GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. 644-644
    Abstract: 644 Background: liver metastases (LM) from well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (wd-GEP-NET) can develop in 28-77% of patients (pts) in their lifetime. Multiple treatments can provide radiological and symptomatic response. Our aim was to evaluate responses to locoregional (LRT) and systemic (SYST) treatments in wd-GEP-NET with LM. Methods: we included consecutive records of pts with confirmed histological diagnosis of wd-GEP-NET and radiological LM, treated at our institution between 2008-2019. Relevant variables were retrospectively extracted from electronic records. Radiological response was assessed with RECIST 1.1 by radiological independent review. Results: 55 pts, 45.5% male. Median age at LM diagnosis 49 years (IQR 41-63). Primary tumor sites: 49% pancreatic, 27.3% small intestine, 11% unknown, 12.7% others. WHO 2019 grade 1, 2 and 3 in 52.7, 41.8 and 1.8%, respectively. Twentynine tumors (52.7%) were functional, with carcinoid syndrome in n20. At LM diagnosis, 91% of pts had symptomatic disease: hormonal n8, local n4, systemic n4, hormonal + local n4, local + systemic n22, hormonal + systemic n5, hormonal + local + systemic n5. LM tumoral burden was 〈 10% in 22%, 11-50% in 43.6, 〉 50% in 30.9% of pts. 49.1% of pts had extra hepatic metastatic disease. LRT to LM was administered to 32 pts: TAE/TACE n26, ablation n8. SYST to 22 pts: somatostatin analog n15, Lutetium-177 n4, chemotherapy n2, everolimus n1. 1 pt did not receive treatment. Response to treatments is shown. In the LRT group, -- pts developed complications: n16 postembolization syndrome, n2 infections, n3 liver failure, n7 others. There was 1-procedure-related death. Conclusions: Patients treated with LRT at our institution achieved similar efficacy and safety results compared to those reported by previous studies.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 10609-10609
    Abstract: 10609 Background: Prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in patients with PDAC varies across populations. There is limited information on the prevalence of PGVs among Mexican patients with PDAC. We prospectively tested an unselected cohort of newly diagnosed PDAC patients using a comprehensive gene panel in order to estimate the prevalence of BRCA1/2, and other germline mutations associated with HPC. Methods: The protocol was approved by the ethics committee at each institution: INCMNSZ, INCAN, and CM ABC Observatorio. Key inclusion criteria: age 〉 18 years and PDAC diagnosed within 6 months of inclusion. Patients were enrolled consecutively, regardless of age, personal or family history of cancer, known hereditary cancer syndrome, or stage of the disease. Written informed consent was obtained before any procedure. Clinical variables including family history of cancer were collected. We used the 84-gene Invitae Multi-Cancer Panel. Genetic testing had no cost for patients. Patient characteristics and family history were summarized using descriptive statistics (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25). The trial was registered on Clinical Trials (NCT05305001). Results: From August 2020 to June 2022, 119 patients with newly diagnosed PDAC were identified. Of these, 107 patients were included: 58% women, median age was 63 y/o, clinical stages at diagnosis were: I (24%), II (22%), III (6%), and IV (48%). All patients had Hispanic ancestry except one (Ashkenazi Jewish). Only 7.5% (n = 8) had a personal history of other cancer, mainly breast cancer (N = 3); 62% had a family history of any cancer, while 47.6% had a first-degree relative (FDR) with any cancer. 11% (n = 12) had family history of pancreatic cancer (PC), and 9% (n = 10) had an FDR with PC. Five patients met clinical criteria for hereditary cancer syndrome: familial pancreatic cancer (4) and Lynch syndrome (1). PGVs were identified in 17.8% (n = 19) of patients. The prevalence of PGVs in genes associated with autosomal dominant risk of PC was 11.2%: CDKN2A(5.6%), ATM (3.7%), BRCA2 (0.93%), and MSH6 (0.93%). Two patients had a PGV associated with autosomal dominant predisposition to other cancers ( CHECK2 and NF1). Six patients (5.6%) had PGVs associated with autosomal recessive predisposition to rare syndromes with increased cancer risk other than PDAC (MUTYH, RECQL4, FH and WRN). Variants of uncertain significance were present in 42% of patients. Conclusions: In Mexican patients with PDAC, the prevalence of PGVs on BRCA1/2 is 〈 1%. The prevalence of PGVs in other susceptibility genes is 11%. Our results support the role of universal germline testing in Mexican patients with PDAC using a comprehensive gene panel. Selective testing for BRCA1/2 is discouraged.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. 454-454
    Abstract: 454 Background: Pancreatic cancer remains a highly lethal disease. There is no consensus on treatment sequences and chemotherapy (CT) regimen in BRPC and LAPC. Our aim was to describe the multimodal treatment and outcomes in our population. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients (pts) with BRPC/LAPC and histological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma evaluated at Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición from January 2011-December 2016. Clinical and pathological variables at diagnosis and treatment were recorded. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-rank test. Results: 69 pts were evaluated, 39% (27) did not receive treatment. We analyze 42 treated pts. BRPC 33%/LAPC 67%. Median age was 58.8 y/o, 54.8% were female. Symptoms at diagnosis: 79% abdominal pain, 76% weight loss, 55% jaundice. ECOG performance status (PS): 0 (17%), 1 (69%) and 2 (14%). Main location was pancreatic head (76%). Median laboratory values: total bilirubin 1.04 mg/dL (0.2-25), albumin 4.1 g/dL (2.4-5.1), CA 19.9 182.8 U/mL (0.8-4028). Laparotomy at diagnosis was performed in 21%. All pts received induction CT (iCT). FOLFIRINOX was the most common regimen (37%), followed by FOLFOX4 (34%). The best overall response with iCT was stable disease (62%), progressive disease was observed in 24%. iCT followed by chemoradiation (CRT) could be delivered to 48% (20/42). Capecitabine-based CRT was preferred (94%). Six pts (14%) underwent surgical resection after multimodal treatment (36% BRPC, 3.5% LAPC), 5 pts achieved R0 resection. The resection rate with single-agent iCT was 0% vs 20% with combination iCT. Median OS was 15.6 months (m): 14.4 m for BRPC and 15.5 m for LAPC. Median OS according iCT: gemcitabine 7.8 m, fluorouracil 13.7 m, FOLFOX4 15.5 m and FOLFIRINOX 24.6 m. Univariate analysis identified ECOG PS (0-1 vs 2, P = 0. 014) and age ( 〈 59 vs ³59, P = 0.002) as significantly associated with survival. Conclusions: Early administration of combination CT followed by CRT and/o surgical resection in selected pts improves oncological outcomes in pts with BRPC/LAPC. In pts with good PS, iCT with FOLFIRINOX is the preferred regimen given best results.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...