GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Oxford University Press (OUP)  (4)
  • Ishikawa, Yojiro  (4)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Radiation Research, Oxford University Press (OUP), ( 2021-08-31)
    Abstract: Intractable late urinary toxicity is a serious complication after radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC). We assessed clinical factors correlated with severe late urinary toxicity in LPC treated with curative image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A total of 452 patients with LPC treated with IMRT between 2002 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 432 patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The median total irradiated doses were 80 (range, 76–80) Gy. Each daily dose was 2 Gy per fraction. The median follow-up was 83 (range, 4–210) months. Late urinary toxicity was scored according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.03. Grade 3 late urinary toxicity was observed in 27 patients. No cases with grade ≥ 4 late urinary toxicity were observed. The 5-, 10-, and 12.5-year grade 3 late urinary toxicity-free survival rates were 97%, 91.8% and 88.1%, respectively. Age, risk classification, total irradiated dose, ADT duration, antithrombotic therapy (AT), cardiovascular disease, hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia (DL), prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and prior high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) were investigated for correlations with grade 3 late urinary toxicity. In univariate analysis, AT and prior HIFU and no other studied factors, were correlated with grade 3 late urinary toxicity. AT and prior HIFU appear to be predictive of grade 3 late urinary toxicity. Patients with LPC with these relevant clinical factors should be carefully followed up by sharing detailed information with the urology department.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0449-3060 , 1349-9157
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2038914-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Radiation Research, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 57, No. 6 ( 2016-11-01), p. 655-661
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine whether metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) are associated with outcomes in Stage I lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Thirty-eight patients underwent [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) within 60 days before SBRT at our institution between January 2001 and December 2011. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), MTV2, MTV4, MTV6, TLG40%, TLG50% and TLG60% were calculated. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were analyzed using Cox's proportional hazards model, and survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of PET parameters for OS and LC were calculated. The median follow-up period for survivors was 37.7 months. Three-year OS and LC rates were 56.4% and 70.5%, respectively, and 5-year OS and LC rates were 36.8% and 70.5%, respectively. In univariate analyses, tumor diameter (P = 0.019), single dose ≥10 Gy (P = 0.017), MTV2 (P = 0.030) and MTV4 (P = 0.048) were significant predictors for OS. Tumor diameter (P  & lt; 0.001), single dose ≥10 Gy (P = 0.007), SUVmax (P = 0.035), MTV2 (P  & lt; 0.001), MTV4 (P = 0.003), MTV6 (P = 0.017), TLG40% (P  & lt; 0.001), TLG50% (P = 0.001) and TLG60% (P = 0.003) were significant predictors for LC. SUVmax was not a significant predictor for OS. We made the ROC curves at PET parameters, and the largest area under the curve value for OS was MTV2 and for LC was TLG40%. Tumor diameter, single dose ≥10 Gy, MTV2 and MTV4 are prognostic factors for OS and LC rates and MTV2 is a better prognostic factor for OS than other PET parameters.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0449-3060 , 1349-9157
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2038914-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Radiation Research, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 62, No. 3 ( 2021-05-12), p. 533-539
    Abstract: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate survival outcomes and irradiated tumor control (local control [LC]) and locoregional control (LRC) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1 or recurrent T1 (rT1) kidney cancer. Twenty-nine nonconsecutive patients with 30 tumors were included. SBRT doses of 70 Gy, 60 Gy or 50 Gy in 10 fractions were prescribed with a linear accelerator using daily image guidance. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate time-to-event outcomes, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between groups divided by each possible factor. The median follow-up periods for all patients and survivors were 57 months and 69.6 months, respectively. The five-year LC rate, LRC rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, disease-specific survival (DSS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 94%, 88%, 50%, 96% and 68%, respectively. No significant factor was related to OS and PFS. Three of 24 non-hemodialysis (HD) patients had new-onset-HD because of the progression of underlying kidney disease. Grade 3 or higher toxicities from SBRT did not occur. In conclusion, SBRT for kidney cancer provided a high rate of LC, LRC and DSS with minimal toxicities, but patient selection and indication for SBRT should be done carefully considering the relatively low OS rate.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0449-3060 , 1349-9157
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2038914-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 51, No. 9 ( 2021-08-30), p. 1444-1451
    Abstract: It is still controversial whether intensity-modulated radiotherapy has an obvious advantage over conventional radiotherapy. The purposes of this study were to evaluate prognostic factors in pre-treatment characteristics for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and to compare treatment outcomes in patients who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy and patients who received two-dimensional radiotherapy or three-dimensional radiotherapy. Methods We reviewed patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received chemoradiotherapy in our hospital during the period from 2000 to 2017, and we excluded patients who had a history of surgery for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and those who had distant metastases before treatment. A total of 72 patients who were treated by radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy were enrolled. All of the patients were irradiated with a total dose of 58–70 Gy. Overall survival, locoregional control and progression-free survival rates were compared in the groups treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional/three-dimensional radiotherapy. Propensity score matching was performed to homogenize the two groups. Results The median follow-up period was 62.5 months. After propensity score matching, in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy, the 5-year rate of overall survival, locoregional control and progression-free survival were 73.5, 95.2 and 72.7%, respectively. In patients treated with two-dimensional/three-dimensional radiotherapy, the 5-year rate of overall survival, locoregional control and progression-free survival were 69.1, 67.7 and 51.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the groups only in locoregional control. Late toxicities of grade 2 or higher were occurred in 38.5 and 24.2% of the patients treated by two-dimensional/three-dimensional radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, respectively. Conclusions Our results suggested that intensity-modulated radiotherapy is more effective than two-dimensional/three-dimensional radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, especially in locoregional control.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1465-3621
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1494610-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...