clone fitness as the aggregate cost of T cells recognizing high-quality neoantigens offset by gains from oncogenic mutations. With this model, we predict the clonal evolution of tumours to reveal that long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer develop recurrent tumours with fewer high-quality neoantigens. Thus, we submit evidence that that the human immune system naturally edits neoantigens. Furthermore, we present a model to predict how immune pressure induces cancer cell populations to evolve over time. More broadly, our results argue that the immune system fundamentally surveils host genetic changes to suppress cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0028-0836 , 1476-4687
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 120714-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1413423-8
    SSG: 11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, BMJ, Vol. 9, No. Suppl 2 ( 2021-11), p. A862-A862
    Abstract: Cancer immunoediting predicts that T cells selectively kill tumor cells expressing immunogenic mutations (neoantigens) resulting in less immunogenic clones to outgrow in tumors. 1 Although established through longitudinal studies of how tumors evolve in immune-proficient and -deficient mice, 1 2 whether the human immune system naturally targets neoantigens to edit tumors, and the principles that identify the edited neoantigens, remains unclear. Methods To investigate if immune selective pressures on neoantigens alter how human tumors evolve, we longitudinally studied how 70 human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) - a poorly immunogenic cancer largely presumed to not be subject to immunoediting - evolved over 10 years. We use exome sequencing, neoantigen identification, and clonal reconstruction to compare how primary PDACs evolve to recurrence in rare long-term PDAC survivors previously shown to have more immunogenic tumors 3 (n = 9 patients, n = 9 primary, 22 recurrent tumors), to short-term survivors with less immunogenic primary tumors (n = 6 patients, n = 6 primary, 33 recurrent tumors). To identify immunogenic “high quality” neoantigens, we use neopeptide-T cell functional assays and computational modeling to extend and apply a previously developed neoantigen quality model 3 4 by predicting high quality neoantigens as arising from amino acid substitutions with sufficient antigenic distance from cognate wild-type peptides to differentially bind the MHC or activate a T cell. Results Compared to short-term survivors, we observe that long-term survivors evolve fewer recurrent tumors with longer latency, and distinct tissue tropism. To evaluate if differential immune pressures explained these differences, we discover that despite longer times to evolve, long-term survivors evolve genetically less heterogeneous tumors with fewer clones, fewer nonsynonymous mutations, and fewer neoantigens. To identify if high quality neoantigens are selectively edited in recurrent tumors of long-term survivors, we observe that neoantigens with greater antigenic distance (“less self”) are more depleted in primary and recurrent tumors of long- compared to short-term survivors. Furthermore, we find that long-term survivors evolve markedly fewer new neoantigens of strikingly lower quality, to indicate clones with high quality neoantigens are immunoedited. Conclusions We submit longitudinal evidence that the human immune system naturally edits neoantigens in PDAC. Furthermore, we present a model that describes how cancer neoantigens evolve under immune pressure over time, with implications for cancer biology and therapy. More broadly, our results argue that immunoediting is a fundamental cancer suppressive mechanism that can be quantified to predict tumor evolution. Acknowledgements This work was supported by NIH U01 CA224175 (V.P.B), a Stand Up to Cancer Convergence Award (B.D.G, V.P.B.), a Damon Runyon Clinical Investigator Award (V.P.B), and the Avner Pancreatic Cancer Foundation (A.J, A.G). Services by the Integrated Genomics Core were funded by the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA08748), Cycle for Survival, and the Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology. References Shankaran V, et al. IFNgamma and lymphocytes prevent primary tumour development and shape tumour immunogenicity. Nature 2001; 410 :1107–1111. Matsushita H, et al. Cancer exome analysis reveals a T-cell-dependent mechanism of cancer immunoediting. Nature 2012; 482 :400–404. Balachandran VP, et al. Identification of unique neoantigen qualities in long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer. Nature 2017; 551 :512–516. Łuksza M, et al. A neoantigen fitness model predicts tumour response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Nature 2017; 551 :517–520. Ethics Approval This study was performed in strict compliance with all institutional ethical regulations and approved by the institutional review boards of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), the Garvan Institute of Medical Research, and the The Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH). We obtained informed consent from all patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2051-1426
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2719863-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...