Abstract: Background Cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) is a life-threatening complication of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) occurring in the first few days after infusion of the stem cell graft prior to administration of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). In the last few years, blockade of IL-6 receptor signaling with tocilizumab has emerged as an effective therapy for Grade 3-4 CRS. As IL-6 mediated signaling is a known regulator of the balance between regulatory T cells (Tregs) and other T cell subsets and has effects on NK cell function, questions remain regarding the effect of the blockade of IL-6 signaling on post-transplant immune cell recovery, engraftment, infection, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and the graft-versus-tumor effect. We report on our experience with the use of tocilizumab to treat CRS, and we address the hypothesis that tocilizumab has no effect on the reconstitution of the post-haploSCT myeloid or lymphoid immune subsets. Methods A retrospective review of haploSCT patients with malignacies treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute during the period of 2010-2019 was undertaken. Data included treatment with tocilizumab, cumulative incidence of NRM and relapse, day+30 and day+100 post-transplant chimerism, laboratory markers of viral and fungal infection, and immune reconstitution data at 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, and 6 months post-transplant. Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS), including competing risk analysis of the cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) with the Fine-Gray model was preformed with EZR. Flow cytometry identification of relevant lymphoid populations was performed with a customized panel that included Treg (CD4+CD25+), Tcon (CD4+) and NK (CD3-CD56+) cells. Comparison of the lymphoid populations between the Tocilizumab-treated subgroup of haploSCT patients and the remaining patients was done with the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test. Results Out of 132 haploSCT patients, 19 received at least one dose of tocilizumab for the treatment of CRS out of whom one patient died from CRS. In tocilizumab-treated patients myeloid engraftment was 100% at day 30 post transplant. Tocilizumab use was not associated with any effect on lymphoid subset reconstitution at any time point post haploSCT (Figure 1A). Specifically, there was no difference in the reconstitution of NK cells (1-month NK: Mann-Whitney U = 120, p = 0.356; 3-month NK: Mann-Whitney U = 130, p = 0.528; 6-month NK: Mann-Whitney U = 110, p = 0.773), Treg (1-month Treg: Mann-Whitney U = 77, p = 0.412; 3-month Treg: Mann-Whitney U = 104, p = 0.203, 6-month Treg: Mann-Whitney U = 80, p = 0.186), or the Treg:Tcon ratio (1-month Treg:Tcon: Mann-Whitney U = 93, p = 0.835; 3-month Treg:Tcon: Mann-Whitney U = 97, p = 0.141; 6-month Treg:Tcon: Mann-Whitney U = 117, p = 0.959). The 1-year OS in the tocilizumab-treated patient subgroup was 62% (95% CI, 36%-80%) while in the rest it was 76% (95%CI, 67%-83%), with no significant difference between the two subgroups (p = 0.13). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse in the tocilizumab-treated subgroup was 19% (95% CI, 4%-42%) while in the rest it was 28% (95% CI, 20%-36%), with no difference between the subgroups (p=0.29). The 1-year NRM in the tocilizumab-treated subgroup was 33% (95% CI, 12%-55%) while in the rest it was 10% (95% CI, 5%-16%), and the difference between subgroups was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Fifty-five percent of patients treated with tocilizumab experienced reactivation of one or more of adenovirus, EBV, CMV or a fungal organism, with 50% of reactivations being CMV and 37% being fungal. Among the tocilizumab-treated patients, 42% experienced any aGVHD with only one patient experiencing Grade 3-4 aGVHD. Conclusions Tocilizumab use is not associated with any effect on post-transplant myeloid engraftment or reconstitution of the Treg, Tcon, and NK cell subsets. Although a significant proportion of tocilizumab-treated patients experienced reactivation of CMV or a fungal organism, the majority of these reactivations were not associated with any clinically significant symptoms. Treatment with tocilizumab was not associated with any significant effect on OS or disease relapse, but the tocilizumab-treated group had a higher NRM than the rest of the haploSCT patients. This association is consistent with prior studies correlating severe CRS with a high NRM, and merits further study. Disclosures Rambaldi: Equillium: Research Funding. Koreth:Amgen: Consultancy; Biolojic Design Inc: Consultancy; Regeneron: Other: Research Support; BMS: Other: Research Support; Cugene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Other: Research Support; Equillium: Consultancy; Moderna Therapeutics: Consultancy; Therakos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EMD Serono: Consultancy; Clinigen: Other. Cutler:Medsenic: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kadmon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nikiforow:Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wu:BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Soiffer:Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Be The Match/National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other; Juno: Other; Novartis: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; VOR Biopharma: Consultancy; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy; Rheos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Ritz:TScan Therapeutics: Consultancy; Talaris Therapeutics: Consultancy; Rheos Medicines: Consultancy; Falcon Therapeutics: Consultancy; Avrobio: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Equillium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; LifeVault Bio: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Abstract: Background Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic stem cell transplant has a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. Cytokine-induced memory like natural killer (CIML NK) cells are a novel therapy with enhanced cytotoxicity independent of KIR ligand interactions able to induce remission of relapsed/refractory AML (Romee et al, Science TM 2016). We are evaluating the safety and potential efficacy of donor-derived CIML NK cells in patients with relapsed myeloid malignancies after haploidentical donor transplant (haploSCT) in a phase 1/1b study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT040247761). Here we report on manufacturing, safety, and in vivo correlative biology of the adoptively transferred CIML NK cells in the first 3 enrolled patients. Methods The primary endpoint is to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of CIML NK cells in patients with MDS, MPN, or AML who relapsed after haplo-SCT. NK cells were enriched from donor-derived non-mobilized leukapheresis product via two-step CD3 depletion followed by selection of CD56+ cells using the CliniMACS reagent system (Miltenyi Biotec). The enriched NK cell product was cultured for 12-16 hours in X-VIVO 15 media containing rhIL-12, rhIL-15, and rhIL-18 to generate CIML NK cells (Figure 1A). Patients in the current cohort were lymphodepleted with fludarabine 25mg/m2 daily for 3-5 days and cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg daily for 2 days followed by CIML NK cells at a dose of 5-10 x 106 cells/kg and IL-2 106 IU/m2 QOD for 7 doses. Dose-limiting toxicities were evaluated for 6 weeks following NK cell infusion. Response to therapy was assessed at day+28 following CIML NK cell infusion. Results Patient #001 has FLT3-ITD AML that relapsed 5 months after a reduced intensity (RIC) haploSCT. She received 7.4x106 NK cells/kg followed by IL-2 106 IU/m2 QOD for 7 doses. Her day+28 bone marrow had no leukemia blasts although FLT3-ITD mutation remained detectable. Two months post-CIML NK the leukocyte and granulocyte chimerism were 88% and 89%, respectively. Patient #002 has AML with multiple pathogenic variants, including a potentially pathogenic variant in TP53. His disease relapsed 15 months post haplo-SCT with repeat marrow showing all the original mutations, including the TP53 variant (VAF 50.5%). He received 9.5x106 NK cells/kg followed by IL-2 106 IU/m2 QOD for 7 doses. His day+28 marrow had trilineage hematopoiesis without any mutations, including no TP53 mutation (Figure 1B). Two months post-CIML NK the leukocyte and granulocyte chimerism were both 99%. Patient #003 has MDS whose disease relapsed 8 months post RIC haploSCT with persistence of all her diagnostic pathogenic mutations. She received approximately 9.2x106 NK cells/kg and has only just completed IL-2 106 IU/m2 QOD for 7 doses. Among the 3 patients, the main toxicity was prolonged cytopenia requiring stem cell boost in one case. Donor NK cells demonstrated a dramatic shift from a predominantly CD56dimCD16hi (88% of NK cells) to a CD56dimCD16lo phenotype (49% of NK cells) as CIML NK cells. Infused CIML NK cells expanded massively, with approximately 50-fold, 10-fold, and 15-fold maximum in vivo expansion in the first three patients, respectively (Figure 1C). CIML NK cells were the major population in the day+28 marrows in both patients #001 and #002, with CD56+CD7+ cells constituting 89% of the cellularity in the former and 48% in the latter (Figure 1C). CIML NK cells persisted for 3 and 6 months post-infusion in the first two patients. The NK cells were predominantly mature, with most expressing CD16 and low levels of the inhibitory receptor NKG2A. PD-1 expression was much lower on the expanded NK cells vs the pre-infusion donor-derived NK cells. There was minimal concurrent expansion of CD4+CD25+ T-regulatory cells (Figure 1D). Conclusion We show with the first 3 patients in this trial that CIML NK cells can be generated and infused safely, can expand massively in the peripheral blood and bone marrow within the first 30 days post-infusion, and can persist for several months. In addition, CIML NK cell infusion can reduce the burden of pathogenic variant alleles to below the limit of detection, including the burden of high-risk mutations such as in TP53. Though our results are preliminary, the massive in vivo expansion and long-term persistence of adoptively transferred CIML NK cells underscores the unique biology of these cells that makes them an attractive option for cellular therapy protocols. Disclosures Nikiforow: Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rambaldi:Equillium: Research Funding. Cutler:Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kadmon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medsenic: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Koreth:Cugene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Other: Research Support; Clinigen: Other; Miltenyi: Other: Research Support; BMS: Other: Research Support; Therakos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Equillium: Consultancy; EMD Serono: Consultancy; Biolojic Design Inc: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Moderna Therapeutics: Consultancy. Wu:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; BionTech: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Soiffer:Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; VOR Biopharma: Consultancy; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy; Rheos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Consultancy; Be the Match/ National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ritz:TScan Therapeutics: Consultancy; Talaris Therapeutics: Consultancy; Rheos Medicines: Consultancy; LifeVault Bio: Consultancy; Avrobio: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Equillium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Falcon Therapeutics: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Abstract: Background: Patients (pts) with MDS or AML who relapse after allogeneic transplantation (allo-HCT) have a very poor prognosis. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) and checkpoint blockade with the anti-CTLA4 blocking antibody ipilimumab (IPI) have each induced responses with acceptable toxicity in AML pts who relapse after allo-HCT. We hypothesized that adding decitabine (DAC) would improve response compared with IPI alone by activating and promoting T cell-mediated anti-leukemic immune reactivity. We are conducting a multicenter phase I study (CTEP 10026) of DAC plus IPI in pts with R/R MDS/AML in both post allo-HCT and transplant-naïve settings to assess safety and estimate efficacy. Methods: The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or RP2D of combination DAC + IPI in pts with R/R MDS/AML who are post allo-HCT (Arm A) or transplant-naïve (Arm B). Cohorts of 3-6 are sequentially enrolled in 3 dose levels (DL) of IPI using a 3+3 design with expansion in each arm; DLs 0-2 are 3, 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Eligibility for both arms: relapsed AML (extramedullary or ≥ 5% blasts) or R/R MDS (≥ 5% blasts) or unfit elderly AML; Arm A only: ≥ 2 wks off systemic immunosuppressive (IS) therapy, T cell chimerism ≥ 20%, and no prior acute GVHD ≥ gr III. DLT is defined as ≥ gr 3 non-heme, ≥ gr 3 acute GVHD or ≥ gr 3 steroid-refractory immune-related adverse events (AEs) occurring within 8 weeks from first IPI dose. Epigenetic priming with DAC lead-in cycle 0 was followed by combination cycles of DAC + IPI. DAC is given at 20 mg/m2 days 1-5 q 28 days. IPI is given on day 1 of cycles 1-4 and every other cycle in cycles 5-12. Pts who discontinued study either in cycle 0 or DLT period without IPI-toxicity were replaced. Arm A opened after safety was confirmed at DL0 in Arm B. Results: As of June 9, 2019, 26 pts (15M, 11 F) have enrolled in this on-going trial. Of the 12 pts (11 AML and 1 MDS) enrolled in Arm A (post allo-HCT), median age was 66.5 (range 29-74) and 9 had previously received HMA. 7 of 8 pts in DL0 (1 progressed in cycle 0) and 3 of 4 pts in DL1 (1 died from pneumonia in cycle 0) received DAC + IPI. DL0 was expanded to 6 to confirm safety without DLT. Median treatment duration after first IPI dose was 5 cycles (range 1-7); 4 pts continue on trial. Common AEs were gr 1-2 dyspnea (n=4), gr 1-3 fatigue (n=4), and gr 1-2 fever (n=4). Gr 3 AEs were febrile neutropenia (n=2), pneumonia (n=1), and candidemia (n=1). Gr 1 immune-related dermatitis (n=1) reversed with steroids. Acute GVHD was not observed. Moderate-severe chronic GVHD was noted in 2 pts mainly involving skin, which was responsive to photopheresis and oral IS. Though 1 CR and 1 marrow CR have been observed at DL0, dose-escalation up to DL2 is on-going to determine MTD. Of the 14 pts (11 AML and 3 MDS) enrolled in Arm B (transplant naïve), median age was 75.5 (range 34-82) and 9 had previously received HMA. 4 of 6 pts in DL0 (1 progressed and 1 withdrew in cycle 0), 3 of 5 pts in DL1 (2 withdrew in cycle 0) and 3 of 3 pts in DL2 received DAC + IPI. Median treatment duration after first IPI dose was 4 cycles (range 1-8); 3 pts remain on study. Common AEs were gr 1-3 fatigue (n=9), gr 1-2 anorexia (n=5), and gr 3 febrile neutropenia (n=8). Immune-related gr 2 colitis (n=1) and gr 2/3 (n=4) dermatitis were all steroid-responsive. Of the 10 pts who received at least one IPI dose, 5 (50%) achieved an objective response including 3 CR, 1 CRi and 1 PR. All responses were observed in AML pts, including 1 with only skin involved. Expansion to confirm MTD is underway. No treatment-related deaths or DLTs were observed in either Arm. Reasons for discontinuation after IPI: progression (n=9), proceeding to allo-HCT or DLI (n=2), withdrawal (n=1), stroke due to underlying atrial fibrillation (n=1) and disseminated nocardiosis (n=1). In both Arms, multiplex immunofluorescence (MIF) staining of BM biopsies revealed a higher density of CD3+CD4+ cells after 4 cycles of DAC + IPI in 4 responders (R) compared to 4 non-responders (NR) (p=0.0433). Longitudinal MIF IHC in an Arm B responder identified the increasing presence of a tumor immune infiltrate composed of CD3+CD8+GZMB+ T cells prior to achieving CR (Fig 1). Conclusions: Combination DAC + IPI is tolerable and has encouraging clinical activity in post allo-HCT and transplant naïve pts with R/R MDS/AML. Ongoing studies focus on comparing the immunologic and genetic characteristics of the tumor immune infiltrate in each cohort to understand the contribution of alloimmunity to treatment response. Disclosures Garcia: Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Keng:agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brunner:Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Khaled:Omeros: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Travel support. Steensma:H3 Biosciences: Other: Research funding to institution, not investigator.; Arrowhead: Equity Ownership; Onconova: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy; Aprea: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Summer Road: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy. Winer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer: Consultancy. Cutler:Omeros: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; BiolineRx: Other: DSMB; Cellect: Other: DSMB; Kalytera: Other: DSMB; ElsaLys: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Ho:Omeros Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Neuberg:Madrigal Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lindsley:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Medlmmune: Research Funding. Galinsky:ABIM: Other: Member of specialty oncology board; Merus Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ritz:TScan Therapeutics: Consultancy; LifeVault Bio: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Talaris Therapeutics: Consultancy; Draper Labs: Consultancy; Avrobio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Equillium: Research Funding; Aleta Biotherapeutics: Consultancy. Davids:AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Adaptive, Biotechnologies, Astra-Zeneca, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, TG therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Genentech, Janssen, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Verastem: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma, Ascentage Pharma, Genentech, MEI pharma, Pharmacyclics, Surface Oncology, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Research Funding; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Wu:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Neon Therapeutics: Other: Member, Advisory Board. Stone:AbbVie, Actinium, Agios, Argenx, Arog, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Biolinerx, Celgene, Cornerstone Biopharma, Fujifilm, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Ono, Orsenix, Otsuka, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sumitomo, Trovagene: Consultancy; Argenx, Celgene, Takeda Oncology: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board/Committee: ; Novartis, Agios, Arog: Research Funding. DeAngelo:Blueprint: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Amgen, Autolus, Celgene, Forty-seven, Incyte, Jazzs, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda: Consultancy. Soiffer:Jazz: Consultancy; Gilead, Mana therapeutic, Cugene, Jazz: Consultancy; Juno, kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB; Kiadis: Other: supervisory board; Mana therapeutic: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Combination of ipilimumab and decitabine for MDS/AML treatment for patients who are post-transplant or transplant naive

Abstract: Although the GvL effect is the curative basis for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the key cellular and molecular mechanisms driving GvL sensitivity and resistance remain incompletely understood. Using genomic approaches, we systematically characterized the changes in cellular composition and state of CLL and non-CLL cells in two settings of effective GvL: reduced intensity conditioning regimens (RIC) and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). We identified 10 patients with CLL progression after RIC, 6 of whom had complete responses before relapse. To define the evolutionary trajectories of CLL cells after RIC, we generated paired whole-exome sequencing data from pre- and post-RIC CLL cells sorted from PBMCs. We used DNA from autologous CD4+ T cells for germline comparison and the algorithms MuTect2 and ABSOLUTE to identify somatic alterations with corresponding cancer cell fractions (CCFs). 5 of the 10 patients had clonal mutations in TP53 and/or SF3B1 pre-transplant. Mutation burden was higher at baseline than previously described for CLL (mean 29.7 vs 17.9 non-silent SNVs/exome, p 〈 0.0001, Student's t-test) but not different from post-transplant. Neither mutations nor altered expression (based on RNA sequencing) of HLA class 1 or 2, or B2M were observed. 8 relapse pairs exhibited complex branched evolution involving CCF shifts of subclonal and clonal mutations whereas two relapse pairs showed CCF shifts only in subclonal mutations. Presence of clonal shifts associated with active immunity (off immune suppression or presence of chronic graft-vs-host disease; p=0.02, Fisher's exact test), longer time to relapse ( 〉 1 vs 〈 1 year; p=0.02), and achievement of complete response (p=0.05). These data suggest that immune selective pressure by GvL can lead to gain of resistance capability, potentially facilitated by the replacement of dominant clones. We likewise saw diverse clonal trajectories in 2 index cases of DLI response followed by relapse, either 11 [branched evolution] or 1.5 [linear] years after DLI. To deeply examine co-evolution of CLL and immune cells during DLI-relapse, we performed single cell RNA sequencing of both cell types collected from 4 paired PBMC samples representing either pre- or post-(relapsed)-DLI time points. Using the inDrop platform, we profiled a median of 11,686 (range: 9,101-16,756) cells per sample with a median of 5,363 CD19+ CD5+ expressing CLL cells (range: 3,622-9,463). We first sought to define the transcriptional heterogeneity underlying CLL cells during DLI relapse. Data visualization using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding plots revealed broad transcriptional shifts in CLL clusters from pre- to post-DLI and also showed the complexity of transcriptional substructure to more closely relate to a patient's own genomic structure rather than a common CLL phenotype, in contrast to prior studies. DLI-relapsed CLL cells in both patients were marked by upregulation of CXCR4 and members of the RhoGTPase family, suggesting migration capacity and cytoskeletal remodeling to play a role in GvL escape. GO term enrichment analysis identified DLI sensitive CLL cells in these cases to associate with regulation of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and interferon signaling. We then determined parallel changes in PBMC immune states over time, which were subtle and not related to time point. To determine if the leukemic microenvironment can differentially affect immune states, we profiled, in total, 32,777 single bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) from pre-DLI, during DLI response, and post-DLI relapse for one patient. Unlike PBMCs, BMMC-derived T cells clustered preferentially by time point, then state of differentiation. DLI response induced a pronounced shift in all T cell states, reflected by upregulation of NFKB and PI3K-AKT signaling; a dysfunctional state marked by metallothionein family expression, recently discovered in murine single cell studies, was unique to the post-DLI relapse timepoint in this patient. Altogether, these data suggest that GvL selective pressure can shape genetic evolutionary trajectories; scRNA-seq analysis of the 2 informative DLI cases is consistent with the notion that the CLL microenvironment shapes immune states during GvL response and relapse. Ongoing studies will dissect the molecular pathways governing these trajectories to suggest therapeutic strategies for overcoming GvL resistance. Disclosures Brown: Boehringer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Invectys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Loxo: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Acerta / Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Ho:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wu:Neon Therapeutics: Equity Ownership.

Abstract: Vaccination using irradiated, adenovirus transduced autologous myeloblasts to secrete granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GVAX) early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can induce potent immune responses. We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial of GVAX after HSCT for myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts or relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Myeloblasts were harvested before HSCT to generate the vaccine. Randomization to GVAX vs placebo (1:1) was stratified according to disease, transplant center, and conditioning. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included tacrolimus and methotrexate. GVAX or placebo vaccination was started between day 30 and 45 if there was engraftment and no GVHD. Vaccines were administered subcutaneously/intradermally weekly × 3, then every 2 weeks × 3. Tacrolimus taper began after vaccine completion. A total of 123 patients were enrolled, 92 proceeded to HSCT, and 57 (GVAX, n = 30; placebo, n = 27) received at least 1 vaccination. No Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 or worse vaccine-related adverse events were reported, but injection site reactions were more common after GVAX (10 vs 1; P = .006). With a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 9-89 months), 18-month progression-free survival, overall survival, and relapse incidence were 53% vs 55% (P = .79), 63% vs 59% (P = .86), and 30% vs 37% (P = .51) for GVAX and placebo, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality at 18 months was 17% vs 7.7% (P = .18), grade II to IV acute GVHD at 12 months was 34% vs 12% (P = .13), and chronic GVHD at 3 years was 49% vs 57% for GVAX and placebo (P = .26). Reconstitution of T, B, and natural killer cells was not decreased or enhanced by GVAX. There were no differences in serum major histocompatibility chain-related protein A/B or other immune biomarkers between GVAX and placebo. GVAX does not improve survival after HSCT for myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01773395.

Abstract: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) following haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) resembles CRS after chimeric antigen receptor-T therapy. We conducted this single-center retrospective study to evaluate the association of posthaploidentical HCT CRS with clinical outcomes and immune reconstitution. One hundred sixty-nine patients who underwent haploidentical HCT between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Of these, 98 patients (58%) developed CRS after HCT. CRS was diagnosed based on the presence of fever within the first 5 days after HCT without evidence of infection or infusion reaction and was graded according to established criteria. The development of posthaploidentical HCT CRS was associated with a lower incidence of disease relapse (P = .024) but with an increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease GVHD (P = .01). The association of CRS with a lower incidence of relapse was not confounded by graft source or disease diagnosis. Neither CD34 nor total nucleated cell dose was associated with CRS independently of graft type. In patients developing CRS, CD4+ Treg (P  & lt; .0005), CD4+ Tcon (P  & lt; .005), and CD8+ T cells (P  & lt; .005) increased 1 month after HCT compared with those who did not develop CRS, but not at later time points. The increase in CD4+ regulatory T cells 1 month after HCT was most notable among patients with CRS who received a bone marrow graft (P  & lt; .005). The development of posthaploidentical HCT CRS is associated with a reduced incidence of disease relapse and a transient effect on post-HCT immune reconstitution of T cells and their subsets. Therefore, the validation of these observations in a multicenter cohort is required.