GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Hartley, Sarah  (3)
  • 2015-2019  (3)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Informa UK Limited ; 2019
    In:  Teaching and Learning in Medicine Vol. 31, No. 5 ( 2019-10-20), p. 519-527
    In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 31, No. 5 ( 2019-10-20), p. 519-527
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1040-1334 , 1532-8015
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2019
    SSG: 5,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Journal of Graduate Medical Education ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Graduate Medical Education Vol. 11, No. 3 ( 2019-06-01), p. 277-283
    In: Journal of Graduate Medical Education, Journal of Graduate Medical Education, Vol. 11, No. 3 ( 2019-06-01), p. 277-283
    Abstract: Residents regularly care for hospitalized patients for whom they are not the primary provider (cross-cover), often without guidance. Objective We identified and defined components of safe cross-cover care. Methods Sixty medical and surgical faculty physicians and chief residents from the Midwest were invited to participate in a Delphi study analyzing the appropriateness of cross-covering residents evaluating patients at bedside, deferring issues to the primary team, documenting a note, contacting the attending, and communicating with nurses. The first survey was free text, and responses were categorized. In the second survey, physicians rated categorized responses based on appropriateness using a 5-point Likert scale. High consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement, approaching consensus as 51% to 79% agreement, and nonconsensus as ≤ 50% agreement. Results were analyzed by specialty and cross-cover experience in the past year using Pearson χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Results Forty respondents (67%) completed the first survey and 30 (50%) completed the second. Responses led to 46 categories. Twenty-eight items (60%) achieved high consensus, 8 (17%) approached consensus, and 10 (22%) did not achieve consensus, with no difference based on specialty or experience. Responses with 100% consensus included: residents should evaluate a patient at bedside whenever asked by the nurse; documentation should occur for change in level of care, death, code, or rapid response team activation; and physician-nurse communication should be respectful and closed loop. Conclusions This regional physician panel reached consensus on 28 elements important in cross-cover care, which can be used for training and future studies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1949-8349 , 1949-8357
    Language: English
    Publisher: Journal of Graduate Medical Education
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2578612-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2019
    In:  The Clinical Teacher Vol. 16, No. 3 ( 2019-06), p. 214-219
    In: The Clinical Teacher, Wiley, Vol. 16, No. 3 ( 2019-06), p. 214-219
    Abstract: To examine the current state of cross‐cover education in undergraduate medical education and intern perceived readiness to provide cross‐cover. Methods An electronic survey was distributed to 126 incoming interns in surgery, internal medicine, family medicine and paediatrics residencies at a single academic centre. Information regarding prior cross‐cover training, experience, confidence, and responses to a sample cross‐cover case were obtained. Results The survey response rate was 69.8% (88 of 126), which included both partial and complete responses. Fifty‐seven interns out of 85 (67.1%) had no formal training and 51 (60.0%) had no experience performing cross‐cover. They reported feeling unprepared to provide cross‐cover, with an average score of 1.8 on a 5‐point Likert scale (1, not at all confident; 5, extremely confident). Interns had more confidence in performing cross‐cover tasks if they had prior direct cross‐cover experience (p = 0.001), and were the least confident in performing the initial evaluation and management of urgent issues (Likert score = 1.6). Scores on the sample case were correlated with the amount of prior experience with patients (p = 0.06). Only 77.7% of interns indicated that they would notify their senior resident in two urgent scenarios. Those who reported higher confidence in knowing when to ask for help were more likely to appropriately notify their senior colleague (p = 0.005). We identified gaps in cross‐cover training and in the preparedness of incoming interns Conclusions We identified gaps in cross‐cover training and in the preparedness of incoming interns. This has important implications for the first day of residency, when interns are often asked to perform cross‐coverage, yet feel unprepared to do so and express the greatest concern in urgent cross‐cover scenarios. Addressing this curricular gap is crucial in assuring safe cross‐cover care.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1743-4971 , 1743-498X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2174501-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...