GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Springer Science and Business Media LLC  (2)
  • Hui, Zhouguang  (2)
  • Xiao, Zefen  (2)
  • 2020-2024  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • Springer Science and Business Media LLC  (2)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 2020-2024  (2)
Year
  • 1
    In: BMC Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 20, No. 1 ( 2020-12)
    Abstract: There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach to ECOG 2 patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), despite the sizable percentage of these patients in clinical practice. This study focused on the efficacy, toxicity and the optimal chemotherapy regimen of CCRT in ECOG 2 patients in a phase III trial. Methods Patients capable of all self-care with bed rest for less than 50% of daytime were classified as ECOG 2 subgroup. A subgroup analysis was performed for ECOG 2 patients recruited in the phase III trial receiving concurrent EP (etoposide + cisplatin)/PC (paclitaxel + carboplatin) chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Results A total of 71 ECOG 2 patients were enrolled into the study. Forty-six (64.8%) patients were treated with IMRT technique. The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for ECOG 2 patients were 16.4 months and 9 months, respectively. No difference was observed in treatment compliance and toxicities between ECOG 2 patients and ECOG 0–1 patients. Within the ECOG 2 group (31 in the EP arm and 40 in the PC arm), median OS and 3-year OS were 15.7 months and 37.5% for the EP arm, and 16.8 months and 7.5% for the PC arm, respectively ( p  = 0.243). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis was higher in the PC arm (17.5% vs. 0.0%, p  = 0.014) with 5 radiation pneumonitis related deaths, while the incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was numerically higher in the EP arm (25.8% vs. 10.0%, p  = 0.078). Conclusions CCRT provided ECOG 2 patients promising outcome with acceptable toxicities. EP might be superior to PC in terms of safety profile in the setting of CCRT for ECOG 2 patients. Prospective randomized studies based on IMRT technique are warranted to validate our findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01494558 . (Registered 19 December 2011).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1471-2407
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041352-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Radiation Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 17, No. 1 ( 2022-12)
    Abstract: The low incidence of primary mediastinal seminomas has precluded the development of clinical trials on mediastinal seminomas. We investigated the clinicopathologic characteristics, prognosis of patients with primary mediastinal seminomas as well as the efficiency of nonsurgical treatments compared with treatments containing surgery. Methods We retrospectively collected data on the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, toxicities, and survival of 27 patients from a single center between 2000 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received operation. Survivals were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test. Results The median age was 28 (13–63) years. The most common symptoms were chest pain (29.6%), cough (25.9%), and dyspnea (22.2%). There were 13 and 14 patients in surgery and non-surgery group. Patients in the non-surgical group were more likely to be with poor performance scores (100% vs. 76.9%) and disease invaded to adjacent structures (100% vs. 76.9%) especially great vessels (100% vs. 46.2%).The median follow-up period was 32.23 (2.7–198.2) months. There was no significant difference of overall survival (5-year 100% vs. 100%), cancer-specific survival (5-year 100% vs. 100%), local regional survival (5-year 91.7% vs. 90.0%, p  = 0.948), distant metastasis survival (5-year 90.9% vs. 100.0%, p  = 0.340) and progression-free survival (82.5% vs. 90.0%, p  = 0.245) between patients with and without surgery. Conclusions Primary mediastinal seminoma was with favorable prognosis, even though frequently invasion into adjacent structures brings difficulties to surgery administration. Chemoradiotherapy is an alternative treatment with both efficacy and safety.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1748-717X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2224965-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...