GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 15, No. 11 ( 2014-10), p. 1269-1278
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 9_Supplement ( 2015-05-01), p. PD2-4-PD2-4
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: The open-label randomized phase III TANIA trial demonstrated statistically significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) with the addition of BEV to 2nd-line chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with HER2-negative LR/mBC progressing after 1st-line BEV-containing therapy. We describe efficacy in clinically relevant subgroups to assess consistency of the BEV treatment effect. METHODS: Pts whose HER2-negative LR/mBC had progressed during/after 1st-line BEV–CT were randomized 1:1 to investigator’s chosen 2nd-line single-agent CT given either alone or with BEV (15 mg/kg q3w or 10 mg/kg q2w). 2nd-line therapy was continued until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. At PD, BEV was continued with 3rd-line CT (investigator’s choice) in pts initially randomized to BEV–CT but was not permitted in pts randomized to CT alone. The primary endpoint was PFS from randomization to 2nd-line PD/death. Sample size was calculated based on a log-rank test assuming median PFS of 7→9.3 mo with a corresponding hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75. PFS events were required in 384 of 488 pts for 80% power at 2-sided α=0.05. Subgroup analyses of the primary endpoint were prespecified and included subgroups defined by stratification factors. RESULTS: From Jan 2011 to Apr 2013, 494 pts were enrolled. The data cut-off for the primary analysis was Dec 20, 2013 (median follow-up: CT 15.9 mo; BEV–CT 16.1 mo). The PFS benefit seen in the overall population was observed consistently in most subgroups. SubgroupPts with PFS events/Total No. of pts (%)Median 2nd-line PFS, moUnstratified HR (95% CI)CTBEV–CTCTBEV–CTAll203/247 (82)204/247 (83)4.26.30.75 (0.61-0.93)aHormone receptor statusbTriple negative56/60 (93)45/56 (80)2.14.90.59 (0.40-0.88)Positive, HER2 negative147/187 (79)159/191 (83)4.76.70.84 (0.67-1.05)1st-line PFS, mob & lt;661/69 (88)54/68 (79)3.95.10.62 (0.43-0.90)≥6142/178 (80)150/179 (84)4.66.40.82 (0.65-1.03)LDHb≤1.5×ULN167/207 (81)168/210 (80)4.46.30.77 (0.62-0.96) & gt;1.5×ULN36/40 (90)36/37 (97)2.15.80.73 (0.46-1.16)CT choicebTaxane25/32 (78)26/32 (81)3.26.90.55 (0.31-0.98)Non-taxane non-vinorelbine156/191 (82)151/188 (80)4.46.00.84 (0.68-1.06)Vinorelbine22/24 (92)27/27 (100)2.46.50.41 (0.22-0.75)CT choice (not stratified)Capecitabine117/146 (80)125/151 (83)4.96.20.92 (0.72-1.19)Non-capecitabine86/101 (85)79/96 (82)3.26.50.55 (0.40-0.75)BEV-free interval, wk≤6138/165 (84)130/149 (87)4.25.80.82 (0.64-1.04) & gt;665/81 (80)74/98 (76)4.47.60.72 (0.51-1.00)aStratified.bStratification factor. CONCLUSIONS: PFS was statistically significantly improved with the addition of BEV to 2nd-line CT in BEV-pretreated pts, meeting the primary objective of TANIA. This effect was seen consistently within subgroups based on stratification factors. Within the limitations of exploratory subgroup analyses with small sample sizes, further subgroup analyses may suggest some potential inconsistencies in treatment effect. These hypothesis-generating observations require further exploration of potential differences in disease and pt characteristics in TANIA, which may have influenced physicians’ CT choice. Citation Format: Fabio Puglisi, Javier Cortes, Eduard Vrdoljak, Joseph Gligorov, Norbert Marschner, Christoph Zielinski, Michele de Laurentiis, Etienne Brain, Christelle Lévy, Anja Welt, Zsuzsanna Kahan, Moshe Inbar, Sabine de Ducla, Ulrich Freudensprung, Gunter von Minckwitz. Subgroup efficacy analyses of the randomized phase III TANIA trial evaluating continued or reintroduced bevacizumab (BEV) after 1st-line BEV for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-4.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 9_Supplement ( 2015-05-01), p. P2-12-16-P2-12-16
    Abstract: BACKGROUND The addition of CAP to maintenance BEV demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS [primary endpoint]; HR 0.38 [95% CI 0.27–0.55] ; log-rank p & lt;0.001) and overall survival (OS [secondary endpoint]; HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.26–0.69] ; log-rank p & lt;0.001) in patients (pts) without disease progression (PD) on initial first-line BEV–DOC for HER2-negative mBC in the IMELDA trial. This benefit was achieved despite the smaller than planned sample size due to premature recruitment discontinuation because of regulatory withdrawal of BEV–DOC. METHODS Pts with HER2-negative measurable mBC, ECOG PS & lt;2, and no prior chemotherapy for mBC were eligible. After 3–6 cycles of BEV–DOC, pts without PD were randomized to either BEV alone or BEV–CAP (BEV 15 mg/kg q3w; CAP 1000 mg/m2 bid d1–14 q3w) until PD. PROs (secondary endpoint) were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 completed at screening (before BEV–DOC), at randomization to CAP vs no CAP, then every 3 cycles until PD, and at (but not beyond) PD. Analyses of mean change from randomization were prespecified. A 28-day window around the scheduled timepoints from randomization was applied to maximize the number of questionnaires available for analysis. Exploratory post hoc analyses included mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM; modeling weighted treatment effect from randomization across all available timepoints) and responder analyses using the global health status/QoL subscale. Pts were categorized as having improved (≥10-point increase), stable (change of & lt;10 points), or worsened (≥10-point decrease) scores from randomization [Osoba, 2005]. RESULTS Adherence with questionnaire completion was 65–85% for all assessment timepoints during the first year of maintenance therapy. MMRM analysis of the global health status/QoL subscale showed no difference between the treatment arms in change from randomization (least squares mean estimate 0.40 [95% CI –6.07 to 6.87]). Similar results were observed for other subscales, including the diarrhea symptom subscale. No. of pts (%)BEV (N=94)BEV–CAP (N=91)Week 9aN=51N=59Improved15 (29.4)17 (28.8)Stable26 (51.0)34 (57.6)Week 18aN=29N=57Improved11 (37.9)12 (21.1)Stable12 (41.4)30 (52.6)Week 27aN=23N=43Improved7 (30.4)16 (37.2)Stable12 (52.2)20 (46.5)Week 36aN=15N=35Improved4 (26.7)14 (40.0)Stable9 (60.0)17 (48.6)aNo. of patients with completed questionnaires at both randomization and the respective week. Only weeks with ≥10 pts in both arms shown. CONCLUSIONS The IMELDA sample size was smaller than planned but protocol adherence with PRO completion was relatively high. Prespecified change from randomization and exploratory post hoc MMRM analyses of PROs suggest that the clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefit from adding CAP to BEV is achieved while maintaining QoL, with no difference between BEV and BEV–CAP treatments. Responder analyses over time showed improved or stable global health status/QoL scores in the majority of pts at each timepoint in both treatment arms. Citation Format: Dinesh Doval, Saverio Cinieri, Hakan Bozcuk, Jean-Yves Pierga, Kadri Altundag, Xiaojia Wang, Sudeep Gupta, Guillermo Lopez Vivanco, Vineet Gupta, Ewa Chmielowska, Jose Bines, Philippe Montcuquet, Alfred Namour, Emilio Alba, Giorgio Mustacchi, Paulo Cortes, Sabine de Ducla, Ulrich Freudensprung, Lesley Fallowfield, Joseph Gligorov. Exploratory post hoc analyses of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the IMELDA randomized phase III trial: Maintenance bevacizumab (BEV) ± capecitabine (CAP) after initial first-line BEV plus docetaxel (DOC) for HER2-negative metastatic breast can [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-16.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 15, No. 12 ( 2014-11), p. 1351-1360
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 9_Supplement ( 2015-05-01), p. P2-17-01-P2-17-01
    Abstract: BACKGROUND The open-label randomized phase III IMELDA trial demonstrated that adding CAP to maintenance BEV until disease progression (PD) after initial BEV–docetaxel (DOC) provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in both progression-free survival (PFS [primary endpoint]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.38 [95% CI 0.27–0.55]; log-rank p & lt;0.001) and OS. We present OS in subgroups representing stratification factors and clinically important populations. METHODS Patients (pts) with HER2-negative measurable mBC, ECOG PS & lt;2, and no prior chemotherapy for mBC were eligible. After 3–6 cycles of BEV–DOC, pts without PD were randomized to BEV alone or BEV–CAP (BEV 15 mg/kg q3w; CAP 1000 mg/m2 bid d1–14 q3w) until PD. Stratification factors were estrogen receptor (ER) status, visceral metastases, response status, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration. OS from randomization was a secondary endpoint. The planned sample size of 360 enrolled pts (290 randomized) was calculated assuming a PFS HR of 0.70 (median PFS 5.8→8.3 months) with 80% power at 2-sided α=0.05 after 244 PFS events. Recruitment was stopped prematurely after regulatory withdrawal of the BEV–DOC combination but pts who had already been enrolled and randomized were followed as originally planned. RESULTS Between Jun 2009 and Mar 2011, 284 pts were enrolled and treated. Of these, 99 were not eligible for randomization (most commonly due to PD [41%] or AEs/toxicity [31%] ) and 185 (65%) were randomized. At the time of the primary PFS analysis, representing study closure, median follow-up (from randomization) was 31.6 months. Median OS from randomization was 23.7 months in the BEV arm and 39.0 months in the BEV–CAP arm (events in 36% of pts). The HR for OS in the two randomized arms showed consistency between subgroups, favoring the BEV–CAP arm in all subgroups analyzed. SubgroupNo. of events/No. of pts (%)Unstratified HR (95% CI)1-y OS rate (%) BEVBEV–CAP BEVBEV–CAPAll53/94 (56)33/91 (36)0.43 (0.26-0.69)a7290 & lt;65 y46/81 (57)27/77 (35)0.51 (0.32-0.82)7293≥65 y7/13 (54)6/14 (43)0.50 (0.16-1.60)6879Triple negative16/21 (76)10/25 (40)0.44 (0.19-0.99)6290Hormone receptor positive37/73 (51)23/66 (35)0.53 (0.31-0.89)7591ER positiveb36/69 (52)23/64 (364)0.53 (0.32-0.90)7590ER negativeb17/25 (68)10/27 (37)0.44 (0.20-0.99)6491 & lt;3 metastatic organ sites17/40 (43)17/48 (35)0.75 (0.38-1.49)8193≥3 metastatic organ sites36/54 (67)16/43 (37)0.39 (0.22-0.71)6588Visceral metastasesb38/65 (58)23/62 (37)0.43 (0.26-0.73)7092No visceral metastasesb15/29 (52)10/29 (34)0.76 (0.34-1.70)7688Complete or partial responseb36/68 (53)24/68 (35)0.61 (0.37-1.03)7389Stable diseaseb14/22 (64)6/20 (30)0.22 (0.08-0.63)68100Non-measurableb3/4 (75)3/3 (100)0.30 (0.03-2.98)6767LDH ≤1.5×ULNb50/89 (56)30/85 (35)0.49 (0.31-0.76)7294LDH & gt;1.5×ULNb3/5 (60)3/6 (50)1.01 (0.20-5.00)6044aStratified analysis. bStratification factor. CONCLUSIONS. Combining maintenance BEV with CAP until PD after initial BEV–DOC for mBC provides a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS (secondary endpoint), seen consistently irrespective of baseline characteristics. Citation Format: Joseph Gligorov, Jose Bines, Emilio Alba, Giorgio Mustacchi, Saverio Cinieri, Vineet Gupta, Jean-Yves Pierga, Hakan Bozcuk, Rabab Gaafar, Sudeep Gupta, Guillermo Lopez Vivanco, Xiaojia Wang, Romulo Costa, Kadri Altundag, Ewa Chmielowska, Sabine de Ducla, Ulrich Freudensprung, Paulo Cortes, Dinesh Doval. Overall survival (OS) in the IMELDA randomized phase III trial of maintenance bevacizumab (BEV) with or without capecitabine (CAP) for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-17-01.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 9_Supplement ( 2015-05-01), p. P3-06-08-P3-06-08
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: A potential predictive and prognostic effect of pretreatment pVEGF-A concentrations was suggested in exploratory analyses of phase III trials in HER2-negative mBC (AVADO), gastric cancer (AVAGAST), and pancreatic cancer (AViTA). This led to initiation of the MERiDiAN trial evaluating pVEGF-A prospectively in patients (pts) receiving 1st-line paclitaxel ± BEV in HER2-negative mBC. Potential predictive value was also noted for pVEGFR-2 in AVADO, AViTA, and in early BC in BEATRICE. We report prespecified pVEGF-A and pVEGFR-2 analyses in TANIA. METHODS: TANIA is an open-label randomized phase III trial evaluating the addition of BEV (15 mg/kg q3w or 10 mg/kg q2w) to the investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (CT) in pts with HER2-negative mBC who experience disease progression (PD) on/after 1st-line BEV-containing therapy. Allocation to BEV or no BEV is continued with 3rd-line therapy after 2nd PD (ie no crossover permitted). The primary endpoint is PFS from randomization to 2nd-line PD/death. Pts consenting to the optional biomarker substudy provided 6 mL plasma samples in EDTA before drug administration at randomization, at wks 7 and 13, every 12 wks thereafter, and at 2nd PD. pVEGF-A and shedded pVEGFR-2 were measured using the IMPACT assay (v2.03). The median concentration for each marker before 2nd-line treatment was prespecified as the cut-off between low (≤ median) and high ( & gt; median) biomarker subgroups. 2nd-line PFS was analyzed in each subgroup. RESULTS: The PFS benefit from BEV seen in the ITT population (N=494; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.93) was observed consistently within subgroups of the biomarker population (N=312). However, there was no differential BEV effect according to pVEGF-A or shedded pVEGFR-2 concentrations. The stratified HR for PFS was 0.69 (95% CI 0.46–1.04) in pts with low pVEGF-A (≤1010.6 pg/mL [median] ) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.54–1.18) in pts with high pVEGF-A (interaction p=0.47). As all pts had received prior BEV, unlike earlier trials showing a potential predictive effect of pVEGF-A, we explored pVEGF-A concentrations according to BEV-free interval. The BEV-free interval was ≤12 wks in 117/150 pts (78%) in the CT arm and 136/162 pts (84%) in the BEV+CT arm. Median pVEGF-A was much lower in the subgroup of 59 pts with a BEV-free interval & gt;12 wks (45.1 pg/mL) than in pts with a BEV-free interval ≤12 wks (1135.3 pg/mL). Analyses of 2nd-line PFS according to shedded pVEGFR-2 concentration showed stratified PFS HRs of 0.68 (95% CI 0.45–1.02) for low pVEGFR-2 (≤9.6 ng/mL [median]) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.60–1.34) for high pVEGFR-2 (interaction p=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The potential predictive effect of pVEGF-A in AVADO was not observed in TANIA, although high pVEGF-A concentrations in pts recently treated with BEV complicate interpretation. pVEGF-A is being evaluated prospectively in BEV-naïve pts in the ongoing MERiDiAN trial. Shedded pVEGFR-2 showed no predictive effect in TANIA and the suggested trend was in the opposite direction to the effect seen in AVADO and BEATRICE. Further analyses are planned to evaluate the impact of gene expression, cell-free DNA, protein expression, and DNA mutations on treatment effect in TANIA. Citation Format: Javier Cortes, Eduard Vrdoljak, Fabio Puglisi, Norbert Marschner, Joseph Gligorov, Christoph Zielinski, Cristian Villanueva, Gilles Romieu, István Lang, Eva Ciruelos, Corinne Veyret, Andrea Fontana, Mikkel Oestergaard, Sabine de Ducla, Ulrich Freudensprung, Gunter von Minckwitz. Plasma (p) biomarker results from the TANIA trial evaluating continued or reintroduced bevacizumab (BEV) after 1st-line BEV for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-08.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...