GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Derolf, Asa Rangert  (2)
  • Juliusson, Gunnar  (2)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 4888-4888
    Abstract: The prevalence of survivors of adult AML has previously been calculated, but the prevalent population has not been characterized. We analysed all 6289 patients diagnosed with adult AML from 1997-2013 as reported in the Swedish AML registry, with a complete survival follow-up. We found 1148 patients, 563 males and 585 females, who were alive on January 1, 2014, constituting 18% of the total, and of them 204 (18%) were diagnosed during 2013. Patients who had their initial treatment at pediatric departments, and people diagnosed with AML before 1997 are not included. The mean age of survivors was 53.4 years at diagnosis and 59.3 years in 2014, and 303 (26%) were 70 years or older in 2014. The overall prevalence of patients diagnosed at age 20 or more was 15.2 per 100,000 (males 15.0 and females 15.4 per 100,000). There were 124 with prior acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) (11%), 54 with inv(16) (5%), 44 with t(8;21) (4%), and 82 with NPM1 mut/FLT3 wt (7%), 75 with FLT3 -ITD (7%), and 82 with complex karyotype (7%). Karyotype results were not available in 10%, and molecular data only since 2007. Four hundred two (35%) had undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation, out of which 32 (8%) had had complex karyotype, 43 (11%) FLT3-ITD, 136 (34%) normal karyortype, and 41 (10%) good risk but were transplanted after relapse. Among the 426 non-transplanted prevalent patients who had survived at least 3 years, 94 (22%) had prior APL, 25 (6%) t(8;21), 24 (6%) inv(16), 126 (30%) normal karyotype, and 11 (3%) complex karyotype, including eight monosomal karyotypes and two with del(7) and one del(5q). Among non-complex karyotypes there were four MLL abnormalities, two del(5q) and two monosomy 7. Although long-term survivors more often have pretreatment good-risk features, this patient group is still heterogeneous, and also contains older people and those with intermediate/high risk cyogenetics. Figure 1. Prevalence in January 1, 2014 of Swedish people with a previous diagnosis of AML by sex and current age per 100,000 inhabitants in 2014, and mean incidence 1997-2014 per 100,000 inhabitants in Sweden 2005. Figure 1. Prevalence in January 1, 2014 of Swedish people with a previous diagnosis of AML by sex and current age per 100,000 inhabitants in 2014, and mean incidence 1997-2014 per 100,000 inhabitants in Sweden 2005. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 281-281
    Abstract: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is widely used as post-remission treatment in younger patients with poor or intermediate risk AML. Transplant decisions are mainly based on cytogenetic and molecular risk group, age, comorbidity and on the availability of a suitable donor. Secondary AML, including therapy-related AML (t-AML) and AML after an antecedent hematological disorder (AHD-AML), constitutes more than one fourth of the AML cases and is a predictor of a poor outcome. However, the extent to which SCT improves outcome of this patient group is poorly studied. In this study, we set out to investigate the role of SCT for the survival of secondary AML patients within the population-based Swedish Adult Acute Leukemia Registry. In total, 5881 patients with AML diagnosed during the period 1997 – 2013 were included in the study. Of these, 4233 (72%) were de novo AML, 1098 (19%) AHD-AML and 550 (9%) t-AML. The median age at diagnosis was 70 in de novo AML, 73 in AHD-AML and 70 in t-AML. The gender distribution was equal in de novo AML (51% males). In AHD-AML, there was a male predominance of 57% whereas in t-AML, there was a female predominance of 56%. The proportion of patients who underwent SCT in first remission (CR1) was 10% in de novo AML, 5% in AHD-AML and 8% in t-AML (de novo vs AHD-AML p 〈 0.001, de novo vs t-AML p = 0.068, AHD-AML vs t-AML p = 0.081; Fisher's exact test). In patients aged 65 or below, the proportion of SCT in CR1 was 24%, 21% and 20%, respectively. The median age of SCT patients was 48 (range 17 – 71) in de novo AML, 57 (27 – 76) in AHD-AML and 49.5 (18 – 68) in t-AML. In de novo AML, the distribution of genetic risk groups among SCT patients was 3% low risk, 55% intermediate risk and 42% high risk. Corresponding figures for AHD-AML was 0%, 34% and 66% and for t-AML 5%, 45% and 50% respectively (de novo vs AHD-AML p = 0.004, de novo vs t-AML p = 0.299, AHD-AML vs t-AML p = 0.124; Fisher's exact test). The estimated median survival after the date of SCT in CR1 was 15 months in AHD-AML and 22 months in t-AML but not reached in de novo AML (95% lower confidence limit 107 months). Among patients 〈 65 years who had been in CR for 3 months (genetic low risk excluded), those with secondary AML had a greater benefit from consolidation with SCT than those with de novo AML (Figure 1). The projected 7-year survival in de novo AML was 60% with SCT and 44% with conventional post remission therapy (CPRT) as compared to 46% and 21%, respectively, in secondary AML. The survival hazard with SCT was 0.45 in secondary AML (95% CI 0.28-0.72) as compared to 0.66 in de novo AML (CI 0.53 – 0.82), by multivariable Cox regression adjusting for type of secondary AML, age, sex, and cytogenetic risk group. To refine the analysis correcting for major confounding factors, a matched pair analysis was performed in patients with CR longer than 3 months. Matching criteria were type of secondary AML (AHD or t-AML), cytogenetic risk group and age (+/- 3 years). Remission of the patient with CPRT was at least as long as the time between CR1 and transplantation for the matched patient undergoing SCT. The projected 7-year survival rate was 43% in the SCT and 8% in the CPRT group (p = 0.01; log-rank test, Figure 2) further indicating a benefit for SCT as post remission therapy in secondary AML. We conclude that SCT improves survival in patients with secondary AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...