GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Imukova, K.  (2)
Material
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Meteorological Society ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Hydrometeorology Vol. 19, No. 3 ( 2018-03-01), p. 555-573
    In: Journal of Hydrometeorology, American Meteorological Society, Vol. 19, No. 3 ( 2018-03-01), p. 555-573
    Abstract: The spatial variability of topsoil water content (SWC) is often expressed through the relationship between its spatial mean 〈θ〉 and standard deviation σθ. The present study tests the concept that a reasonably performing land surface model (LSM) should be able to produce σθ–〈θ〉 data pairs that fall into a polygon, spanned by the cloud of observed data and two anchor points: σθ at the permanent wilting point σθ–〈θwp〉 and σθ at saturation σθ–〈θs〉. A state-of-the-art LSM, Noah-MP, was driven by atmospheric forcing data obtained from eddy covariance field measurements in two regions of southwestern Germany, Kraichgau (KR) and Swabian Alb (SA). KR is characterized with deep loess soils, whereas the soils in SA are shallow, clayey, and stony. The simulations series were compared with SWC data from soil moisture networks operating in the two study regions. The results demonstrate that Noah-MP matches temporal 〈θ〉 dynamics fairly well in KR, but performs poorly in SA. The best match is achieved with the van Genuchten–Mualem representation of soil hydraulic functions and site-specific rainfall, soil texture, green vegetation fraction (GVF) and leaf area index (LAI) input data. Nevertheless, most of the simulated σθ–〈θ〉 pairs are located outside the envelope of measurements and below the lower bound, which shows that the model smooths spatial SWC variability. This can be mainly attributed to missing topography and terrain information and inadequate representation of spatial variability of soil texture and hydraulic parameters, as well as the model assumption of a uniform root distribution.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1525-755X , 1525-7541
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2042176-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Copernicus GmbH ; 2015
    In:  Biogeosciences Vol. 12, No. 8 ( 2015-04-17), p. 2311-2326
    In: Biogeosciences, Copernicus GmbH, Vol. 12, No. 8 ( 2015-04-17), p. 2311-2326
    Abstract: Abstract. The energy balance of eddy covariance (EC) flux data is normally not closed. Therefore, at least if used for modelling, EC flux data are usually post-closed, i.e. the measured turbulent fluxes are adjusted so as to close the energy balance. At the current state of knowledge, however, it is not clear how to partition the missing energy in the right way. Eddy flux data therefore contain some uncertainty due to the unknown nature of the energy balance gap, which should be considered in model evaluation and the interpretation of simulation results. We propose to construct the post-closure methods uncertainty band (PUB), which essentially designates the differences between non-adjusted flux data and flux data adjusted with the three post-closure methods (Bowen ratio, latent heat flux (LE) and sensible heat flux (H) method). To demonstrate this approach, simulations with the NOAH-MP land surface model were evaluated based on EC measurements conducted at a winter wheat stand in southwest Germany in 2011, and the performance of the Jarvis and Ball–Berry stomatal resistance scheme was compared. The width of the PUB of the LE was up to 110 W m−2 (21% of net radiation). Our study shows that it is crucial to account for the uncertainty in EC flux data originating from lacking energy balance closure. Working with only a single post-closing method might result in severe misinterpretations in model–data comparisons.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1726-4189
    Language: English
    Publisher: Copernicus GmbH
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2158181-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...