GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • S. Karger AG  (2)
  • Furukawa, Kazuhiro  (2)
Materialart
Verlag/Herausgeber
  • S. Karger AG  (2)
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
Fachgebiete(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Digestion, S. Karger AG, Vol. 102, No. 5 ( 2021), p. 701-713
    Kurzfassung: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Introduction: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 We aimed to compare the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-EG) with that of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the diagnosis of the depth of invasion in colorectal neoplasms. This is an important clinical issue as the depth of invasion is associated with the risk of metastasis. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Consecutive patients with suspected superficial colorectal neoplasms, evaluated by MCE, EUS, and EUS-EG, for whom endoscopic submucosal dissection was considered, were enrolled in 2018 (derivation study) and in 2019–2020 (validation study). The primary clinical endpoint was the diagnostic yield differentiating intramucosal and shallow submucosal neoplasms from deep submucosal (dSM) and advanced colorectal cancers. In addition, inter- and intra-observer agreements of the elastic score of colorectal neoplasm (ES-CRN) were evaluated by 2 expert and 2 non-expert endoscopists. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Thirty-one (33 lesions) and 50 (55 lesions) patients were enrolled in the derivation and validation studies, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values, and accuracy of assessment of the depth of submucosal or deeper invasion in the derivation and validation groups were as follows: EUS-EG, 100/88.2/86.7/100/93.3% and 77.8/86.1/73.7/88.6/83.3%; MCE, 66.7/94.4/90.9/77.3/81.8% and 84.2/91.4/84.2/91.4/88.9%; and EUS, 93.3/77.8/77.8/93.3/84.8% and 89.5/65.7/58.6/92.0/74.1%, respectively. For the 2 expert endoscopists, interobserver agreement for the ES-CRN (first and second assessments) in the derivation group was 0.84 and 0.78, respectively; these values were 0.73 and 0.49, respectively, for the 2 non-expert endoscopists. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Discussion/Conclusion: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 All 3 modalities presented similar diagnostic yield. Inter- and intra-observer agreements of the ES-CRN were substantial, even for non-expert endoscopists. Therefore, EUS-EG may be a useful modality in determining the depth of invasion in colorectal neoplasms.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0012-2823 , 1421-9867
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: S. Karger AG
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 1482218-0
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Digestion, S. Karger AG, Vol. 104, No. 3 ( 2023), p. 202-211
    Kurzfassung: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Introduction: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Eosinophils in the esophageal epithelium are unevenly distributed in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal eosinophilia (EE) may be observable by endocytoscopy (EC). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EC for the diagnosis of EE. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 A total of 33 EoE patients underwent EC with methylene blue staining from March 2020 to April 2021. A total of 194 EC images with corresponding biopsies were obtained. Three findings of EC, increased squamous cells (item I), increased inflammatory cells (item II), and cells with bilobed nuclei (item III), were established. These findings were reviewed by two endoscopists to diagnose EE. Another four endoscopists reviewed the images for interobserver agreement. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 When all three items were met by EC, the sensitivity and the accuracy for the diagnosis of EE were 88% and 76%, respectively. The integrated diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for the diagnosis of EE of the four endoscopists were significant (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 2.94–5.40, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 & #x3c; 0.001). The results were similar when only item III was met. Interobserver agreement was good for item III to diagnose EE (kappa value = 0.653). 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Discussion/Conclusion: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The diagnostic performance of EC for EE is acceptable and has good interobserver agreement. It may be useful for targeted biopsy in EoE patients.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0012-2823 , 1421-9867
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: S. Karger AG
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 1482218-0
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...