GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Interventional Neuroradiology, SAGE Publications, Vol. 22, No. 6 ( 2016-12), p. 711-716
    Abstract: The purpose of this article is to present a case series of transarterial venous sinus occlusion for dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses. Materials and methods From 2006 to 2012, 11 patients with DAVF of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses were treated with transarterial closure of the affected venous sinus using ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (ONYX). The consecutive retrospective cohort included six female and five male patients with an age range of 30–79. Patients presented with stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, seizure, headache, focal neurologic deficit or cognitive change. Lesions were categorized as Cognard II a + b ( n = 5) or Cognard II b ( n = 6). Four of this latter group consisted of isolated sinus segments. Selection criteria for dural sinus occlusion included direct multi-hole fistulas involving a broad surface in length or circumference of the sinus wall. External carotid artery (ECA) branches were directly embolized when considered safe. High-risk arterial supply from ICA, PICA, AICA or ECA cranial nerve branches were closed via retrograde approach during sinus occlusion. Results DAVF closure was accomplished in all 11 patients with a total of 17 embolization procedures using ONYX. High-risk arterial collaterals were closed via artery-artery or artery-sinus-artery embolization. The vein of Labbe was spared in the four cases with initial antegrade flow. No neurologic complications occurred, and DAVF closures were durable on three-month angiography. Conclusion Transarterial closure of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1591-0199 , 2385-2011
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2571161-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, BMJ, Vol. 13, No. 10 ( 2021-10), p. 865-868
    Abstract: Persons with pre-existing disabilities represent over one-third of acute stroke presentations, but account for a far smaller proportion of those receiving endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and thrombolysis. This is despite existing ethical, economic, legal, and social directives to maximize equity for this vulnerable population. We sought to determine associations between baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and outcomes after EVT. Methods Individuals who underwent EVT were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Demographics, medical history, presentations, treatments, and outcomes were recorded. Baseline disability was defined as baseline mRS≥2. Accumulated disability was defined as the delta between baseline mRS and absolute 90-day mRS. Results Of 381 individuals, 49 had baseline disability (five with mRS=4, 23 mRS=3, 21 mRS=2). Those with baseline disability were older (81 vs 68 years, P 〈 0.0001), more likely female (65% vs 49%, P=0.032), had more coronary disease (39% vs 20%, P=0.006), stroke/TIA history (35% vs 15%, P=0.002), and higher NIH Stroke Scale (19 vs 16, P=0.001). Baseline mRS was associated with absolute 90-day mRS ≤2 (OR=0.509, 95%CI=0.370–0.700). However, baseline mRS bore no association with accumulated disability by delta mRS ≤0 (ie, return to baseline, OR=1.247, 95%CI=0.943–1.648), delta mRS ≤1 (OR=1.149, 95%CI=0.906–1.458), delta mRS ≤2 (OR 1.097, 95% CI 0.869–1.386), TICI 2b–3 reperfusion (OR=0.914, 95%CI=0.712–1.173), final infarct size (P=0.853, β=−0.014), or intracerebral hemorrhage (OR=0.521, 95%CI=0.244–1.112). Conclusions While baseline mRS was associated with absolute 90-day disability, there was no association with accumulated disability or other outcomes. Patients with baseline disability should not be routinely excluded from EVT based on baseline mRS alone.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1759-8478 , 1759-8486
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2506028-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, BMJ, Vol. 8, No. 9 ( 2016-09), p. 927-933
    Abstract: The Raymond–Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC) qualitatively assesses intracranial aneurysm occlusion following endovascular coil embolization. The Modified Raymond–Roy Classification (MRRC) was developed as a refinement of this classification scheme, and dichotomizes RROC III occlusions into IIIa (opacification within the interstices of the coil mass) and IIIb (opacification between the coil mass and aneurysm wall) closures. Methods To demonstrate in an external cohort the predictive accuracy of the MRRC, the records of 326 patients with 345 intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coil embolization from January 2007 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Within this cohort, 84 (24.3%) and 83 aneurysms (24.1%) had MRRC IIIa and IIIb closures, respectively, during initial coil embolization. Progression to complete occlusion was more likely with IIIa than IIIb closures (53.6% vs 19.2%, p≤0.01), while recanalization was more likely with IIIb than IIIa closures (65.1% vs 27.4%, p 〈 0.01). Kaplan–Meier estimates demonstrated a significant difference in the test of equality for progression to complete occlusion (p=0.02) and recurrence (p 〈 0.01) between class IIIa and IIIb distributions. For the entire cohort, male gender (p 〈 0.01), ruptured aneurysm (p=0.04), intraluminal thrombus (p 〈 0.01), and MRRC IIIb closure (p 〈 0.01) were identified as predictors of recanalization. For aneurysms with an initial RROC III occlusion, MRRC IIIa closure was found to be an independent predictor of progression to complete occlusion (p=0.02). Conclusions This study confirms that the MRRC enhances the predictive accuracy of the RROC.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1759-8478 , 1759-8486
    Language: English
    Publisher: BMJ
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2506028-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 48, No. suppl_1 ( 2017-02)
    Abstract: Background: Endovascular management of stroke from acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) requires complex, emergent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The “weekend effect” (worsened outcomes from stroke presenting on weekends or evenings) is a recognized phenomenon, attributed to non-uniform availability of services throughout the week. We assessed the impact of institutional protocols for stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy during off hours. Methods: We analyzed a prospective observational stroke database for consecutive patients with anterior circulation stroke undergoing endovascular therapy between 6/2012 and 10/2015. Patients were grouped and analyzed based on day of the week and time of presentation to the emergency department. Off-hours were considered between 1900hrs and 0700hrs on weekdays and 1900hrs on Friday to 0700hrs on Mondays for weekends. Functional outcome was assessed prospectively by 3 month modified Rankin scale (mRS), dichotomized into good (mRS 0-2) versus poor (mRS 3-6). Results: In a cohort of 129 patients, 75 (58%) patients were treated off-hours. Patients treated off-hours demonstrated equivalent imaging to groin puncture times (78 vs 72 min, p = 0.4) and procedure durations (75 vs 68 min, p = 0.3). Reperfusion rates (TICI 2b or 3) were 68% off hours and 76% during working hours (p = 0.4). Complication rates were similar between the two groups. Outcome at 90 days was no different in the patients treated off hours, with 35 of 75 treated off-hours achieving a good outcome (mRS 0-2) compared to 22 of 54 treated during working hours (p = 0.6). With protocol adherence, temporal improvement was noted in imaging to groin times. Discussion/Conclusions: Following recent evidence of benefit from endovascular therapy for LVOs there is increased attention to care delivery. Our findings demonstrate that under the guidance of protocols, the “weekend effect” was negated. Evaluation and treatment times, and 90 day outcomes were equivalent in patients treated off- vs business hours, with improving treatment times as familiarity with protocols increased. Our findings highlight the importance of establishing institutional and regional protocols in the optimized management of these patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Interventional Neuroradiology, SAGE Publications, Vol. 29, No. 3 ( 2023-06), p. 315-320
    Abstract: The utility of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO) is controversial. Some data suggest IVT increases MT technical difficulty. Within our hub-and-spoke telestroke network, we examined how spoke-administered IVT affected hub MT procedure time and pass number. Methods Patients presenting to 25 spoke hospitals who were transferred to the hub and underwent MT from 2018 to 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. MT procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and pass number were obtained from operative reports. Results Of 107 patients, 48 received IVT at spokes. Baseline characteristics and NIHSS were similar. The last known well (LKW)-to-puncture time was shorter among IVT patients (4.3 ± 1.9 h vs. 10.5 ± 6.5 h, p  〈  0.0001). In patients that received IVT, mean MT procedure time was decreased by 18.8 min (50.5 ± 29.4 vs. 69.3 ± 46.7 min, p = 0.02) and mean fluoroscopy time was decreased by 11.3 min (21.7 ± 15.8 vs. 33.0 ± 30.9 min, p = 0.03). Furthermore, IVT-treated patients required fewer MT passes (median 1 pass [IQR 1.0, 1.80] vs. 2 passes [1.0, 2.3] , p = 0.0002) and were more likely to achieve reperfusion in ≤2 passes (81.3% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.01). An increased proportion of IVT-treated patients achieved TICI 2b-3 reperfusion after MT (93.9% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.045). There were no associations between MT procedural characteristics and LKW-to-puncture time. Conclusion Within our network, hub MT following spoke-administered IVT was faster, required fewer passes, and achieved improved reperfusion. This suggests spoke-administered IVT does not impair MT, but instead may enhance it.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1591-0199 , 2385-2011
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2571161-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Interventional Neuroradiology, SAGE Publications
    Abstract: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is an infrequent but often fatal subtype of stroke. Predicting outcomes and selecting patients for endovascular therapy (EVT) remains challenging. Advances in neuroimaging and the development of prognostic scoring systems have augmented clinical decision-making over time. Recent randomized trials, BEST (Basilar Artery Occlusion Endovascular Intervention vs. Standard Medical Treatment), BASICS (Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study), BAOCHE (Basilar Artery Occlusion CHinese Endovascular Trial) and ATTENTION (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion), compared EVT and medical management for patients with BAO. These trials yielded mixed results. The former two suggested unclear benefit while the latter two supported a benefit of EVT. While all had limitations, most providers agree caution should be exercised when excluding patients from EVT who may stand to benefit. Further studies are therefore needed to determine the effectiveness, safety, selection criteria, and optimal technical approach for EVT among patients with BAO. Hyperacute-phase advanced imaging can offer several benefits to aid decision making. It is reasonable to exclude patients with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), large imaging-proven cores, and evidence of perforator occlusion by branch atheromatous disease. Herein, we review the clinical presentation, imaging work-up, treatments, and clinical outcomes for BAO, while highlighting knowledge gaps in treatment selection and technique.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1591-0199 , 2385-2011
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2571161-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 53, No. Suppl_1 ( 2022-02)
    Abstract: Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has revolutionized the care of emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke patients. It is, therefore, crucial to optimize its delivery to eligible candidates. Within hub-and-spoke hospital system models, some patients first present to distant spoke hospitals and require transfer to hub hospitals for EVT. We sought to understand changes in EVT eligibility during transfer. Methods: Consecutive EVT candidates presenting to 25 spokes from 2018 to 2020 with pre-transfer CTA-defined ELVO and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score ≥6 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes of interest included hub EVT, reasons for EVT ineligibility, and 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, mRS ≤2). Results: Among 258 patients, the median age was 70 years (IQR 60-81) and 50% were female. Forty-four percent underwent EVT upon hub arrival, of which 87% achieved Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3 reperfusion. Compared to EVT-eligible patients, ineligible patients were older (73 vs 68 years, p=0.04), had lower NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS, 10 vs 16, p 〈 0.0001), longer LKW-hub arrival time (8.4 vs 4.6 hours, p 〈 0.0001), and received less IV alteplase (32% vs 45%, p=0.04). The clinical reasons cited for becoming EVT ineligible upon hub arrival included large established infarct (49%), mild symptoms (33%), recanalization (6%), distal occlusion location (5%), subocclusive lesion (3%), and goals of care (3%). Becoming EVT ineligible independently reduced the odds of 90-day functional independence (aOR=0.26, 95%CI=0.12,0.56; p=0.001), even when controlling for age, NIHSS, and LKW-hub arrival time. Conclusions: These data support that approaches to increase EVT eligibility among ELVO transfers may improve long term outcomes. Infarct growth represents the primary reason for ineligibility. Possible interventions include direct field triage to the hub when feasible, improving inter-hospital transfer times, supporting ischemic penumbra before EVT, and developing novel agents to slow infarct growth.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 53, No. Suppl_1 ( 2022-02)
    Abstract: Introduction: For patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is crucial to prevent irreversible infarction and improve outcomes. We sought to evaluate the arrival-to-puncture times and outcomes for LVO patients transferred directly to the angio-suite (LVO2OR) versus those accepted through the emergency department (ED). Methods: Consecutive patients transferred for EVT within a hub-and-spoke model with spoke CTA-confirmed LVO, spoke ASPECTS 〉 6, and last known well-to-hub arrival 〈 6 hours were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The LVO2OR protocol began implementation in January 2017. The LVO2OR cohort includes patients who underwent EVT from July 2017 to October 2020, and the ED cohort includes those from January 2011 to December 2016. Arrival-to-puncture time and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were prospectively recorded. Results: The LVO2OR cohort was comprised of 91 patients and the ED cohort 90 patients. LVO2OR patients had more atrial fibrillation (AF, 51% vs 32%, p=0.02) and more M2 occlusions (27% vs 10%, p=0.01), but otherwise similar demographics, medical history, and presentations. They had dramatically faster median hub arrival-to-puncture times (11 vs 92 min, p 〈 0.001), more TICI 2b-3 (92% vs 69%, p 〈 0.001), and more 90-day mRS 0-1 (35% vs 21%, p=0.04). In a multivariable model, LVO2OR significantly increased the odds of 90-day mRS 0-1 (aOR 2.77, 95%CI 1.07,7.20; p=0.04) even when controlling for age, baseline mRS, AF, NIHSS, M2 location, and TICI 2b-3. Conclusion: Within a hub-and-spoke Telestroke network, transferring eligible LVO patients directly to the angio-suite was associated with dramatically reduced arrival-to-puncture times and improved 90-day outcomes. Direct to angio-suite systems of care should be considered in Telestroke networks to expedite high-quality stroke care.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 1, No. S1 ( 2021-11)
    Abstract: This meeting abstract was removed due to the OA licensing requirements of this journal. The full abstract is listed here : https://www.svin.org/files/SVIN_2021_Abstracts_for_Web.pdf
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2694-5746
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3144224-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 1, No. S1 ( 2021-11)
    Abstract: Introduction : The care of emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke patients has been revolutionized by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Given its robust efficacy, it is crucial to optimize delivery to eligible patients. Within hub‐and‐spoke hospital system models, some patients first present to distant spoke hospitals and require transfer to hub hospitals for EVT. We sought to understand reasons EVT candidates become ineligible after transfer for treatment. Methods : Consecutive EVT candidates presenting to 25 spokes from 2018 to 2020 with pre‐transfer CTA‐defined ELVO and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score ≥6 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes of interest included hub EVT, reasons for EVT ineligibility, and 90‐day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, mRS ≤2). Results : 258 patients were identified with median age 70 years (IQR 60–81) and 50% female. 44% underwent EVT upon hub arrival, of which 87% achieved Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b‐3 reperfusion. Compared to EVT‐eligible patients, ineligible patients were older (73 vs 68 years, p = 0.04), had lower NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS, 10 vs 16, p 〈 0.0001), longer LKW‐hub arrival time (8.4 vs 4.6 hours, p 〈 0.0001), and received less IV alteplase (32% vs 45%, p = 0.04). The clinical reasons cited for becoming EVT ineligible upon hub arrival included large established infarct (49%), mild symptoms (33%), recanalization (6%), distal occlusion location (5%), subocclusive lesion (3%), and goals of care (3%). Becoming EVT ineligible independently reduced the odds of 90‐day functional independence (aOR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.12,0.56; p = 0.001), even when controlling for age, NIHSS, and LKW‐hub arrival time. Conclusions : Approaches to increase EVT eligibility among ELVO transfers may improve long term outcomes. A primary reason for becoming EVT ineligible is infarct growth. Future studies should explore triaging patients directly to EVT‐capable hubs when feasible, improving inter‐hospital transfer times, supporting ischemic penumbra before EVT, and developing novel neuroprotective agents.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2694-5746
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3144224-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...