GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (6)
  • Colombo, Nicoletta  (6)
  • Scambia, Giovanni  (6)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (6)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of pazopanib efficacy and safety in patients with ovarian cancer who have not progressed following first-line standard therapy.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2014
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 32, No. 15_suppl ( 2014-05-20), p. 5574-5574
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 15_suppl ( 2014-05-20), p. 5574-5574
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.5574
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Catumaxomab with and without prednisolone in patients with malignant ascites due to epithelial cancer: Results from the phase IIIb CASIMAS study.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e13097-e13097
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e13097-e13097
    Abstract: e13097^ Background: The primary objective of this study was to compare catumaxomab with prednisolone (CP) to catumaxomab without prednisolone (C) as 3-hour intraperitoneal (i.p.) infusion by demonstrating superiority for safety and non-inferiority for efficacy of the CP arm. Methods: 219 patients were randomized to catumaxomab plus premedication of 25 mg prednisolone (111 pts) or to catumaxomab alone (108 pts). The primary endpoint was the composite safety score (CSS) summarizing the worst CTCAE grades for the main TEAEs (pyrexia, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain). A potential impact of prednisolone on efficacy was assessed by the co-primary endpoint puncture-free survival (PuFS). Further parameters included overall survival (OS) and time to next therapeutic puncture (TTPu). Results: The superiority of CP for safety was not proven as the mean CSS was comparable in the two groups (CP: 4.1; C: 3.8 for; p= 0.383). The median PuFS was slightly lower in CP (30 days) compared to C (37 days). However the hazard ratio (HR) for PuFS (HR: 1.130, p=0.402) as well as the 75% quartiles (CP: 155 days, C: 92 days) were in favour of CP compared to C. The median TTPu was similar in both groups (CP: 78 days; C: 102 days, p= 0.599). The majority of patients (123 pts) had no therapeutic paracentesis prior to death (CP: 54.8%; C; 61.7%, p=0.297). Median OS was longer for CP (CP: 124 days; C: 86 days, p= 0.186) without statistical significance. Conclusions: The CASIMAS results are in concordance with the data of the pivotal study and thus confirm the robustness of the treatment effect of catumaxomab in malignant ascites. The administration of 25mg prednisolone as premedication prior to catumaxomab infusion did not change the safety profile and did not negatively impact the efficacy of catumaxomab. The composite safety score after 3-hour infusion time was comparable to that seen in the pivotal study using 6 hours.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e13097
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Incorporation of Pazopanib in Maintenance Therapy of Ovarian Cancer
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2014
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 32, No. 30 ( 2014-10-20), p. 3374-3382
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 30 ( 2014-10-20), p. 3374-3382
    Abstract: Pazopanib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1/-2/-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) -α/-β, and c-Kit. Preclinical and clinical studies support VEGFR and PDGFR as targets for advanced ovarian cancer treatment. This study evaluated the role of pazopanib maintenance therapy in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease did not progress during first-line chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Nine hundred forty patients with histologically confirmed cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, International Federation Gynecology Obstetrics (FIGO) stages II-IV, no evidence of progression after primary therapy consisting of surgery and at least five cycles of platinum-taxane chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg once per day or placebo for up to 24 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival by RECIST 1.0 assessed by the investigators. Results Maintenance pazopanib prolonged progression-free survival compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91; P = .0021; median, 17.9 v 12.3 months, respectively). Interim survival analysis based on events in 35.6% of the population did not show any significant difference. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of hypertension (30.8%), neutropenia (9.9%), liver-related toxicity (9.4%), diarrhea (8.2%), fatigue (2.7%), thrombocytopenia (2.5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (1.9%) were significantly higher in the pazopanib arm. Treatment discontinuation related to adverse events was higher among patients treated with pazopanib (33.3%) compared with placebo (5.6%). Conclusion Pazopanib maintenance therapy provided a median improvement of 5.6 months (HR, 0.77) in progression-free survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have not progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Overall survival data to this point did not suggest any benefit. Additional analysis should help to identify subgroups of patients in whom improved efficacy may balance toxicity (NCT00866697).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7348
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Molecular results and potential biomarkers identified from MILO/ENGOT-ov11 phase 3 study of binimetinib versus physicians choice of chemotherapy (PCC) in recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 5519-5519
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 5519-5519
    Abstract: 5519 Background: Lower responses to chemotherapy and the unique molecular profile of LGSO led to the adoption of MEK-inhibitors for this disease. Updated analysis from the MILO/ENGOT-ov11 phase III study of binimetinib vs PCC in recurrent LGSOC showed response rate of 24% in those treated with binimetinib (JCO, 2020; NCT01849874). Here we present results of the post-hoc tumor tissue biomarker analysis performed with MILO/ENGOT-ov11. Methods: Mutational/copy number analysis was performed via Foundation Medicine on archival tissue obtained prior to randomization. Unbiased univariate analysis was used to test association between mutation status and outcomes in binimetinib and PCC treated patients. Outcomes examined were progression free survival (PFS), binary response by local RECIST 1.1 (complete or partial response [CR/PR] vs. stable [SD] or progressive disease [PD]), and ordinal response. Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate PFS. Cox regression, binary logistic regression, and ordinal logistic regression were used to examine relationship between mutation status and outcomes. Results: MILO/ENGOT-OV11 enrolled 341 patients from June, 2013 to April, 2016. Patients were randomized 2:1 to binimetinib or PCC. Based on January 1, 2020 data cut-off the data is as-is, amongst those patients treated with binimetinib with molecular results available, PFS data is available for 144 and response rate (RR) data for 135. There were 47 mutations detected in ≥5% of patients, most commonly KRAS (33%). Patients harboring a KRAS mutation had 3.4 times the odds of responding to treatment with binimetinib as patients without KRAS mutation (95% CI 1.57,7.67; p-value 0.002). There was no difference in effect of KRAS G12V mutation vs other KRAS mutation on PFS (PFS HR 1.06; 95% CI:0.53, 2.12; p value 0.9). In the 135 patients with binimetinib RR data, other MAPK mutations were identified as follows; NRAS in 11(8.1%), BRAFV600E in 8(5.9%), RAF1 in 2 (1.5%), NF1 in 7 (5.2%). In patients with MAPK mutation (as defined above) the RR was 41% vs 13% in those without MAPK mutation. PFS was significantly better in patients treated with binimetinib harboring MAPK mutation vs those without (HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.31, 0.79; p = 0.003). In patients treated with PCC there was a nonsignificant trend towards improved PFS in those with MAPK mutation vs those without (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.43,1.59; p = 0.6). A test for interaction between treatment and MAPK pathway was not significant by Cox regression model (p = 0.32). Conclusions: While this hypothesis generating analysis is limited by multiple testing, higher response rates and longer PFS were seen in those patients with LGSOC treated with binimetinib who harbored MAPK mutations, most commonly in KRAS. Somatic tumor testing should be routinely performed in patients with recurrent LGSOC to aid in clinical decision making. Clinical trial information: NCT01849874.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5519
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Impact of the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab followed by systemic chemotherapy (CTX) on overall survival (OS): Results of a subgroup analysis in patients (pts) with relapsed ovarian cancer (OC) and malignant ascites (MA).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e16547-e16547
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e16547-e16547
    Abstract: e16547 Background: MA can compromise QoL in pts with OC. The safety and efficacy of catumaxomab in pts with MA due to EpCAM+ carcinomas where standard therapy was not available, not effective or no longer feasible was confirmed in a phase III trial comparing a 3-h intraperitoneal (i.p.) infusion with and without prednisolone premedication (Sehouli, ASCO 2012). Pts with OC who received subsequent CTX after treatment with catumaxomab (post-catumaxomab CTX) were analysed separately. Methods: OC pts in both treatment arms were pooled. The efficacy parameters time to next puncture (TTPu), puncture-free survival (PuFS) and OS were evaluated in relation to post-catumaxomab CTX. Results: 42/109 (39%) pts with MA due to OC received post-catumaxomab CTX, which included a platinum-containing regimen in 19 pts (17%). 21/109 (19%) received 〉 1 post-catumaxomab CTX regimen. Pts with any post-catumaxomab CTX compared with those without CTX had significantly prolonged OS (median 273 vs 81 d, HR 0.24, p 〈 0.0001) and PuFS (median 138 vs 43 d, HR 0.46, p = 0.0002). The difference in TTPu was not significant (223 vs 110 d, HR 0.68, p = 0.1788). Pts with 〉 1 post-catumaxomab CTX compared with 1 post-catumaxomab CTX had significantly prolonged OS (480 vs 167 d, HR 0.20, p 〈 0.0001). The difference between the groups with 1 and 〉 1 post-catumaxomab CTX in PuFS (153 vs 123 d, HR 0.64, p = 0.1804) and TTPu (153 vs 169 d, HR 1.52, p = 0.3600) was not significant. Pts who received platinum-containing post-catumaxomab CTX had significantly prolonged OS compared with those who received post-catumaxomab CTX without platinum (462 vs 169 d, HR 0.32, p = 0.0026). The difference between the groups with and without platinum in PuFS (153 vs 123 d, HR 0.76, p = 0.4448) and TTPu (153 vs 229 d, HR 1.68, p = 0.2373) was not significant. Conclusions: The data indicate that pts with MA due to OC who are able to receive CTX after catumaxomab treatment have significantly prolonged survival compared with pts who could not receive CTX. Further trials have been initiated to identify the best patient population to receive i.p. catumaxomab followed by subsequent CTX.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e16547
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Quality of life in patients with malignant ascites during catumaxomab treatment: Results from the CASIMAS trial.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e13095-e13095
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e13095-e13095
    Abstract: e13095^ Background: Malignant Ascites (MA) is associated with a poor prognosis and limited palliative treatment options. To demonstrate the value of a new treatment the assessment of quality of life (QoL) is of particular importance. Following the demonstration of catumaxomab’s potential to stabilize QoL and prolong the time to first deterioration of QoL, results from CASIMAS give evidence that the QoL of patients remains unaffected during catumaxomab treatment Methods: In a two-arm, open-label, multicentre phase II/III study 219 patients were randomized to catumaxomab plus premedication of 25 mg prednisolone (111 pts) or to catumaxomab alone (108 pts) QoL was measured using the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ-VAS reports the respondent’s self-rated health on a vertical scale where the endpoints are labelled “Best imaginable health state” (100) and “Worst imaginable health state” (0). This information is used as a quantitative measure of health outcome. Patients were asked to complete EQ-VAS during the treatment period (d 0, 3 and 10) and follow-up (d8, 28). Descriptive analyses were performed according to EQ-5D User Guide (Version 4.0). Additionally ascites related symptoms were measured with a disease specific FACIT patient questionnaire. Results: For the pooled population (catumaxomab plus prednisolone and catumaxomab alone) longitudinal analysis of the EQ-VAS showed no relevant changes in mean score during the treatment period of catumaxomab (d0: 51.5; d3: 50.9; d10: 51.0) and compared to screening (52.7). An increase in mean values was observed in the follow-up period (d8: 53.9, d28: 57.1). Descriptive comparison of both treatment groups revealed no major differences in QoL and ascites related symptoms during the treatment and follow-up period, indicating that prednisolone has no impact on patient`s self-rated health. Conclusions: This analysis shows that QoL as measured by EQ-VAS remains unaltered during the treatment with catumaxomab and improves after the treatment period. The improvement is plausible due to the prolonged-puncture-free survival and is consistent with previous observations of QoL changes during and after intraperitoneal treatment with catumaxomab.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e13095
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...