GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Medicine, MDPI AG, Vol. 10, No. 11 ( 2021-06-04), p. 2490-
    Abstract: Background: In patients with COVID-19, cardiovascular complications are common and associated with poor prognosis. Among these, an association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and COVID-19 has been described; however, the extent of this relationship is unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the epidemiology of AF in COVID-19 patients and its impact on all-cause mortality. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed and reported according to PRISMA guidelines, and a protocol for this study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021227950). PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched for relevant studies. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Overall, 31 studies were included in the analysis, with a total number of 187,716 COVID-19 patients. The prevalence of AF was found to be as high as 8% of patients with COVID-19 (95% CI: 6.3–10.2%, 95% prediction intervals (PI): 2.0–27.1%), with a high degree of heterogeneity between studies; a multiple meta-regression model including geographical location, age, hypertension, and diabetes showed that these factors accounted for more than a third of the heterogeneity. AF COVID-19 patients were less likely to be female but more likely older, hypertensive, and with a critical status than those without AF. Patients with AF showed a significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 2.76–5.71), with a high degree of heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis focusing on new-onset AF showed the consistency of these results. Conclusions: Among COVID-19 patients, AF is found in 8% of patients. AF COVID-19 patients are older, more hypertensive, and more likely to have a critical status. In COVID-19 patients, AF is associated with a 4-fold higher risk of death. Further studies are needed to define the best treatment strategies to improve the prognosis of AF COVID-19 patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2077-0383
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2662592-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Future Medicine Ltd ; 2021
    In:  Future Cardiology Vol. 17, No. 2 ( 2021-03), p. 215-226
    In: Future Cardiology, Future Medicine Ltd, Vol. 17, No. 2 ( 2021-03), p. 215-226
    Abstract: During the last decade, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) revolutionized the thromboprophylaxis management of several medical conditions, including atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Dabigatran etexilate was the first NOAC widely available worldwide, and it is currently the only one that directly inhibits thrombin. More recently, the availability of idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent, has increased the safety of dabigatran use in clinical practice, especially for those patients with severe and life-threatening bleeding. This review aims to summarize current evidence on dabigatran, starting from its pharmacological characteristics, and providing an updated overview of pivotal randomized controlled trials and real-world data on its efficacy and safety.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1479-6678 , 1744-8298
    Language: English
    Publisher: Future Medicine Ltd
    Publication Date: 2021
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Personalized Medicine, MDPI AG, Vol. 12, No. 4 ( 2022-03-30), p. 547-
    Abstract: Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common complication in patients with sepsis, although its prevalence and impact on outcomes are still unclear. We aim to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of NOAF in patients with sepsis, and its impact on in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched on 26 December 2021. Studies reporting on the prevalence of NOAF and/or its impact on in-hospital mortality or ICU mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. The pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, as well as the risk ratios (RR), 95%CI and 95% prediction intervals (PI) for outcomes. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed to account for heterogeneity. Results: Among 4988 records retrieved from the literature search, 22 articles were included. Across 207,847 patients with sepsis, NOAF was found in 13.5% (95%CI: 8.9–20.1%), with high heterogeneity between studies; significant subgroup differences were observed, according to the geographical location, study design and sample size of the included studies. A multivariable meta-regression model showed that sample size and geographical location account for most of the heterogeneity. NOAF patients showed an increased risk of both in-hospital mortality (RR: 1.69, 95%CI: 1.47–1.96, 95%PI: 1.15–2.50) and ICU mortality (RR: 2.12, 95%CI: 1.86–2.43, 95%PI: 1.71–2.63), with moderate to no heterogeneity between the included studies. Conclusions: NOAF is a common complication during sepsis, being present in one out of seven individuals. Patients with NOAF are at a higher risk of adverse events during sepsis, and may need specific therapeutical interventions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2075-4426
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2662248-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Internal and Emergency Medicine, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 18, No. 1 ( 2023-01), p. 127-135
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1828-0447 , 1970-9366
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2378342-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: EP Europace, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 24, No. 9 ( 2022-10-13), p. 1395-1403
    Abstract: The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the epidemiology of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and the risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and ischaemic stroke (IS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched from inception to 6 March 2021. All studies reporting the prevalence of CMBs and incidence of ICH and IS in AF patients with and without CMBs were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effect models; odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated for each outcome. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the number and localization of CMBs. A total of 562 studies were retrieved, with 17 studies finally included in the meta-analysis. Prevalence of CMBs in AF population was estimated at 28.3% (95% CI: 23.8–33.4%). Individuals with CMBs showed a higher risk of ICH (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.83–5.06, 95% PI 1.23–7.49) and IS (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.26–2.49, 95% PI 1.10–2.87). Patients with ≥5 CMBs showed a higher risk of ICH. Metaregression showed how higher of prevalence of diabetes mellitus in AF cohort is associated with higher prevalence of CMBs. Conclusions Cerebral microbleeds are common in patients with AF, found in almost one out of four subjects. Cerebral microbleeds were associated with both haemorrhagic and thromboembolic events in AF patients. Moreover, the risk of ICH increased consistently with the burden of CMBs. Cerebral microbleeds may represent an important overlooked risk factor for both ICH and IS in adults with AF.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1099-5129 , 1532-2092
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002579-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: European Journal of Clinical Investigation, Wiley, Vol. 53, No. 9 ( 2023-09)
    Abstract: The Mobile Health Technology for Improved Screening and Optimized Integrated Care in AF (mAFA‐II) prospective randomized trial showed the efficacy of a mobile health (mHealth) implemented ‘Atrial fibrillation Better Care’ (ABC) pathway for the integrated care management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this ancillary analysis, we evaluated the effect of mAFA intervention according to the history of diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods The mAFA‐II trial enrolled 3324 AF patients across 40 centres in China, between June 2018 and August 2019. In this analysis, we assessed the interaction between history of DM and the effect of mAFA intervention on the risk of the primary composite outcome of stroke, thromboembolism, all‐cause death and rehospitalizations. Results were expressed as adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The effect of mAFA intervention on exploratory secondary outcomes was also assessed. Results Overall, 747 (22.5%) patients had DM (mean age: 72.7 ± 12.3, 39.6% females; 381 allocated to mAFA intervention). mAFA intervention was associated with a significant risk reduction for the primary composite outcome both in patients with and without DM (aHR [95%CI]: .36 [.18–.73] and .37 [.23–.61], respectively, p for interaction = .941). A significant interaction was found only for the composite of recurrent AF, heart failure and acute coronary syndromes ( p int  =.025), with lower effect of mAFA intervention in patients with DM. Conclusions A mHealth‐technology implemented ABC pathway showed a consistent effect in reducing the risk of the primary composite outcome in AF patients with and without DM. Trial Registration WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Registration number: ChiCTR‐OOC‐17014138.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0014-2972 , 1365-2362
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004971-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Elsevier BV, ( 2023-8)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0025-6196
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2052617-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: European Heart Journal Open, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 3, No. 2 ( 2023-03-02)
    Abstract: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia worldwide. The presence of AF is associated with increased risk of systemic thromboembolism, but with the uptake of oral anticoagulant (OAC) and implementation of a holistic and integrated care management, this risk is substantially reduced. The diagnosis of AF requires a 30-s-long electrocardiographic (ECG) trace, irrespective of the presence of symptoms, which may represent the main indication for an ECG tracing. However, almost half patients are asymptomatic at the time of incidental AF diagnosis, with similar risk of stroke of those with clinical AF. This has led to a crucial role of screening for AF, to increase the diagnosis of population at risk of clinical events. The aim of this review is to give a comprehensive overview about the epidemiology of asymptomatic AF, the different screening technologies, the yield of diagnosis in asymptomatic population, and the benefit derived from screening in terms of reduction of clinical adverse events, such as stroke, cardiovascular, and all-cause death. We aim to underline the importance of implementing AF screening programmes and reporting about the debate between scientific societies’ clinical guidelines recommendations and the concerns expressed by the regulatory authorities, which still do not recommend population-wide screening. This review summarizes data on the ongoing trials specifically designed to investigate the benefit of screening in terms of risk of adverse events which will further elucidate the importance of screening in reducing risk of outcomes and influence and inform clinical practice in the next future.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2752-4191
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3112907-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Abstract: Background The Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology for Improved Screening and Optimized Integrated Care in atrial fibrillation (AF) (mAFA-II) cluster randomized trial assessed the efficacy of an integrated care approach in improving the prognosis of AF patients. In this study, we provide a reanalysis of the trial outcomes using the win ratio (WR) approach. Methods The mAFA-II trial allocated patients to receive a mHealth-technology implemented Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway (mAFA intervention) or usual care. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death, ischemic stroke or systemic thromboembolism, and rehospitalization. The efficacy of the mAFA intervention was analyzed according to the WR method using the unmatched pairs approach, with the components of the primary outcome analyzed hierarchically as follows: (1) all-cause death; (2) ischemic stroke or thromboembolism; (3) rehospitalization. Results were reported as WR and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In addition, we calculated win odds (WO) and 95% CI. Results A total of 3,324 patients were enrolled in the mAFA-II trial and included in this analysis (1,646 allocated to mAFA intervention and 1,678 to usual care). Among 2,761,988 unmatched pairs comparisons, the number of wins was higher in the mAFA intervention group, with a WR: 2.78 (95% CI: 1.85–4.17). WO confirmed the effect of mAFA intervention, although with a lower magnitude (WO: 1.06; 95% Cl: 1.04–1.08). Conclusions In this posthoc WR analysis of the mAFA-II trial, a mHealth-technology-implemented integrated care approach was effective in reducing the risk of the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, ischemic stroke or thromboembolism, and rehospitalization, even when prioritizing fatal events.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0340-6245 , 2567-689X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2023
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Clinical Research in Cardiology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 112, No. 9 ( 2023-09), p. 1263-1277
    Abstract: Mechanisms of myocardial ischemia in obstructive and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), and the interplay between clinical, functional, biological and psycho-social features, are still far to be fully elucidated. Objectives To develop a machine-learning (ML) model for the supervised prediction of obstructive versus non-obstructive CAD. Methods From the EVA study, we analysed adults hospitalized for IHD undergoing conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Non-obstructive CAD was defined by a stenosis  〈  50% in one or more vessels. Baseline clinical and psycho-socio-cultural characteristics were used for computing a Rockwood and Mitnitski frailty index, and a gender score according to GENESIS-PRAXY methodology. Serum concentration of inflammatory cytokines was measured with a multiplex flow cytometry assay. Through an XGBoost classifier combined with an explainable artificial intelligence tool (SHAP), we identified the most influential features in discriminating obstructive versus non-obstructive CAD. Results Among the overall EVA cohort ( n  = 509), 311 individuals (mean age 67 ± 11 years, 38% females; 67% obstructive CAD) with complete data were analysed. The ML-based model (83% accuracy and 87% precision) showed that while obstructive CAD was associated with higher frailty index, older age and a cytokine signature characterized by IL-1β, IL-12p70 and IL-33, non-obstructive CAD was associated with a higher gender score (i.e., social characteristics traditionally ascribed to women) and with a cytokine signature characterized by IL-18, IL-8, IL-23. Conclusions Integrating clinical, biological, and psycho-social features, we have optimized a sex- and gender-unbiased model that discriminates obstructive and non-obstructive CAD. Further mechanistic studies will shed light on the biological plausibility of these associations. Clinical trial registration NCT02737982. Graphical abstract
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1861-0684 , 1861-0692
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2218331-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...