GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL  (2)
  • De Mestral, Charles  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL  (2)
Language
Years
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL ; 2021
    In:  Clinical and Investigative Medicine Vol. 44, No. 2 ( 2021-06-14), p. E36-43
    In: Clinical and Investigative Medicine, University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL, Vol. 44, No. 2 ( 2021-06-14), p. E36-43
    Abstract: Purpose: To estimate the positive predictive value of diagnosis and procedure codes for open and endovascular revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) in Ontario administrative databases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective validation study using population-based Ontario administrative databases (2005-2019) to identify a random sample of 600 patients who underwent revascularization for PAD at two academic centres, based on ICD-10 diagnosis codes and Canada Classification of Health Intervention procedure codes. Administrative data coding was compared to the gold standard diagnosis (PAD vs. non-PAD) and revascularization approach (open vs. endovascular) extracted through blinded hospital chart re-abstraction. Positive predictive values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Combinations of procedure codes with or without supplemental physician claims codes were evaluated to optimize the positive predictive value. Results: The overall positive predictive value of PAD diagnosis codes was 87.5% (84.6%-90.0%). The overall positive predictive value of revascularization procedure codes was 94.3% (92.2%-96.0%), which improved through supplementation with physician fee claim codes to 98.1% (96.6%-99.0%). Algorithms to identify individuals revascularized for PAD had combined positive predictive values ranging from 82.8% (79.6%-85.8%) to 95.7% (93.5%-97.3%). Conclusion: Diagnosis and procedure codes with or without physician claims codes allow for accurate identifi-cation of individuals revascularized for PAD in Ontario administrative databases.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1488-2353
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067562-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL ; 2018
    In:  Clinical and Investigative Medicine Vol. 41, No. 3 ( 2018-09-30), p. E148-E155
    In: Clinical and Investigative Medicine, University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL, Vol. 41, No. 3 ( 2018-09-30), p. E148-E155
    Abstract: Purpose: To determine the positive predictive values (PPV) of Ontario administrative data codes for the identification of open (OSR) and endovascular (EVAR) repairs of elective (eAAA) and ruptured (rAAA) abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods: We randomly identified 319 eAAA and rAAA repairs at two Toronto hospitals between April 2003 and March 2015, using administrative health data in Ontario, Canada. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes I71.3 and I71.4, were used to identify rAAA and eAAA patients, respectively. A blinded retrospective chart review was conducted and served as the gold standard comparator. Re-abstracted records were compared to Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) and Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) codes in the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD) and OHIP databases. We calculated the PPV and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of individual and combined procedure and billing codes for elective and ruptured OSR and EVAR (eOSR, eEVAR, rOSR, and rEVAR). Results: Permutation of codes allowed identification of eOSR with 95% PPV (95% CI 88, 98), eEVAR with 96% PPV (95% CI 90, 99), rOSR with 87% PPV (95% CI 79, 93) and rEVAR with 91% PPV (95% CI 59, 100). Conclusions: Diagnostic, procedure and billing code combinations allow identification of eOSR, eEVAR, rOSR and rEVAR patients in Ontario administrative data with a high degree of certainty.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1488-2353
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067562-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...