GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Garland, Allan  (2)
  • Gershengorn, Hayley B.  (2)
  • Rubenfeld, Gordon  (2)
Material
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2014
    In:  Anesthesiology Vol. 120, No. 3 ( 2014-03-01), p. 650-664
    In: Anesthesiology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 120, No. 3 ( 2014-03-01), p. 650-664
    Abstract: Arterial catheters (ACs) and central venous catheters (CVCs) are common in intensive care units (ICUs). Few data describe which patients receive these devices and whether variability in practice exists. Methods: The authors conducted an observational cohort study on adult patients admitted to ICU during 2001–2008 by using Project IMPACT to determine whether AC and CVC use is consistent across U.S. ICUs. The authors examined trends over time and patients more (mechanically ventilated or on vasopressors) or less (predicted risk of hospital mortality ≤2%) likely to receive either catheter. Results: Our cohort included 334,123 patients across 122 hospitals and 168 ICUs. Unadjusted AC usage rates remained constant (36.9% [2001] vs. 36.4% [2008] ; P = 0.212), whereas CVC use increased (from 33.4% [2001] to 43.8% [2008] ; P & lt; 0.001 comparing 2001 and 2008); adjusted AC usage rates were constant from 2004 (35.2%) to 2008 (36.4%; P = 0.43 for trend). Surgical ICUs used both catheters most often (unadjusted rates, ACs: 56.0% of patients vs. 22.4% in medical and 32.6% in combined units, P & lt; 0.001; CVCs: 46.9% vs. 32.5% and 36.4%, P & lt; 0.001). There was a wide variability in AC use across ICUs in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (median [interquartile range], 49.2% [29.9–72.3%] ; adjusted median odds ratio [AMOR], 2.56), vasopressors (51.7% [30.8–76.2%] ; AMOR, 2.64), and with predicted mortality of 2% or less (31.7% [19.5–49.3%]; AMOR, 1.94). There was less variability in CVC use (mechanical ventilation: 63.4% [54.9–72.9%] , AMOR, 1.69; vasopressors: 71.4% (59.5–85.7%), AMOR, 1.93; predicted mortality of 2% or less: 18.7% (11.9–27.3%), AMOR, 1.90). Conclusions: Both ACs and CVCs are common in ICU patients. There is more variation in use of ACs than CVCs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-3022
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2016092-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 2014
    In:  JAMA Internal Medicine Vol. 174, No. 11 ( 2014-11-01), p. 1746-
    In: JAMA Internal Medicine, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 174, No. 11 ( 2014-11-01), p. 1746-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2168-6106
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2014
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...