In:
Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 75, No. 9_Supplement ( 2015-05-01), p. P3-10-02-P3-10-02
Abstract:
Background: There is still no standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Our previous phase II pilot trial with first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (GP) in patients with mTNBC (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00601159) showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.2 months. In this Chinese Breast Cancer Study Group (CBCSG) 006 trial (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01287624) we explored in a randomized trial the role of the less costly GP regimen versus the standard GT [Gemcitibine + paclitaxel] chemotherapy for the metastatic breast cancer as a first line treatment for mTNBC. Trial objectives: progression free survival [PFS]; overall survival [OS] ; and toxicity. Methods: In the trial with a hybrid trial design incorporating a formal test of superiority as well as noninferiority, mTNBC patients with no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive either GP regimen (G/P: 1250 mg/m2 d1,8/ 75 mg/m2 d1) or the GT regimen (same G; T: 175 mg/m2 d1). Results: Between Jan. 2011 and Nov., 2013, 236 patients were randomized [118 patients / arm], and all received at least one dose of assigned chemotherapy. As of Mar. 20, 2014, the intent-to-treat analysis showed 201 recurrences and 97 deaths. Objective response rates of GP vs GT were 67.9% vs. 50.4% (P= 0.008), with median PFS of 232 vs. 194 days (HR=0.692, 95% CI 0.523-0.915; P= 0.009). Overall survival of patients from the GP vs. the GT arms was median 672 vs. 556 days (HR=0.902, 95% CI 0.605-1.344; P= 0.611). Significant differences in grade 3/4 adverse events were seen for nausea, vomiting, anemia and thrombocytopenia [GP vs. GT, 6.8 vs. 0.8%; 11.0 vs. 0.8%; 33.1 vs. 51.0%; and 32.2 vs. 2.5%, respectively]. In addition, assessment of adverse events of any grade showed the GP regimen had more anorexia, constipation, hypomagnesemia and hypokalemia, while GT regimen had significantly more alopecia and peripheral neuropathy. The delivered relative dose intensity was & gt; 90% for all three drugs, with the total number of delivered cycles of chemotherapy in GP and GT arms being 654 and 648 [average 5.54 and 5.49 /patient], respectively. Conclusions: 1.The Gemcitabine + Platinum is superior to Gemcitabine + Paclitaxel in terms of objective response rates and duration of PFS. 2.While grade 3 / 4 nausea & vomiting, and anemia, were heavier for the GP combination, the delivery of chemotherapy and average number of cycles delivered were comparable between the two arms. 3.Overall survival data will be updated on the conference to indicate the long-term effect of the somehow more toxic GP regimen, which shows nevertheless superiority of response rates and of the PFS over the more costly GT regimen. Citation Format: Xichun Hu, Binghe Xu, Li Cai, Zhonghua Wang, Biyun Wang, Jian Zhang, Yuee Teng, Zhongsheng Tong, Yueyin Pan, Yongmei Yin, Changping Wu, Zefei Jiang, Xiaojia Wang, Guyin Lou, Donggeng Liu, Jifeng Feng, Jianfeng Luo, Jiong Wu, Zhimin Shao, Joseph Ragaz. Gemcitabine with cisplatin or paclitaxel in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-02.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0008-5472
,
1538-7445
DOI:
10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS14-P3-10-02
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Publication Date:
2015
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2036785-5
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1432-1
detail.hit.zdb_id:
410466-3
Permalink
