Abstract: Patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) suffer from pruritus, night sweats, and other symptoms, as well as from thromboembolic complications and progression to post-PV myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for second-line therapy in high-risk PV pts with hydroxyurea intolerance or resistance. The RuxoBEAT trial (NCT02577926, registered on October 1, 2015, at clinicaltrials.gov) is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm phase-IIb trial with a target population of 380 pts with PV or ET, randomized to receive RUX or best available therapy. This pre-specified futility analysis assesses the early clinical benefit and tolerability of RUX in previously untreated PV pts (6-week cytoreduction was allowed). Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive RUX. Compared to baseline, after 6 months of treatment, there was a significant reduction of median hematocrit (46 to 41%), the median number of phlebotomies per year (4.0 to 0), and median patient-reported pruritus scores (2 to 1), and a trend for reduced night sweat scores (1.5 to 0). JAK2V617F allele burden, as part of the scientific research program, also significantly decreased. One hundred nine adverse events (AEs) occurred in 24/28 patients (all grade 1 to 3), and no pt permanently discontinued treatment because of AEs. Thus, treatment with ruxolitinib in untreated PV pts is feasible, well-tolerated, and efficient regarding the above-mentioned endpoints.

Abstract: Introduction: Mutations (muts) in JAK2, MPL, and CALR are genetic hallmarks in myeloproliferative neoplasms such as myelofibrosis (MF). Prognostication in MF is predominantly based on clinical parameters according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). However, gene mutations become increasingly important allowing for a more precised assessment of prognosis. For instance, CALR mutated MF is associated with favorable prognosis, while mutations in distinct high molecular-risk (HMR) genes are considered adverse. Our multicenter phase-Ib/II MPNSG-0212 trial (NCT01644110) investigating ruxolitinib plus pomalidomide in a total cohort of 92 patients with advanced MF and anemia provides an ideal basis for investigating the genomic landscape and molecular risk in a well-defined study population. Aims & Methods: To assess the genomic landscape in MF patients treated within the MPNSG-0212 trial and to correlate the results with clinical parameters and overall survival (OS). So far, targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of 269 candidate genes was performed in peripheral blood or bone marrow from 81/92 patients using libraries prepared with SureSelectXT HS (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA). NGS was carried out on a NextSeq550 (Illumina, San Diego, USA). Results: At study entry, median age of the 81 patients was 71 years (range 52-86), median Hb 8.6 g/dL (range 5.4-11.7 g/dl); 30% of patients were RBC transfusion-dependent; 67% had primary MF (PMF) and 33% secondary MF (SMF), respectively. According to DIPSS, the vast majority of the patients were categorized as intermediate-2 (63%) or high-risk (26%) MF; 11% were low- and intermediate-1 risk patients. Overall, 315 muts were identified in 80/81 (99%) patients with a median of 3 muts/patient (range 0-9). Recurrent muts (≥5%) were identified in JAK2 (60%), ASXL1 (30%), SRSF2 (21%), CALR (20%; type-1: 75% [n=12], type-2 and non-type-1/2: 12.5% [n=2] each), MPL (19%), SF3B1 (19%), TET2 (16%), U2AF1 (15%), CBL and EZH2 (10% each), IDH2 and DNMT3A (7% each), PHF6, ZRSR2, and CUX1 (5% each). The majority of the patients (95%) was characterized by the presence of a driver mut in JAK2, CALR, or MPL; 4/81 patients (5%) were triple negative (Figure 1). JAK2mut was associated with TET2mut (p=.047), whereas muts in CALR and TET2 were mutually exclusive (p=.05). CALRmut patients had less co-muts than patients with JAK2/MPL muts (mean 2.5 vs. 4.1, p=.007) and were mutually exclusive with muts in the spliceosome regulating genes SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, and ZRSR2 (p=.009). Compared to MF with mutated JAK2 or MPL, MF patients with mutated CALR had a longer median OS (not reached vs. 3.1 years; p=.04). With regard to high molecular risk (HMR) muts, n=56 were detected in 38 patients (47%), with 40% (15/38) of the patients harboring ≥2 HMR muts. The most commonly mutated HMR genes were ASXL1 (43%; 24/56), followed by SRSF2 (30%), EZH2 (14%), IDH2 (11%), and IDH1 (2%). MPLmut but not JAK2mut or CALRmut were significantly associated with HMR mut (p=.023). HMR mut patients harbored more co-muts than HMR wt patients (median 5 vs. 3; p & lt;.0001). There were no significant differences in the variables age, sex, WBC, Hb, PLT, or LDH level between patients with HMR mut and HMR wt MF. In univariate analysis, patients with HMR mut MF had shorter median OS (2.3 vs 3.7 years, p=.007). In multivariate analysis (HMR mut, age, DIPSS-category, SMF vs. PMF) a higher DIPSS-score (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0; p=.004) and muts in HMR genes (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.1; p=.003) were significant adverse prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Our NGS data underline the genomic complexity of advanced MF. CALR mutations were only found in 20% of the patients that were characterized by less co-mutations, mutual exclusivity with spliceosome mutations, and with more favorable outcome suggesting a distinct disease biology. Almost 50% of patients showed mutations in HMR genes which were associated with an inferior OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. §Frank Stegelmann and Konstanze Döhner contributed equally to this work. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Koschmieder: Shire: Honoraria, Other; Alexion: Other: Travel support; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Geron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; AOP Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; CTI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Image Biosciences: Other: Travel support; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karthos: Other: Travel support. Heidel: Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AOP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hebart: AbbVie: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Isfort: Alexion: Other: Travel reimbursement; Roche: Other: Travel reimbursement; Amgen: Other: Travel reimbursement; Mundipharma: Other: Travel reimbursement; Hexal: Other: Travel reimbursement; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel reimbursement; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel reimbursement. Reiter: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Deciphera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Waller: Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mylan: Consultancy; Alvotech: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IPSEN: Other: travel grant. Scheid: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goethert: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; zr pharma & : Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Proteros Biostructures: Consultancy. Schafhausen: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Blueprint Medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Radsak: Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Other: e.g. travel support; Astellas: Other: e.g. travel support; TEVA: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: e.g. travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: e.g. travel support; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: e.g. travel support; Amgen: Other: e.g. travel support; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Corat: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cogent Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; JAZZ: Other: e.g. travel support. Gattermann: Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. von Bubnoff: Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Brümmendorf: Bristol Myers: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Repeat Diagnostics: Research Funding; Takepart Media: Honoraria. Döhner: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; GEMoaB: Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Oxford Biomedica: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Helsinn: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Berlin-Chemie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding. Griesshammer: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AOP Orphan: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stegelmann: BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Döhner: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Jazz Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Astellas: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios and Astex: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Pomalidomide was shown to be active in patients with myelofibrosis in particular in the treatment of anemia (Tefferi et al 2009, Begna et al 2011, Mesa et al 2010)

Abstract: Inflammation-induced thrombosis represents a severe complication in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and in those with kidney dysfunction. Overlapping disease-specific attributes suggest common mechanisms involved in MPN pathogenesis, kidney dysfunction, and thrombosis. Data from 1420 patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET, 33.7%), polycythemia vera (PV, 38.5%), and myelofibrosis (MF, 27.9%) were extracted from the bioregistry of the German Study Group for MPN. The total cohort was subdivided according to the calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, (mL/min/1.73 m2)) into eGFR1 (≥90, 21%), eGFR2 (60–89, 56%), and eGFR3 ( 〈 60, 22%). A total of 29% of the patients had a history of thrombosis. A higher rate of thrombosis and longer MPN duration was observed in eGFR3 than in eGFR2 and eGFR1. Kidney dysfunction occurred earlier in ET than in PV or MF. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified arterial hypertension, MPN treatment, increased uric acid, and lactate dehydrogenase levels as risk factors for kidney dysfunction in MPN patients. Risk factors for thrombosis included arterial hypertension, non-excessive platelet counts, and antithrombotic therapy. The risk factors for kidney dysfunction and thrombosis varied between MPN subtypes. Physicians should be aware of the increased risk for kidney disease in MPN patients, which warrants closer monitoring and, possibly, early thromboprophylaxis.

Abstract: Introduction: Polycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by trilineage blood cell expansion, PV-associated symptoms, and the risk of thromboembolic complications, progression to post-PV myelofibrosis, and acute leukemia. Cytoreductive treatment with hydroxyurea (HU) or ropeginterferon-alpha is approved in EU for the treatment of high-risk patients (pts) with PV. In addition, ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for HU-intolerant/-resistant PV. However, RUX vs. best available therapy (BAT) has not been investigated as first-line treatment of pts with untreated PV. We hypothesized that RUX may have higher efficacy in such early-line PV pts. Methods: The clinical trial entitled “Ruxolitinib versus Best Available Therapy in pts with high-risk PV or high-risk ET” (RuxoBEAT; NCT02577926) is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm phase-IIb trial with a target population of 190 pts in each stratum. Crossover from BAT to RUX is possible in eligible pts after 6 months. Pts with PV in the RUX arm received a starting dose of 10 mg BID and may increase their dose up to 20 mg BID. The primary endpoint is the clinicohematologic complete response (CR) rate at month 6, as defined by Barosi et al (Blood 2009), using a strict score of zero for the four symptoms by patient-reported outcome measures (PROM, Table 2) and an adjusted level alpha = 0.005 at a power of 80%. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (CR+PR), freedom from phlebotomy, changes in blood counts, spleen size, and PROM, using p values descriptively. The interim trial data were recently reviewed by the DMC, and, due to the low likelihood of reaching the primary endpoint (CR rate improvement), the DMC has recommended that the trial should continue without recruitment of new pts. Therefore, this pre-specified interim analysis was performed after 78 (instead of 95) PV pts were randomized 1:1 to RUX vs. BAT. A maximum of 6 weeks of previous PV-directed therapy was allowed. Differences between RUX and BAT at month 6 and between baseline and end of month 6 data for each treatment were calculated using Fisher´s exact test/ McNemar Test (for unpaired/ paired binary variables) or the Mann-Whitney-U test/ Wilcoxon signed-rank test (for unpaired/ paired ordered or continuous variables). Results: 78 first-line pts (33% were pre-treated for a median of 22 days [range 1-42]) were included in the intention-to-treat set (n=44 vs 34 randomized to RUX vs. BAT, resp.) and analyzed at the 6-month time point. Baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1. In pts on RUX or BAT, CR rates at 6 months were comparable (2.3% and 2.9%, p=1.0), while overall response (CR+PR) rates were 77.3% with RUX and 55.9% with BAT (p=0.054). Also, at month 6 (Table 2), pts on RUX showed significantly lower hematocrit (40.8% vs 42.1%, p=0.046), and PROM symptom points for pruritus (1 vs 4, p=0.001) and fatigue (2.5 vs 5, p=0.031), and a trend towards less headache, abdominal discomfort, and weight loss, while the number of platelets was lower with BAT vs. RUX (254/nl vs 386/nl, p=0.013). There was no difference between RUX and BAT in the number of white blood cells (WBC), spleen size, or other symptoms at this time point. When each treatment arm was analyzed separately for changes between baseline and month 6, RUX treatment significantly reduced platelet counts, WBC, hemoglobin and hematocrit, phlebotomy rates, spleen size and fraction of pts with splenomegaly (Table 2), and significantly improved PROMs for pruritus, early satiety, and quality of life. During the same time period, BAT significantly reduced platelet counts, WBC, hematocrit, and phlebotomy rates, but failed to impact on hemoglobin, spleen size, fraction of pts with splenomegaly, or any of the symptoms (Table 2). Safety analysis revealed 301 adverse events (AE) in both assigned treatment groups, including 153 AE in the RUX and 148 AE in the BAT group (11.8% and 8.1% grade ≥3, resp.). There was no significant difference in the percentage of grade ≥3 AE between both groups (p=0.358), and there were no consistent patterns of grade ≥3 AE in either of the two arms. Conclusion: In this interim analysis, first-line treatment with ruxolitinib for 6 months in high-risk pts with PV led to clinically meaningful improvements in overall response, hemoglobin and hematocrit, phlebotomy rates, splenomegaly, and patient-reported pruritus and fatigue severity, while BAT only improved platelet counts, WBC, hematocrit, and phlebotomy rates, without having an impact on symptoms.