GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (11)
  • Garcia-Alfonso, Pilar  (11)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 4_suppl ( 2022-02-01), p. 59-59
    Abstract: 59 Background: Over the last decades the incidence of EOCRC (age 50 or less) has dramatically increased, and so has the scientific interest in this field, given that clinical and molecular characteristics in these patients are not well understood, and may be critical to identify prognostic factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 554 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), analyzing the PFS and OS of 68 (12.25%) patients with EOCRC, as well as their clinical and molecular characteristics. We used a log-rank test to compare PFS and OS, and the estimate of hazard ratio (HR) between the studied groups was calculated by means of Cox proportional hazard model. We also used the exact test of Fisher to identify significant association between categoric variants, while Mann-Whitney test was applied to identify significant differences between numeric values. Results: We performed a survival analysis: those patients with EOCRC had significantly higher median PFS in first line of treatment (16.2 vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.042) and significantly higher median OS (121.5 vs. 58.1 months, p = 0.011). Several characteristics were significantly more frequent in patients with EOCRC (n=68): BMI 〈 18.5 (n = 16, OR = 1.9, p = 0.046), primary tumor site at transverse colon (n = 9, OR = 2.61, p = 0.03) and ECOG 0 (n = 32, OR = 2.21, p = 0.003). Having peritoneal metastases almost reached statistical signification (n = 17, OR = 1.82, p = 0.055). Some other characteristics were less frequent: BMI 25-30 (n = 13, OR = 0.51, p = 0.046), primary tumor site at sigmoid colon (n = 14, OR = 0.49, p = 0.038) and former-smoker status (n = 7, OR = 0.44, p = 0.048). Moreover, mean values of LDH at diagnosis were significantly higher in EOCRC patients (359 U/L vs. 280 U/L, p = 0.015). EOCRC patients received a significantly higher number of lines of chemotherapy (2.94 vs. 2.38, p = 0.027) and underwent more surgeries (2,42 vs. 1.24, p 〈 0,001) than patients with 〉 50 years. Significant differences in tumor mutational status (BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, MSI, PI3K and HER2), sex, primary tumor resection or number of metastatic sites between groups were not found. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis showed that EOCRC patients had significant higher rates of PFS in first-line treatment and OS. Moreover, EOCRC patients had more frequently BMI 〈 18.5, primary tumor located at transverse colon and ECOG 0.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 4041-4041
    Abstract: 4041 Background: Approximately 25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) debut with metastatic disease. In addition, 25-35% of patients with localized disease at diagnosis develop metastatic lesions during the evolution of their disease. Consequently, approximately 50-60% of patients with CRC will present metastatic lesions at some point in their lives. Metastasis resection has improved the prognosis of these patients, achieving overall survival (OS) that exceed 40 months. However, there are doubts about the benefit of this approach in patients with mutations in oncogene BRAF or tumors located on the right-side, due their poor prognosis. The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of metastases resection on OS of these populations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with mCRC attended in the Medical Oncology Department of the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Spain) between January 2010 and 2018. Results: 487 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Median age was 71 years (62-81). Most patients were males (62.4%). 55.2% had metastatic lesions at diagnosis. Most patients had ECOG 0-1 at diagnosis of metastatic disease (91.0%). 8.9% of patients had BRAF mutations (n = 21) and 31.8% of patients had primary tumors located on the right-side (n = 152). 474 patients received first-line chemotherapy (97.3%). OS of the entire cohort was 29.67 months; 30.69 months in BRAF mutated patients vs 35.89 in wild-type patients (p = 0.161); 25.29 months in right-side tumors vs 31.02 in left-side tumors (p = 0.044). 306 patients (62.8%) underwent metastases resection. Most common location was liver (51.4%). 147 patients (30.2%) underwent a second metastases resection. Mean number of metastases surgeries was 1.35 (+/-1.40). OS since metastases resection was 24.83 months in BRAF mutated patients vs 41.55 months in wild-type patients (p = 0.020). According to location, it was 35.49 months in right-side tumors vs 43.78 months in left-side tumors (p = 0.106). In BRAF mutated patients, OS was 38.19 months in patients underwent metastases resection vs 18.52 months in non-surgical patients (p = 0.043); 41.51 months vs 16.18 months respectively in patients with tumors located on the right-side (p 〈 0.001). Conclusions: Metastases resection has a positive impact on overall survival of patients with mutations in oncogene BRAF or right-side tumors, even though their prognosis is still poor compared to patients without these alterations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. e15136-e15136
    Abstract: e15136 Background: A recent study has suggested that KRAS mutation could increase the risk of VTE in patients with CRC. The role of others biomarkers, such as BRAF, in this setting is unknown. The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence of cancer-associated thrombosis in a cohort of patients with CRC based on KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with metastatic CRC and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status known, attended in the Medical Oncology Department of the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Madrid, Spain) between January 2010 and January 2018. Results: 194 patients were identified and included in the analysis. The median age was 64 years (18-86). Most were metastatic at diagnosis (58.1%). Khorana’s predictive model: low-risk 67.7%, intermediate-risk 31.0%, high-risk 2.3%. The median follow-up was 35 months (2-240). 41 patients (21.1%) experienced VTE (11 pulmonary embolism, 15 lower extremity deep-vein thrombosis, 12 visceral vein thrombosis, 2 catheter-related thrombosis, 1 unknown). Most had metastatic disease at the moment of VTE (90.2%). 40% of the events occurred at the time of diagnosis or within the first 6 months. 65% were incidental events. Khorana’s predictive model in VTE patients: low-risk 63.4%, intermediate-risk 24.5%, high-risk 7.3%. According to biomarkers, the incidence was 19.1% (13/68) in KRAS/NRAS mutated patients, 28.6% (6/21) in BRAF mutated patients and 21% (22/105) in triple-wild-type patients. 6/38 patients (15.8%) developed recurrent thrombosis. In the univariate analysis, the presence of chronic kidney disease (p = 0.022), ECOG ≥ 2 (p = 0.038) and high-risk Khorana score (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with increased risk of VTE. Metastatic disease showed a trend towards the statistical significance (p = 0.053). In the multivariate model, including this variables, age, sex and biomarkers, only ECOG ≥ 2 remained independent predictor of VTE (OR 8.73; CI 95% 1.32-57.82; p = 0.025). Conclusions: The biomarkers have not been associated with the risk of VTE. We have observed a high incidence of VTE in BRAF mutated patients that should be investigated in further studies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. 159-159
    Abstract: 159 Background: Peritoneal metastases in patients with mCRC are commonly associated with poor outcomes. Some of these patients are candidates to undergo metastases surgery, which may result in better prognosis; however, clinical and molecular characteristics of these patients remain uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 166 patients with mCRC and peritoneal metastases in a tumor registry from 2015 to 2021, analyzing the clinical and molecular characteristics, as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients who received peritoneal surgery versus those who did not. Results: From the whole population, 65 patients (39%) underwent peritoneal metastases surgery, and several characteristics were more frequent in this subgroup: ECOG 0 (n = 26, OR 2.75, p = 0,0069), age & lt;65 years (n = 43, OR 2.29, p = 0,0162), absence of hepatic metastases (n = 56, OR 3.31, p = 0,0037), single metastatic location (n = 43, OR 3.48, p = 0,0002), normal CEA levels at diagnosis (n = 33, OR 2.02, p = 0,0455) and BRAF mutation (n = 12, OR 3.32, p = 0,0345). Moreover, these patients received more lines of systemic treatment (2.8 vs 2, p = 0,006) and more metastases surgeries (1.7 vs 0.9, p = 0,000). Significant differences in tumor mutational status regardless of BRAF (KRAS, NRAS, MSI, PI3K and HER2), sex and primary tumor location between groups were not found. PFS was longer in patients receiving metastases surgery (median, 13.68 vs 7.76 months; HR for progression 0.64; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 0.89; p = 0,009), as well as overall survival (median NR vs 29.53; HR for death 0.39; 95 % CI, 0.25 to 0.60; p = 0,000). Conclusions: In our cohort, patients with mCRC and peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent metastases surgery had more frequently less than 65 years, ECOG 0, absence of liver metastases, single metastatic location, normal CEA levels at diagnosis and BRAF mutation. Moreover, this subgroup showed better outcomes with a statistically significant increase in PFS and OS.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e15552-e15552
    Abstract: e15552 Background: BRAF mutated mCRC patients have worse prognosis compared with BRAF wildtype mCRC. Within this group, those with resectable disease have a better prognosis compared to those with unresectable disease. However, it is not well known whether there are clinical differences that may help clinicians to identify this subgroup of patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 24 patients with BRAF mutated mCRC, describing their clinical characteristics and the differences between those who have undergone metastatic surgery (n = 18) versus those who have not (n = 6). We applied the exact test of Fisher to identify significant association between categoric variables, while we used Mann-Whitney test to identify significant differences between quantitative variables. PFS and OS were compared using a long-rank test, and the estimate of hazard ratio (HRs) between studied groups was calculated by means of Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Twenty-four patients with BRAF mutated mCRC have been identified. 58% (n = 14) of them were 〈 65 years old; 54% (n = 13) had BMI 〉 25, and all of them had a good PS at diagnosis (0 or 1). The most frequent tumor location was the right colon (58%; n = 14) and in 79% (n = 19) of the cases the primary tumor was resected. Most of the patients presented peritoneal (41%, n = 10) or liver (41%, n = 10) disease, and 70% of them (n = 17) had synchronous disease. Within the 18 patients who underwent surgery, the most frequent surgery was liver metastasectomy (50%, n = 9) followed by peritoneal metastasectomy (28%, n = 5). Regarding first-line chemotherapy treatment, only 12% (n = 3) presented disease progression in the first reassessment. No statistically significant differences were found between surgical and non-surgical patients regarding the following variables: age, BMI, ECOG, primary tumor side, location of the metastases, synchronous presentation of the metastatic disease, analytical parameters (CEA, Ca 19.9 and LDH), response to chemotherapy treatment and first line progression-free survival. However, we found significant differences in overall survival with an HR for mortality of 0.22 (95% CI 0.049-0.99; p = 0.031) in patients undergoing metastases surgery, with a median of 38 months in patients who underwent surgery vs 20 months in those who did not. Conclusions: BRAF mutated mCRC who receive surgery for metastases have better prognosis with higher overall survival, compared to those who have not undergone surgery. Still, no other statistically significant differences were found in the rest of the clinical characteristics analyzed to identify a subgroup with better prognosis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 4_suppl ( 2022-02-01), p. 586-586
    Abstract: 586 Background: In recent years CTCs have been extensively studied in different neoplasms. However, in PC CTCs are still emerging as a potential prognostic tool and the significance in different stages of the disease and the correlation with tumor markers are poorly understood. Methods: We conducted an observational, prospective, cohort study in two Spanish centers. Isolation was carried out with Isoflux technology (Fluxion Biosciences, Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA), that is combining cell separation by immunomagnetic particles (positive selection) with a microfluidic system. Before isolation, it was performed a first cell enrichment step using the density gradient cell separation technique (Ficoll). Four different markers were used, including two mesenchymal markers, EpCAM and EGFR (EMT Enrichment Kit:EpCAM/EGFR/Mesenchymal). The count of CTCs was done in a confocal microscope using the iMSRC (intelligent Matrix Screen Remote Control). A high throughput system was performed over the entire area, using a 20x objective, increasing to a 60x objective. Primary endpoint was the prognostic significance of CTCs, correlating the number of CTCs at diagnosis with overall survival. Secondary endpoints: Correlation between number of CTCs with Ca19.9/CEA values, and the difference in the median value of CTCs in metastatic compared to locally advanced disease. CTCs were analyzed at day 0 (CTC-0), just before first chemotherapy cycle was administered. Results: Thirty-four patients were analyzed. Clinical characteristics: Table 1. Median follow up 12.0 months. Median value of CTC-0 was 347 (range 104 - 3273) for metastatic and 436 (81 - 1082) for locally advanced patients (p = 0.942). Correlation coefficient for Ca 19.9 0.006 (p = 0.97); CEA correlation coefficient 0.191 (p = 0.303). For a cutoff of 500 CTCs, we found an AUC of 0.8 for mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed an estimated median overall survival for patients with ≥500 CTCs of 8.6 months (95% confident interval [95% CI] 5.3 – 12) vs not reached for patients with 〈 500 CTCs (p = 0.007). HR for mortality 3.3 (95% CI 1.3 – 8.4; p = 0.011) for patients with ≥ 500 CTCs. Conclusions: Our data suggest 500 CTCs might be a potential cutoff for prognostic assessment. The absence of differences of CTC-0 between metastatic and locally advanced patients supports the idea of a systemic disease irrespective of the presence of metastases at diagnosis. CTC-0 seems not to correlate with tumor markers at diagnosis.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 4_suppl ( 2022-02-01), p. 188-188
    Abstract: 188 Background: Hepatic metastatic disease from colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant clinical problem, as the liver is the dominant metastatic site for patients with CRC and 25% of patients will have liver affection at diagnosis. Due to improvement in systemic therapy and locoregional treatments in the last decade, survival has increased significantly. In this regard, it is key to be able to establish several prognostic factors that significantly influence survival. Methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 554 patients with mCRC treated at the Gregorio Marañon Hospital (Madrid, Spain) between January 2010 and 2021. We analyzed the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients undergoing liver metastasis surgery as first metastasis surgery together with relapse patterns to progression. Results: Out of our cohort of 554 patients with mCRC we identified 169 patients that underwent liver metastasis surgery as 1st surgery, achieving a media of survival of 56.38 months [95% CI, 44.21-73.78 months]. Regarding the clinical characteristics of the population, the majority were men (63,91%) and had a PS 0-1 (90,5%); and 46 patients (27,2%) were more than 70 years old. In relation to the location of the primary tumour, 46 patients (27,2%) had it n the right colon and 120 in the left colon (71,0%). And 43 patients (25,4%) had extrahepatic disease at the time of surgery. Regarding the biomakers, we indentified the following mutations: 68 mutated KRAS (40,2%), 5 mutated NRAS (2,9%), 9 mutated BRAF (5,3%), 13 mutated PI3K (7,6%), 1 HER2 amplification (0,5%) and 4 with IMS phenotype (2,3%). After the metastasis surgery, progression was mainly hepatic (50,3%), followed by pulmonary (24,8%), peritoneal (11,8%), lymph node (12%), bones (4,7%) and cerebral (1,1%), without having significant differences in relapse patterns at the statistics when analyzed by genomic profile. When analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to the genomic profile, in the BRAF mutated vs BRAF WT population, no statistically significant differences were found, obtaining therefore an evident benefit. Furthermore, we found significant differences in OS for patients with right vs left primary tumour as well as for patients with extrahepatic involvement at the time of surgery. Conclusions: Patients undergoing sequential metastatic surgery have a long survival, so it is important to analyse patterns of relapse and clinical course. There is no evidence of significant differences in the progression patterns according to the mutational status of the mCRC; but selected patients with BRAF mutations may obtain benefit in PFS and OS with locoregional approaches to their liver disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. 740-740
    Abstract: 740 Background: Several inflammatory scores such as the Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), the Inflammation Index Score (IIS), and the Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) have been reported to have prognostic value in PDAC with different results. We hypothesize that the KS, designed to predict the risk of cancer-associated thrombosis, may also be a surrogate marker for inflammation to be included as a relevant prognostic index for PDAC. Methods: Baseline characteristics and individual SIRI, IIS, NLR and KS indexes from 197 PDAC patients diagnosed in our center between 2019 and 2021 have been retrospectively recorded. PFS and OS (Log-rank test) have been used to compare the different scores of each index in the whole population as well as in the metastatic setting. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test were also done to determine if the SIRI varies significantly between KRS values. Results: Of the 197 patients analyzed, 41 were resectable (20.8%), 54 locally advanced (27.4%) and 102 metastatic (51.8%). Patients with intermediate risk according to KS (2 points, n = 131, 66.5%) had a significantly higher median PFS (8.4 vs. 4.8 months, p = 0.03) and significantly higher OS (12.9 vs. 7.7 months, p = 0.002) than those with high-risk ( 〉 3 points, n = 66, 33.5%). The median OS for patients with low ( 〈 3,000) and high ( 〉 3,000) SIRI was 13.1 and 9.3 months respectively (p = 0.05). No significant differences were observed in PFS. In the metastatic setting, a low SIRI was significantly associated with higher OS (10.6 vs. 5.8, p = 0.016). No significant differences were observed in patients with low vs. high IIS and NLR. The Kruskal-Wallis test indicates that SIRI values vary between at least two KS values (p 〈 0.001). The Mann-Whitney test found significant differences between the SIRI values from S 2 and 3 (p = 0.002) as well as 2 and 4 (p = 0.04). SIRI values were higher in patients with KRS 〉 3 vs. 2. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis showed that patients with lower KS live longer and progress later than those with higher KS. Lower SIRI is associated with better survival in metastatic patients, being on the verge of statistical significance in the whole cohort. There is a strong correlation between SIRI and KS. In this cohort of unselected PDAC patients, KS is a prognostic factor for OS and PFS that correlates with subclinical inflammation and demonstrates to be a better predictor than other inflammatory indexes that deserves further analysis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. 670-670
    Abstract: 670 Background: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has historically been an important diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The multidisciplinary approach and new diagnostic techniques’ implementation have modified this process. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis based on clinical data of patients with PDAC between the years 2010 to 2021, analyzing the diagnosis and initial treatment evolution. Results: 673 patients between 2010-2021 with a suspected diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were reviewed. Most of them were metastatic (n=362; 53.8%), followed by locally advanced unresectable (n=166; 24.7%) and resectable or borderline resectable (n=145; 21.5%). Regarding the pathological diagnosis, it was not possible in 62 patients (9.2%), varying over time from 21.2% in 2010-2012 to 1% in 2019-2021 (p 〈 0,0001). Moreover, the number of biopsies has decreased with a mean number of biopsies to obtain a pathological diagnosis of 1.55 (2010-2012) vs 1.31 (2019-2021). During this last period, most of the diagnoses were made by cytological analysis (61.4%; n=121). Specifically in the 2019-2021 patients subgroup, we found that 18 NGS (9,1%) were performed in this period (solid tumor), with 4 patients having actionable mutations (22.2%; 3 KRAS G12C). Germline (g) mutational panels were carried out in 89 patients, finding only 9 positive cases (10.1%), being 3 of them gBRCA1/2 mutated (3,4%). In our study, a decrease in palliative management was evidenced over time. In 2010-2012, 28,8% of patients received exclusively palliative care against 9,6% in 2019-21 (p 〈 0.0001). An increase in PDAC diagnosis was observed since 2010, 44 patients/year in 2010-12 vs. 66 patients/year in 2019-21 (including COVID-19 pandemic period). All previous results are summarized. Conclusions: The diagnosis of PDAC has changed throughout the last decade, increasing the percentage of patients with a pathological diagnosis without increasing the number of invasive procedures. The number of patients suitable for anti-cancer therapy has also increased among time. In our cohort, the implementation of molecular testing would change the therapeutic approach in more than 20% of patients.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 49-49
    Abstract: 49 Background: Elderly patients with mCRC are underrepresented in clinical trials. For this reason, the optimal treatment in this population is uncertain. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with mCRC treated in our institution according to age ( 〈 65 vs ≥65 years). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 482 patients with mCRC attended in the Hospital Gregorio Marañón (Spain) between January 2010 and 2018. Results: Patients characteristics table. First-line: chemotherapy (CT) 98.7% vs 97.3% respectively (p=0.324), biologic agents (BA) 81.2% vs 79.0% (p=0.585). Significantly more 〈 65-year-old patients received FOLFOX (60.5% vs 44.4%) and more ≥65-year-old patients XELOX (9.2% vs 17.5%) or capecitabine (2.0% vs 7.5%). Second-line: CT 64.9% vs 63.5% (p=0.764), BA 60.4% vs 51.1% (p=0.055). Significantly more 〈 65-year-old patients received FOLFIRI (67.0% vs 54.5%) and more ≥65-year-old patients irinotecan (2.0% vs 8.6%). Third and subsequent lines: Significantly more young patients received a third-line (CT: 41.6% vs 31.0%; BA: 24% vs 21.6%), fourth-line (CT: 22.1% vs 11.9%; BA:16.2% vs 6.4%) and fifth-line of treatment (CT: 11.7% vs 5.8%; BA: 4.5% vs 3.6%). More young patients underwent metastasis resection (74.0% vs 58.1%, p=0.001). There were no differences in rate of post-operative complications (p=0.840). There were no differences in overall survival (36.05m vs 28.06, p=0.142), progression-free-survival (first-line: 12.73m vs 11.78m, p=0.139; second-line: 8.78m vs 62.71m, p=0.254) or adverse event rate (73.4% vs 73.6%, p=0.967). Conclusions: Intensive treatment could be an effectiveness and safe option in selected elderly patients. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...