In:
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, JCDR Research and Publications, ( 2023)
Abstract:
Introduction: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the common microvascular complications of diabetes. In patients with DR, the most frequent cause of vision loss is Diabetic Macular oedema (DME). In the present era, anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) agents are the mainstay of treatment for managing DME. A majority of patients show a good response to multiple doses of these agents administered by a pro re nata regimen at regularly spaced fixed intervals. However, the tendency of DME to become chronic and resistant to these agents, as well as the burden of repeated injections, necessitates considering alternative treatment options with similar or better efficacy. As steroids can address these drawbacks of anti-VEGF treatment, the present study compared the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents with dexamethasone implant in the treatment of naïve DME. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of dexamethasone implant with anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of naïve DME. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences and Pradyumna Bal Memorial Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India from September 2020 to September 2022. A total of 100 eyes with DME, newly diagnosed patients aged 18 years and above, without other macular oedema-causing diseases, were included. A total of 50 eyes in each group were treated with an anti-VEGF agent (Group A) or dexamethasone implant (Group B), and Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Central Foveal Thickness (CFT) were monitored for six months. For statistical analysis, paired t-test and independent t-test were used for within-group and inter-group analysis, respectively. A p-value 〈 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In both groups, post-treatment BCVA showed marked improvement, but there was no significant difference in mean BCVA between the groups (p=0.89) at six months. However, the mean CFT showed significant improvement in Group B at six months. In Group A, the mean CFT reduced from 441.87±54.48 μm to 257.83±25.73 μm, and in Group B, the mean CFT reduced from 464±109.44 μm to 207±22.51 μm at six months (p 〈 0.0001). Adverse events like cataracts and glaucoma were seen in patients treated with the dexamethasone implant and were managed by cataract surgery and topical anti-glaucoma medications, respectively. Conclusion: Dexamethasone implant and anti-VEGF agents are equally effective in improving visual acuity; however, dexamethasone stands superior in reducing macular thickness. Needing fewer injections while treating with a dexamethasone implant improves compliance. The progression of cataract remains a major side-effect with the dexamethasone implant, which is not a concern when treating DME in pseudophakic eyes.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2249-782X
DOI:
10.7860/JCDR/2023/65352.18739
Language:
Unknown
Publisher:
JCDR Research and Publications
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2775283-5
Permalink
