GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Fan, Ruitai  (2)
  • Gu, Xiaobin  (2)
Material
Publisher
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 1
    In: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, SAGE Publications, Vol. 12 ( 2020-01), p. 175883592093742-
    Abstract: Previous studies on the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), which is based on platelet, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, as a prognostic marker in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) yielded inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological role of SII in CRC via meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive literature survey was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases to include studies published up to 6 April 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to estimate the prognostic and clinicopathological value of SII in CRC. Results: A total of 12 studies published between 2016 and 2019 were included in our meta-analysis. The combined analysis showed that high SII levels were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS; HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.21–2.13, p = 0.001) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.26–2.39, p = 0.001) in CRC. Moreover, elevated SII was also correlated with poor tumor differentiation (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.27–2.02, p  〈  0.001), presence of distant metastasis (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.10–4.67, p = 0.026), ECOG PS of 1–2 (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.39–2.84, p  〈  0.001) and tumor size ⩾5 cm (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.18–1.88, p = 0.001). However, high SII was not significantly associated with sex, tumor location, lymph node metastasis, or age in patients with CRC. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicated that high SII levels predicted poor prognosis in CRC. In addition, an elevated SII was also associated with clinical factors, implying higher malignancy of the disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1758-8359 , 1758-8359
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2503443-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2021
    In:  Science Progress Vol. 104, No. 2 ( 2021-04), p. 003685042110093-
    In: Science Progress, SAGE Publications, Vol. 104, No. 2 ( 2021-04), p. 003685042110093-
    Abstract: There are few randomised prospective data or guidelines for the treatment of neuroendocrine cervical cancer (NECC). In addition, the role of radiotherapy (RT) in NECC remains controversial. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the role of RT for the treatment of NECC. Particular attention was paid to the different role of RT in patients with or without a metastasis (M1 or M0). Methods: The SEER database was queried for studies on NECC. We limited the year of diagnosis to the years 2000 to 2015. A Pearson’s two-sided Chi-squared test, the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis models were used for statistical analyses. The overall survival (OS) was studied for the overall group and between-subgroup groups. Results: NECC was an aggressive disease with a mean OS of only 46.3 months (range of 0–196 months, median of 23 months). No significant differences were shown between the surgery (S) and S + RT groups ( p = 0.146) in the M0 (without metastasis) arm. However, there was a statistically significant difference in OS between the S and S + RT groups in the M1 (with metastasis) arm (median of 44.6 months for the S group and 80.9 months for the S + RT group), p = 0.004. The mean survival was significantly longer for M0 patients than for M1 patients when treated with S only (S arm), that is, 82.1 months versus 44.6 months, respectively (log-rank p = 0.000). We also noted that when patients received adjuvant RT (S + RT arm), there were no significant differences between the M0 and M1 groups (median of 90.6 and 81.0 months, p = 0.704, respectively). Age at diagnosis, chemotherapy, T stage and N stage were significant factors for OS in the M0 arm. Interestingly, radiotherapy was the only significant factor for OS with a multivariate HR for death of 0.502 (95% CI 0.206–0.750, p = 0.006) in the M1 arm. Conclusions: RT may be carefully used in patients who are negative for metastases. Using SEER data, we identified a significant survival advantage with the combination of radiotherapy and surgery in NECC with metastases. This suggests that active local treatment should be conducted and has a significant impact on OS, even if a distant metastasis has occurred.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0036-8504 , 2047-7163
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2483680-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2199376-2
    SSG: 11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...