GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

You have 0 saved results.
Mark results and click the "Add To Watchlist" link in order to add them to this list.

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Gaines, Peter A.  (3)
  • Macdonald, Sumaira  (3)
Material
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    International Society of Endovascular Specialists ; 2002
    In:  Journal of Endovascular Therapy Vol. 9, No. 6 ( 2002-12), p. 777-785
    In: Journal of Endovascular Therapy, International Society of Endovascular Specialists, Vol. 9, No. 6 ( 2002-12), p. 777-785
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1526-6028 , 1545-1550
    Language: English
    Publisher: International Society of Endovascular Specialists
    Publication Date: 2002
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049858-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2002
    In:  Journal of Endovascular Therapy Vol. 9, No. 6 ( 2002-12), p. 777-785
    In: Journal of Endovascular Therapy, SAGE Publications, Vol. 9, No. 6 ( 2002-12), p. 777-785
    Abstract: To compare outcomes for two nonrandomized cohorts of patients with high-grade carotid disease who underwent either unprotected carotid stenting or stent implantation protected by the NeuroShield filter. Methods: Under this protocol, symptomatic patients with carotid stenoses 〉 70% or asymptomatic patients with bilateral carotid stenoses who were being evaluated for coronary artery bypass grafting were eligible for carotid stenting. Between December 1998 and November 2001, 75 consecutive patients (57 men; median age 67 years range 45–85) underwent carotid stenting without cerebral protection; concurrently, 75 carotid stent procedures protected with the NeuroShield filter were performed in 73 patients (51 men; median age 66 years, range 47–83). A neurologist reviewed all patients before and after treatment. The groups were comparable for age, sex, and symptoms, but the protected group had a higher proportion of postsurgical restenoses (14.7% versus 1.3%; p=0.003). Outcome measures included death and neurological events at 24 hours and 30 days. Results: There were minor technical difficulties in 12 of the protected group, but none were clinically relevant. The procedural all-stroke/death rates in the unprotected versus protected groups, respectively, were 5.3% (4/75) and 2.7% (2/75; p=0.681), while the disabling stroke/death rates were 4% (3/75) and 1.3% (1/75; p=0.620). At 30 days, the all-stroke/death rates were 10.7% (8/75) in the unprotected group and 4.0% (3/75) in the protected group (p=0.117); the death/major-disability-from-stroke rates were 6.7% (5/75) and 2.7% (2/75), respectively (p=0.442). Conclusions: Filter-related complications are well tolerated. Neuroprotection devices have the potential to reduce the procedural neurological event rate. Larger series and/or randomized trials are required for further evaluation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1526-6028 , 1545-1550
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2002
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049858-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cerebrovascular Diseases, S. Karger AG, Vol. 29, No. 3 ( 2010), p. 282-289
    Abstract: 〈 i 〉 Background: 〈 /i 〉 Our aim was to determine whether filter protection reduces embolisation to the brain during carotid artery stenting (CAS). 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 Thirty patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≧70% (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) were randomly assigned to filter-protected or unprotected CAS. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) of the brain was performed before and at 3 time points after CAS. In a subset of patients, high-intensity transient signals on transcranial Doppler (TCD) were recorded with categorisation of emboli. Data were independently reviewed off-site. 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 There were no significant differences in mean age, proportion of octogenarians or presenting symptoms between the groups. On procedural DWI (1–3 and 24 h after stenting), there were 7/24 (29%) and 4/22 (18%) new lesions in protected and unprotected patients respectively (p = 0.38). At 30 days there were 9/33 (26%) and 4/33 (12%) lesions in protected and unprotected patients, respectively (p = 0.1). On TCD there were significantly more signals in total as well as particulate emboli during filter-protected CAS (426.5 and 251.3) than during unprotected CAS (165.2 and 92) – p = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively. 〈 i 〉 Conclusions: 〈 /i 〉 Filter-protected CAS is associated with an increase in new lesions on DWI and significantly higher rates of total and particulate microembolisation on TCD than unprotected CAS. The clinical significance of these findings requires further study.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1015-9770 , 1421-9786
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482069-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...