GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (33)
  • Hyung, Woo Jin  (33)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (33)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 28 ( 2020-10-01), p. 3304-3313
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 28 ( 2020-10-01), p. 3304-3313
    Abstract: It is unclear whether laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer is oncologically equivalent to open distal gastrectomy. The noninferiority of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer compared with open surgery in terms of 3-year relapse-free survival rate was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS A phase III, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted for patients with histologically proven locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma suitable for distal subtotal gastrectomy. The primary end point was the 3-year relapse-free survival rate; the upper limit of the hazard ratio (HR) for noninferiority was 1.43 between the laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy groups. RESULTS From November 2011 to April 2015, 1,050 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopy (n = 524) or open surgery (n = 526). After exclusions, 492 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 482 underwent open surgery and were included in the analysis. The laparoscopy group, compared with the open surgery group, suffered fewer early complications (15.7% v 23.4%, respectively; P = .0027) and late complications (4.7% v 9.5%, respectively; P = .0038), particularly intestinal obstruction (2.0% v 4.4%, respectively; P = .0447). The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 80.3% (95% CI, 76.0% to 85.0%) for the laparoscopy group and 81.3% (95% CI, 77.0% to 85.0%; log-rank P = .726) for the open group. Cox regression analysis after stratification by the surgeon revealed an HR of 1.035 (95% CI, 0.762 to 1.406; log-rank P = .827; P for noninferiority = .039). When stratified by pathologic stage, the HR was 1.020 (95% CI, 0.751 to 1.385; log-rank P = .900; P for noninferiority = .030). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was comparable to open surgery in terms of relapse-free survival for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy could be a potential standard treatment option for locally advanced gastric cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.01210
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: Short term outcomes from multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-02).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 4062-4062
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 4062-4062
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.4062
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of comparing laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for upper third early gastric cancer (KLASS-05).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. TPS184-TPS184
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. TPS184-TPS184
    Abstract: TPS184 Background: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is rarely performed for upper third early gastric cancer (EGC) because of postoperative reflux esophagitis. Recently, PG with double tract reconstruction was introduced and reported to have a reflux of approximately the same frequency as total gastrectomy (TG) with esophagojejunostomy. PG has several theoretical advantages over TG but has not yet been proven in randomized controlled trial. This study aimed to provide scientific evidence of laparoscopic PG with double tract reconstruction as a standard procedure for proximal EGC. Methods: The present trial is multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial with superiority design. A total of 138 patients with upper third cT1N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma are randomized to laparoscopic PG with double tract reconstruction and laparoscopic TG with esophagojejunostomy. Patients are enrolled for two years and followed up for two years. Primary co-endpoints are hemoglobin change and vitamin B12 cumulative supplement quantity after 2 years of operation. We used the alpha-split method to set the hemoglobin to 4% and vitamin B12 to 1% for alpha. The sample size needed was 62 patients for each arm. Accounting for 10% follow-up loss, the enrollment of 69 patients in each group was required. Secondary endpoints are prevalence rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis, morbidity and mortality, quality of life 2-year after operations, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. Nineteen investigators from 10 institutes participated in this trial. The first patient was enrolled on October 27, 2016 and we completed the patient enrollment on September 17, 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT02892643.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.TPS184
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Extensive peritoneal lavage after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer study (EXPEL): An international multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 279-279
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 279-279
    Abstract: 279 Background: Peritoneal recurrence of gastric cancer after curative surgical resection is common and portends a poor prognosis. Preliminary studies suggest extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) may reduce the risk of peritoneal recurrence and improve survival. We sought to perform a randomized phase III study to definitively establish the role of performing EIPL after gastrectomy. Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial involving 22 hospitals from Korea. China, Japan, Malaysia and Singapore. Patients aged between 21 to 80 years with cT3/4 stomach cancer undergoing curative resection were randomized to either surgery and EIPL (lavage with 10 litres of saline) or surgery alone. Comparison of DFS and OS were made via log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of peritoneal recurrence was compared using competing risks approach. All analyses were performed based on intention-to-treat. Results: Between March 2015 to August 2018, 800 patients were randomly assigned to surgery alone ( n= 402) or EIPL ( n= 398). Based on a median follow-up duration of 29 months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 23.1% and 23.3% for EIPL and surgery alone respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.52, p = 0.615). Similarly, the 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrence were 28.0% and 25.9% respectively (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.37, p = 0.947), and 7.9% and 6.6% respectively for peritoneal recurrence (Subdistribution HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.73 to 2.42, p = 0.347). Overall, the risk of adverse events was higher in EIPL as compared to surgery alone (relative risk = 1.58, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.33, p = 0.019). The most common adverse events were anastomotic leak, bleeding and intra-abdominal abscess. At the planned third interim analysis on 28 August 2019, the predictive probability of achieving even a 5% difference in 3-year OS in favour of EIPL at final analysis was 〈 0.4%. The trial was thus recommended to terminate on the basis of futility. Conclusions: EIPL does not show any survival benefit compared with surgery alone and is not recommended for patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02140034.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.4_suppl.279
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Subgroup analysis of a multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 4025-4025
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. 4025-4025
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.4025
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: Results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2015
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 33, No. 3_suppl ( 2015-01-20), p. 4-4
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 3_suppl ( 2015-01-20), p. 4-4
    Abstract: 4 Background: Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is widely performed for gastric cancer in Eastern countries, although large scale prospective data are still lacking. We conducted a phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01) to compare the short and long term outcomes of LADG versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer in Korea. Methods: The primary end point was 5-year overall survival. The morbidity within 30 postoperative days and the surgical mortality were compared to evaluate the safety of LADG as a secondary end point. A total of 1,416 patients were randomly assigned to the LADG group (n = 705) or the ODG group (n = 711) between Feb 1, 2006 and Aug 31, 2010. Results: 1,256 were eligible for per protocol (PP) analysis (644 and 612, respectively). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the LADG group (LADG vs. ODG; 13.0% vs. 19.9%, P =.001). In detail, the wound complication rate of the LADG group was significantly lower than that of the ODG group (3.1% vs. 7.7%, P 〈 .001). The major intra-abdominal complication (7.6% vs. 10.3%, P =.095) and mortality rates (0.6% vs. 0.3%, P =.450) were similar between groups. Modified intention-to-treat analysis showed similar results with PP analysis. Conclusions: LADG for patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer is safe and has a benefit of lower occurrence of wound complication compared with conventional ODG. Clinical trial information: NCT00452751.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.4
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Large-Scale Case-Control and Case-Matched Korean Multicenter Study
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2014
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 32, No. 7 ( 2014-03-01), p. 627-633
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 7 ( 2014-03-01), p. 627-633
    Abstract: The oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to validate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of long-term survival, morbidity, and mortality retrospectively. Patients and Methods The study group comprised 2,976 patients who were treated with curative intent either by laparoscopic gastrectomy (1,477 patients) or open gastrectomy (1,499 patients) between April 1998 and December 2005. The long-term 5-year actual survival analysis in case-control and case-matched population was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. The morbidity and mortality and learning curves were evaluated. Results In the case-control study, the overall survival, disease-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival (median follow-up period, 70.8 months) were not statistically different at each cancer stage with the exception of an increased overall survival rate for patients with stage IA cancer treated via laparoscopy (laparoscopic group; 95.3%, open group: 90.3%; P 〈 .001). After matching using a propensity scoring system, the overall survival, disease-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival rates were not statistically different at each stage. The morbidity of the case-matched group was 15.1% in the open group and 12.5% in the laparoscopic group, which also had no statistical significance (P = .184). The mortality rate was also not statistically significant (0.3% in the open group and 0.5% in the laparoscopic group; P = 1.000). The mean learning curve was 42. Conclusion The long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer were comparable to those of open gastrectomy in a large-scale, multicenter, retrospective clinical study.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Stomach Preservation in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 21 ( 2022-07-20), p. 2342-2351
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 21 ( 2022-07-20), p. 2342-2351
    Abstract: To compare postoperative complications, long-term survival, and quality of life (QOL) after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) and laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS Five hundred eighty patients with preoperatively diagnosed stage IA gastric adenocarcinoma (≤ 3 cm) were assigned to undergo either LSG or LSNNS. Observers were not blinded to patient grouping. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (3y-DFS). Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, QOL, 3-year disease-specific survival (3y-DSS), and 3-year overall survival (3y-OS). RESULTS In total, 527 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis population for the primary outcome (LSG, 269; LSNNS, 258). Stomach-preserving surgery was performed in 210 patients (81%) in the LSNNS group. During the median follow-up duration, the 3y-DFS rates in the LSG and LSNNS groups were 95.5% and 91.8%, respectively (difference: 3.7%; 95% CI, –0.6 to 8.1). Three patients with recurrence and five with metachronous gastric cancer in the LSNNS group underwent standard surgery. Two patients with distant metastasis in both groups were treated with palliative chemotherapy. The 3y-DSS and 3y-OS rates in the LSG and LSNNS groups were 99.5% and 99.1% ( P = .59) and 99.2% and 97.6% ( P = .17), respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 19.0% of the LSG group and 15.5% of the LSNNS group ( P = .294). The LSNNS group showed better physical function ( P = .015), less symptoms ( P 〈 .001), and improved nutrition than the LSG group. CONCLUSION LSNNS did not show noninferiority to LSG for 3y-DFS, with a 5% margin. However, the 3y-DSS and 3y-OS were not different after rescue surgery in cases of recurrence/metachronous gastric cancer, and LSNNS had better long-term QOL and nutrition than LSG.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02242
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Long-term quality of life and nutritional results of stomach-preserving surgery after sentinel node evaluation in patients with early gastric cancer: A multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial (SENORITA).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 4070-4070
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 4070-4070
    Abstract: 4070 Background: In the SENORITA trial, laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) showed no significant difference in overall and disease specific survivals compared with laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG). Here, we present the effect of stomach preservation surgery on QoL and nutritional outcomes, and identify risk factors affecting QoL in stomach preservation surgery. Methods: SENORITA was a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer of 3 cm or less were randomly allocated (1:1) to LSNNS or LSG. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. This analysis focuses on long-term quality of life and nutritional outcomes of patients who finally underwent stomach-preservation surgery in the LSNNS group. QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and stomach module (STO22) at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. Linear mixed model analyses were used to evaluate differences between treatment groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01804998. Results: From March 2013 to March 2017, a total of 580 patients were randomly assigned in the SENROTA trial. Among them, 258 patients underwent sentinel node navigation surgery and 198 finally underwent stomach preservation surgery. QoL data was available in 194 patients and compared with those of 257 patients who underwent standard gastrectomy. The stomach-preservation group had better QoL in physical function, dyspnea, and appetite loss of C30 and dysphagia, pain, reflux symptoms, eating restriction, anxiety, taste change, body image, and total score of STO22. Regarding nutritional outcomes, body mass index, hemoglobin, protein, and albumin levels were significantly higher in the stomach-preservation group than in the gastrectomy group. In multivariate analyses, tumor location (greater curvature) was an independent favorable factor affecting global health status, reflux symptoms, eating restriction, and total score of STO22 at 3 months in the stomach-preservation group. Segmental resection was a risk factor for diarrhea and eating restriction at postoperative 3 year. Conclusions: The stomach-preservation surgery had better long-term QoL and nutritional outcomes compared with standard gastrectomy. These findings can help decision making about treatment for patients with early gastric cancer, especially or elderly or nutritionally high risk patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01804998 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4070
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A western validation of a novel gastric cancer prognostic model using American data.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 4_suppl ( 2016-02-01), p. 2-2
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 4_suppl ( 2016-02-01), p. 2-2
    Abstract: 2 Background: A novel prediction model, the Yonsei University Gastric Cancer Prediction Tool was developed by an international collaborative group (G6+) for accurate determination of 5-year overall survival of gastric cancer patients. This prediction model was created using a prospectively maintained single institution database of 12,399 patients and included clinically relevant factors not accounted for in the TNM staging system. This prediction model was validated using external data sets from Asia; its’ applicability in the American population has yet to be determined through a validated data set. Methods: Using the SEER dataset, 2014 release, all patients with gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed between the years 2002 –2012 who underwent resection were selected. The following characteristics were selected for analysis: age, sex, gender, depth of tumor invasion, number of positive lymph nodes, total lymph nodes retrieved, presence of distant metastasis, extent of resection, and histology. These data were processed through a recently published prognostic nomogram to obtain concordance index (C-statistic) using the bootstrap method and calibration was assessed. This was compared to the current prognostic index, the TNM staging system. Results: A total of 26,019 possible patients were identified from the SEER database, years 2002-2012. Of these, 11,765 had complete datasets. Validation of the prognostication model revealed a C-statistic of 0.762 (95% CI 0.754-0.769). This is compared to the 7 th TNM staging model, C-statistic 0.683 (95% CI 0.677-0.689). The new nomogram was found to be significantly more accurate with a p-value of 〈 0.001. Conclusions: Our study validates a novel prediction model for gastric cancer in the American patient population. Using this model, superior accuracy in prognosticating the 5-year survival of gastric cancer patients was confirmed in the western cohort strongly supporting its global applicability. This model also allows for inclusion of those who did not undergo adequate lymphadenectomy or who underwent a non-curative resection and can be a useful prediction tool for an increasing number of gastric cancer patients world-wide.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.2
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...