Abstract: Background The percentage of blasts in the bone marrow in the early stage of remission induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been reported to affect not only remission rate, but also long-term prognosis. If early post-treatment response to therapy was determined to affect prognosis, this finding could be a basis for selection of a proactive treatment such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; however, the proper assessment period and the percentage of blast cell survival vary among reports. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the relationship between prognosis and the percentage of blasts in the bone marrow in the early post-treatment stage in cases registered for the AML201 study conducted by the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG). Patients and Methods The JALSG AML201 study was a multicenter randomized study in which 1064 patients with newly diagnosed AML patients were registered between December 2001 and December 2005. For remission induction therapy, we compared standard-dose idarubicin or high-dose daunorubicin in combination with cytarabine. For consolidation therapy, we compared standard-dose multiagent chemotherapy or high-dose cytarabine alone, and no apparent differences were observed in overall survival (OS) between both treatment groups. The percentage of blasts in the bone marrow on day 15 was strongly associated with remission; using the receiver operating characteristic curve as a reference, we divided patients into a ≥5% and a 〈 5% blasts group and compared their prognoses. For between-groups comparisons, we used Fisher's exact test. For comparison of survival curves, we employed the log-rank test. We conducted statistical analysis using the statistics program EZR. Results Among the 1064 patients registered for the JALSG AML201 study, 600 patients for whom bone marrow examination was performed on Day 15 were selected as subjects for the present study. The patients consisted of 375 men and 225 women with a median age of 47 years (15-64 years). A total of 377 patients (62.8%) had 〈 5% blasts in their bone marrow on day 15 and their complete remission (CR) rate was 91.8%. On the other hand, 223 patients (37.2%) had ≥5% blasts and their CR rate was 58.3%. The 3-year overall survival rate (OS) in the 〈 5% blasts group and the ≥5% blasts groups were 61.6% and 38.6%, respectively (p 〈 0.001) (Figure 1); while the 3-year relapse free survival rate (RFS) was 46.3% vs. 29.8%, respectively (p 〈 0.001). Thus, the group with 〈 5% blasts in the bone marrow showed significantly more favorable results. The difference in outcomes was especially remarkable in the group with intermediate-risk cytogenetics (n = 397). These patients demonstrated significant differences in both OS ( 〈 5% blasts vs. ≥5% blasts = 59.3% vs. 34.0% p 〈 0.001) and RFS ( 〈 5% blasts vs. ≥5% blasts = 44.8% vs. 24.8%, p 〈 0.001). Among the patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics, we analyzed 63 cases in which allogeneic stem cell transplantation was performed at the first remission. Patients with ≥5% blasts in the bone marrow demonstrated a significantly worse prognosis in terms of both OS and RFS, while no significant difference was observed in cumulative incidence rates (CIR) (2-year CIR 12.8% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.575). Among patients who required two courses of induction therapy at first remission (n = 24), non-relapse mortality occurred frequently. Furthermore, multivariate analysis of factors affecting OS and RFS revealed that 〈 5% blasts in bone marrow was an independent prognostic factor (HR 1.92 [1.49-2.48]) p 〈 0.001, HR 1.66 [1.24-2.23] p 〈 0.001 respectively). Conclusion As an early assessment of bone marrow following remission induction therapy, having 〈 5% of blasts in the bone marrow on day 15 was linked to not only a short-term remission rate, but also to long-term prognosis in terms of OS and RFS. A strong link to prognosis was observed particularly among patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics; the group with ≥5% blasts had significantly worse outcomes even after allogeneic transplantation in the first remission. No significant difference in CIR was observed between the two groups following allogeneic transplantation during the first remission, but the non-relapse mortality rate was suggested to yield a difference in prognosis. Disclosures Fujita: Chugai Pharmaceutical CO.,LTD.: Honoraria. Kiyoi:Novartis Pharma K.K.: Research Funding; JCR Pharmaceutlcals Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; FUJIFILM Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Phizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; Toyama Chemikal Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; AlexionpharmaLLC.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; MSD K.K.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Yakult Honsha Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding. Naoe:Amgen Astellas BioPharma K.K.: Honoraria; Fujifilm Corporation: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; TOYAMA CHEMICAL CO.,LTD.: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; CMIC Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene K.K.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,LTD.: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kyowa-Hakko Kirin Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract: Background: After long-term analysis of the JALSG-APL204 study we recently reported that maintenance therapy with tamibarotene was more effective than all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) by reducing relapse in APL patients. Here, the clinical significance of other important prognostic factors was evaluated with multivariate analyses. Patients and Methods: Newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients were registered with the study. Induction was composed of ATRA and chemotherapy. Patients who achieved molecular remission after consolidation were randomly assigned to maintenance with tamibarotene or ATRA. Results: Of the 344 eligible patients, 319 (93%) achieved complete remission (CR). After completing consolidation, 269 patients underwent maintenance random assignment—135 to ATRA, and 134 to tamibarotene. By multivariate analysis, overexpression of CD56 in blast was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.006) together with more than 10.0 × 109/L WBC counts (p = 0.001) and the ATRA arm in maintenance (p = 0.028). Of all phenotypes, CD56 was related most clearly to an unfavorable prognosis. The CR rate, mortality rate during induction and overall survival of CD56+ APL were not significantly different compared with CD56− APL. CD56 is continuously an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for RFS in APL patients treated with ATRA and chemotherapy followed by ATRA or tamibarotene maintenance therapy.

Abstract: DNA hypermethylation has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and also highlighted by the frequent efficacy of demethylating agents to this disease. Meanwhile, recent genetic studies in MDS have revealed high frequency of somatic mutations involving epigenetic regulators, suggesting a causative link between gene mutations and epigenetic alterations in MDS. The accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations promotes tumorigenesis, hypomethylating agents such as Azacitidine exert their therapeutic effect through inhibition of DNA methylation. However, the relationship between patterns of epigenetic phenotypes and mutations, as well as their impact on therapy, has not been clarified. To address this issue, we performed genome-wide DNA methylation profiling (Infinium 450K) in combination with targeted-deep sequencing of 104 genes for somatic mutations in 291 patients with MDS. Beta-mixture quantile normalization was performed for correcting probe design bias in Illumina Infinium 450k DNA methylation data. Of the 〉 480,000 probes on the methylation chip, we selected probes using the following steps: (i) probes annotated with "Promotor_Associated" or "Promoter_Associated_Cell_type_specific; (ii) probes designed in "Island", "N_Shore" or "S_Shore"; (iii) removing probes designed on the X and Y chormosomes; (iv) removing probes with 〉 10% of missing value. Consensus clustering was performed utilizing the hierarchical clustering based on Ward and Pearson correlation algorithms with 1000 iterations on the top 0.5% (2,000) of probes showing high variation by median absolute deviation across the dataset using Bioconductor package Consensus cluster plus. The number of cluster was determined by relative change in area under cumulative distribution function curve by consensus clustering. Unsupervised clustering analysis of DNA methylation revealed 3 subtypes of MDS, M1-M3, showing discrete methylation profiles with characteristic gene mutations and cytogenetics. The M1 subtype (n=121) showed a high frequency of SF3B1 mutations, exhibiting the best clinical outcome, whereas the M2 subtype (n=106), characterized by frequent ASXL1, TP53 mutations and high-risk cytogenetics, showed the shortest overall survival with the hazard ratios of 3.4 (95% CI:1.9-6.0) and 2.2 (95% CI:1.2-4.0) compared to M1 and M3, respectively. Finally, the M3 subtype (n=64) was highly enriched (70% of cases) for biallelic alterations of TET2 and showed the highest level of CpG island methylation and showed an intermediate survival. In the current cohort, we had 47 patients who were treated with demethylating agents, including 11 responders and 36 non-responders. When DNA methylation status at diagnosis was evaluated in terms of response to demethylating agents, we identified 54 differentiated methylated genes showing 〉 20% difference in mean methylation levels between responders and non-responders (q 〈 0.1). Twenty-five genes more methylated in responders were enriched in functional pathways such as chemokine receptor and genes with EGF-like domain, whereas 29 less methylated gene in responders were in the gene set related to regulation of cell proliferation. Genetic alterations were also assessed how they affected treatment responses. In responders, TET2 mutated patients tended to more frequently respond (45% vs 34%), whereas patients with IDH1/2 and DNMT3A mutations were less frequently altered (0% vs 14%, 9% vs 14%) in responders, compared in non-responders. In conclusion, our combined genetic and methylation analysis unmasked previously unrecognized associations between gene mutations and DNA methylation, suggesting a causative link in between. We identified correlations between genetic/epigenetic profiles and the response to demethylating agents, which however, needs further investigation to clarify the mechanism of and predict response to demethylation agents in MDS. Disclosures Alpermann: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Nadarajah:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kiyoi:Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Novartis Pharma K.k.: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; MSD K.K.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals.: Research Funding; Teijin Ltd.: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Company,Ltd.: Research Funding; FUJIFILM RI Pharma Co.,Ltd.: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; Japan Blood Products Organization.: Research Funding; Eisai Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; Yakult Honsha Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa-Hakko Kirin Co.,Ltd.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Fujifilm Corporation.: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,LTD.: Research Funding; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding. Kobayashi:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Naoe:Toyama Chemical CO., LTD.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; FUJIFILM Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene K.K.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Patents & Royalties. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miyazaki:Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shin-bio: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon: Honoraria; Celgene Japan: Honoraria; Kyowa-Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract: Background: Tamibarotene, a new synthetic retinoid, displays (i) approximately 10-fold increased potency over ATRA at inducing in vitro differentiation of NB-4 cells (ii) enhanced chemical stability compared with ATRA (iii) low affinity for cellular RA-binding protein. The clinical efficacy of tamibarotene for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has also been reported. A prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate tamibarotene by comparison to ATRA was carried out for maintenance therapy of APL in JALSG APL204 (Shinagawa et al, 2014). The 4-year-relapse free survival (RFS) did not differ between patients treated with ATRA or tamibarotene. However, an improved efficacy of tamibarotene in high-risk patients was suggested, which warrants further investigation. Here, we evaluate the long-term outcome of the study. Patients and Methods: Patients enrolled in this study were newly diagnosed with APL and documented cytogenetic and/or molecular evidence of t(15;17)/ PML-RARA . The age of the patients ranged between 15 and 70 years and the ECOG performance status was between 0 and 3. For remission induction therapy, ATRA was administered to all patients at a daily dose of 45 mg/m2 until complete remission (CR). The chemotherapy protocol varied depending on the initial leukocyte count and blast count in the peripheral blood. In brief, patient groups were defined as: leukocytes & lt; 3,000/µl (Group A: ATRA alone), 3,000/µl ≤ leukocytes & lt; 10,000/µl (Group B: ATRA plus IDA/Ara-C: 2+5), and leukocytes ≥ 10,000/µl (Group C: ATRA plus IDA/Ara-C: 3+5). Those patients who experienced leukocytosis received additional chemotherapy (Group D). Patients who achieved molecular remission after consolidation chemotherapy were randomly assigned to 2 groups of maintenance therapy, and administered tamibarotene at a daily dose of 6 mg/m2 divided into 2 doses for 14 days or ATRA at a daily dose of 45 mg/m2 divided into 3 doses for 14 days. Each cycle of treatment was repeated every 3 months for 2 years. The primary endpoint was hematological or molecular relapse-free survival (RFS) during the maintenance and follow up period. This study is registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as C000000154. Results: A total of 347 patients were enrolled in the study. Of the 344 eligible patients, 319 (93%) achieved CR. After completing three courses of consolidation therapy, 269 patients underwent maintenance random assignment; 135 patients were assigned to ATRA, and 134 patients were assigned to tamibarotene. The mean follow-up of patients alive and relapse-free at the date of last contact was 7 years. The 7-year RFS rate was 84% for the ATRA arm and 93% for the tamibarotene arm (p=0.031) (Fig.1). When the analysis was restricted to 52 high-risk patients with an initial leukocyte count ≥ 10,000/µl, the difference was more prominent (62% vs 89%, p=0.034) (Fig.2). The 7-year RFS of induction treatment for Group A (92 cases) was 91%, Group B (38 cases) 92%, Group C (52 cases) 75% and Group D (87 cases) 91% (p=0.005). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Secondary hematopoietic disorders were observed in 12 cases, malignancies in 9 cases, late cardiac complications (grade 3 or more) in 5 cases. However, there was no significant difference in terms of these complications between the two treatment groups. Conclusions: Maintenance therapy with tamibarotene was effective at decreasing the relapse rate in APL patients by comparison to ATRA at the 7-year observation point. In particular, tamibarotene was significantly more effective than ATRA for high risk patients with leukocytes ≧10,000/μl. These results could lead to a new strategy for the treatment of high risk patients, which is one of the recent priority issues in the treatment of APL. Disclosures Takeshita: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Phizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd: Research Funding. Asou: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding. Ueda: KAINOS LABORATORIES INC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abrynx nv: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Elli LiLLY Japan KK: Other: Clinical Trial; Takeda PharmaceuticalCompany Limited: Other: Clinical TRial; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd: Other: Clinical Trial; Celgene KK: Other: Clinical Trial; Symbio Pharmaceutical Limited: Other: Clinical Trial; AstellasPharma Inc: Other: Clinical Trial; Eisai Co. Ltd: Other: Clinical Trial. Fujita: Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Usui: Nippon Shinyaku Pharmaceutical Co: Research Funding. Kobayashi: Pfizer, Ohtsuka, Astellas, Ariad: Research Funding. Kiyoi: Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; ONO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Meiji Seika Pharma Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding; FUJIFILM Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Phizer Japan Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD K.K.: Research Funding; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; JCR Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding. Atsuta: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Naoe: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fujifilm Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co.,LTD.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Toyama Chemikal Co.,Ltd.: Research Funding. Miyazaki: Nippon Shinyaku: Honoraria.

Abstract: Background: Recent advance in genetic analysis has revealed that many mutations are associated with the development, progression and/or prognosis of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML). Although KIT mutation is the most frequently identified in CBF-AML, its prognostic relevance remains controversial. We conducted the prospective, multicenter cooperative study (JALSG CBF-AML209-KIT, UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000003434, http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) to evaluate the prognostic impact of KIT mutation, the incidence and clinical relevance of the other gene mutations and prognostic impact of the minimal residual disease (MRD) in CBF-AML. Methods: A total of 199 patients 16 to 64 years of age with newly diagnosed de novo AML were enrolled in this study if they had a RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 chimeric transcript and achieved complete remission within 2 courses of the standard induction therapies consisting of cytarabine and either daunorubicin or idarubicin. All patients were to be received 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine therapy (2 g/m2 by 3-hour infusion every 12 hours for 5 days) and no further chemotherapy until relapse. MRD level was evaluated in BM after the completion of the 3-course of consolidation therapy by the quantitation of RUNX1-RUNX1T or CBFB-MYH11 transcript in 112 patients. Target sequencing of 56 genes frequently identified in myeloid malignancies including exons 8, 10, 11 and 17 of the KIT gene were analyzed using the preserved DNA extracted from AML cells at diagnosis. Results: A total of 68 KIT mutations were identified in 63 of 199 patients (31.7%); 42 of 132 (31.8%) and 21 of 67 (31.3%) patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11, respectively. Mutation in exon 17 was the most frequently identified (73.5%), followed by in exon 8 (20.6%) and in exon 10-11 (5.9%). Mutation in exon 8 was more frequent in AML with CBFB-MYH11 (37.5%) than that with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (11.4%, P=0.014). Although mutation at N822 residue in exon 17 was identified in 13/44 (29.5%) KIT mutations of the patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, no patient with CBFB-MYH11 had this mutation (P=0.008); however, mutation at the D816 residue was equally identified in patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (21/44, 47.7%) and CBFB-MYH11 (13/24, 54.1%). The median BM blast percentage of the KIT mutation positive-patients (73.5%) was significantly higher than that of negative-patients (53.8%, P 〈 0.0001). The median follow-up time was 1556 days (range, 356 - 2453 days). There was no significant difference in RFS and OS between the patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11. The 2-year RFS rate was 67.1% in KIT mutation negative-patients and 48.6% in positive-patients (P=0.0033). The 2-year OS rate was 91.0% in KIT mutation negative-patients and 74.6% in positive-patients (P=0.0005). In the patients with CBFB-MYH11, KIT mutations did not affect either RFS or OS. However, in the patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, KIT mutations had a strong impact both on 2-year RFS (72.8% vs. 39.5%, P 〈 0.0001) and OS rates (89.7% vs. 63.5%, P 〈 0.0001) in KIT mutation negative- and positive-patients, respectively. Among 3-types of KIT mutations, only the mutation in exon 17 had a worse prognostic impact on CBF-AML, which was also observed in the patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (P 〈 0.001), but not in those with CBFB-MYH11 (P=0.724). Furthermore, mutations at the D816 and N822 residues showed a worse prognostic impact (P 〈 0.0001). In addition to KIT mutations, NRAS (21.7%), FLT3 (12.1%) and ASXL2 (12.0%) genes were frequently identified in CBF-AML. ASXL1 mutation was a favorable factor for RFS in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and NRAS mutation was a poor prognostic factor for RFS in CBFB-MYH11. The 2-year RFS rate of the patients without MRD was significantly higher than that of those with MRD (81.3% vs. 55.4%, P=0.0075). Notably, the presence of the MRD was associated with worse RFS in the patients with CBFB-MYH11 (P=0.0144), but not in those with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (P=0.1018). Conclusions: This large-scale prospective study demonstrated that KIT mutation has an adverse effect for OS and RFS only on AML with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 but not on AML with CBFB-MYH11. Notably, we demonstrated that only mutations in the exon 17 of KIT gene had an adverse effect both on the RFS and OS of the patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, and the presence of MRD was a poor factor for RFS in AML with CBFB-MYH11. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sawa: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis International AG: Honoraria; CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Honoraria; Mundipharma K.K.: Honoraria. Dobashi:Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd.: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Celgene Co.: Research Funding; Sysmex Co.: Research Funding. Asou:Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; SRL Inc.: Consultancy; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Naoe:Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Fujifilm Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kiyoi:Eisai Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Sanofi K.K.: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Research Funding; Phizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding; FUJIFILM Corporation: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding.