GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Fischer, Matthias  (2)
  • Janoueix-Lerosey, Isabelle  (2)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 28, No. 21 ( 2010-07-20), p. 3506-3515
    Abstract: To evaluate the impact of a predefined gene expression–based classifier for clinical risk estimation and cytotoxic treatment decision making in neuroblastoma patients. Patients and Methods Gene expression profiles of 440 internationally collected neuroblastoma specimens were investigated by microarray analysis, 125 of which were examined prospectively. Patients were classified as either favorable or unfavorable by a 144-gene prediction analysis for microarrays (PAM) classifier established previously on a separate set of 77 patients. PAM classification results were compared with those of current prognostic markers and risk estimation strategies. Results The PAM classifier reliably distinguished patients with contrasting clinical courses (favorable [n = 249] and unfavorable [n = 191] ; 5-year event free survival [EFS] 0.84 ± 0.03 v 0.38 ± 0.04; 5-year overall survival [OS] 0.98 ± 0.01 v 0.56 ± 0.05, respectively; both P 〈 .001). Moreover, patients with divergent outcome were robustly discriminated in both German and international cohorts and in prospectively analyzed samples (P ≤ .001 for both EFS and OS for each). In subgroups with clinical low-, intermediate-, and high-risk of death from disease, the PAM predictor significantly separated patients with divergent outcome (low-risk 5-year OS: 1.0 v 0.75 ± 0.10, P 〈 .001; intermediate-risk: 1.0 v 0.82 ± 0.08, P = .042; and high-risk: 0.81 ± 0.08 v 0.43 ± 0.05, P = .001). In multivariate Cox regression models based on both EFS and OS, PAM was a significant independent prognostic marker (EFS: hazard ratio [HR], 3.375; 95% CI, 2.075 to 5.492; P 〈 .001; OS: HR, 11.119, 95% CI, 2.487 to 49.701; P 〈 .001). The highest potential clinical impact of the classifier was observed in patients currently considered as non–high-risk (n = 289; 5-year EFS: 0.87 ± 0.02 v 0.44 ± 0.07; 5-year OS: 1.0 v 0.80 ± 0.06; both P 〈 .001). Conclusion Gene expression–based classification using the 144-gene PAM predictor can contribute to improved treatment stratification of neuroblastoma patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 21, No. 8 ( 2015-04-15), p. 1904-1915
    Abstract: Purpose: To optimize neuroblastoma treatment stratification, we aimed at developing a novel risk estimation system by integrating gene expression–based classification and established prognostic markers. Experimental Design: Gene expression profiles were generated from 709 neuroblastoma specimens using customized 4 × 44 K microarrays. Classification models were built using 75 tumors with contrasting courses of disease. Validation was performed in an independent test set (n = 634) by Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox regression analyses. Results: The best-performing classifier predicted patient outcome with an accuracy of 0.95 (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.97) in the validation cohort. The highest potential clinical value of this predictor was observed for current low-risk patients [5-year event-free survival (EFS), 0.84 ± 0.02 vs. 0.29 ± 0.10; 5-year overall survival (OS), 0.99 ± 0.01 vs. 0.76 ± 0.11; both P & lt; 0.001] and intermediate-risk patients (5-year EFS, 0.88 ± 0.06 vs. 0.41 ± 0.10; 5-year OS, 1.0 vs. 0.70 ± 0.09; both P & lt; 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression models for low-risk/intermediate-risk patients, the classifier outperformed risk assessment of the current German trial NB2004 [EFS: hazard ratio (HR), 5.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.20–8.02; OS: HR, 25.54; 95% CI, 8.40–77.66; both P & lt; 0.001]. On the basis of these findings, we propose to integrate the classifier into a revised risk stratification system for low-risk/intermediate-risk patients. According to this system, we identified novel subgroups with poor outcome (5-year EFS, 0.19 ± 0.08; 5-year OS, 0.59 ± 0.1), for whom we propose intensified treatment, and with beneficial outcome (5-year EFS, 0.87 ± 0.05; 5-year OS, 1.0), who may benefit from treatment de-escalation. Conclusions: Combination of gene expression–based classification and established prognostic markers improves risk estimation of patients with low-risk/intermediate-risk neuroblastoma. We propose to implement our revised treatment stratification system in a prospective clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res; 21(8); 1904–15. ©2014 AACR. See related commentary by Attiyeh and Maris, p. 1782
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...