GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Courtin, Aurelie  (2)
  • 1
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 71, No. 8_Supplement ( 2011-04-15), p. 5446-5446
    Abstract: The pharmacokinetics (PK) of the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine were investigated in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Allografts of a cell line (K8484) derived from a pancreatic adenocarcinoma which occurred in a KrasG12D; p53R172H; Pdx1-Cre (KPC) mouse (S. Hingorani, et al., Cancer Cell 2005) were grown subcutaneously in left and right flanks of syngeneic immunocompetent recipient mice. Mice were dosed with either a single dose or 5 daily doses of capecitabine at 755 mg/kg (2.1 mmol/kg/day) with tumour volumes of approximately 250 mm3. Plasma and tissue homogenates were analysed using an LC-MS/MS assay developed to simultaneously detect capecitabine and its 3 metabolites DFCR, DFUR and 5-FU (S.M.Guichard, et al., J. Chrom. B. 2005). Forty minutes after a single dose the mean plasma concentrations (n=3) were 28 +/- 20 mg/ml capecitabine, 78 +/- 48 mg/ml DFCR, 41 +/- 17 mg/ml DFUR and 0.19 +/- 0.07 mg/ml (1.5 µM) 5-FU, with concentrations of all analytes falling at 2 and 4 hours. In the tumour tissue, mean concentrations at 40 mins were capecitabine: 37 +/- 19 ng/mg tissue, DFCR: 56 +/- 12 ng/mg; DFUR: 20 +/- 8 ng/mg and 5-FU: 3.3 +/- 0.7 ng/mg. At 2 and 4 hours the tumour 5-FU concentrations were 3.0 +/- 1.1 and 1.4 +/- 0.6 ng/mg respectively. In the liver, DFCR concentrations were higher than in the tumour from the same mice but DFUR concentrations were lower and 5-FU was below the limit of quantification ( & lt;0.4 ng/mg) in most, consistent with the reported distribution of carboxylesterases, cytidine deaminase and thymidine phosphorylase in tissues (M. Miwa, et al., Eur. J. Cancer 1998). In animals dosed for 5 days, there was no evidence of accumulation of capecitabine or its metabolites in tumour tissue when compared to the single dose. The concentration of tumour 5-FU, ranging from 1.4 to 3.3 ng/mg, is estimated to be equivalent to 11 to 25 µM, more than 10-fold higher than the plasma concentration. The IC50 for 5-FU in K8484 cells, grown in vitro, was 1.4 +/- 0.8 µM suggesting that oral dosing with capecitabine delivers a therapeutically effective dose to the allograft. This was then confirmed in an efficacy study, treating tumour-bearing mice with oral capecitabine for 5 days per week for 3 weeks, which resulted in significant inhibition of tumour growth rate compared to the vehicle treated group, with mean tumour doubling time of 7.5 +/- 3.0 days for capecitabine compared to 3.5 +/- 0.5 days for the vehicle treated group (P & lt; 0.001). Despite identical germline Kras and p53 genotypes, the KPC PDA and KPC allograft tumour types have previously shown differences in gemcitabine sensitivity in vivo, predicted to be due to differences in drug delivery (K. Olive, et al., Science 2009). Therefore, capecitabine PK and efficacy are now being investigated in the autochthonous tumours arising in the KPC model. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5446. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5446
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 72, No. 8_Supplement ( 2012-04-15), p. 3771-3771
    Abstract: Capecitabine (CAP) is an oral fluoropyrimidine, converted sequentially and selectively to 5-FU at the tumour site. It is used in the treatment of a number of cancers as a single agent and in patients with pancreatic cancer, in combination with gemcitabine. However, pre-clinical data in pancreatic cancer models are limited. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of CAP in a GEMM of spontaneous pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) occurring in KrasG12D; p53R172H; Pdx1-Cre (KPC) mice, compared to an allograft model of a cell line isolated from a PDA arising in the KPC mice. In the PK study, tumour was collected 2 hours after CAP treatment (755 mg/kg by oral gavage), homogenates were analysed using an LC-MS/MS assay developed to simultaneously detect capecitabine and its 3 metabolites DFCR, DFUR and 5-FU (modified from S.M.Guichard, et al., J. Chrom. B. 2005). Data were compared to our previously reported studies in an allograft model (Proc. AACR 2011 a 5446). After a QDx7 treatment, 5-FU concentrations of 27 ± 13 μM were achieved (compared to 23.0 ± 8.1 μM and 22.7 ± 7.7 μM in allograft tumours after 1 and 5 consecutive doses respectively), confirming adequate drug delivery to the in situ tumour following oral administration of CAP. Therefore we proceeded to efficacy studies in this model. In the allograft model we had identified a significant reduction of the tumour doubling time with 755 mg/kg CAP (5 days/week, 3 weeks), compared to control (7.5 ± 3.0 vs 3.5 ± 0.5 days; P & lt;0.001). In in situ tumours, a short term study over 7 days showed a reduction in tumour growth in CAP-treated KPC PDA tumours compared to control (199% ± 22% vs 121% ± 10%; P & lt;0.01). In a survival study in KPC mice, CAP (755 mg/kg, 5 days/week) was compared to the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine (GEM, 100 mg/kg, Q3D), and there was no difference in the median survival of mice with spontaneous PDA tumours (P=0.61) suggesting a similar efficacy of CAP to GEM. There is conflicting evidence regarding the utility of the combination of GEM and CAP in this disease, so we also investigated the combination in mice bearing allograft PDA tumours. Full doses of both drugs were not tolerated, but the combination of GEM (75 mg/kg Q3D, 2 weeks) plus CAP (539 mg/kg, 5 days/week, 2 weeks) was feasible. This regimen was associated with significant growth inhibition, but this was not superior to GEM alone (75 mg/kg) at the same dose (tumour doubling time: 8.6 ± 10.8 vs 7.2 ± 2.8 days respectively). In summary, orally administered CAP achieves active concentrations of 5-FU in PDA tumours. Similar effects on survival compared to GEM are seen in PDA tumours. Growth inhibition data in allograft tumours did not show any additional benefit for the GEMCAP combination, when compared to GEM alone. CAP could be considered as an alternative to GEM in future, rationally designed, combination treatment strategies. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3771. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3771
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...