GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Chu, Melinda Bernabe  (2)
  • 2010-2014  (2)
Material
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 2010-2014  (2)
Year
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e20661-e20661
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e20661-e20661
    Abstract: e20661 Background: Nausea and vomiting (N/V) are two common side effects during HD IL-2 therapy. They may be severe enough to cause electrolyte imbalances or lead to missed doses, which may compromise response. Our aim was to describe the incidence of N/V during HD IL-2 therapy at our institution. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients treated with HD IL-2 therapy (720,000 IU/kg per dose intravenously; 14 doses, 2 cycles per course, maximum 2 courses) from January 1999 to June 2011 at Saint Louis University was performed. Patients received scheduled PO ondansetron 24 mg daily and prochlorperazine 10 mg IV or PO every 4 hours as needed per standard protocol. Additional antiemetics were ordered at the clinician’s discretion. Data regarding incidence of N/V and use and type of rescue medication for N/V were recorded. Results: 104 patients were identified (68 melanoma and 36 renal cell carcinoma). Median age was 53.7 years (17.7-77.7 years) and there were 66 men and 38 women. Only 3.8% of patients (4 out of 104) were able to complete HD IL-2 therapy without rescue medication. All patients (n = 100) who needed rescue therapy received prochlorperazine on day 1 of treatment (acute phase) and at least 1 additional day during days 2-6 of each admission (delayed phase). Metoclopramide (n = 23) was the most common supplemental antiemetic ordered followed by promethazine (n = 16), meclizine (n = 5), and palonsetron (n = 3). Conclusions: Almost all patients who underwent HD IL-2 therapy had N/V that necessitated rescue therapy during both the acute phase and the delayed phase. Decreasing the incidence and severity of N/V may increase patients’ quality of life during this demanding regimen. Current protocols are single-institution based, but generally include daily 5HT-3 antagonists and prochlorperazine as needed. Our data suggests that this regimen is inadequate. One challenge to management is that steroids, which are commonly used as adjuncts, are contraindicated during immunotherapy. Additional therapeutic options are still needed. Recently new drug targets, including neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) inhibitors, have been approved to treat N/V during chemotherapy. NK1R inhibitors may be of assistance during immunotherapy with HD IL-2 in the future.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e20049-e20049
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e20049-e20049
    Abstract: e20049 Background: At our institution, patients with metastatic melanoma who achieve partial response (PR) to HD IL-2 therapy undergo monthly maintenance treatment with IL-2 and GM-CSF with the thought that the continuous stimulation of the immune system may improve response. Our aim was to describe our experience with maintenance treatment following HD IL-2 therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with metastatic melanoma seen at Saint Louis University from January 1999-June 2011 who were partial responders to HD IL-2 therapy (720,000 IU/kg per dose intravenously; 14 doses, 2 cycles per course, maximum 2 courses) that received maintenance IL-2 therapy (continuous 42 hour infusion of three consecutive doses of 18,000,000 IU/m 2 over 6, 12 hours, then 24 hours) and GM-CSF (daily subcutaneous injection of 125 mcg/m 2 for 3 days) every 4 weeks for 13 cycles or until disease progression. Duration of response for this cohort was compared to established data for partial responders using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Five patients were included in the analysis. Median duration of response was 9 months (3.9-53.4 months). Median overall survival was 20.6 months (15-53.4+ months). One patient who initially showed PR to HD IL-2 therapy converted to complete response during maintenance IL-2 and has the longest duration of response in the study dataset. Duration of response for the maintenance group (9 months) was longer than a benchmark of 5.9 months as reported in the literature and package insert for partial responders to HD IL-2 without maintenance therapy, p = 0.068. Conclusions: Subjects who received maintenance IL-2 and GM-CSF therapy had a longer duration of response compared to previous reports, which trended toward statistical significance in this small sample. Maintenance IL-2 and GM-CSF after HD IL-2 therapy may help to prolong partial response, possibly lead to conversion to complete response and is worthy of additional study.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...