GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 39, No. 2 ( 2019-02), p. 209-218
    Abstract: The management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension focuses on reducing intracranial pressure to preserve vision and reduce headaches. There is sparse evidence to support the use of some of the drugs commonly used to manage idiopathic intracranial hypertension, therefore we propose to evaluate the efficacy of these drugs at lowering intracranial pressure in healthy rats. Methods We measured intracranial pressure in female rats before and after subcutaneous administration of acetazolamide, topiramate, furosemide, amiloride and octreotide at clinical doses (equivalent to a single human dose) and high doses (equivalent to a human daily dose). In addition, we measured intracranial pressure after oral administration of acetazolamide and topiramate. Results At clinical and high doses, subcutaneous administration of topiramate lowered intracranial pressure by 32% ( p = 0.0009) and 21% ( p = 0.015) respectively. There was no significant reduction in intracranial pressure noted with acetazolamide, furosemide, amiloride or octreotide at any dose. Oral administration of topiramate significantly lowered intracranial pressure by 22% ( p = 0.018), compared to 5% reduction with acetazolamide ( p =  〉 0.999). Conclusion Our in vivo studies demonstrated that both subcutaneous and oral administration of topiramate significantly lowers intracranial pressure. Other drugs tested, including acetazolamide, did not significantly reduce intracranial pressure. Future clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and side effects of topiramate in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients would be of interest.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 33, No. 4 ( 2013-03), p. 245-255
    Abstract: The HURT Questionnaire consists of eight questions which the patient answers as a measure of effectiveness of intervention against headache. This first assessment of clinical utility was conducted in headache specialist centres in three countries in order to demonstrate that HURT was responsive to change induced by effective management. We administered HURT on three occasions to 159 consecutive patients seeking non-urgent care from centres in Denmark and the United Kingdom: the first before the initial visit to the centres; the second at the initial visit; and the third when the specialist judged that the best possible outcome had been achieved in each patient. Questionnaires were also answered by 42 patients at initial and final visits to a centre in Italy. Internal consistency reliability was very good ( α = 0.85) while test-retest reliability was fair to low ( κ = 0.38–0.62 and r s  = 0.49–0.76), possibly because headache was unstable prior to start of management. There were significant changes in responses post-intervention compared with baseline ( p  〈  0.01), indicating a favourable outcome overall in up to 77% of patients, and responsiveness to change, but there was no improvement in patients’ concerns about side effects of medication ( p = 0.18). We conclude that the questionnaire has utility across headache disorders. It can help patients describe headache frequency and headache-attributed disability, medication use/efficacy/tolerability, self-efficacy and knowledge about headache. It may guide physicians in assessment of disability of individual patients, how to proceed with management towards the best possible outcome, and in evaluating the quality of management.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 34, No. 13 ( 2014-11), p. 1100-1110
    Abstract: Chronic cluster headache (CCH) is a debilitating headache disorder with a significant impairment of the patients' lives. Within the past decade, various invasive neuromodulatory approaches have been proposed for the treatment of CCH refractory to standard preventive drug, but only very few randomized controlled studies exist in the field of neuromodulation for the treatment of drug-refractory headaches. Based on the prominent role of the cranial parasympathetic system in acute cluster headache attacks, high-frequency sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) stimulation has been shown to abort ongoing attacks in some patients in a first small study. As preventive effects of SPG-stimulation have been suggested and the rate of long-term side effects was moderate, SPG stimulation appears to be a promising new treatment strategy. Aims and conclusion As SPG stimulation is effective in some patients and the first commercially available CE-marked SPG neurostimulator system has been introduced for cluster headache, patient selection and care should be standardized to ensure maximal efficacy and safety. As only limited data have been published on SPG stimulation, standards of care based on expert consensus are proposed to ensure homogeneous patient selection and treatment across international headache centres. Given that SPG stimulation is still a novel approach, all expert-based consensus on patient selection and standards of care should be re-reviewed when more long-term data are available.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2015
    In:  Cephalalgia Vol. 35, No. 7 ( 2015-06), p. 553-562
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 35, No. 7 ( 2015-06), p. 553-562
    Abstract: The aims of this article are to characterize the headache in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and to field-test the ICHD diagnostic criteria for headache attributed to IIH. Materials and methods We included 44 patients with new-onset IIH. Thirty-four patients with suspected but unconfirmed IIH served as controls. Headache and other IIH-related symptoms were assessed by a detailed standardized interview. In participants referred before diagnostic lumbar puncture ( n = 67), we recorded headache intensity before and after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) withdrawal. Results Headache in patients with IIH was daily occurring in 86%, focal in 84% and pulsating in 52%. Aggravation of headache by coughing or straining and relief after CSF withdrawal were significantly more frequent in patients than in controls ( p ≤ 0.002). From the ICHD-2 to the ICHD-3 beta classification the sensitivity increased from 60% to 86% whereas the specificity decreased from 86% to 53%. Based on our data the headache criteria can be revised to increase sensitivity to 95% and specificity to 65%. Conclusion Aggravation of headache by coughing or straining, relief after CSF withdrawal, retrobulbar pain and pulsatile tinnitus may suggest intracranial hypertension. Based on data from a well-defined IIH cohort, we propose a revision of the ICDH-3 beta diagnostic criteria with improved clinical applicability and increased sensitivity and specificity.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 41, No. 2 ( 2021-02), p. 256-273
    Abstract: This meta-analysis evaluates pressure pain sensitivity values in symptomatic and distant pain-free areas comparing individuals with tension-type headache to controls. Databases and data treatment Electronic databases were searched for cross-sectional or prospective case-control studies comparing pressure pain thresholds in patients with tension-type headache to headache-free controls. Data were extracted by three reviewers. The methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Meta-analyses of trigeminal, extra-trigeminal (neck) and distant pain-free areas in tension-type headache were compared to headache-free controls. Frequency of tension-type headache and gender were taken into account. Results Twenty studies were included. Patients with tension-type headache exhibited lower pressure pain thresholds than headache-free controls: Trigeminal (MD −49.11 kPa, 95% CI −66.05 to −32.17), cervical spine (MD −88.17 kPa, 95% CI −108.43 to −67.92) and distant pain-free areas (MD −98.43 kPa, 95% CI −136.78 to −60.09). Differences were significant for chronic, episodic, and mixed episodic and chronic tension-type headache within the trigeminal and neck (symptomatic areas), but only significant for chronic tension-type headache (MD −102.86, 95% CI −139.47 to −66.25 kPa) for distant pain-free areas. In general, women had lower pressure pain thresholds than men. The methodological quality ranged from fair (45%) to good (40%). The results showed a high heterogeneity and publication bias. Conclusion This first meta-analysis addressing pressure pain thresholds differences in symptomatic and distant pain-free areas between patients with tension-type headache and controls found low to moderate evidence supporting the presence of pressure pain hypersensitivity in the trigeminal and neck areas in tension-type headache in comparison with headache-free controls. Sensitivity to pressure pain was widespread only in chronic, not episodic, tension-type headache (moderate evidence). Registration number: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R29HY
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 41, No. 11-12 ( 2021-10), p. 1135-1151
    Abstract: Although the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration have cleared several devices that use neuromodulation to provide clinical benefits in the acute or preventive treatment of migraine, the Clinical Trials Committee of the International Headache Society has not developed guidelines specifically for clinical trials of neuromodulation devices. In recognition of the distinct needs and challenges associated with their assessment in controlled trials, the Committee provides these recommendations for optimizing the design and conduct of controlled trials of neuromodulation devices for the acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine. Methods An international group of headache scientists and clinicians with expertise in neuromodulation evaluated clinical trials involving neuromodulation devices that have been published since 2000. The Clinical Trials Committee incorporated findings from this expert analysis into a new guideline for clinical trials of neuromodulation devices for the treatment of migraine. Results Key terms were defined and recommendations provided relative to the assessment of neuromodulation devices for acute treatment in adults, preventive treatment in adults, and acute and preventive treatment in children and adolescents. Ethical and administrative responsibilities were outlined, and a bibliography of previous research involving neuromodulation devices was created. Conclusions Adoption of these recommendations will improve the quality of evidence regarding this important area in migraine treatment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 42, No. 11-12 ( 2022-10), p. 1116-1126
    Abstract: Our objective was to assess optic nerve sheath diameter (a marker of elevated intracranial pressure) and optic disc elevation (a marker of papilledema) in pseudotumor cerebri syndrome using transorbital sonography. Methods The study was a prospective case-control study. We included patients with new-onset pseudotumor cerebri syndrome and matched healthy controls. All had fundoscopy, lumbar puncture with opening pressure and transorbital sonography. Sonography was assessed by a blinded observer. Results We evaluated 45 patients and included 23 cases. We recruited 35 controls. Optic nerve sheath diameter was larger in pseudotumor cerebri syndrome compared to controls (6.3 ± 0.9 mm versus 5.0 ± 0.5 mm, p  〈  0.001) and so was optic disc elevation (0.9 ± 0.4 mm versus 0.4 ± 0.1 mm, p  〈  0.001). The optimal cut-off point for optic nerve sheath diameter was 6 mm with a sensitivity of 74% for prediction of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome and 68% for prediction of elevated opening pressure. Specificity was 94%. The optimal cut-off point for optic disc elevation was 0.6 mm. Sensitivity was 100% and specificity 83% for prediction of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome. Conclusion Optic disc elevation and optic nerve sheath diameter are increased in new-onset pseudotumor cerebri syndrome. Optic disc elevation achieved high specificity and excellent sensitivity for diagnosis of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome. Transorbital sonography (TOS) is a potential, non-invasive screening tool for pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in headache clinics.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2013
    In:  Cephalalgia Vol. 33, No. 7 ( 2013-05), p. 444-453
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 33, No. 7 ( 2013-05), p. 444-453
    Abstract: Human and animal models suggest that central sensitisation plays a role in medication-overuse headache (MOH). We aimed to study pain perception in MOH patients before and a year after withdrawal. Methods We examined pain perception in 35 MOH patients before and two, six and 12 months after detoxification. For baseline comparison, we tested 40 healthy controls. We measured cephalic and extra-cephalic pressure-pain thresholds and supra-threshold pressure-pain scores and extra-cephalic pain thresholds, supra-threshold pain scores and temporal summation for electrical stimulation. Results Of the 35 patients, 21 patients completed the entire study and remained cured of MOH. Statistically significant differences between patients and healthy controls were found in cephalic pressure-pain thresholds (137.3 kPa vs. 170 kPa, p  〈  0.05), extra-cephalic pressure pain thresholds (213.3 vs. 274.3 kPa, p  〈  0.05), in cephalic supra-threshold pressure-pain scores measured on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (61 vs. 27 mm, p  〈  0.05) and extra-cephalic supra-threshold pain scores for electrical stimulation (19.0 vs. 10.0 mm, p  〈  0.05). Cephalic supra-threshold pain scores decreased statistically significantly from 50.3 mm at baseline to 28.0 mm at the 12-month follow-up. In contrast to controls, temporal summation was not found in MOH patients before withdrawal, but after detoxification temporal summation normalised. Conclusion The central nervous system is sensitised in patients with MOH. For the first time we demonstrate that the pain perception continues to normalise up to a year after detoxification. This emphasises the importance of detoxification and follow-up to prevent relapse.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 33, No. 15 ( 2013-11), p. 1238-1247
    Abstract: About 10% of cluster headache patients have the chronic form. At least 10% of this chronic group is intractable to or cannot tolerate medical treatment. Open pilot studies suggest that occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) might offer effective prevention in these patients. Controlled neuromodulation studies in treatments inducing paraesthesias have a general problem in blinding. We have introduced a new design in pain neuromodulation by which we think we can overcome this problem. Methods/design We propose a prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group international clinical study in medically intractable, chronic cluster headache patients of high- versus low-amplitude ONS. Primary outcome measure is the mean number of attacks over the last four weeks. After a study period of six months there is an open extension phase of six months. Alongside the randomised trial an economic evaluation study is performed. Discussion The ICON study will show if ONS is an effective preventive therapy for patients suffering medically intractable chronic cluster headache and if there is a difference between high- and low-amplitude stimulation. The innovative design of the study will, for the first time, assess efficacy of ONS in a blinded way.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Cephalalgia, SAGE Publications, Vol. 34, No. 6 ( 2014-05), p. 409-425
    Abstract: Case definitions of medication-overuse headache (MOH) in population-based research have changed over time. This study aims to review MOH prevalence reports with respect to these changes, and to propose a practical case definition for future studies based on the ICHD-3 beta. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify MOH prevalence studies. Findings were summarized according to diagnostic criteria. Results Twenty-seven studies were included. The commonly used case definition for MOH was headache ≥15 days/month with concurrent medication overuse ≥3 months. There were varying definitions for what was considered as overuse. Studies that all used ICHD-2 criteria showed a wide range of prevalence among adults: 0.5%–7.2%. Conclusions There are limits to comparing prevalence of MOH across studies and over time. The wide range of reported prevalence might not only be due to changing criteria, but also the diversity of countries now publishing data. The criterion “headache occurring on ≥15 days per month” with concurrent medication overuse can be applied in population-based studies. However, the new requirement that a respondent must have “a preexisting headache disorder” has not been previously validated. Exclusion of other headache diagnoses by expert evaluation and ancillary examinations is not feasible in large population-based studies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0333-1024 , 1468-2982
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2019999-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604567-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...