Abstract: Background. R-CHOP is the standard first-line treatment for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However 30% of patients will relapse and 70% of relapsed patients will die within 2 years of diagnosis. The REMARC study (clinicalTrials.gov NCT01122472) is an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, phase III trial that assessed the benefit of lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance after response to R-CHOP in patients aged 60 to 80 years with untreated DLBCL, FL3b or transformed lymphoma. Patients achieving CR or PR at the end of 6 or 8 cycles of R-CHOP21 or R-CHOP14 were stratified by CR/PR status and country and randomized 1:1 to receive 2 years of LEN maintenance (25 mg/day for 21 of every 28 days) or placebo (PBO). The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, PR to CR conversion rate, and overall survival (OS). Diagnosis was retrospectively centrally reviewed. In patients with adequate samples, GCB/nonGCB profile was assessed by the Hans algorithm and GCB/ABC/unclassified profile was assessed using NanoString gene expression profiling technology. Methods. From 05/2009 to 05/2014, 784 patients were enrolled either before R-CHOP (n= 437) or after completion of 6 or 8 cycles of R-CHOP (n= 347). At the end of R-CHOP therapy, 650 patients were randomized to maintenance, either in CR (n= 495) or in PR (n= 152). Central review found that 3 patients were randomized in SD or PD, all in LEN arm. At time of diagnosis, median age was 68 y (range 58-80), 43.5% were older than 70 y, and 56% were male. aaIPI was low in 38.5% and high in 57.5% of patients (missing data 4%). COO analyses are ongoing for both Hans algorithm and NanoString technology. Results. With a median follow-up of 40 months, median PFS (according to independent centralized radiology review) was not reached in the LEN group versus 68 months in the PBO group (hazard ratio favoring the LEN group, 0.708 (95% CI 0.537-0.932; p=0.0135))(See Figure). In the LEN group, 18 patients (21%) converted from PR to CR during maintenance compared to 13 patients (14%) in the PBO group. Immature overall survival data did not show any benefit for LEN arm, a lack of difference not attributable to an excess of lymphoma relapse, secondary cancer or safety problems in LEN arm. Deaths generally occurred off study drug (median time from last dose of study drug to death was 277 days (range 20, 1291) in LEN arm and 334 (41, 1594) in control arm. During maintenance, the most common observed grade 3 or 4 AEs were neutropenia (56% vs. 22%), rash (5% vs. 1%), infections (8% vs. 6%), and thrombocytopenia (2.5% vs. 0.6%) in LEN and PBO arms, respectively. Dose adjustments were necessary in 72% of the LEN patients and 42% of PBO patients. 59% of patients stopped LEN and 40% stopped PBO for toxicity (p 〈 0.001). Median number of cycles was 15 in LEN and 25 in PBO (p 〈 0.001). Secondary primary malignancies occurred in 33 patients receiving LEN and in 42 patients on PBO. Conclusion. This analysis of the REMARC study shows that 2 years of LEN maintenance in patients responding to R-CHOP significantly improved PFS (primary endpoint) without an early significant impact on OS. The COO analysis is currently ongoing. This is the first report finding that using an immunomodulatory agent as maintenance therapy prolongs PFS for patients with DLBCL after first line treatment with R-CHOP. Figure 1. Progression-free survival of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in response to R-CHOP treated in maintenance with either lenalidomide or placebo Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Thieblemont: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; Bayer healthcare: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gomez da Silva:Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ROche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morschhauser:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria. Haioun:Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cabecadas:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Salles:Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Coiffier:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Anemia is a common feature at diagnosis of patients with lymphoid malignancies and has been previously described as an important prognostic factor (Moullet et al. Ann Oncol 1998). Recent guidelines recommend evaluating iron parameters as part of the initial assessment of cancer associated anemia in order to propose iron therapy for patients with functional or absolute iron deficiency. However, incidence of iron parameters abnormalities and impact on prognosis is largely unknown. Methods The phase III randomized LNH 03-6B protocol included elderly patients from 60 to 80-year with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 1 or more. Patients were randomized between 8 cycles of R-CHOP given every 2 or 3 weeks (Delarue et al. Lancet Oncol 2013) and between a prophylactic treatment with Darbepoetin alfa in order to maintain hemoglobin level between 13 and 14 g/dL versus an usual management of chemotherapy-induced anemia including ESAs and transfusions. Iron parameters including serum iron, transferrin and ferritin levels and transferrin saturation (TSAT) were measured at screening and at the end of study treatment. Iron deficiency was defined by TSAT below 20% and was considered either as true or functional if ferritin level was below or above normal or value, respectively. Results At diagnosis, median serum iron level was 9 µmol/L (n=358 patients, range: 0.14-62.6), median transferrin level was 2.1 g/L (n=262 patients, range: 0.3-29), median ferritin level was 325 ng/mL (n=321 patients, range: 6-6071) and median TSAT was 17% (n=258 patients, range: 2-57). Among patients with available TSAT data, 163/258 (63%) presented a coefficient lower than 20%. When comparing with the whole study population, patients with TSAT ≤ 20% had similar baseline characteristics including aaIPI. In univariate analysis, there is no difference of PFS (HR: 1.078, 95%CI: 0.734-1.584, p=0.7006) and OS (HR: 0.963, 95%CI: 0.622-1.491, p=0.8664) according to TSAT. By contrast, in univariate and multivariate analysis, patients with ferritin level lower than normal and patients with ferritin level higher than normal presented, compared with patients with normal ferritin level, worse PFS (respectively, HR: 4,973, 95%CI: 1.673-14.780, p=0.039; HR: 1,654, 95%CI: 1.094-2.499, p =0,017) and OS (respectively HR: 6.204, 95%CI: 1.713-22.475, p=0.0055; HR: 1.8, 95%CI: 1.108-2.923, p =0.0175). Conclusion Elderly patients with untreated aggressive lymphoma and iron deficiency as measured by TSAT showed similar characteristics compared to the whole population. TSAT level did not impact prognosis in contrast to ferritin level, whose variations could be independent of iron metabolism. The high frequency of iron deficiency at diagnosis raise the question of the use of IV iron as a frontline treatment of chemotherapy-associated anemia. A prospective, placebo-controlled, phase III trial is planned within our group, whose primary objective will be to demonstrate efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose alone compared to placebo as measured by the diminution of percentage of patients requiring red blood cell transfusion and/or ESA administration. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: There are some evidences that blood transfusions, either red blood cell (RBC) or platelet, could impact survival of patients affected with various medical conditions. Mechanisms are largely unknown but immune dysfunction, storage duration, cytokines or iron releases could be involved. These concerns led to the publication of revised guidelines with a more restrictive approach for RBC and platelet transfusions in various conditions, mostly surgery and emergency. However, less was known for cancer patients receiving therapy with a curative attempt. Methods The phase III randomized LNH 03-6B protocol included elderly patients from 60 to 80-year with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 1 or more. Patients were randomized between 8 cycles of R-CHOP given every 2 or 3 weeks (Delarue et al. Lancet Oncol 2013) and between a prophylactic treatment with Darbepoetin alfa in order to maintain hemoglobin level between 13 and 14 g/dL and an usual management of chemotherapy-induced anemia. In both arms, RBC and platelet transfusions were given according to physician decision without predefined threshold, but analysis of current practices showed that most patients were transfused with RBC for grade 3 or more anemia and with platelet for grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Results A total of 602 patients were included in the study and 599 have been analyzed for safety issues. Overall, 236 patients received at least one RBC transfusion (39%) with a higher incidence in the R-CHOP14 group (47% versus 31%, p=0.0001) and 60 patients (10%) received at least one platelet transfusion. Comparing with the whole study population, patients who were transfused presented with more aggressive baseline characteristics including percentage of patients with an aaIPI of 2 or 3 (72% versus 58%). Occurrence of RBC transfusion was associated with a worse outcome regarding progression-free (HR: 0.696, 95%CI: 0.547-0.885, p=0.0031) and overall survival (HR: 0.544, 95%CI: 0.414-0.714, p= 〈 0.0001). Moreover, the number of episode of red blood cell transfusion (0 vs. 1-2 vs. 〉 2) was also associated with PFS and OS. Occurrence of platelet transfusion was also associated with worse PFS (HR: 2.658, 95%CI: 1.922-3.677, p 〈 0.0001) and OS (HR: 3.257, 95%CI: 2.302-4.608, p 〈 0.0001), with an impact of the number of episode (0 vs. 1 vs. 〉 1). In a multivariate analysis including LDH level, ECOG performans status and β2-microglobulin level, RBC and platelet transfusions were both predictive for overall survival (HR: 1.575, 95%CI: 1.158-2.143, p=0.0038 and HR: 2.608, 95% CI: 1.736-3.917, p 〈 0.0001). Finally, no adverse event was associated with transfusion. Conclusion In elderly patients who received a first line immunochemotherapy for aggressive B-cell lymphoma, occurrence of transfusions as well as the number of blood products transfused appear to be significantly and independently associated with lower survival rates. These results suggest a direct effect of transfusion and will prompt us to explore possible mechanistic explanations in animal models and to validate this hypothesis in others cancer populations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: Obinutuzumab (GA101), a type II, glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was superior to rituximab in human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) xenograft models. In phase I of our study, obinutuzumab (GA101) exhibited encouraging activity but no clear dose-response relationship, and few patients had aggressive histologies. The efficacy and safety of two doses of obinutuzumab (GA101) were explored in our randomized phase II trial in patients with heavily pretreated DBLCL and MCL. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive eight cycles of obinutuzumab (GA101) either as a flat dose of 400 mg for all infusions (days 1 and 8 of cycle 1; day 1 of cycles 2 to 8) or 1,600 mg on days 1 and 8 of cycle 1 and 800 mg on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8. Results Forty patients were enrolled: 21 patients in the 400/400-mg treatment arm (DLBCL, n = 10; MCL, n = 11) and 19 patients in the 1,600/800-mg arm (DLBCL, n = 15; MCL, n = 4). End-of-treatment response was 28% (32% and 24% in the 1,600/800-mg and 400/400-mg study arms, respectively). Best overall response rates were 37% in the 1,600/800-mg arm and 24% in the 400/400-mg study arm (DLBCL, eight [32%] of 25 patients; MCL, four [27%] of 15 patients). Five (20%) of 25 rituximab-refractory patients exhibited treatment response, including four of 12 in the 1,600/800-mg group. The most common adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRRs), which were manageable. Three patients had grade 3/4 IRRs. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in only one patient. Conclusion Obinutuzumab (GA101) 1,600/800 mg achieves early steady-state concentration and clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory DLBCL and MCL, supporting further exploration.

Abstract: Introduction Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is of poor prognosis, with a median survival of about 5 years. Besides the t(11;14) translocation, several secondary genetic abnormalities have been shown to correlate with prognosis. However, most studies have analysed patients with heterogeneous treatment, mostly with anthracyclin-based regimens. In 2004, the European MCL Network started the randomized MCL Younger trial comparing R-CHOP followed by high-dose radiochemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP followed by a high-dose cytarabine conditioning regimen and ASCT in previously untreated MCL stage II-IV patients up to the age of 65y. The R-CHOP/R-DHAP arm showed improved time to treatment failure (TTF) and, potentially, overall survival (OS) (Hermine et al., ASH 2010, ASH 2012). Our aim was to revisit the prognostic value of some gene copy number alterations (GCNA) in this randomized trial and to determine whether high-dose cytarabine could counteract some of those factors. Methods The inclusion criteria for this biological study were: confirmed histological diagnosis of MCL, the availability of diagnostic tumor DNA and complete clinical data. When no frozen biopsy was available, peripheral samples with more than 50% tumor cells were considered eligible for GCNA analysis. CDKN1B, CDK2, and MDM2 were analyzed using quantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments (QMPSF) (Jardin et al., BJH 2009), 6q25-q26, CDK4, and the 13q14 locus were analyzed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) (MRC-Holland CLL kit), and MYC, CDKN2A, ATM, RB1 and TP53 were assessed by both methods. The analyses of the prognostic value of GCNA was adjusted for clinical prognostic factors summarized in the quantitative MIPI score (age, performance status, LDH, and WBC). The rate of proliferating tumor cells (Ki-67 index) was centrally assessed by the reference pathologists of the European MCL Pathology Panel according to published guidelines (Klapper et al., J Hematopathol 2009). Outcome variables were TTF from treatment start to stable disease, progression, or death from any cause, and OS from trial registration to death from any cause. Results Of 135 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria (median age 56 years), 49%, 26%, and 25% of patients were of low, intermediate, and high MIPI risk . The most frequent amplification involved MYC (18%), whereas the most frequent deletion involved the 13q14 locus (36%), including RB1 in 26%. As expected, CDKN2A and TP53 deletions were frequently found (25% and 22%, respectively). ATM alterations mostly consist of deletion (25%), but amplification was found in 3 of 129patients. The frequencies of GCNA did not differ according to the type of sample analyzed i.e. tumor biopsies (n=79) vs. high tumor load peripheral blood or bone marrow samples (n=56). The Ki-67 index was higher in patients with CDKN2A or RB1 deletion compared to patients without, but was not different between patients with or without TP53 deletion. Only TP53 gene status was associated with MCL cytology, with more frequent deletion in blastoid forms (4/8) than in classic MCL (11/81, 14%). In univariable analyses, deletions of CDKN2A, 13q14, RB1, CDKN1B, and TP53 were associated with shorter TTF and OS, whereas GCNA of 6q25-q26, MYC, ATM, CDK2, CDK4, and MDM2 were not prognostic. In multivariable analyses, adjusting for MIPI score, CDKN2A and TP53 deletions showed independent prognostic impact with hazard ratios of 2.4 (p=0.001) and 2.3 (p=0.004) for TTF and 2.3 (p=0.007) and 2.4 (p=0.007) for OS. This effect was observed in both treatment arms (Figure 1). In addition, there was an interacting effect of CDKN2A (p16) deletion and TP53 deletion on TTF (p=0.004). Conclusions The introduction of high-dose cytarabine in first-line treatment of younger MCL patients did not erase the adverse prognostic value of TP53 and CDKN2A deletions observed with previous regimens. Moreover, our study identified a small patient group of very bad prognosis which could benefit of more aggressive regimens or new targeted drugs combination. Figure 1: TTF (left) and OS (right) according to CDKN2A/TP53 deletion status in patients of the R-CHOP/R-DHAP study arm; nom=not deleted, del=deleted Figure 1:. TTF (left) and OS (right) according to CDKN2A/TP53 deletion status in patients of the R-CHOP/R-DHAP study arm; nom=not deleted, del=deleted Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Feugier: Roche: Honoraria. Haioun:Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Pfizer, Janssen,: Honoraria.

Abstract: As previously reported (Colombat, Blood2001;97:101), rituximab (4 weekly doses of 375mg/m²) can lead to high response rates (RR) and prolonged remissions with minimal toxicity as 1st line therapy for low tumor burden FL. We report the final analysis of a trial evaluating long term efficacy and safety of rituximab in untreated low tumor burden FL (GELF criteria). 49 patients (pts) were included in the initial trial (median age 52 yrs), 2 refused consent for the extended F/Up period, and 1 pt died at M12. Molecular bcl2-JH rearrangement was assessed throughout the study. The median F/up was 83.8 mths. Overall best RR, complete/unconfirmed RR and partial RR at D78 were 74%, 50% and 24% respectively. Median PFS was 23.5 mths for the study population. Median duration of response (34 responders at D78, i.e 6 weeks after the last rituximab dose) was 28.6 mths, but response was still maintained without any further treatment in 11 pts after 5 years (24%) and in 7 pts after 7 years (15%). 31/46 pts were bcl2 positive in blood and/or marrow samples before rituximab: 11 (35%) became negative at D50, and 20 remained positive (65%). Median PFS was 37 mths for bcl2-negative pts at D50, and 12 mths for patients remaining positive (p=0.018 Log-rank). Of the 7 pts with sustained response after 7 years, 5 were bcl2 positive at D0, 2/5 became negative at D50, and 5/5 were still negative at M84. At year 7, 4/46 pts have died (1 from myelodysplasia, 3 from NHL), 35/42 have progressed, and 7 have never progressed without any other treatment than the initial rituximab therapy. Time to progression was significantly longer in the bcl2-negative population at D50 (p= 0.018, Log-rank). Duration of response was not correlated with bcl2 status at D50, but was associated with ‘Best response CR/Cru’ (p=0.007 Log-rank). Long-term tolerance was good, with only 13 SAE observed in 13 pts during the additional 4 years of F/Up (4 surgeries for non NHL-related pathologies, 1 node biopsy, 1 sleep apnea syndrome, 1 ischemic cardiopathy, 2 deaths from NHL, 1 depression, 1 pneumonia, 1 erysipela, 1 bronchitis). This long-term update confirms that a single 4-dose rituximab treatment yields durable benefits without the toxicity of chemotherapy for pts with low burden FL : Median PFS of 23.5 mths for the cohort, 28.6 mths for responders and 37 mths for pts turning bcl2-negative at D50, 15% of pts have maintained their response after 7 years, (2bis) the quality (CR/Cru) of the initial response was associated with a longer response duration high overall survival is observed with 4 deaths/46 pts (8.6%).

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Obinutuzumab is a type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis, and direct cell death better than rituximab. Given promising results with lenalidomide and rituximab (R2), we assessed the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide combined with obinutuzumab (GALEN)in a large phase Ib/II study in separate patient populations (NCT01582776). In relapsed/refractory follicular B-cell lymphoma (FL), we found the GALEN regimen might be even more efficient than R2 while retaining a similarly manageable safety profile. Here, we report the results for the phase II part assessing efficacy and safety of GALEN in advanced untreated FL patients (pts) in need of systemic therapy. METHODS: Eligible pts had grade 1-3a FL and required systemic therapy per GELF criteria. Induction treatment consisted of lenalidomide (LEN) 20 mg on day (d) 1-21 of a 28-d cycle for the first cycle and on d2-22 of a 28-d cycle from cycles 2 to 6. Obinutuzumab (GA) 1000 mg was given IV on d8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and d1 of cycles 2 to 6. Responding pts then received maintenance with LEN at 10 mg on d2-22 every 28d for 12 cycles and GA 1000 mg every 8 wk for 12 cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary study endpoint was complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu) rate by investigator assessment at the end of induction according to 1999 IWG criteria. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and CR according to IWG 2007, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: 100 pts with WHO FL gr 1-2 (91%) and 3a (9%) according to local pathology reports were enrolled between October 2015 and February 2017. Median age was 60.5 years (range, 32-89), 43% had FLIPI score ≥3, 89% stage III/IV, and 31% bulky disease ( 〉 7 cm). All 100 pts were evaluable for safety and efficacy. At a median follow-up of 2.1 years, 96 pts (96%) completed induction, 41 completed maintenance, 36 were ongoing in maintenance, and 23 prematurely discontinued treatment due to disease progression (n=12, including 2 during induction), toxicity (n=6, including 2 during induction), concurrent illness (n=3), consent withdrawal (n=1), or other cause (n=1). At the end of induction, 61 pts had regression by more than 75% of sum of the product of the greatest diameters (SPD) of target lesions and 83/97 (85.6%) with PET assessment were PET negative (Juweid criteria) including 79/93 (84.9%) with a 5PS (Deauville scale) score of 1-3. Sixteen pts with SPD regression 〉 75% and 25 pts with negative PET were conservatively downgraded to PR due to missing bone marrow evaluation, leading to 47% CR/CRu rate and 59% CR rate at the end of induction per IWG1999 and 2007 criteria, respectively. Response rates at the end of induction, PFS, DOR and OS are summarized in the Table and Figure. Most common AEs ( 〉 10% of pts) during induction (% all gr/% gr 3/4) were neutropenia (43/42), asthenia (35/2), constipation (32/0), infusion-related reactions (23/3), diarrhea (21/2), rash (21/2), cough (18/0), nausea (13/0), pruritus (12/1), weight decrease (12/0), bronchitis (11/0), muscle spasms (11/1), and pyrexia (11/0). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2% of pts. Eight second primary malignancies were reported in 8 pts, including 2 deemed unrelated since they were misdiagnosed at baseline. Three (3%) pts had died, 1 each due to lymphoma, toxicity of additional treatment, and intestinal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: The immunomodulatory GALEN regimen is highly effective with no unexpected toxicity in advanced, untreated FL pts in need of systemic therapy and has the potential to challenge immunochemotherapy in this setting. Disclosures Morschhauser: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures. Salles:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Feugier:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria. Maerevoet:abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant; roche: Other: travel grant; takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tilly:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria. Haioun:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Houot:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Abstract: Abstract 3655 Obinutuzumab (GA101) is a type II glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has increased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and direct cell death activity but lower complement-dependent cytotoxicity compared with type I anti-CD20 antibodies such as rituximab and ofatumumab. GA101 is in clinical development for the treatment of lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The Phase I/II study BO20999 has evaluated the efficacy and safety of GA101 monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (aNHL). Here, we report updated Phase II results including progression-free survival (PFS) and best overall response (BOR). Patients (n = 40) were randomized to receive GA101 (D1, D8 and D22, then 3-weekly for total of 9 infusions) at either a high dose (1,600 mg on D1 and D8, then 800 mg thereafter; 1,600/800 mg cohort; n = 19), or a flat low dose of 400 mg (400/400 mg cohort; n = 21). Baseline patient characteristics were similar for both cohorts (Table 1). The median observation time for all patients was 9.5 months (0.3–26.1 months). BOR rates are given in Table 2, with 8/25 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients (32%) and 4/15 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients (27%) responding to GA101. Among the patients with rituximab-refractory disease, a response was observed in 1/13 patients (7.7%) and 4/12 patients (33.3%) treated in the 400/400 mg and 1,600/800 mg cohorts, respectively. Of these, 4 patients (1,600/800 mg cohort) had a response duration 〉 6 months, with 2 patients having an ongoing response (response duration: 9.8, 16.5+, 19.5 and 20.0+ months). Median PFS for patients with DLBCL (Figure 1) was 1.9 months (range: 0.3–15.7 months) for the 400/400 mg cohort and 2.7 months (range: 0.2–22.3) months) for the 1,600/800 mg cohort (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.30–1.66). For the DLBCL subgroup, response duration was 3.1, 3.1+, 5.8, 16.5+ and 19.5 months for the 5 responders in the 1,600/800 mg cohort, compared with 6.3, 8.6 and 9.8 months for the 3 responders in the 400/400 mg cohort. Individual response data indicated that 2 MCL patients had an ongoing response for ≥ 20 months (20.0 and 20.4 months). GA101 was well tolerated in both cohorts. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs; all grades) were the most common adverse event (AE), occurring in 81% of patients in the 400/400 mg cohort and 68% of patients in the 1600/800 mg cohort. Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in 〉 5% of patients across both cohorts included IRRs (10%), tumor lysis syndrome (10%), cardiac failure (not treatment-related; 10%), anemia (14%) and thrombocytopenia (14%) in the 400/400 mg cohort and IRRs (5%) and anemia (5%) in the 1,600/800 mg cohort.Table 1.Baseline patient characteristicsCharacteristic400/400 mg (n = 21)1,600/800 mg (n = 19)All (n = 40)Median age, years (range)70 (43–80)72 (22–85)71 (22–85)Histology, nDLBCL101525MCL11415Median number of prior treatments, n (range)4 (1–17)3 (1–6)3 (1–17)Previous rituximab, n211940Rituximab refractory*, n131225Prior stem cell transplant, n268DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma.*Rituximab refractory defined as patients who had a response of 〈 6 months or who failed to respond to a rituximab-containing regimen (rituximab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy) at any point during their treatment history.Table 2.Best overall response according to diagnosis and cohortDLBCLMCLResponse, n (%)400/400 mg (n = 10)1,600/800 mg (n = 15)400/400 mg (n = 11)1,600/800 mg (n = 4)Complete response (CR)0 (0.0)3 (20.0)2 (18.2)0 (0.0)CR unconfirmed1 (10.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)Partial response2 (20.0)2 (13.3)0 (0.0)2 (50.0)Stable disease1 (10.0)1 (6.7)3 (27.3)0 (0.0)Progressive disease5 (50.0)9 (60.0)6 (54.5)2 (50.0)No response assessment1 (10.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma.Figure 1.Progression-free survival for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomaFigure 1. Progression-free survival for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma In conclusion, GA101 shows encouraging single-agent efficacy in these heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory aNHL (DLBCL or MCL). A Phase III trial of rituximab plus CHOP vs GA101 plus CHOP in first-line DLBCL has recently started. Disclosures: Morschhauser: Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cartron:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; LFB: Honoraria. Milpied:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wenger:Roche: Employment. Wassner-Fritsch:Roche: Employment. Asikanius:Roche: Employment. Salles:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Abstract: Abstract 2632 Hans algorithm using immunohistochemistry correlates well with gene expression data in Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) (Meyer PN, 2011) and has demonstrated in some studies clear survival differences in favor of germinal-centre (GC) vs non-germinal centre (n-GC) B-cell among DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. We undertook an immunohistochemical study among patients aged 18 to 59 years with aaIPI 1 included in the GELA trial LNH 03-2B that compared R-ACVBP intensified immunochemotherapy to standard R-CHOP. This trial demonstrated an improvement of EFS, PFS and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with R-ACVBP (C Recher et al, in press). Our goal was to evaluate survival of patients with GC and n-GC DLBCL according to treatment regimens. We analyzed by immunohistochemistry the expression of CD10, BCL6 and MUM1 and classified patients as GC or n-GC according to the Hans algorithm. Among the 380 patients enrolled in this study, 229 patients were available for Hans algorithm classification. There was no differences considering clinical characteristics of these 229 patients (age, sex, B symptoms, PS, Stage, LDH, number of extranodal sites, bulky mass, bone marrow involvement) compared to the whole LNH03-2B population. 175 DLBCL cases were present on a tissue microarray (TMA) and 54 other cases were analyzed using unstained slides. 101 patients were classified as GC and 128 as n-GC. 107 patients were treated by R-ACVBP and 122 by R-CHOP. EFS, PFS and OS were not different between the GC and n-GC profile among the whole population (P=.82, P=.90, P=.68, respectively). There was no statistical difference in EFS, PFS and OS between R-ACVBP and R-CHOP in GC patients (P=.78; P=.84, P=.33, respectively). Interestingly, EFS, PFS and OS were significantly much longer among n-GC patients treated by R-ACVBP compared to R-CHOP (P=.02; P=.007, P=.007, respectively). Results were similar considering only TMA population (P=.02, P=.001, P=.001, respectively). This subgroup analysis suggests that the survival benefit related to R-ACVBP over R-CHOP in the LNH 03-2B is in large part linked to a survival improvement in the n-GC population. This algorithm, easy to apply on routine paraffin-embedded tissue, might be useful in the future to select patients that can primarily benefit from this intensive regimen. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: Rituximab alone may be given as initial treatment for FL either as a single treatment or as an induction treatment followed by a maintenance. In 2002, we have reported the response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) of 49 patients (pts) treated with 4 weekly 375 mg/m² doses of rituximab (Blood2002; 97: 101–6). All patients had FL and a low-tumor burden according to the GELF criteria. These pts have been followed during at least 5 years. According to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (Blood, in press). 22 pts were in the low-risk group (45%), 20 (41%) in the intermediate risk group and 7 (14%) in the poor risk group. Best response rate was 80% with 49% CR/CRu and 31% PR, and response was maintained in 34% without further treatment after at least 5 years. Median F/Up was 60 months. The median PFS was 18 months. Among these 49 pts, only 3 pts died (2 from NHL, 1 from lung carcinoma). Among the 32 pts who were bcl-2 positive in the blood and/or the bone marrow before treatment with rituximab, 10 (33%) became negative and 20 (67%) remained positive at d50. 6 (60%) relapsed among the former and 15 (75%) among the latter. Median PFS was 37 months for pts who became bcl-2 negative and 14 months for those who remained positive (p[log-rank test] = 0.10). Among the 4 patients who had information on molecular biology who did not relapse after a 5-year F/Up, 3 were bcl-2 negative and 1 was bcl-2 positive. The long F/Up of these pts (i) confirms the median PFS of 18 months for all pts and the median relapse-free survival of 27 months for best responders (ii) shows that some patients (i.e. 28% of all pts and 34 % of responders) may have a relapse-free survival longer than 5 years after a single first line treatment with rituximab in monotherapy ; (iii) shows an excellent overall survival (only 3 death (6%) during the study) in these FL pts. These results confirm the relevance of on-going trials comparing a maintenance treatment with rituximab and treatment at the time of relapse.