GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Ghiotto, Cristina  (2)
  • 2010-2014  (2)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e12037-e12037
    Abstract: e12037 Background: Women BRCA+ are at significant risk of developing both OC and BC. Double tumors could arise also in NH patients. Whether the clinical outcome of double OC and BC is different in BRCA+ and in NH subjects is unknown. Methods: The databases of the Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV), Medical Oncology Department of Mirano (VE) and Thiene (VI) were searched to identify the clinical and pathological features of (BC) and (OC) arisen in BRCA+ subjects as well as patients with both malignancy but tested negative/no-tested/unknown for BRCA1/2 mutation (NH). The primary endpoint was to establish if OC instead of BC needs a more intensive follow-up because it principally affects patient’s prognosis. Patients were censored at last follow-up or death (any cause) for determination of overall survival (OS). OS estimates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by means of log-rank test. The Fisher’s exact test and the t-test were used to compare frequencies and means between groups, respectively. Results: 24/31 (77%) BRCA+ and 30/49 (61%) NH had BC as their first malignancy (p=0.15). Among NH, 20 were BRCA test negative, 20 were untested and 9 unknown. BRCA+ were younger than NH at diagnosis of first malignancy (mean age 51 vs 56y, p=0.055). Bilateral BC was more frequent in BRCA+ than in NH (78.6% vs 28.6% p=0.001). Stage III-IV OC at diagnosis were 74% in BRCA vs 61% in NH (p=0.34). Locally advanced (stage II-III) BC was significantly more frequent in BRCA+ vs NH (75% vs 42%, p=0.03). No OS difference was observed between BRCA+ and NH subjects (P=0.99). Death for progression of ovarian cancer was observed in 11/31 (35%) in BRCA+ vs 10/49 (20%) patients in NH (p=0.19). No progression of breast cancer was reported in either groups. Conclusions: OC is the killer malignancy among patients affected by OC and BC, both in BRCA+ and in NH subjects. In patients with double tumors, irrespective of their pathological features, a more conserving management for BC and an intensive follow-up for OC are suggested.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 5548-5548
    Abstract: 5548 Background: The clinical outcome of double OC and BC is specifically unknown either BRCA+ and in double tumours NH patients. Methods: The present databases made of 106 patients, 67 cases of NH (negative, no-tested or ongoing test for BRCA1/2 mutations) and 39 of BRCA+, were constituted to identify the clinical and pathological features of BC and OC. The primary endpoint was to evaluate biological characteristics of both cancers and clinical outcome of OC in coexistence with BC. Patients were censored at last follow-up or death (any cause) for determination of overall survival (OS). OS were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compared the different levels of a variable. Pearson Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare relationship between variables in to groups and Mann-Whitney U test to compare the medians. Results: 32/39 (82 %) BRCA+ and 44/67 (66 %) NH had BC as their first malignancy. As regards the genetic test on NH patients, 28 were BRCA negative, 22 have not been tested and in 10 patients the test is still in progress. All BRCA2 patients had BC as first malignancy, while 20/22 of BRCA1. Bilateral BC was more frequent in BRCA+ than in NH (33 % vs 9 %), resulted in a fivefold higher risk (p = 0.002). III-IV stage OC at diagnosis was 79% in BRCA+ vs 55 % in NH (p = 0.013); indeed BRCA+ patients have a threefold higher risk (however moderate) to develop an advanced stage OC. Death for progression of ovarian cancer involved both groups, and third neoplasm was involved in death cause in 1/1 of BRCA and 5/6 of NH. Two BRCA1 with OC as first neoplasm are alive. Conclusions: III-IV stage OC is more frequent in BRCA+ than in NH, and the main cause of disease progression and death is due to OC. Eventually the most relevant conclusive assessment is the suggestion of a more conserving management for BC and an intensive follow-up for OC in patients with double tumours, irrespective of their pathological or genetic features. Prospective trials are also indicated.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...