GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Ekman, Annica M. L.  (3)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Geophysical Union (AGU) ; 2017
    In:  Geophysical Research Letters Vol. 44, No. 13 ( 2017-07-16), p. 7053-7060
    In: Geophysical Research Letters, American Geophysical Union (AGU), Vol. 44, No. 13 ( 2017-07-16), p. 7053-7060
    Abstract: High aerosol concentrations were sometimes observed to be in contact with the boundary layer top in the summertime Arctic during ASCOS Free tropospheric aerosol can be transported to the boundary layer by direct entrainment or by cloud‐mediated activation and regeneration Aerosol properties measured at the surface may not be a good indicator of aerosol properties in the cloud layer
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0094-8276 , 1944-8007
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Geophysical Union (AGU)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2021599-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 7403-2
    SSG: 16,13
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Copernicus GmbH, Vol. 17, No. 11 ( 2017-06-08), p. 6693-6704
    Abstract: Abstract. The Arctic climate is changing; temperature changes in the Arctic are greater than at midlatitudes, and changing atmospheric conditions influence Arctic mixed-phase clouds, which are important for the Arctic surface energy budget. These low-level clouds are frequently observed across the Arctic. They impact the turbulent and radiative heating of the open water, snow, and sea-ice-covered surfaces and influence the boundary layer structure. Therefore the processes that affect mixed-phase cloud life cycles are extremely important, yet relatively poorly understood. In this study, we present sensitivity studies using semi-idealized large eddy simulations (LESs) to identify processes contributing to the dissipation of Arctic mixed-phase clouds. We found that one potential main contributor to the dissipation of an observed Arctic mixed-phase cloud, during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS) field campaign, was a low cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) of about 2 cm−3. Introducing a high ice crystal concentration of 10 L−1 also resulted in cloud dissipation, but such high ice crystal concentrations were deemed unlikely for the present case. Sensitivity studies simulating the advection of dry air above the boundary layer inversion, as well as a modest increase in ice crystal concentration of 1 L−1, did not lead to cloud dissipation. As a requirement for small droplet numbers, pristine aerosol conditions in the Arctic environment are therefore considered an important factor determining the lifetime of Arctic mixed-phase clouds.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1680-7324
    Language: English
    Publisher: Copernicus GmbH
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2092549-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2069847-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2018
    In:  Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Vol. 144, No. 717 ( 2018-10), p. 2449-2462
    In: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Wiley, Vol. 144, No. 717 ( 2018-10), p. 2449-2462
    Abstract: While there is an increasing scientific interest in the role of advection of warm and moist air into the Arctic, there is little understanding of the interactive processes between the advected air, boundary‐layer clouds and turbulence during such events and almost all studies refer to winter conditions. We use large‐eddy simulation (LES) to investigate these processes for an extreme warm‐air advection episode observed during summer 2014. The results indicate that moisture advection is the critical factor for cloud formation; shutting off this supply resulted in cloud dissipation, regardless of heat advection being present or not. The dissipation of the cloud reduced the surface energy budget by up to 37 W/m 2 . Advection of heat suppresses cloud‐driven mixing through enhancement of the atmospheric stability. Turning off the large‐scale heat transport therefore resulted in a somewhat optically thicker cloud, on average increasing the liquid water path by ∼10 g/m 2 . The results showed little sensitivity to a number of assumptions and simplifications in the LES set‐up, such as the prescribed cloud condensation nuclei concentration, friction velocity, surface albedo and the available moisture above the cloud layer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0035-9009 , 1477-870X
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3142-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2089168-4
    SSG: 14
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...