GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Oxford University Press (OUP)  (2)
  • Holm, Niels Ramsing  (2)
  • 1
    In: European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 20, No. 11 ( 2019-11-01), p. 1208-1218
    Abstract: European and North American guidelines currently recommend pre-test probability (PTP) stratification based on simple probability models in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). However, no unequivocal recommendation has yet been established. We aimed to compare the ability of risk factors and different PTP stratification models to predict haemodynamically obstructive CAD with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference in low to intermediate probability patients. Methods and results We prospectively included 1675 patients with low to intermediate risk who had been referred to coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Patients with coronary stenosis were subsequently investigated by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with FFR measurement if indicated. Discrimination and calibration were assessed for four models: the updated Diamond–Forrester (UDF), the CAD Consortium Basic, the Clinical, and the Clinical + Coronary artery calcium score (CACS). At coronary CTA, 24% of patients were diagnosed with a suspected stenosis and 10% had haemodynamically obstructive CAD at the ICA. Calibration for all CAD Consortium models increased compared with the UDF score. However, all models overestimated the probability of haemodynamically obstructive CAD. Discrimination increased by area under the receiver operating curve from 67% to 86% for UDF vs. CAD Consortium Clinical + CACS. The proportion of low-probability patients (pre-test score  〈  15%) was for the UDF, CAD Consortium Basic, Clinical, and Clinical + CACS: 14%, 58%, 51%, and 66%, respectively. The corresponding negative predictive values were 97%, 94%, 95%, and 98%, respectively. Conclusion CAD Consortium models improve PTP stratification compared with the UDF score, mainly due to superior calibration in low to intermediate probability patients. Adding the coronary calcium score to the models substantially increases discrimination. Clinical Trials. gov identifier NCT02264717.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2047-2404 , 2047-2412
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2042482-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2647943-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: European Heart Journal - Digital Health, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 2, No. 2 ( 2021-06-29), p. 279-289
    Abstract: Recent technological advances enable diagnosing of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) from heart sound analysis with a high negative predictive value. However, the prognostic impact of this approach remains unknown. To investigate the prognostic value of heart sound analysis as two scores, the Acoustic-score and the CAD-score, in patients with suspected CAD which is treated according to standard of care. Methods and results Consecutive patients with angina symptoms referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) were enrolled. The Acoustic-score was developed from eight acoustic CAD-related features. This score was combined with risk factors to generate the CAD-score. A cut-off score & gt;20 was pre-specified for both scores to indicate disease. If coronary CTA raised suspicion of obstructive CAD, patients were referred to invasive angiography and revascularized when indicated. Of 1675 enrolled patients, 1464 (87.4%) were included in this substudy. The combined primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (n = 26). Follow-up was 3.1 (2.7–3.4) years. Of patients with primary endpoints, the Acoustic-score was & gt;20 in 25 (96%); the CAD-score was & gt;20 in 22 (85%). In an unadjusted Cox analysis of the primary endpoints, the hazard ratio for scores & gt;20 under current standard clinical care was 12.6 (1.7–93.2) for the Acoustic-score and 5.4 (1.9–15.7) for the CAD-score. The CAD-score contained prognostic information even after adjusting for lipid-lowering therapy initiation, stenosis at CTA, and early revascularization. Conclusion Heart sound analysis seems to carry prognostic information and may improve initial risk stratification of patients with suspected CAD. Clinicaltrials.org ID NCT02264717.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2634-3916
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3076078-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...